Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Fast-track pneumonia pathway focusing on early progressive mobilisation: a clinical feasibility study

Lise Notander Clausen, Mette Børgesen, Pernille Ravn, Tom Møller
ERJ Open Research 2019 5: 00012-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00012-2019
Lise Notander Clausen
1Dept of Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mette Børgesen
1Dept of Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pernille Ravn
2Dept of Medical Diseases, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Møller
3The University Hospitals Centre for Health Research (UCSF), Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tom Møller
  • For correspondence: tom@ucsf.dk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Interdisciplinary efforts should be organised into a fast-track concept to enhance mobilisation within the clinical environment and post-discharge to reduce hospital length of stay and increase survival in pneumonia http://ow.ly/tu0s30nKLrE

To the Editor:

Pneumonia and lower respiratory tract infection are the most common reasons for acute hospital admission in Denmark [1], with an incidence of 3.1 cases per 1000 inhabitants [2]. Various European studies report a substantial mortality rate of 5–15% among admitted patients following pneumonia. Pneumonia affects people of all ages across all sociodemographic profiles, with greater risk in frail, older individuals [3]. Often, patients are characterised by multiple comorbidities, low levels of function, reduced energy intake, cognitive impairment and depression [4]. In addition, acutely admitted elderly patients are exposed to prolonged bedrest and immobilisation, causing further physical deterioration [5].

The present feasibility study, inspired from the surgical fast-track pathways [6], aimed to investigate whether patients with community-acquired pneumonia may be suitable for a fast-track pneumonia pathway (FTPP) to support early progressive mobilisation as a mandatory systematic part of treatment (figure 1a). The FTPP is a practical clinical worksheet that: supports clinician decision making on, for example, the need for intravenous antibiotics; and coordinates monitoring and care according to the existing national pneumonia guidelines. The basis of the FTPP is to reduce unnecessary treatment that may delay or impede early progressive mobilisation. Moreover, using an objective physiological measurement tool, we were able to detect mobilisation, physical activity and sedentary time during hospitalisation and 10 days following discharge. We included patients aged >18 years with a radiologically verified pneumonia consecutively recruited from the medical acute ward. Inclusion was applied to new patients acutely admitted within the past 24 h. Exclusion criteria were pre-illness inability to walk with a walking aid, inability to speak Danish, and confusion or cognitive dysfunction that prohibited informed consent and the ability to cooperate with wearing the accelerometer.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

a) Fast-track pneumonia pathway: an interdisciplinary tool. b) Mean body position times: lying, sitting and standing. c) Patient-reported outcomes. Data are presented as mean±sd, unless otherwise stated. SF-12: 12-item Short Form Survey; EQ-5D-5L: five-dimension, five-level EuroQol questionnaire; VAS: visual analogue scale. #: scored from 1 to 100, with a low score indicating severe problems; ¶: scored from 1 to 5, with a high score indicating severe problems

During hospitalisation, 24-h mobility was measured using accelerometers (GT9X Link; ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL, USA) placed at the right hip. Quantified as time (in hours) spent lying, sitting and standing, mobility was analysed using ActiLife software (ActiGraph) in addition to steps per hour. The nurse registered mobility on the standardised mobilisation care plan, which was used to document patients' mobilisation and physical activity during hospitalisation and irrespective of study participation. The patient's ability to perform various activities of daily living was assessed using the Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index (BI-100) [7]. The five-dimension, five-level EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) scale [8] and the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) [9] were used to assess participants' experiences of their own health upon admission, discharge and follow-up.

Due to the nature of the feasibility design, descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics of the study population and outcomes. Study inclusion was based on ethical requirements for giving oral and written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

During the study period, 57 patients were admitted with respiratory symptoms, fever and coughing, and assessed for eligibility. 33 patients met the inclusion criteria in terms of a radiological verification of pneumonia while 23 were excluded: six were unable to walk prior to hospitalisation, eight had been hospitalised for >24 h, two had hospital-acquired pneumonia, and seven had a combination of comorbidities (dementias and confusion) in addition to being deemed cognitively unable to adhere to and collaborate with the FTPP programme and/or wearing the accelerometer. 10 eligible patients agreed to participate and none of these patients involuntarily left the study prior to its conclusion. One patient died, and one was admitted to the intensive care unit within the first 24 h after inclusion and was subsequently withdrawn from further study assessments. The patient who died was necropsied, which showed a pulmonary embolism due to previous radiation damage due to breast cancer.

Patient demographics (median 74 years) showed an overrepresentation by men (80%), which was considered a random periodic outcome. 50% had a CURB-65 (confusion, urea >7 mmol·L−1, respiratory rate ≥30 breaths per min, blood pressure <90 mmHg (systolic) or ≤60 mmHg (diastolic), age ≥65 years)) score of two or more, indicating moderate to severe pneumonia. The patients' habitual level of functioning was reasonably good, with a self-reported BI-100 of 94. According to the FTPP tool, 87% of the patients were reassessed for need for intravenous antibiotics within 72 h and the total time for intravenous antibiotics was median 3.36 days. The median length of hospital stay was 4 days.

Daily documentation on the FTPP interdisciplinary tool by doctors, nurses and physiotherapists was carried out 78% of the time. Based on the total number of day and night shifts documented, the mobilisation care plan was applied 70% of the time. All patients were mobilised for ≥20 min within 24 h of admission. Moreover, patients had a documented level of activity level per shift that corroborates this.

The median observation time for patients in the project was 313 h (13 days) with a median adherence to wearing the accelerometer of 269 h (79%). Summarised data showed that patients during hospitalisation on average lied down for 10.08 h·day−1 (42%) with a slight increase during hospitalisation. At home, the lying period was reduced to 8.4 h (35%) with a marginal increase in standing (figure 1b). The number of steps per hour during the first 3 days of hospitalisation was remarkably low with an average of 56, 40 and 50 steps per h. At home, the average number of steps increased to 110 per h.

Most patients had various symptomatic and functional problems on admission (e.g. bodily pain, vitality and role physical) with a slight improvement at follow-up. The EQ-5D-5L score ranged from 1.25 to 2.6, with no scale showing any apparent difference over time, suggesting a relatively stable care independency. The score on the total EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale increased from 52.4 on admission to 69.38 at follow-up, indicating an improvement in self-rated health (figure 1c).

Elderly patients with pneumonia often suffer from several comorbidities and competing disabilities [5]. In the current feasibility study, several patients were excluded due to a lack of function and/or dementia and cognitive dysfunctions, making them unable to participate in the accelerometer-based monitoring and intervention. Despite this selection, and the fact that we may have included the healthiest participants with pneumonia, the population still represent a very low level of physical activity during and after hospitalisation with only slight improvement observed. This does strongly imply the need to emphasise early mobilisation in cross-sectional care planning among this vulnerable population with significant risk of mortality [3, 10, 11]. We hypothesise that the relatively large group of patients who were too frail to be included should be offered and could benefit from a similar FTPP treatment course including an early mobilisation care plan. This is supported by research that examines early mobilisation and the study of patient progress in pneumonia treatment [10–14].

We conclude that structuring progressive patient mobilisation during complex clinical work conditions is warranted, though application of advanced technology such as accelerometers may compromise study feasibility. A stronger focus on research in this medical area is required to counteract hospital-induced sedentarism and its immediate impact on daily functioning and subsequent major outcomes.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: L.N. Clausen has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Børgesen has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: P. Ravn has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: T. Møller has nothing to disclose.

  • Received October 16, 2018.
  • Accepted January 28, 2019.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2019
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Flachs E,
    2. Eriksen L,
    3. Koch
    M. Sygdomsbyrden i Danmark – Sygdomme [The Burden of Disease in Denmark – Diseases]. Copenhagen, Sundhedsstyrelsen, 2015.
  2. ↵
    1. Egelund GB,
    2. Jensen AV,
    3. Andersen SB, et al.
    Penicillin treatment for patients with community-acquired pneumonia in Denmark: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pulm Med 2017; 17: 66-017-0404-8.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Lim WS,
    2. Baudouin SV,
    3. George RC, et al.
    BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: update 2009. Thorax 2009; 64: Suppl. 3, iii1–iii55.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Davydow DS,
    2. Hough CL,
    3. Levine DA, et al.
    Functional disability, cognitive impairment, and depression after hospitalization for pneumonia. Am J Med 2013; 126: 615–624.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Klausen HH,
    2. Petersen J,
    3. Lindhardt T, et al.
    Outcomes in elderly Danish citizens admitted with community-acquired pneumonia. Regional differences, in a public healthcare system. Respir Med 2012; 106: 1778–1787.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Kehlet H
    . Fast-track surgery – an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011; 396: 585–590.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Collin C,
    2. Wade DT,
    3. Davies S, et al.
    The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 61–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Oemar M
    editor. EQ-5D-5L User Guide. 2nd Edn. Rotterdam, EuroQol, 2013.
  9. ↵
    1. Optum SF Health Surveys
    . SF-12v2 Health Survey. https://www.optum.com/solutions/life-sciences/answer-research/patient-insights/sf-health-surveys/sf-12v2-health-survey.html
  10. ↵
    1. Ebell M
    . Does early mobilization improve outcomes in patients with community-acquired pneumonia? Evid Based Pract 2003; 6: 9.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Carratala J,
    2. Garcia-Vidal C,
    3. Ortega L, et al.
    Effect of a 3-step critical pathway to reduce duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy and length of stay in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2012 Jun 25; 172: 922–928.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hauck LD,
    2. Adler LM,
    3. Mulla ZD
    . Clinical pathway care improves outcomes among patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. Ann Epidemiol 2004 Oct; 14: 669–675.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mundy LM,
    2. Leet TL,
    3. Darst K, et al.
    Early mobilization of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Chest 2003; 124: 883–889.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Holland BS
    . Pneumonia pathway reduces LOS and saves money. Hosp Case Manag 2000; 8: 151–154.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 5 Issue 1 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 5 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fast-track pneumonia pathway focusing on early progressive mobilisation: a clinical feasibility study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Fast-track pneumonia pathway focusing on early progressive mobilisation: a clinical feasibility study
Lise Notander Clausen, Mette Børgesen, Pernille Ravn, Tom Møller
ERJ Open Research Feb 2019, 5 (1) 00012-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00012-2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Fast-track pneumonia pathway focusing on early progressive mobilisation: a clinical feasibility study
Lise Notander Clausen, Mette Børgesen, Pernille Ravn, Tom Møller
ERJ Open Research Feb 2019, 5 (1) 00012-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00012-2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • rs2070600 SNP regulates AGER splicing and sputum sRAGE
  • Procoagulant microparticles and COVID-19
  • Cancer referral and interventional pulmonology during COVID-19
Show more Original research letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society