Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Maximal aerobic capacity in ageing subjects: actual measurements versus predicted values

Cristina Pistea, Evelyne Lonsdorfer, Stéphane Doutreleau, Monique Oswald, Irina Enache, Anne Charloux
ERJ Open Research 2016 2: 00068-2015; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00068-2015
Cristina Pistea
Service de Physiologie et d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Pôle de Pathologie Thoracique, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg et Equipe d'Accueil 3072, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evelyne Lonsdorfer
Service de Physiologie et d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Pôle de Pathologie Thoracique, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg et Equipe d'Accueil 3072, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stéphane Doutreleau
Service de Physiologie et d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Pôle de Pathologie Thoracique, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg et Equipe d'Accueil 3072, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monique Oswald
Service de Physiologie et d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Pôle de Pathologie Thoracique, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg et Equipe d'Accueil 3072, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irina Enache
Service de Physiologie et d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Pôle de Pathologie Thoracique, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg et Equipe d'Accueil 3072, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Charloux
Service de Physiologie et d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Pôle de Pathologie Thoracique, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg et Equipe d'Accueil 3072, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Anne.Charloux@chru-strasbourg.fr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Measured maximal oxygen consumption (V′O2peak) in a) 58 men and b) 41 women, aged >70 years and free of chronic diseases. Predicted maximal oxygen consumption (V′O2max) reference values and their changes with age were calculated using reference equations by Wasserman et al. [11], Jones et al. [8], Blackie et al. [12], Hakola et al. [13] and Koch et al. [17] for an illustrative individual (male: 80 kg and 172 cm; female: 67 kg and 160 cm; mean heights and weights in our study).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1

    Equations used for calculation of predicted maximal oxygen consumption (V′O2max)

    First author [ref.], yearCharacteristics of the population samplesPrediction equations for V′O2max#
    Wasserman [11], 1999The published equations were modified from:
     Hansen et al. [10]
      77 males, 34–74 years
      Asbestos exposed workers with normal
    cardiorespiratory function, California, USA
     Bruce et al. [9]
      138 males, 157 females, 29–73 years
      General population, Washington, USA
    Men
     (50.72−(0.372×Age))×Weight (units of mL·min−1) 
     Example¶: predicted value: 1.92 L·min−1; no LLN can be calculated
    Women
     (22.78−(0.17×Age))×(Weight+43) (units of mL·min−1)
     Example¶: predicted value: 1.16 L·min−1; no LLN can be calculated
    Jones [8], 198550 males, 50 females, 15–71 years
    Subjects recruited by advertising from the local university and general population, Ontario, Canada
    (0.046×Height)−(0.021×Age)−(0.62×Sex)−4.31 (units of L·min−1)
    Sex: male=0; female=1
    Men
     Example¶: predicted: 2.09 L·min−1; LLN: 1.14 (55% pred)
    Women
     Example¶: predicted: 0.92 L·min−1; LLN: 0.15 (16% pred)
    Blackie [12], 198981 males, 47 females, 55–80 years
    Subjects recruited locally by advertising from hospital and community centres, British Columbia, Canada
    Men
     (0.0142×Height)−(0.0494×Age)+(0.00257×Weight)+3.015
      (units of L·min−1)
     Example¶: predicted: 2.11 L·min−1; LLN: 1.25 (60% pred)
    Women
     (0.0142×Height)−(0.0115×Age)+(0.00974×Weight)−0.651 (units of L·min−1)
    Example¶: predicted: 1.45 L·min−1; LLN: 0.90 (62% pred)
    Koch [17], 2009Disease-free subjects, 253 males, 281 females, 25–80 years
    Representative sample selected from the population registration offices in Pomerania, Germany
    47.7565–(0.988×Age)−(0.2356×Age²)−(8.8697×Sex)+(2.3597×BMI)
     −(2.0308×Age×BMI)−(3.7405×Sex×BMI)+(0.2512×Age×Sex)
     +(1.3797×Age×Sex×BMI) (units of L·kg−1·min−1)
    With: Age >65 years=5; Sex male=1, female=2; BMI ≤25 kg·m−2=0, BMI >25 kg·m−2=1
    Men
     Example¶: predicted: 1.97 L·min−1; LLN: 1.43 (73% pred)
    Women
     Example¶: predicted: 1.35 L·min−1; LLN: 1.13 (84% pred)
    Hakola [13], 2011Nondiseased subjects, 117 males, 112 females, 57–78 years Subjects randomly selected from the town of Kuopio, FinlandMen
     4.846−(0.039×Age) (units of L·min−1)
     Example¶: predicted: 1.91 L·min−1; LLN: 1.12 (59% pred)
    Women
     3.475−(0.031×Age) (units of L·min−1)
     Example¶: predicted: 1.32 L·min−1; LLN: 0.70 (53% pred)
    • Exercise tests were performed using cycle ergometers. LLN: lower limit of normal; BMI: body mass index. #: for all equations, age is in years, height in cm and weight in kg; ¶: Predicted V′O2max and LLN (L·min−1) have been calculated for an illustrative individual (72 years-old; male: 80 kg and 172 cm; female: 67 kg and 160 cm).

  • TABLE 2

    Subjects' characteristics, spirometry and exercise test results

    MenWomen
    Subjects n5841
    Age years73.6±4.073.2±2.7
    Weight kg81.3±13.367.7±11.5
    Height cm172.2±0.1159.5±0.1
    Body mass index kg·m−228.0±3.626.2±3.6
    Current smokers5 (8.6)0 (0)
    Former smokers32 (55.0)9 (21.9)
    Intense physical activity13 (22.4)6 (14.6)
    Moderate physical activity31 (53.4)27 (65.8)
    Sedentary14 (24.2)8 (19.6)
    FVC L3.7±0.72.8±0.6
    FVC % predicted101.7±20.1122.8±25.4
    FEV1 L2.7±0.62.2±0.4
    FEV1 % pred99.6±22.8117.1±21.6
    FEV1/FVC %74.1±8.978.7±6.3
    Oxygen uptake at rest L·min−10.30±0.070.23±0.06
    Heart rate at rest beats·min−176±1277±13
    Ventilation at rest L11.52±2.618.42±1.64
    Maximal oxygen uptake L·min−11.88±0.411.26±0.24
     mL·min−1·kg−123.05±5.4718.94±4.00
    Maximal workload W127.33±36.6684.20±18.29
    Maximal heart rate beats·min−1142±21137±18
     % pred#87.2±13.085.8±10.6
    Maximal ventilation L72.77±18.3149.50±13.22
     % pred#77.6±17.468.0±16.7
    Maximal V′E/V′CO234.19±4.6334.83±5.66
    Maximal V′E/V′O238.38±7.3739.40±6.91
    Maximal respiratory exchange ratio1.14±0.101.15±0.07
    • Data are presented as mean±sd or n (%), unless otherwise stated. The exercise test was performed on an electrically-braked cycle ergometer. FVC: forced vital capacity; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; V′E: minute ventilation; V′CO2: carbon dioxide output; V′O2: oxygen uptake. #: predicted maximal ventilation was calculated as the subject's FEV1×35; predicted maximal heart rate was calculated as 210−0.65×(age) [7].

  • TABLE 3

    Comparison of measured maximal oxygen consumption (V′O2peak) versus predicted maximal oxygen consumption (V′O2max) according to prediction equations from five studies

    SamplePrediction equationV′O2peak % predictedV′O2peak minus
    V′O2max L·min−1
    Subjects with V′O2peak <LLN#
    58 disease-free men,
     >70 years old
    Wasserman et al. [11]108±230.15 (−0.50–0.79)
    Jones et al. [8]92±20−0.18 (−0.87–0.52)3 (5)
    Blackie et al. [12]93±21−0.16 (−0.85–0.54)4 (7)
    Koch et al. [17]89±20−0.25 (−0.95 –0.45)8 (14)
    Hakola et al. [13]103±240.04 (−0.65–0.74)3 (5)
    41 disease-free women,
     >70 years old
    Wasserman et al. [11]117±200.19 (−0.17–0.55)
    Jones et al. [8]164±1030.35 (−0.19–0.88)0 (0)
    Blackie et al. [12]88±16−0.19 (−0.59–0.22)0 (0)
    Koch et al. [17]90±17−0.15 (−0.59–0.28)9 (22)
    Hakola et al. [13]98±18−0.03 (−0.41–0.35)0 (0)
    • Data are presented as mean±sd, mean difference (90% CI) or n (%). LLN: lower limit of normal. #: Wasserman et al. [11] did not provide LLN.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Disclosures

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • M. Oswald
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 2 Issue 1 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 2 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Maximal aerobic capacity in ageing subjects: actual measurements versus predicted values
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Maximal aerobic capacity in ageing subjects: actual measurements versus predicted values
Cristina Pistea, Evelyne Lonsdorfer, Stéphane Doutreleau, Monique Oswald, Irina Enache, Anne Charloux
ERJ Open Research Jan 2016, 2 (1) 00068-2015; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00068-2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Maximal aerobic capacity in ageing subjects: actual measurements versus predicted values
Cristina Pistea, Evelyne Lonsdorfer, Stéphane Doutreleau, Monique Oswald, Irina Enache, Anne Charloux
ERJ Open Research Jan 2016, 2 (1) 00068-2015; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00068-2015
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Lung structure and function
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Recurrence of symptoms after childhood LRTI
  • BMI and in-hospital mortality in patients with AE-IPF
  • Characteristics and impact of EILO
Show more Original articles

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society