Pulmonary function tests (diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide of the lungs) and radiological imaging (plain chest film, high resolution computed tomography (CT) and CT expiratory density mask) were compared in the assessment of 29 patients with suspected airways obstruction. Conventional roentgenogram showed a good agreement with the diffusing capacity of the lungs and proved to be useful in predicting the presence of severe emphysema, but the extension of the disease was more precisely assessed by computed tomography. A good agreement was found between high resolution CT and density mask CT, although the "subjective" high resolution identified more patients with mild emphysema than the "automated" density mask. In conclusion, although the plain chest film is useful in the diagnosis of severe emphysema, CT (especially when high resolution is used) is helpful in identifying cases of mild disease and in diagnosing the type of emphysema.