Postoperative recovery from the perspective of day surgery patients: A phenomenographic study
Introduction
Day surgery is widely applied in many countries’ health care systems and often represents more than 50% of all surgery (Toftgaard, 2009). This study has been carried out in Sweden, where approximately 80% of elective surgery is performed as a day surgical procedure (Toftgaard, 2012). Several surgeries have been transferred from in-hospital to day surgical procedures (e.g. laparoscopic cholecystectomy, anterior cruciate ligament repair, hernia repair in the elderly, shoulder surgery as well as minor procedures for gynaecological prolapse and urine incontinency) (Segerdahl et al., 2007). Day surgery implies admittance, surgery and discharge without an overnight stay (Toftgaard and Parmentier, 2006), and minimal disruption of ordinary life (Mottram, 2010). Most patients appreciate the possible choice of day surgery (Lemos et al., 2009, Martin et al., 2010, Rhodes et al., 2006), and it is perceived as less risky (risks concerning anaesthesia, loss of personal autonomy and separation from one's family) than if undergoing an in-hospital surgical procedure (Mottram, 2012). On the other hand, the day surgery patient does not have the advantage of postoperative surveillance by professionals following discharge (Kleinbeck, 2000). Instead, postoperative care is transferred to the patient and the family, who have to manage the recovery by themselves, which might raise feelings of insecurity at home (Boughton and Halliday, 2009, Mitchell, 2003, Mottram, 2011a). A lack of professional support (Mottram, 2011b), information and insufficient preparation for self-care at home (Boughton and Halliday, 2009), inadequate communication between day surgery and community care (Mitchell, 2003) and overoptimistic expectations concerning recovery (Gilmartin, 2007, Mottram, 2010) may contribute to this insecurity. However, from a personal and social perspective the transfer of responsibility for postoperative care to the home environment is mostly accepted by patients and their families (Majholm et al., 2012).
The postoperative course is influenced by many factors, including patient characteristics, type of surgery and anaesthesia, and social factors (Bettelli, 2009). Postoperative symptoms can be troublesome, and are a common reason for unplanned contact with health care following discharge (Mattila et al., 2005). Symptoms also cause a delay in patients’ return to daily life functions (Rosén et al., 2009). Reviews report pain and nausea as the most common postoperative symptoms, followed by drowsiness, tiredness, fatigue and dizziness (Rosén et al., 2009, Schnaider and Chung, 2006, Wu et al., 2002). Patients also have to deal with psychological issues post-discharge, for instance mood swings and anxiety. Also, a changed body image and appearance due to swelling and discoloration of the surgery site might be bothersome for some patients (Demir et al., 2008, Gilmartin, 2007). Many day surgery patients expect recovery to be fast (Mottram, 2010), with no (or only limited) effects on role functions. However, non-resumed role functions in family and social life are not unusual (Horvath, 2003, Mottram, 2010, Mottram, 2011a). Nursing in day surgery has to adapt to an environment characterized by productivity and cost-effectiveness. To ensure a safe and efficient throughput, nursing often focuses on physiological measurements. However, to attain a patient-centred approach and to enable patients to successfully manage their recovery, psychosocial aspects have to be taken into account (Demir et al., 2008, Mitchell, 2010).
Day surgery has developed very rapidly in recent decades, and is today a ‘streamlined’ process offering excellent physical care. Yet, when it comes to the time following surgery, research indicates a lack of support for patients’ management of their postoperative recovery at home (Mottram, 2011b). To improve the care, a better understanding of variations in patients’ needs after surgery would be valuable. The aim of this study was therefore to explore day surgery patients’ different experiences of postoperative recovery.
Section snippets
Design
A qualitative design with a phenomenographic approach was used. Phenomenography seeks an understanding of people's different ways of experiencing phenomena in their surrounding world. From a phenomenographic perspective, this means a description of people's conceptions of the reality and context in which they are participating (Marton, 1981). The results in a phenomenographic study comprise a set of descriptive categories which are qualitatively different from each other (Dahlgren and
Results
Three descriptive categories emerged: ‘Conditions for recovery at home’, made up of factors that influenced the recovery period; ‘The rollback to ordinary life’, describing postoperative recovery and its consequences on daily living; and ‘Being a cog in a flow of care’, which represented the efficiency and structure perceived in the day surgery context and its effect on recovery. Excerpts from the interviews have been used to describe the results.
Discussion
From a phenomenographic perspective, this study aimed to explore day surgery patients’ different experiences of postoperative recovery. Three categories emerged: ‘Conditions for recovery at home’, ‘The rollback to ordinary life’ and ‘Being a cog in a flow of care’, elucidating the varying perceptions of recovery post-discharge.
Day surgery patients must take an active part in preoperative preparations at home (Gilmartin, 2004). In this study, preoperative preparations varied from an extensive
Implications
These results offer an insight into the situation for day surgery patients’ at home. To succeed in recovery, patients need knowledge about and an understanding of the constituents of the normal range of recovery regarding their specific surgical procedure, as well as of self-care management. In contrast to the smooth and easy routines at the day surgery unit, the postoperative phase seems to be a weak link in day surgical care.
Further research on different ages may deepen the knowledge about
Conflict of interest
No authors have any conflicts of interests.
Funding
This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from ALF, the County Council of Östergötland, Sweden and Linköping University. The funding bodies were not involved in the study design or outcome.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval by a Regional Ethical Review Board, study code 2011/86-31.
References (50)
- et al.
Postoperative recovery after different orthopedic day surgical procedures
International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing
(2011) - et al.
Information needs of general day surgery patients
Ambulatory Surgery
(1999) - et al.
Are we teaching what patients need to know? Building skills in heart failure self-care
Heart and Lung
(2009) Postoperative recovery at home after ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopic surgery
Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing
(2003)- et al.
Preferences for information and behavioral control among adult ambulatory surgical patients
Applied Nursing Research
(2009) - et al.
Patient satisfaction following day surgery
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
(2009) - et al.
Limitations to self-care in the ambulatory surgical patient
Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing
(2000) - et al.
Modelling the effect of minor orthopaedic day surgery on patient mood at the early post-operative period: a prospective population-based cohort study
European Psychiatry
(2009) - et al.
Evolution of the concept of self-care and implications for nurses: a literature review
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2009) High risk patients in day surgery
Minerva Anestesiologica
(2009)