Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Biometric monitoring in silicosis to detect early disease and monitor lung injury: not quite there

Noa Ophir, Elizabeth Fireman
ERJ Open Research 2016 2: 00093-2016; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00093-2016
Noa Ophir
Occupational Environmental Medicine Dept, Tel Aviv University–Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Fireman
Occupational Environmental Medicine Dept, Tel Aviv University–Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fireman@tlvmc.gov.il
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Biomonitoring of artificial stone-exposed workers http://ow.ly/Ut4J304amUr

From the authors:

We would like to thank D. Weiler Ravell and H. Bishara for their comments about our recent paper [1], and take this opportunity to reply. While their observation that 63.2% of our cohort already had silicosis negates the definition of “early diagnosis” is correct, 36.8% of the exposed workers had neither a previous diagnosis of silicosis nor clinical symptoms, and they were considered “healthy workers” and, as such, they are monitored by spirometry and chest radiographic findings once in 3 years. Our biomarker revealed that they had exposure-induced inflammation and a high load of hazardous dust in the airways, thus alerting for close monitoring and medical observation and, most importantly, precautionary measures at the workplace. In Israel, the manufacture of kitchen and bath countertops is based mainly on artificial stone that contains 93% silica as natural quartz, and ∼3500 workers are currently involved in cutting and processing it. We estimate that there should be more than 1000 “healthy workers” exposed to artificial stone dust who already have inflammatory abnormalities and high load of dust in their airways. We claim that implementation of the preventive biomonitoring measures that we recommend are sensitive and that the early detection that they enable may lead to avoidance or slowing down of the disease process.

We cite two of our earlier works [2, 3] to support our claim that the neutrophil count is a robust biomarker to detect time-dependant occupational exposure to hazardous dust.

The first report was on firefighters that were on duty during the World Trade Center collapse: their neutrophil count was correlated to the time of working at “ground zero” [2]. In the second report, the neutrophil count was correlated to the years of exposure to airborne particles in the workplace of a cohort of welders [3]. The point made by D. Weiler Ravell and H. Bishara regarding a “…follow-up over time with serial tests to detect a temporal relationship between increased levels of inflammatory biomarkers and the risk of silicosis…” is very well taken. We have just completed a 4-year prospective study on a group of dental technicians exposed to beryllium and hard metal alloys who were monitored by us for a period of 4 years. Induced sputum was performed at enrolment to the study and followed-up after 2 years. Neutrophil counts were found to be the main biomarker that significantly increased in correlation to sensitisation to beryllium (figure 1) over the years.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Differential cell counts in induced sputum in groups negative or positive for the beryllium lymphocyte proliferation test (which measures sensitisation to beryllium). Each bar shows the mean (internal line) and 95% confidence interval. T1: baseline; T2: 2 years of follow-up; Δ: change in mean.

While D. Weiler Ravell and H. Bishara are correct in noting that we did not break down the definition of “past smoker”, the variable of a past smoking history as well as age, sex and weight between the exposed population and the control group were considered and adjusted during the statistical evaluation.

We did not specify how our samples were collected at the workplace. The first author retrieved them from the surface of the cutting machines in plants that dealt exclusively with artificial stone. All the samples were contaminated with metals.

As for the number of patients in each group: the inclusion of the word “exposed” was an error: there were 116 study participants, of whom 68 were exposed to hazardous dust and 48 had not been exposed and served as controls.

Finally, we please note that we did not mention Caesarstone so much as once in our entire paper.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received August 18, 2016.
  • Accepted August 31, 2016.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2016

This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ophir N,
    2. Bar Shai A,
    3. Alkalay Y, et al.
    Artificial stone dust-induced functional and inflammatory abnormalities in exposed workers monitored quantitatively by biometrics. ERJ Open Res 2016; 2: 00086-2015.
  2. ↵
    1. Fireman EM,
    2. Lerman Y,
    3. Ganor E, et al.
    Induced sputum assessment in New York City firefighters exposed to World Trade Center dust. Environ Health Perspect 2004; 112: 1564–1569.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Fireman E,
    2. Lerman Y,
    3. Stark M, et al.
    Detection of occult lung impairment in welders by induced sputum particles and breath oxidation. Am J Indust Med 2008; 51: 503–511.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 2 Issue 4 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 2 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Biometric monitoring in silicosis to detect early disease and monitor lung injury: not quite there
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Biometric monitoring in silicosis to detect early disease and monitor lung injury: not quite there
Noa Ophir, Elizabeth Fireman
ERJ Open Research Oct 2016, 2 (4) 00093-2016; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00093-2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Biometric monitoring in silicosis to detect early disease and monitor lung injury: not quite there
Noa Ophir, Elizabeth Fireman
ERJ Open Research Oct 2016, 2 (4) 00093-2016; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00093-2016
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Epidemiology, occupational and environmental lung disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Interpreting lung oscillometry results
  • Interpreting lung oscillometry results
  • It is time to end our love affair with SABA in asthma?
Show more Correspondence

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society