Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Facilitating communication with patients for improved migraine outcomes

  • Published:
Current Pain and Headache Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effective communication is integral to good medical care. Medical professional groups, regulatory agencies, educators, researchers, and patients recognize its importance. Quality of medical communication is directly related to patient satisfaction, improvement in medication adherence, treatment compliance, other outcomes, decreased risk of malpractice, and increase in health care providers’ levels of satisfaction. However, skill level and training remain problematic in this area. Fortunately, research has shown that medical communication skills can be successfully taught and acquired, and that improvement in communication skills improves outcomes. The American Migraine Communication Studies I and II evaluated the current state of health care provider-patient communication in headache care and tested a simple educational intervention. They found problematic issues but demonstrated that these areas could be improved. We review theoretical models of effective communication and discuss strategies for improving communication, including active listening, interviewing strategies, and methods for gathering information about headache-related impairment, mood, and quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Byrne P, Long B: Doctors Talking to Patients. London: HMSO/Royal College of General Practitioners; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis M: Variations in patients’ compliance with doctors’ advice: an empirical analysis of patterns of communication. Am J Public Health Nations Health 1968, 58:274–288.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Korsch B, Gozzi E, Francis V: Gaps in doctor-patient communication. I: Doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics 1968, 42:855–871.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ford S, Fallowfield L, Lewis S: Doctor-patient interactions in oncology. Soc Sci Med 1996, 42:1511–1519.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wasserman R, Inui T: Systematic analysis of clinician-patient interactions: a critique of recent approaches with suggestions for future research. Med Care 1983, 21:279–293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Learning objectives for medical student education—guidelines for medical schools: report I of the Medical School Objectives Project. Acad Med 1999, 74:13–18.

  7. Simpson M, Buckman R, Stewart M, et al.: Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement. BMJ 1991, 303:1385–1387.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Makoul G: Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med 2001, 76:390–393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Duffy FD, Gordon GH, Whelan G, et al.: Assessing competence in communication and interpersonal skills: the Kalamazoo II report. Acad Med 2004, 79:495–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education: Toolbox for the evaluation of competence. Available at: http://www.acgme.org Accessed January 2008.

  11. Project of the ABIM Foundation, ACP-ASIM Foundation, and European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med 2002, 136:243–246.

  12. Bensing JM, Roter DL, Hulsman RL: Communication patterns of primary care physicians in the United States and the Netherlands. J Gen Intern Med 2003, 18:335–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam SM, et al.: Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA 1997, 277:350–356.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hahn SR, Brandes JL, Cady R, et al.: In-office discussions of frequency, impairment and prevention: American Migraine Communication Study (AMCS). Headache 2006, 46:878; paper presented at the 48th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Los Angeles, CA; June 22–25, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mueller PS, Barrier PA, Call TG, et al.: Views of new internal medicine faculty of their preparedness and competence in physician-patient communication. BMC Med Educ 2006, 6:30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lansky D: Measuring what matters to the public. Health Aff 1998, 17:40–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis D, O’Brien MA, Freemantle N, et al.: Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA 1999, 282:867–874.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fellowes D, Wilkinson S, Moore P: Communication skills training for health care professionals working with cancer patients, their families and/or carers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003, 2:CD003751.

  19. Nelson MR, Hahn SR, Cady RK, et al.: Improving healthcare professional-patient communication to promote more effective assessment of migraine impairment during and between attacks: results of the American Migraine Communication Study Phase II (AMCS II). Headache 2007, 47:782; paper presented at the 49th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Chicago, IL; June 7–11, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roter DL, Hall JA: Improving Talk Through Interventions. Doctors Talking with Patients/Patients Talking with Doctors: Improving Communication in Medical Visits, edn 2. Westport, CT: Praeger; 2006:163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hulsman RL, Ros WJ, Winnubst JA, Bensing JM: Teaching clinically experienced physicians communication skills: a review of evaluation studies. Med Educ 1999, 33:655–668.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hall JA, Irish JT, Roter DL, et al.: Satisfaction, gender, and communication in medical visits. Med Care 1994, 32:1216–1231.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Frederikson LG: Exploring information-exchange in consultation: the patients’ view of performance and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 1995, 25:237–246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall JA, Roter DL, Katz NR: Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care 1988, 26:657–675.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stevenson F, Cox K, Britten N, Dundar Y: A systematic review of the research on communication between patients and health care professionals about medicines: the consequences for concordance. Health Expect 2004, 7:235–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stewart M, Meredith L, Brown JB, Galajda J: The influence of older patient-physician communication on health and health-related outcomes. Clin Geriatr Med 2000, 16:25–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stewart MA: Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 1995, 152:1423–1433.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cole SA: Reducing malpractice risk through more effective communication. Am J Manag Care 1997, 3:649–653.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Graham J, Potts HW, Ramirez AJ: Stress and burnout in doctors. Lancet 2002, 360:1975–1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Holmes WF, MacGregor EA, Sawyer JP, Lipton RB: Information about migraine disability influences physicians’ perceptions of illness severity and treatment needs. Headache 2001, 41:343–350.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Greer J, Halgin R: Predictors of physician-patient agreement on symptom etiology in primary care. Psychosom Med 2006, 68:277–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Boyle D, Dwinnell B: Invite, listen and summarize: a patient-centered communication technique. Acad Med 2005, 80:29–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Martin LR, Jahng KH, Golin CE, DiMatteo MR: Physician facilitation of patient involvement in care: correspondence between patient and observer reports. Behav Med 2003, 28:159–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Abdel-Tawab N, Roter D: The relevance of client-centered communication to family planning settings in developing countries: lessons from the Egyptian experience. Soc Sci Med 2002, 54:1357–1368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ishikawa H, Takayama T, Yamazaki Y, et al.: Physicianpatient communication and patient satisfaction in Japanese cancer consultations. Soc Sci Med 2002, 55:301–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Roter DL, Larson S, Shinitzky H, et al.: Use of an innovative video feedback technique to enhance communication skills training. Med Educ 2004, 38:145–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Attending Role in the Evaluation of Clinical Competence. Philadelphia: American Board of Internal Medicine; 1995.

  38. Cole SA, Bird J: The Medical Interview: A Three Function Approach, edn 2. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book Inc.; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Janisse T, Vuckovic N: Can some clinicians read their patients’ minds? Or do they just really like people? A communication and relationship study. Permanente J 2002, 6:35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Epstein RM: Mindful practice. JAMA 1999, 282:833–839.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Platt FW, Gaspar DL, Coulehan JL, et al.: “Tell me about yourself”: the patient-centered interview. Ann Intern Med 2001, 134:1079–1085.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al.: The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 2000, 49:796–804.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kinnersley P, Stott N, Peters T, Harvey I: The patientcentredness of consultations and outcome in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 1999, 49:711–716.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Law S, Britten N: Factors that influence the patient-centredness of a consultation. Br J Gen Pract 1995, 45:520–524.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wanzer MB, Booth-Butterfield M, Gruber K: Perceptions of health care providers’ communication: relationships between patient-centered communication and satisfaction. Health Commun 2004, 16:363–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. American Academy on Communication in Healthcare: Relationshi-centered quality healthcare: moving patients’ experiences from “good” to “very good.” Available at: http://www.aachonline.org Accessed January 2008.

  47. Engel GL: The need for a new medical model. Science 1977, 196:129–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Brown J, Stewart M, McCracken E, et al.: The patient-centred clinical method. 2. Definition and application. Fam Pract 1986, 3:75–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kinmonth A, Woodcock A, Griffin S, et al.: Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team. BMJ 1998, 317:1202–1208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Mead N, Bower P, Hann M: The impact of general practitioners’ patient-centredness on patients’ post-consultation satisfaction and enablement. Soc Sci Med 2002, 55:283–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hahn SR: Communication in the care of the headache patient. In Wolff’s Headache and Other Head Pain. Edited by Silberstein SD, Lipton RL, Dodick DW. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008:805–824.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rogers CR: On Becoming a Person: A Psychotherapist’s View of Psychotherapy. London: Constable; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Robertson K: Active listening. More than just paying attention. Aust Fam Physician 2005, 34:1053–1055.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. American Academy on Communication in Healthcare. Available at: http://www.aachonline.org Accessed February 2008.

  55. Egan G: The Skolled Helper: A Systematic Approach to Effective Helping, edn 4. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Back AL, Arnold RM, Baile WF, et al.: Approaching difficult communication tasks in oncology. CA Cancer J Clin 2005, 55:164–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lake AE, Rains JC, Penzien DB, Lipchik GL: Headache and psychiatric comorbidity: historical context, clinical implications, and research relevance. Headache 2005, 45:493–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. McWilliams LA, Goodwin RD, Cox BJ: Depression and anxiety associated with three pain conditions: results from a nationally representative sample. Pain 2004, 111:77–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hamelsky SW, Lipton RB: Psychiatric comorbidity of migraine. Headache 2006, 46:1327–1333.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Breslau N, Davis GC, Schultz LR, Peterson EL: Migraine and major depression: a longitudinal study. Headache 1994, 34:387–393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Guidetti V, Galli F, Fabrizi P, et al.: Headache and psychiatric comorbidity: clinical aspects and outcome in an 8-year follow-up study. Cephalalgia 1998, 18:455–462.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. DiMatteo MR, Hays RD, Prince LM: Relationship of physicians’ nonverbal communication skills to patient satisfaction, appointment noncompliance, and physician workload. Health Psychol 1986, 5:581–594.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Roter DL, Hall JA, Kern DE, et al.: Improving physicians’ interviewing skills and reducing patients’ emotional distress. A randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med 1995, 155:1877–1884.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Buller MK, Buller DB: Physicians’ communication style and patient satisfaction. J Health Soc Behav 1987, 28:375–388.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, edn 4. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.

  66. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB: The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care 2003, 41:1284–1292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB: The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001, 16:606–613.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B: A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006, 166:1092–1097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Buse DC, Bigal ME, Rupnow MFT, et al.: The Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS): a new instrument to measure global burden of migraine between attacks. Paper presented at the International Headache Congress: The 13th Congress of the International Headache Society. Stockholm, Sweden; June 28 to July 1, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Montefiore Headache Center, 1575 Blondell Avenue, Suite 225, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA

    Dawn C. Buse

Authors
  1. Dawn C. Buse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard B. Lipton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn C. Buse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buse, D.C., Lipton, R.B. Facilitating communication with patients for improved migraine outcomes. Current Science Inc 12, 230–236 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-008-0040-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-008-0040-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation