Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Safety and tolerability of nintedanib for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in routine UK clinical practice

Sophie V. Fletcher, Mark G. Jones, Elizabeth A. Renzoni, Helen Parfrey, Rachel K. Hoyles, Katherine Spinks, Maria Kokosi, Apollinaris Kwok, Chris Warburton, Vanessa Titmuss, Muhunthan Thillai, Nicola Simler, Toby M. Maher, Christopher J. Brereton, Felix Chua, Athol U. Wells, Luca Richeldi, Lisa G. Spencer
ERJ Open Research 2018 4: 00049-2018; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00049-2018
Sophie V. Fletcher
1NIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre University Hospital Southampton and Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark G. Jones
1NIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre University Hospital Southampton and Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth A. Renzoni
2ILD Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Parfrey
3Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Helen Parfrey
Rachel K. Hoyles
4John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine Spinks
5Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Kokosi
2ILD Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Apollinaris Kwok
6Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Warburton
6Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vanessa Titmuss
5Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muhunthan Thillai
3Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicola Simler
3Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toby M. Maher
2ILD Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher J. Brereton
1NIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre University Hospital Southampton and Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christopher J. Brereton
Felix Chua
2ILD Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Athol U. Wells
2ILD Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luca Richeldi
1NIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre University Hospital Southampton and Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa G. Spencer
6Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In IPF, commencement of antifibrotic therapy in patients with preserved lung volume may increase the duration of therapy http://ow.ly/4HeM30lFS67

To the Editor:

Nintedanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), reduces annual forced vital capacity (FVC) decline in these patients by ∼50% with combined analysis of data from clinical trials showing a trend towards reduction in mortality [1–3]. Nintedanib prescription criteria for the treatment of IPF vary between countries and in 2016, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence approved nintedanib in England and Wales for patients with an FVC between 50% and 80% predicted [4]. Prior to this approval, nintedanib was available through a manufacturer-funded programme with varying prescribing criteria. We investigated the safety and tolerability of nintedanib in UK clinical practice during this period in which FVC prescription criteria differed from those now available in routine practice.

This was a multicentre cohort review across six National Health Service (NHS) hospital trusts. Data were collected from the clinical records of individuals eligible to commence nintedanib for the treatment of IPF between October 2014 and July 2015. During this period, nintedanib was provided through manufacturer-funded compassionate-use programmes, initially for those with an FVC >50% predicted, then for all patients with a diagnosis of IPF regardless of FVC, and finally for patients with an FVC >50% predicted who were intolerant of or could not be prescribed pirfenidone (e.g. FVC >80% predicted). All patients with an MDT diagnosis of IPF and a minimum of 12 months follow up (or who had discontinued nintedanib or died prior to this) were included. The most recent pulmonary function tests performed prior to starting nintedanib were used as baseline values. Nintedanib was prescribed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Patients were reviewed 3-monthly and data on adverse events, dose interruptions and/or dose changes collected.

Group comparisons were performed using t-tests, Mann–Whitney rank sum tests or Chi-squared tests as appropriate and logistic regression analysis evaluated clinical characteristics associated with nintedanib discontinuation. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 22) for Mac (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Results are reported as mean±sd or as n (%) as appropriate.

154 patients commenced nintedanib between October 2014 and July 2015; of these, 17 (11%) had a baseline FVC <50% predicted, 81 (52.6%) an FVC between ≥50% and <80% predicted, and 56 (36.4%) an FVC >80% predicted. The average age was 71±7.9 years and 124 (80.5%) were male. The pre-treatment average FVC was 72.6% predicted (range 35–137%, n=154) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was 43.3% predicted (range 19–95%, n=139). 44 (28.6%) patients had domiciliary oxygen. The average time since IPF diagnosis was 13.8±16.4 months and 50 (32.5%) patients had received previous pirfenidone treatment.

At least one adverse event was reported by 77% of patients. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal, including diarrhoea (67.5% of patients), nausea (52.6%) and reduced appetite (16.9%). Weight loss was reported by 14.3% of patients and elevations in liver function tests (alanine transaminase) greater than three times the upper limit of normal were identified in six (3.9%) patients.

69 (44.8%) patients discontinued treatment over 12 months. 32 (46.8%) patients discontinued within the first 3 months of treatment, 12 (17.4%) following 3–6 months of treatment and 25 (36.2%) following 6–12 months of treatment. 34 (49.3%) out of 69 patients underwent a dose reduction before discontinuing nintedanib. 18 (11.8%) died, 12 (7.8%) patients discontinued as a consequence of nondiarrhoeal gastrointestinal side-effects and 11 (7.2%) discontinued as a result of diarrhoea. Two patients suffered an ischaemic stroke and one a myocardial infarction during the study period.

Comparison of characteristics of patients continuing and discontinuing nintedanib (table 1) identified lower pre-treatment FVC, older age and domiciliary oxygen to be associated with discontinuation. Multivariate regression analysis identified increasing age (regression coefficient 0.063, p<0.001) and decreasing FVC (regression coefficient −0.032, p<0.001) at treatment commencement to be independently associated with nintedanib discontinuation. After 12 months, 23.5% (four out of 17) of patients with a baseline FVC <50% predicted, 51.8% (42 out of 81) with an FVC between ≥50% and <80% predicted, and 69.6% (39 out of 56) of patients with a baseline FVC >80% predicted continued nintedanib (figure 1). There was a nonsignificant trend toward discontinuation of nintedanib in those previously intolerant of pirfenidone (p=0.112).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Characteristics of patients continuing and discontinuing nintedanib in the year following commencement

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted of patients continuing and discontinuing nintedanib during the year following commencement. a) Individual patient data. b) Stratified by FVC. ***: p<0.001.

Nintedanib was safe and generally well tolerated when used in routine practice, in keeping with other recent real-world experiences [5–7]. Discontinuation rates were higher than reported in clinical trials (44.8% at 12 months c.f. ∼25% in INPULSIS) [3]. This could be related partly to the current cohort, which included 50 patients not tolerating pirfenidone and may therefore be enriched for patients with a propensity towards drug induced side-effects. The majority of adverse events were gastrointestinal with a low reported frequency of cardiovascular related events and deranged liver function. Discontinuation due to diarrhoea, at 7.2% (11 out of 154), was comparable to the INPULSIS trials where discontinuation due to diarrhoea was ∼5%.

Recently, in a cohort of 57 patients followed for an average of 42 weeks, Galli et al. [7] identified no association between nintedanib discontinuation and FVC when stratifying patients with an FVC >50% or <50% predicted. Within our larger cohort, after 52 weeks of follow-up, however, increasing age and decreasing pre-treatment FVC were independently associated with discontinuation of nintedanib. The high drug discontinuation rate of 76.5% identified in the subgroup with FVC <50% predicted suggests that careful informed patient discussion is required prior to treatment commencement in this patient group. No predominant reason for discontinuation was identified in this group with no clear increase in mortality as a reason for discontinuation. It is possible in this group, the preceding longer duration of disease burden limits tolerance to any side-effects and so increases the likelihood of discontinuation.

This study has a number of limitations. It has not considered comorbid medical conditions and FVC eligibility criteria differed during the period studied. However, this has enabled the study of a real-world patient population with FVC values now excluded from routine clinical practice within England. The drug was tolerated best in the “high” FVC subgroup (>80% predicted), a significant group currently excluded from NHS-funded treatment in England and Wales. This is despite evidence demonstrating effectiveness of nintedanib in a post hoc subgroup analysis of those with FVC >80% predicted from the INPULSIS study [8].

Increasing age and decreasing pre-treatment FVC are associated with increased probability of discontinuation during 52 weeks of treatment. A prospective study is required to further investigate these real-world findings that suggest that commencement of antifibrotic therapy in patients with preserved lung volume (FVC >80% predicted) may increase the duration of therapy for an individual patient. This would be anticipated to lengthen the period with preserved functional capacity and quality of life, and improve mortality in this chronic invariably progressive disease.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: S.V. Fletcher reports receiving funding to attend conferences, speaker fees and fees for advisory boards from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim.

  • Conflict of interest: M.G. Jones has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: E.A. Renzoni reports receiving lecture fees from Boehringer, Roche and Takeda outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: H. Parfrey reports receiving personal fees for consultancy work from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, and nonfinancial support for conference attendance from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche.

  • Conflict of interest: R.K. Hoyles reports receiving support for a specialist interstitial lung disease nurse (part time) for 1 year outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: K. Spinks reports receiving advisory board fees and conference sponsorship from Boehringer Ingelheim, and educational meeting sponsorship from Roche, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Kokosi has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: A. Kwok has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: C. Warburton has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: V. Titmuss reports receiving personal fees for discussion on the new formulary of pirfenidone and its new patient information leaflet from the Roche Nurse Advisory Board outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Thillai has received travel scholarships and consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche.

  • Conflict of interest: N. Simler has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: T.M. Maher reports receiving grant funding to his institution and personal fees for service on a clinical trial advisory board from GSK; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, InterMune, Sanofi Aventis, AstraZeneca, Roche, Biogen Idec, Cipla, Prometic and Sanumed; research fees to his institution, personal fees and nonfinancial support from UCB; and holds stock options in Apellis, all outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: C.J. Brereton reports receiving support to attend a conference from Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: F. Chua has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: A.U. Wells reports receiving fees for consulting and speaking from Intermune/Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim and Bayer, fees for consulting from Gilead, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: L. Richeldi reports grants and personal fees for service on an advisory board from InterMune, personal fees for service on an advisory board from Medimmune, Roche and FibroGen, personal fees for consulting activity from Biogen, Sanofi-Aventis, ImmuneWorks, Celgene and Nitton, a speaker fee from Shionogi, and personal fees for service on a steering committee from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: L.G. Spencer has received payments for advisory boards and travel support to attend respiratory conferences from both Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, and speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim in the last 36 months.

  • Received March 29, 2018.
  • Accepted August 25, 2018.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2018

This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Karimi-Shah BA,
    2. Chowdhury BA
    . Forced vital capacity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – FDA review of pirfenidone and nintedanib. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1189–1191.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Richeldi L,
    2. Collard HR,
    3. Jones MG
    . Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lancet 2017; 389: 1941–1952.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Richeldi L,
    2. du Bois RM,
    3. Raghu G et al.
    Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 2071–2082.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Technology appraisal guidance TA379. Nintedanib for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. 2016. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta379.
  4. ↵
    1. Hughes G,
    2. Toellner H,
    3. Morris H
    ,et al. Real world experiences: pirfenidone and nintedanib are effective and well tolerated treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Med 2016; 5: 78.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bonella F,
    2. Kreuter M,
    3. Hagmeyer L, et al.
    Insights from the German compassionate use program of nintedanib for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respiration 2016; 92: 98–106.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Galli JA,
    2. Pandya A,
    3. Vega-Olivo M, et al.
    Pirfenidone and nintedanib for pulmonary fibrosis in clinical practice: tolerability and adverse drug reactions. Respirology 2017; 22: 1171–1178.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Kolb M,
    2. Richeldi L,
    3. Behr J, et al.
    Nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and preserved lung volume. Thorax 2017; 72: 340–346.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 4 Issue 4 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 4 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Safety and tolerability of nintedanib for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in routine UK clinical practice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Safety and tolerability of nintedanib for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in routine UK clinical practice
Sophie V. Fletcher, Mark G. Jones, Elizabeth A. Renzoni, Helen Parfrey, Rachel K. Hoyles, Katherine Spinks, Maria Kokosi, Apollinaris Kwok, Chris Warburton, Vanessa Titmuss, Muhunthan Thillai, Nicola Simler, Toby M. Maher, Christopher J. Brereton, Felix Chua, Athol U. Wells, Luca Richeldi, Lisa G. Spencer
ERJ Open Research Oct 2018, 4 (4) 00049-2018; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00049-2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Safety and tolerability of nintedanib for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in routine UK clinical practice
Sophie V. Fletcher, Mark G. Jones, Elizabeth A. Renzoni, Helen Parfrey, Rachel K. Hoyles, Katherine Spinks, Maria Kokosi, Apollinaris Kwok, Chris Warburton, Vanessa Titmuss, Muhunthan Thillai, Nicola Simler, Toby M. Maher, Christopher J. Brereton, Felix Chua, Athol U. Wells, Luca Richeldi, Lisa G. Spencer
ERJ Open Research Oct 2018, 4 (4) 00049-2018; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00049-2018
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Interstitial and orphan lung disease
  • Pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics
  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • rs2070600 SNP regulates AGER splicing and sputum sRAGE
  • Procoagulant microparticles and COVID-19
  • Cancer referral and interventional pulmonology during COVID-19
Show more Original research letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society