Molecular epidemiology of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infections in cystic fibrosis

PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050731. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

Abstract

Background/methods: The molecular epidemiology of the chronic airway infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) was investigated by cross-sectional analysis of bacterial isolates from 51 CF centers and by longitudinal analysis of serial isolates which had been collected at the CF centers Hanover and Copenhagen since the onset of airway colonization over 30 years.

Results: Genotyping revealed that the P. aeruginosa population in CF is dominated by a few ubiquitous clones. The five most common clones retrieved from the CF host also belonged to the twenty most frequent clones in the environment and in other human disease habitats. Turnover of clones in CF airways was rare. At the Hanover clinic more than half of the patient cohort was still harbouring the initially acquired clone after twenty years of airway colonization. At the Copenhagen clinic, however, two rare clones replaced the initially acquired individual clones in all but one patient.

Conclusion: The divergent epidemiology at the two sites is explained by their differential management of hygiene and antipseudomonal chemotherapy. Hygienic measures to prohibit patient-to-patient transmission and the modalities of antipseudomonal chemotherapy modify the epidemiology of the chronic P. aeruginosa infections in CF.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Cystic Fibrosis / microbiology*
  • Female
  • Genotype
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Molecular Epidemiology / methods*
  • Pseudomonas Infections / epidemiology*
  • Pseudomonas Infections / microbiology*
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa / classification
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa / genetics*

Grants and funding

Financial support was received from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 900, A2; GRK 653/3) and the Christiane Herzog Stiftung. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.