Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Effects of bile acids on human airway epithelial cells: implications for aerodigestive diseases

Adil Aldhahrani, Bernard Verdon, Chris Ward, Jeffery Pearson
ERJ Open Research 2017 3: 00107-2016; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00107-2016
Adil Aldhahrani
1Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernard Verdon
1Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Ward
1Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
2Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
3These authors contributed equally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: chris.ward@ncl.ac.uk
Jeffery Pearson
1Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
3These authors contributed equally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Gastro-oesophageal reflux and aspiration have been associated with chronic and end-stage lung disease and with allograft injury following lung transplantation. This raises the possibility that bile acids may cause lung injury by damaging airway epithelium. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of bile acid challenge using the immortalised human bronchial epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B).

The immortalised human bronchial epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B) was cultured. A 48-h challenge evaluated the effect of individual primary and secondary bile acids. Post-challenge concentrations of interleukin (IL)-8, IL-6 and granulocyte−macrophage colony-stimulating factor were measured using commercial ELISA kits. The viability of the BEAS-2B cells was measured using CellTiter-Blue and MTT assays.

Lithocholic acid, deoxycholic acid, chenodeoxycholic acid and cholic acid were successfully used to stimulate cultured BEAS-2B cells at different concentrations. A concentration of lithocholic acid above 10 μmol·L−1 causes cell death, whereas deoxycholic acid, chenodeoxycholic acid and cholic acid above 30 μmol·L−1 was required for cell death. Challenge with bile acids at physiological levels also led to a significant increase in the release of IL-8 and IL6 from BEAS-2B.

Aspiration of bile acids could potentially cause cell damage, cell death and inflammation in vivo. This is relevant to an integrated gastrointestinal and lung physiological paradigm of chronic lung disease, where reflux and aspiration are described in both chronic lung diseases and allograft injury.

Abstract

Bile acid exposure has a significant effect on cytokine production which could contribute to airway injury http://ow.ly/Jwfa309jRqu

Introduction

The airway epithelium plays a critical role in diseased as well as non-diseased lungs, primarily by providing a physical barrier to foreign particles such as particulates and smoke, as well as viruses and bacteria. In addition, it enables a range of pro-inflammatory, anti-microbial and regulatory functions. Epithelial regulatory functions can involve generating and disseminating a range of mediators for various responses, including chemotaxis, inflammatory cell differentiation and activation in both diseased and non-diseased conditions [1].

Many chronic degenerative diseases, including lung allograft dysfunction, are characterised by epithelial damage related to pro-inflammatory cytokines. This process commonly involves bronchial cell injury and necrosis, as well as leukocyte infiltration, leading to inflammatory lung disease [2].

When the lower oesophageal sphincter becomes relaxed, gastric contents may pass into the oesophagus by retrograde flow. Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) is not uncommon and generally may not be harmful [3]. However, certain conditions may lead to GOR becoming pathological, resulting in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) [1, 2]. GORD symptoms can be relieved by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). PPIs work by binding covalently to gastric H+ K+-ATPase pumps, causing irreversible inhibition of the final step in gastric acid secretion. The use of PPIs therefore causes gastric pH to be elevated [4]. PPI treatment can reduce gastric acid secretion, but does not prevent overall gastric aspiration, which includes non-acid components [5]. This is one reason why acid suppression alone may not be entirely effective in preventing GOR [6], and in cases where symptoms are unresponsive to PPI treatment, it is thought that these continued symptoms may be caused by reflux of agents other than gastric acid [7].

Bile acids (BAs) are sparingly water-soluble steroids produced by hepatocytes. Despite being strongly cytotoxic and associated with gastrointestinal malignancy [8], BAs are an essential component of the digestive process, aiding lipid digestion in the small intestine. “Primary BAs” are synthesised by conversion of cholesterol into cholic acid (CA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), which are then conjugated to glycine or taurine. These are deconjugated by bacterial enzyme action in the colon into “free BAs”. The action of 7α-dehydroxylase converts free BAs into “secondary BAs” (CDCA into lithocholic acid (LCA) and CA into deoxycholic acid (DCA)).

Gastric mucosa [8, 9], colonic mucosa [9, 10] and hepatocytes [11] are all affected by BAs. However, their toxicity to airway mucosa is less well understood [12]. Patients with a range of airway diseases have been shown to exhibit higher BA concentrations in their bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) [13]. Gastric aspiration has been revealed to lead to severe pneumonitis [14]. Most therapeutic interventions for GORD and associated inflammatory disease have sought to inhibit acid production by gastric parietal cells. However, a study conducted by Kauer et al. [15] measured both acid (using standard pH tests) and duodenal juice (bilirubin monitoring) reflux in 53 GORD patients. Both types of reflux were found to be present in two-thirds of the patients. Furthermore, higher levels of bilirubin were identified in the refluxate of patients with Barrett's oesophagus. These findings may explain the limited success of PPI therapy in this setting and perhaps why some patients appear more prone to developing Barrett's oesophagus.

The most physiologically relevant cell type to evaluate airways damage is arguably the primary human bronchial epithelial cell (PBEC), but these cells are costly and difficult to culture [16]. Consequently, cell lines have been investigated regarding their ability to provide a useful model to complement the use of PBECs. The human bronchial epithelial cell line, BEAS-2B, for example, is able to secrete interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8 and other cytokines, while maintaining epithelial cell morphology in vitro. These qualities make BEAS-2B a favoured cell line for airway epithelial structure and functional studies [17].

This study hypothesised that BAs, described previously as being present in the lung, can cause damage to the airway epithelium, which may be a mechanism for lung injury. The study aimed to establish a model for airway epithelial cell injury that is relevant to reflux-associated chronic degenerative airways diseases. BEAS-2B cells were challenged with primary and secondary Bas, and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels (IL-8, IL-6 and granulocyte−macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)) were measured by ELISA. These cytokine markers were chosen on the basis of prior studies, which have found these factors to be released by damaged cells, and because they are associated with airway pathophysiology [17].

Materials and methods

Cell culture

BEAS-2B culture

BEAS-2B (obtained from ATCC; LGC Standards, Teddington, UK) is a human bronchial epithelial cell line derived from normal human epithelial cells immortalised using a hybrid of adenovirus 12 and simian virus 40 [18]. BEAS-2B cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 6 to 7×l05 cells·mL−1 and were grown in 500 µL bronchial epithelial growth medium (BEGM) (Lonza, Cambridge, MA, USA) at 5% CO2 and 37°C. This was supplemented with 2 mL bovine pituitary extract (0.004 mL·mL−1), 0.5 mL insulin (5 μg·mL−1), 0.5 mL hydrocortisone (0.5 μg·mL−1), 0.5 mL retinoic acid (0.1 ng·mL−1), 0.5 mL transferrin (10 μg·mL−1), 0.5 mL tri-iodothyronine (6.7 ng·mL−1), 0.5 mL adrenaline (0.5 μg·mL−1), 0.5 mL recombinant epidermal growth factor human (10 ng·mL−1), 100 U·mL−1 l-glutamine and 100 U·mL−1 penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma, Gillingham, UK).

BEAS-2B cell stimulation

At about 80% confluence, BEAS-2B cells were rested for 24 h in serum-free medium (BEBM, 50 mg·mL−1 gentamycin, 50 μg·mL−1 amphotericin B (Lonza), 100 U·mL−1 penicillin, 100 µg·mL−1 streptomycin (Sigma). BAs were dissolved in methanol to prepare stock solutions (100 Mmol·L−1). The solution was diluted with resting medium to achieve a range of experimental concentrations. A total of three experiments with five replicate wells (n=15) were conducted. The following BA concentrations were used: 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 50, 75 and 100 μmol·L−1. After 48 h incubation, cell culture supernatants were collected to measure cytokine concentrations. Commercial IL-8, IL-6 and GM-CSF ELISA kits were used (R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK).

Cell viability assays

CellTiter-Blue assay

Cell viability was assessed using the CellTiter-Blue assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Known ratios of living to dead cells were used to generate a standard curve (with the dead cell control prepared by exposure to ice-cold methanol for 5 min) and to provide cell mixtures. The standard curve comprised 100% live cells (resting media); 25/75%, 50/50%, 75/25% dead/live cells; and 100% dead cells. This was used to determine the percentages of viable cells. Wavelengths of 560 and 600 nm were used to measure absorbance and determine signal strength.

Thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide

The MTT (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) assay, which measures mitochondrial function, was used for several experiments. For the MTT assay, cells were cultured and stimulated with BAs. After 48 h, the medium was removed and replaced with 100 µL MTT solution (5 mg·mL−1 in 3 mL of fresh medium without BAs). The plate was incubated for a further 4 h at 37 °C. Formazan crystals developed, and were dissolved in MTT solubilisation solution equal to the original culture medium volume. A gyratory shaker was used to accelerate dissolution. The standard curve comprised 100% live cells (resting media); 25/75%; 50/50%; 75/25% dead/live cells; and 100% dead cells. This was used to determine the percentages of viable cells. Spectrophotometric analysis, with reference and background wavelengths of 570 and 690 nm, was used to measure well absorbance.

Statistical analysis

Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v6 for Windows. All data are represented as mean±sem and n indicates the number of repeat experiments performed. For experiments involving comparison of three or more matched groups, repeated measures ANOVA was used followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test, which compares all pairs of groups. In line with convention, p-values of ≤0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Effect of BA on BEAS-2B cell viability

Both the CellTiter-Blue and MTT assays were used to calculate viability. The results revealed no significant difference between the two methods of assessment.

The results showed that cell viability reduced significantly in response to exposure to 5 μmol·L−1 concentrations of LCA (to 78±3%) and then decreased with 10 µmol·L−1 to 46±3%. This decreased further at 20 µmol·L−1 (to 7±3%) (figure 1a).

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Effects of BAs on BEAS-2B cell viability. BEAS-2B cell viability following stimulation with a) lithocholic, b) deoxycholic, c) cholic and d) chenodeoxycholic acids at varying concentrations. Viability is measured as a percentage of vehicle control after 48 h exposure. Data are presented as mean±sem. Negative controls were measured by fixing the cells in methanol before adding the TiterBlue and MTT reagent (n=6). C: control; CTB: CellTiter-Blue assay; MTT: thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide. **: p=0.01; ****: p<0.0001 versus controls.

Cell viability was also reduced significantly by DCA at concentration 50 µmol·L−1 (94±3%). However, 15 and 30 µmol·L−1 DCA did not affect cell viability (figure 1b).

Cell viability also reduced significantly in response to exposure to 50 μmol·L−1 concentrations of CA to 88±3%. This decreased further to the lowest cell viability level at 100 µmol·L−1 (53±3%). The lowest concentration (15 and 30 µmol·L−1) of CA did not affect cell viability (figure 1c).

Cell viability was also diminished significantly by CDCA at concentration 50 µmol·L−1 to 78±3%. The cell viability greatly reduced to 100 µmol·L−1 of CDCA with 23±3%. No difference was found in the cell viability at lowest concentration 15 and 30 µmol·L−1 compared to control (figure 1d).

Release of pro-inflammatory markers by BEAS-2B cells following exposure to BA

Lithocholic acid

IL-8, IL-6 and GM-CSF secretion were all effected in BEAS-2B cells by exposure to lithocholic acid (LCA) at concentrations from 1 to 20 µmol·L−1. IL-8 levels increased significantly at 5 µmol·L−1 and increased further up to the maximum level at 10 µmol·L−1. The level of IL-8 production then fell off at 20 µmol·L−1 but was still significantly higher than the control (figure 2a). Moreover, there was a significant increase in IL-6 levels with LCA at concentrations of 10, 15 and 20 μmol·L−1, but not at 1 and 5 µmol·L−1. The result revealed that the highest level of IL-6 production was at 10 µmol·L−1 and then declined as the concentration of LCA increased to 20 µmol·L−1 (figure 2b).The GM-CSF levels increased significantly at 5 µmol·L−1 LCA, and rose further to the maximum level at 10 µmol·L−1. The level of GM-CSF production then fell off at 20 µmol·L−1 (figure 2c).

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Measurement of a) L-8, b) IL-6 and c) GM-CSF release by BEAS-2B cells stimulated with lithocholic acid for 48 h. Data are presented as mean±sem (n=6). ELISA measured cytokine secretion in cell supernatants. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA test. p-values of 0.05 or less were regarded as significant. C: control; IL: interleukin; GM-CSF: granulocyte−macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Deoxycholic acid

Cells were treated with deoxycholic acid (DCA) at concentrations from 15 to 100 µmol·L−1. IL-8 levels increased significantly at 30 µmol·L−1 and rose further to the maximum level at 75 µmol·L−1. The level of IL-8 production than fell off at 100 µmol·L−1 but was still significantly higher than the control. However, no significant increase was observed using concentrations of 15 µmol·L−1 DCA (figure 3a). IL-6 levels rose considerably with DCA at concentrations of 50, 75 and 100 μmol·L−1, but not at 15 and 30 µmol·L−1. The highest level of IL-6 secretion was with 100 µmol·L−1. The levels reduced to 50 µmol·L−1 but remained significantly above the control (figure 3b). Furthermore, the GM-CSF levels increased significantly at 30 µmol·L−1 and increased further up to the maximum level at 75 µmol·L−1. The level of GM-CSF production then decreased at 100 µmol·L−1 but remained significantly higher than the control. However, no significant increase was observed using a concentration of 15 µmol·L−1 DCA (figure 3c).

FIGURE 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3

Measurement of a) IL-8, b) IL-6 and c) GM-CSF release by BEAS-2B cells stimulated with deoxycholic acid for 48 h. Data are presented as mean±sem (n=6). ELISA measured cytokine secretion in cell supernatants. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA test. p-values of 0.05 or less were regarded as significant. C: control; IL: interleukin; GM-CSF: granulocyte−macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Cholic acid

ELISA analysis detected IL-8, IL-6 and GM-CSF in cell culture supernatants following cholic acid (CA) stimulation of BEAS-2B. IL-8 levels increased significantly with CA at concentrations of 50, 75 and 100 μmol·L−1, but not at 15 and 30 µmol·L−1 (figure 4a). The highest level of IL-8 secretion was with 100 µmol·L−1. The levels reduced to 50 µmol·L−1 but remained considerably above the control. All CA concentrations significantly elevated IL-6 levels except 15 μmol·L−1. IL-6 production increased in a dose-dependent manner (figure 4b). Furthermore, the GM-CSF levels increased significantly at 30 µmol·L−1 and rose further to the maximum level at 75 µmol·L−1. The level of GM-CSF production then dropped at 100 µmol·L−1 but was still significantly higher than the control (figure 4c).

FIGURE 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4

Measurement of a) IL-8, b) IL-6 and c) GM-CSF release by BEAS-2B cells stimulated with cholic acid for 48 h. Data are presented as mean±sem (n=6). ELISA measured cytokine secretion in cell supernatants. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA test. p-values of 0.05 or less were regarded as significant. C: control; IL: interleukin; GM-CSF: granulocyte−macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Chenodeoxycholic acid

Concentrations of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) from 15 to 100 µmol·L−1 were tested. IL-8 levels increased significantly, but this was not evident at concentrations of 15 µmol·L−1 (figure 5a). It is clear that IL-8 levels increased significantly at 30 µmol·L−1 and rose further to the maximum level at 50 µmol·L−1. The level of IL-8 production than fell off at 100 µmol·L−1 but was still significantly higher than the control. The IL-6 levels were increased with CDCA at concentrations of 30, 50, 75 and 100 μmol·L−1, but not at 15 µmol·L−1 (figure 5b). The highest level of IL-6 secretion was with 100 µmol·L−1. The levels reduced at 30 µmol·L−1 but remained significantly above the control. ELISA detected GM-CSF following CDCA stimulation of BEAS-2B cells. The CDCA significantly upregulated GM-CSF production at 30, 50, 75 and 100 μmol·L−1 (figure 5c). It was apparent that GM-CSF production increased significantly at 30 µmol·L−1 and rose further to a maximum level at 50 µmol·L−1. The level of GM-CSF production then decreased at 100 µmol·L−1 but was still significantly higher than the control.

FIGURE 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5

Measurement of a) IL-8, b) IL-6 and c) GM-CSF release by BEAS-2B cells stimulated with chenodeoxycholic acid for 48 h. Data are presented as mean±sem (n=6). ELISA measured cytokine secretion in cell supernates. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA test. p-values of 0.05 or less were regarded as significant. C: control; IL: interleukin; GM-CSF: granulocyte−macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Discussion

Diseases of the lung are a major source of mortality and morbidity worldwide and are becoming increasingly prevalent. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), for example, is the fifth biggest cause of death globally, while cystic fibrosis (CF) and interstitial lung disease are not rare and have a poor prognosis, including low quality of life and premature death. A connection between lung disease and GORD has long been suspected [15, 19] and high incidences of GORD are known to affect sufferers of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, asthma, CF and COPD [20, 21]. It is of interest that in COPD it has been revealed that the second most powerful predictor of exacerbations is a history of heartburn, a symptom associated with GOR [22]. Refluxate from GORD patients has been found to contain BA levels up to a millimolar level [23]. We have previously described high levels of BAs in the lungs of people with CF, both before and after transplantation [13].

The potential role of BAs in respiratory infection and inflammation is becoming increasingly recognised, although the mechanisms are still not well understood. Most BAs in humans exist in their conjugated forms [24]. Treatment for GORD, including the use of PPIs and acid suppression therapies can result in deconjugation of BAs [25], producing a higher ratio of deconjugated to conjugated BAs in patients undergoing GORD treatment [25]. CDCA, DCA and LCA have all been found in their unconjugated forms in airway secretions [26], so their effect may be of particular relevance to patients with GORD.

The effects of both primary and secondary BAs on BEAS-2B viability were studied. Cell viability was found to be affected depending on BA concentration. There was an inverse relationship between BA concentration and measured cell viability, with increasing concentration and decreasing cell viability in a dose-dependent manner. LCA at 5 μmol·L−1 caused a decrease in cell viability and 20 μmol·L−1 killed nearly all cells. These results are supported by data provided by Wu et al. [18], whose study exposed human epithelial cells to BAs. The precise mechanism by which BA exposure affects the viability of BEAS-2B cells remains unclear. It is known that cell membranes and cationic permeability are disrupted by BAs in type II pneumocytes in vitro [27], which may provide a mechanistic explanation for our study findings. In vivo, it is possible that this detergent effect may cause mucosal barrier breakdown, disrupting the mucus layer and surfactant function in the lungs, consequently damaging type II pneumocytes, which produce both surfactant protein and phospholipids [27, 28].

BEAS-2B cells retain the morphology of an epithelial cell in vitro [18] and release IL-8 and IL-6 in addition to other cytokines [29]. Under submerged conditions, BEAS-2B cells are commonly used as the in vitro model of human airways epithelium, especially within studies on inhalation toxicity.

Our work demonstrates that cell viability decreased depending on BA concentration. There was a dose response to BA concentration, where increasing levels of BAs were associated with decreased cell viability. Our data demonstrated that low levels of LCA (5 μmol·L−1) affected viability and inflammatory cytokine outputs from human bronchial epithelial cells. Moreover, LCA effects occurred at five- to 10-fold lower concentrations compared to the other BAs.

Alongside the potential effect on cell viability, our data show that BA stimulation of epithelial cells is associated with a release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The study found an increase in the expression of IL-8, IL-6 and GM-CSF following BA challenge.

The lung diseases in which reflux and aspiration are implicated all involve a contribution from acute or chronic inflammation, leading frequently to the use of anti-inflammatory medication, such as steroids [17]. The data gathered in this study support, overall, the hypothesis that BA exposure may have a significant effect on cytokine production and subsequently contribute to airway injury.

IL-8 is a neutrophilic chemoattractant and an angiogenic factor. Immunostaining has been used to identify IL-8 localisation in peribronchial lesions [30]. IL-6 plays a role in the activation of monocytes, T-cell differentiation and B-cell maturation. Moreover, it serves as a pyrogen, inducing fever in response to infection [31]. GM-CSF is involved in macrophage activation and is a strong chemoattractant for neutrophils. It stimulates microbicidal and phagocytotic activity, oxidative metabolism, and improves the cytotoxicity of both macrophages [32] and neutrophils [33]. Increased levels of IL-8, IL-6 and GM-CSF are a common finding in airways and lung disease where reflux and aspiration have been implicated as a possible injury [17, 31, 34].

A strength of our study, which is complementary to the limited amount of previous work available, was that the use of BEAS-2B allowed a comprehensive evaluation of a range of primary and secondary BAs, cytotoxicity and inflammatory cytokine production. This was possible because the available cell numbers did not limit the experiments.

Our work could be strengthened by studies involving PBECs. In this study, submerged culture systems were used to examine the association between airways diseases and BAs. Future work could include establishing PBECs at an air–liquid interface, where cells are differentiated into ciliated epithelial cells. The present BA stimulation could then usefully be repeated in in differntiated cells.

Conclusions

Our model data, revealing cytotoxicity and increased levels of inflammatory cytokines associated with BA stimulation of BEAS-2B epithelial cells, may explain the decreased lung function and chronic inflammation connected with aspiration in respiratory disease patients. These findings and further studies may contribute to an integrated “aerodigestive paradigm” regarding the understanding of reflux-related chronic lung diseases. Increased knowledge in this field may represent an opportunity to consider new approaches to patient therapy.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received September 29, 2016.
  • Accepted February 3, 2016.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2017

This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Brown JM,
    2. Wilson TM,
    3. Metcalfe DD
    . The mast cell and allergic diseases: role in pathogenesis and implications for therapy. Clin Exp Allergy 2008; 38: 4–18.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Todd JL,
    2. Palmer SM
    . Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: the final frontier for lung transplantation. Chest 2011; 140: 502–508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Herbella FA,
    2. Patti MG
    . Gastroesophageal reflux disease: from pathophysiology to treatment. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 3745–3749.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Fock KM,
    2. Ang TL,
    3. Bee LC, et al.
    Proton pump inhibitors. Clin Pharmacokinet 2008; 47: 1–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Blondeau K,
    2. Mertens V,
    3. Vanaudenaerde BA, et al.
    Gastro-oesophageal reflux and gastric aspiration in lung transplant patients with or without chronic rejection. Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 707–713.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Rabe KF,
    2. Wedzicha JA,
    3. Wouters EFM
    1. Patel ARC,
    2. Hurst IR
    . Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and COPD. In: Rabe KF, Wedzicha JA, Wouters EFM, eds. COPD and Comorbidity (ERS Monograph). Sheffield, European Respiratory Society, 2013; pp. 105–116.
  7. ↵
    1. McQuaid KR,
    2. Laine L,
    3. Fennerty MB, et al.
    Systematic review: the role of bile acids in the pathogenesis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and related neoplasia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 146–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Jenkins GJ,
    2. Hardie LJ
    . Bile Acids: Toxicology and Bioactivity. London, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2008.
  9. ↵
    1. Owen RW,
    2. Thompson MH,
    3. Hill MJ
    . Analysis of metabolic profiles of steroids in faeces of healthy subjects undergoing chenodeoxycholic acid treatment by liquid-gel chromatography and gas-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Steroid Biochem 1984; 21: 593–600.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Turjman N,
    2. Nair PP
    . Nature of tissue-bound lithocholic acid and its implications in the role of bile acids in carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1981; 41: 3761–3763.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Schölmerich J,
    2. Becher MS,
    3. Schmidt K, et al.
    Influence of hydroxylation and conjugation of bile salts on their membrane-damaging properties – studies on isolated hepatocytes and lipid membrane vesicles. Hepatology 1984; 4: 661–666.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Nasr AO,
    2. Robb W,
    3. Walsh TN
    . Duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux combined and isolated. Am Med J 2013; 4: 127–142.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Brodlie M,
    2. Aseeri A,
    3. Lordan JL, et al.
    Bile acid aspiration in people with cystic fibrosis before and after lung transplantation. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 1820–1823.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Marik PE
    . Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 665–671.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Kauer WK,
    2. Peters JH,
    3. DeMeester TR, et al.
    Mixed reflux of gastric and duodenal juices is more harmful to the esophagus than gastric juice alone. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 525–531.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Stewart CE,
    2. Torr EE,
    3. Mohd Jamili NH, et al.
    Evaluation of differentiated human bronchial epithelial cell culture systems for asthma research. J Allergy 2012; 2012: 943982.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Mullol J,
    2. Baraniuk JN,
    3. Logun C, et al.
    Endothelin-1 induces GM-CSF, IL-6 and IL-8 but not G-CSF release from a human bronchial epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B). Neuropeptides 1996; 30: 551–556.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Wu YC,
    2. Hsu PK,
    3. Su KC, et al.
    Bile acid aspiration in suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 2009; 13: 118–124.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Pearson JEG,
    2. Wilson RSE
    . Diffuse pulmonary fibrosis and hiatus hernia. Thorax 1971; 26: 300–305.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Feigelson J,
    2. Girault F,
    3. Pecau Y
    . Gastro-oesophageal reflux and esophagitis in cystic fibrosis. Acta Paediatrica 1987; 76: 989–990.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Tobin RW,
    2. Pope CE,
    3. Pellegrini CA, et al.
    Increased prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158: 1804–1808.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Hurst JR,
    2. Vestbo J,
    3. Anzueto A, et al.
    Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1128–1138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Lefebvre P,
    2. Cariou B,
    3. Lien F, et al.
    Role of bile acids and bile acid receptors in metabolic regulation. Physiol Rev 2009; 89: 147–191.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Hofmann AF
    . The continuing importance of bile acids in liver and intestinal disease. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 2647–2658.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Theisen J,
    2. Nehra D,
    3. Citron D, et al.
    Suppression of gastric acid secretion in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease results in gastric bacterial overgrowth and deconjugation of bile acids. J Gastrointest Surg 2000; 4: 50–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Wu Y-C,
    2. Hsu P-K,
    3. Su K-C, et al.
    Bile acid aspiration in suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 2009; 136: 118–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. D'Ovidio F,
    2. Mura M,
    3. Tsang M, et al.
    Bile acid aspiration and the development of bronchiolitis obliterans after lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 1144–1152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. D'Ovidio F,
    2. Keshavjee S
    . Gastroesophageal reflux and lung transplantation. Dis Esophagus 2006; 19: 315–320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Ke Y,
    2. Reddel RR,
    3. Gerwin BI, et al.
    Human bronchial epithelial cells with integrated SV40 virus T antigen genes retain the ability to undergo squamous differentiation. Differentiation 1988; 38: 60–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Zheng L,
    2. Walters EH,
    3. Ward C, et al.
    Airway neutrophilia in stable and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome patients following lung transplantation. Thorax 2000; 55: 53–59.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Rincon M,
    2. Irvin CG
    . Role of IL-6 in asthma and other inflammatory pulmonary diseases. Int J Biol Sci 2012; 8: 1281–1290.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Sorgi CA,
    2. Rose S,
    3. Carlos D, et al.
    GM-CSF priming drives bone marrow-derived macrophages to a pro-inflammatory pattern and downmodulates PGE 2 in response to TLR2 ligands. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e40523.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Katano M,
    2. Okamoto K,
    3. Suematsu N, et al.
    Increased expression of S100 calcium binding protein A8 in GM-CSF-stimulated neutrophils leads to the increased expressions of IL-8 and IL-16. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2010; 29: 768–775.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Yamamoto C,
    2. Yoneda T,
    3. Yoshikawa M, et al.
    Airway inflammation in COPD assessed by sputum levels of interleukin-8. Chest 1997; 112: 505–510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 3 Issue 1 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 3 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of bile acids on human airway epithelial cells: implications for aerodigestive diseases
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Effects of bile acids on human airway epithelial cells: implications for aerodigestive diseases
Adil Aldhahrani, Bernard Verdon, Chris Ward, Jeffery Pearson
ERJ Open Research Jan 2017, 3 (1) 00107-2016; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00107-2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Effects of bile acids on human airway epithelial cells: implications for aerodigestive diseases
Adil Aldhahrani, Bernard Verdon, Chris Ward, Jeffery Pearson
ERJ Open Research Jan 2017, 3 (1) 00107-2016; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00107-2016
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Lung biology and experimental studies
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • A common model for the breathlessness experience
  • Endobronchial autologous BM-MSCs in IPF patients
  • Effect of β-blockers on the risk of COPD exacerbations
Show more Original articles

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society