Skip to main content
Log in

Giving feedback in medical education

Verification of recommended techniques

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated naturally occurring feedback incidents to substantiate literature-based recommended techniques for giving feedback effectively.

SETTING: A faculty development course for improving the teaching of the medical interview, with opportunities for participants to receive feedback.

PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-four course participants (clinician-educators from a wide range of medical disciplines, and several behavioral scientists).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used qualitative and quantitative approaches. Participants provided narratives of helpful and unhelpful incidents experienced during the course and then rated their own narratives using a semantic-differential survey. We found strong agreement between the two approaches, and congruence between our data and the recommended literature. Giving feedback effectively includes: establishing an appropriate interpersonal climate; using an appropriate location; establishing mutually agreed upon goals; eliciting the learner’s thoughts and feelings; reflecting on observed behaviors; being nonjudgmental; relating feedback to specific behaviors; offering the right amount of feeback; and offering suggestions for improvement.

CONCLUSIONS: Feedback techniques experienced by respondents substantiate the literature-based recommendations, and corrective feedback is regarded as helpful when delivered appropriately. A model for providing feedback is offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983;250(8):777–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Isaacson JH, Posk LK, Litaker DG, Halperin AK. Resident perceptions of the evaluation process. Society of General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(suppl):89.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Westberg J, Jason H. Collaborative Clinical Education: The Foundation of Effective Health Care. New York, NY: Springer Company; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scholtes PR. The Team Handbook: How to Use Teams to Improve Quality. Madison, Wis: Joiner Associates; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lipkin M, Kaplan C, Clark W, Novack DH. Teaching medical interviewing: the Lipkin model. In: Lipkin M, Putnam SM, Lazare A, eds. The Medical Interview: Clinical Care, Education and Research. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1995:413–22.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sandelowski M. Telling stories: narrative approaches in qualitative research. IMAGE: J Nurs Sch. 1991;23(3):161–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana; Ill: University of Illinois Press; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Albreck PL, Settle RB. The Survey Research Handbook. (2nd ed.) Chicago, Ill: Richard D Irwin, Inc; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beckman H, Markakis K, Suchman A, Frankel R. The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1365–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Knowles MS. The Modern Practice of Adult Education. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hewson MG. Clinical teaching in the ambulatory setting. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:76–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hewson, M.G., Little, M.L. Giving feedback in medical education. J GEN INTERN MED 13, 111–116 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00027.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00027.x

Key words

Navigation