Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

High frequency of infection of lung cancer patients with the parasite Toxoplasma gondii

Jaroslav Bajnok, Muyassar Tarabulsi, Helen Carlin, Kevin Bown, Thomas Southworth, Josiah Dungwa, Dave Singh, Zhao-Rong Lun, Lucy Smyth, Geoff Hide
ERJ Open Research 2019 5: 00143-2018; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00143-2018
Jaroslav Bajnok
1Biomedical Research Centre and Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muyassar Tarabulsi
1Biomedical Research Centre and Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Carlin
1Biomedical Research Centre and Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Bown
1Biomedical Research Centre and Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Southworth
2The University of Manchester, Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josiah Dungwa
2The University of Manchester, Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dave Singh
2The University of Manchester, Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhao-Rong Lun
1Biomedical Research Centre and Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford, UK
3Center for Parasitic Organisms, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences and Key laboratory of Tropical Diseases Control, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucy Smyth
1Biomedical Research Centre and Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geoff Hide
1Biomedical Research Centre and Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Geoff Hide
  • For correspondence: g.hide@salford.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Toxoplasma gondii is an intracellular protozoan parasite that can cause a wide range of clinical conditions, including miscarriage and pneumonia. The global prevalence is 30% in humans, but varies by locality (e.g. in the UK it is typically 10%). The association between lung cancer and T. gondii infection was investigated by direct detection in lung tissue samples.

Methods Lung tissue samples were taken from patients undergoing lung resection surgery (n=72) for suspected lung cancer (infection prevalence 100% (95% CI: 93.9–100%)). All 72 participants were confirmed as having lung cancer following subsequent diagnostic tests. In addition, bronchial biopsy samples were collected from non-lung cancer healthy control subjects (n=10). Samples were tested for T. gondii using PCR amplification of T. gondii specific gene markers and T. gondii specific immunohistochemistry.

Results All 72 lung cancer patients were infected with T. gondii (prevalence 100% (95% CI: 93.9–100%)). Of which, 95.8% (n=69) of patients showed evidence of active parasite stages. Infection prevalence in the controls (10%) was significantly lower (p<0.0001).

Conclusions Clinicians treating lung cancer patients should be aware of the potential presence of the parasite, the potential for induction of symptomatic complications and interference with treatment success.

Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii infection was found to be present in all lung tissue samples taken from 72 cancer patients (including active parasite stages in 96% of samples) http://bit.ly/2DhPPRN

Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii is an intracellular protozoan parasite which can be found in all warm-blooded animals. This parasite can only complete its full life cycle in cats, but nevertheless around 30% of the human population, globally, is estimated to be infected [1–3]. Current estimates of human infection range from a relatively lower prevalence in countries like the UK (10%), China (10%) and the USA (10–20%) [2, 4] to areas where prevalence can exceed 40% (e.g. parts of continental Europe and South America) [2]. The main routes of transmission to humans are thought to be via ingestion of infective oocysts shed by infected cats or by ingestion of parasite cysts from undercooked meat. Congenital transmission, although reported to be infrequent, contributes to transmission and is often associated with significant neonatal pathology and possible miscarriage [5–8]. Other accidental routes of transmission have also been reported (e.g. blood transfusion and organ transplantation). With the exception of congenital transmission, primary infection in humans is usually asymptomatic in healthy individuals. If symptoms occur, they are usually mild influenza-like symptoms, occasionally accompanied by hepatosplenomegaly and lymphadenopathy, but are usually self-limiting [3, 9]. In immunosuppressed and immunodeficient patients T. gondii infection can have fatal consequences [10]. T. gondii can invade every type of nucleated cell in the body, but preferred target organs are the lymph nodes, brain, heart and lungs. Proliferation of tachyzoites results in the infection of neighbouring cells and necrosis [11, 12]. Common presentations include encephalitis, miscarriages, pneumonia and myocarditis [3].

Patients with cancer may have deficient cellular immunity that has allowed dysregulated proliferating cells to escape immune defences, and are potentially susceptible to opportunistic infections including T. gondii [5]. Not much is known about toxoplasmosis in this group of patients and few reports are available. As examples of studies of T. gondii infection in cancer patients [13], serological measurement of infection rates showed high prevalences in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (46.2%) and rectal cancer (63.6%), but lower rates in the other cancer groups, for example, pulmonary carcinoma (4.6%), breast cancer (9.5%), gastric carcinoma (10.0%), hepatocellular carcinoma (14.3%) and uterine cervix carcinoma (12.5%). This might suggest that there is an association between T. gondii infection and some types of cancer; however, these studies give little indication as to whether active infection is present, and they measure generic infection status rather than localised infection status in the cancer affected tissue. The objectives of this study were to use specific DNA based and immunohistochemical detection systems to detect the presence of the parasite, T. gondii, in lung biopsy samples taken from a well-characterised collection of patients with lung cancer. A secondary aim was to investigate any associations between parasite infection intensity or active/dormant infection and other recorded characteristics of these lung cancer patients (such as sex, age, presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and smoking history).

Materials and methods

Study subjects and sample processing

In total, 72 tissue samples were collected from patients undergoing lung resection surgery at University Hospital of South Manchester as part of their clinical care in the National Health Service (NHS). These patients were not specifically recruited for this study but were referred to the hospital with suspected lung cancer and biopsies were taken as part of the diagnostic process. This centre serves a large catchment area covering referrals for lung diseases across the north-west of England. The samples were taken for exploratory investigations as part of suspected lung cancer diagnosis and were taken prior to any anti-cancer drug therapy. All 72 patients were subsequently confirmed as having lung cancer following all subsequent diagnostic tests. Routine diagnosis for cancer does not involve serological testing for Toxoplasma infection, thus none of these patients were tested in this way. To act as controls, a further 10 bronchial biopsy samples were obtained from healthy subjects without any history or evidence of lung cancer who were recruited specifically as healthy controls. The potential risk of biopsy to healthy subjects made it difficult to gain a large sample size of control subjects. The control subjects were selected from the same population catchment area as the lung cancer patients and covered a comparable age range, although they have a lower average age (table 1). We recognise the limitations of the control sample, the relatively small numbers, the younger average age range and different tissue type (bronchial rather than lung biopsy), but it was not possible with this study to recruit more appropriate controls. These limitations are discussed later in this article. The overall study methodology is presented in figure 1. The studies were approved by the local South Manchester research ethics committee (03/SM/396, lung tissue collection) and the NRES Committee North West – Greater Manchester South (06/Q1403/156, control sampling). All subjects provided written informed consent. The study also received ethical approval from the University of Salford Research Governance and Ethics (CST 12/37 and ST16/124). For each sample, data was available on age, sex, lung conditions (e.g. COPD) if present, pack-years smoking history, and inhaled medication use including bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Summary of patient demographics

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Flowchart showing the study methodology. IHC: immunohistochemistry; HE: haematoxylin and eosin.

Tissue sections were obtained from the lung as far distal to the tumour as possible, as determined by an NHS pathologist. Lung tissue was washed in sterile PBS prior to use. A portion of the tissue was fixed with 10% formalin in PBS buffer and embedded in paraffin, using a Leica TP1020 automatic tissue processor (Leica Microsystems (UK) Ltd, Milton Keynes, UK). Tissues were sectioned into 5 µm slices and lifted onto poly-l-lysine glass slides. Portions of tissue were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, stored at −80°C and used later for DNA extraction. Control bronchial biopsies were collected from subjects and immediately fixed using 10% neutral buffered formalin (CellPath, Newtown, UK), processed and paraffin embedded. 4 µm sections were cut and lifted onto poly-l-lysine coated glass slides (Surgipath, Peterborough, UK).

PCR detection of T. gondii in human lung samples

DNA from 72 lung cancer patients and 10 control subjects was extracted from small blocks of snap frozen tissue or directly from sections on poly-l-lysine microscope slides, using proteinase K lysis followed by phenol/chloroform extraction as previously described [14]. Extracted DNA was tested using a mammalian α-tubulin PCR to ensure the viability of the DNA for PCR amplification [15]. Protocols and processes were applied to prevent cross contamination of PCR reactions as previously described [16–19]. The presence of the parasite was tested with five markers at four genetic loci: SAG1, SAG2 (the 3′ and 5′ ends were tested separately), SAG3 and B1 [20–22] as previously described [19]. All of these markers are commonly used specific PCR diagnostic markers for T. gondii. Pure parasite DNA from the T. gondii RH strain and from a type II strain, isolated from a goat in Slovakia [19] were used as positive controls. Negative controls (water) were interspersed throughout the PCR reactions to detect any possible false amplification and DNA extraction controls from sham blocks were also included as negative controls. Any experiment in which the negative controls showed amplification was discarded and repeated. PCR amplifications were conducted in replicates; each sample was tested three times. PCR products were visualised by agarose gel electrophoresis using standard methods and were sequenced to confirm that the correct amplicons were amplified. The DNA samples were considered to be positive for T. gondii if they successfully amplified in all three reactions with all five Toxoplasma specific markers.

Immunohistochemical detection of T. gondii in human lung sections

Using established approaches [23], immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on paraffin embedded tissue using commercial anti-T. gondii polyclonal antibodies produced in rabbits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Catalogue number PA1-38789, Rockford, IL, USA). This antibody was generated from a whole Toxoplasma gondii lysate, has been validated for IHC (Thermo Fisher) and used in previous studies (e.g. [24]). The 5 µm tissue sections were cut and mounted on positively charged glass slides then dewaxed in Histoclear (2×5 min), rehydrated in alcohols (ethanol), 100% (5 min), 90% (3 min), 75% (2 min) and 50% (1 min). They were finally rinsed in tap water to remove the ethanol for 5 min. Antigen retrieval was performed in 1% trypsin/calcium chloride (pH 7.8) at 37°C for 30 min in a humidified chamber [25]. After incubation, the sections were left to cool at room temperature for 10 min, then washed in PBS Tween 20 twice for 2 min. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubating slides in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 30 min at room temperature followed by washing in TBS. Nonspecific antibody binding was blocked using normal goat serum (Vectastain ABC Systems, Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK) for 30 min at room temperature and followed by incubation in diluted (1/100) polyclonal rabbit anti-T. gondii antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Following this incubation, the slides were washed in TBS Tween for 3×3 min and incubated in biotinylated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Vectastain ABC Systems) for 30 min at room temperature followed by another wash in TBS Tween (3×3 min). Slides were incubated in ABC-Px mix (Vectastain ABC Systems) for 30 min, and re-washed ×3 in TBS. The resulting complex was visualised using 3-3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) for a maximum of 10 min. The intensity of the tissue staining was monitored using light microscopy and the DAB reaction quenched in distilled water when optimal staining was reached. Sections were then washed with running water for 5 min, counterstained with haematoxylin for 45 s, washed with water for another 5 min, dehydrated with alcohols, 50% (1 min), 75% (2 min), 95% (4 min), and 100% (5 min), cleared in Histoclear (2×5 min) and mounted, using cover slips, in DPX. Three negative controls were used for each staining. These were lung sections from T. gondii negative wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus), human lung sections with primary antibodies omitted and cells derived from a C2C12 culture (mouse myoblast cell line, free of T. gondii) with both primary antibodies present and absent. Specific T. gondii staining was not observed in any negative controls. Cell culture derived T. gondii RH strain tachyzoites and lung tissue from a T. gondii infected wood mouse were used as positive controls [19]. Specific T. gondii staining was observed in all positive controls. Immunostained slides were also assessed using quantitative criteria. The program ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) was used to calculate a percentage score which described the degree of coverage of infected tissue on each slide. For each patient, three microscope fields of view (×400 magnification) were randomly selected, photographed and quantified using ImageJ software (as a percentage of stained pixels with respect to total pixels). The mean percentage of pixels in the stained areas was calculated for each slide. According to the calculated mean (a measure of parasite intensity) the patients were divided into three grades of staining. Grade 1 had a staining of <10% of the area covered, grade 2 between 10 and 20% and grade 3 intensity of >20%. In addition to overall percentage cover, slides were analysed in more detail and percentage coverage for different parasite life cycle stages were recorded (T. gondii cysts, intracellular infection of macrophages (or other cell types) and free tachyzoites). Finally, haematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining was used to confirm that structures compatible with T. gondii stages could be observed within sections [26].

Statistical analyses

To compare infection status of lung cancer patients (n=72) and non-lung cancer control patients (n=10), 2×2 contingency tables were used. Fisher's exact test was used to calculate p-values and values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. In order to investigate any relationships between T. gondii infection and demographic data collected from within the lung cancer patient cohort (n=72), logistic regression (generalised linear model with a binomial distribution) was used to avoid the statistical pitfalls of conducting multiple univariate analyses. Model selection was based on backwards selection with only those factors remaining significant at a level of p<0.05 being included in the final model. This approach was used to avoid the pitfalls of confounding variables. As all lung cancer patients were infected, this analysis used the following variables for parasite infection status: Toxoplasma infection intensity (i.e. grades 1–3) and active/inactive parasite stages. Intensity grades were assessed by IHC staining using Image J analysis of pixel coverage, as described above, and also included distinction between active (presence of tachyzoites and infected cells) and inactive stages (presences of cysts alone). Dependent variables used in the model for parasite infection were inactive versus active infection. Data on patient status was also recorded as follows: sex, age, presence of COPD and smoking history. Lung cancer patients were placed into two categories (dependent variables), “No COPD” subjects (no airflow obstruction as determined by normal spirometry) or “COPD” subjects (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria), and considered against factors that predicted individuals in each category. Factors considered included age, sex of the individual and a number of measures of smoking and Toxoplasma infection intensity and active/inactive stage status. Patient-associated dependent variables were as follows: smoker, “pack-year history” (1 pack-year is defined as 20 cigarettes per day for 1 year) and non-smoker; current smoker versus non-smoker; prior medication versus non-medication. Only one patient- or Toxoplasma-associated variable was considered at a time and all combinations were considered. Model selection was based on backwards selection with only those factors remaining significant at a level of p<0.05 being included in the final model. All analyses were undertaken using R 3.01 (RCore Team, 2013) [27].

Results

DNA and tissue samples, for IHC, were collected from resected lung tissues from lung cancer patients (n=72) and non-lung cancer healthy control subjects (n=10). Patient demographics are shown in table 1 and figure 1 illustrates the overall methodology used to examine the samples. Initially, DNA was extracted successfully from tissue from all subjects. All samples were tested for the absence of PCR inhibition using amplification of the mammalian α-tubulin gene. All samples showed successful PCR amplification of the α-tubulin gene and were used for T. gondii DNA PCR detection using three replicated experiments of five genetic markers at four independent loci: SAG1, SAG2 (3′ and 5′ ends), SAG3 and B1. Multiple independent markers were used to rule out the possibility that individual markers could nonspecifically amplify as can happen with Toxoplasma in single marker PCR or qPCR. All tested lung cancer patient samples (32 females, 40 males) were found to be T. gondii positive, giving a prevalence of 100% with all five genes. Of the 10 healthy control subjects, one sample showed positive amplification for all T. gondii markers and the remaining nine did not amplify with any of the T. gondii specific primers. To confirm the presence of the parasite, using an independent detection system, the tissue sections were examined by IHC using specific anti-T. gondii antibodies. This was followed by secondary confirmation using HE staining. IHC was performed on all tissue sections enabling both detection of the parasite and identification of the life cycle stage. Infected tissue could be identified as containing T. gondii cysts, intracellular infection of macrophages (or other cell types) and free tachyzoites (figure 2). All 72 lung cancer patient tissue samples showed positive staining with the anti-T. gondii antibody and thus confirmed the PCR detection results of 100% (95% CI: 95.19–100%) prevalence in this cohort. Only one sample in the control group showed specific staining with the anti-T. gondii antibody and this was the same sample that showed positive amplification for the five T. gondii specific PCR amplifications. There was an extremely significant difference in prevalence between the lung cancer group (n=72) and the non-cancer control group (n=10) (p<0.0001, Fisher's exact test). A surprisingly high proportion of lung cancer patients (95.8%; n=69) showed evidence of an active form of infection, as defined by the presence of tachyzoites or infected alveolar macrophages (or other cell types). Only three lung cancer subjects (4.2%) had the dormant cyst stage as the only stage present. This is indicative of a latent infection in these three patients. Image J was used to measure the proportion of infected cells and infected areas of the lung tissue. A quantitative score was calculated for each type of life cycle stage individually and an overall score determined (see materials and methods) for each lung tissue sample (table 2). Both T. gondii cysts and infected cells were observed in the single infected non-cancer control sample. All samples were also stained with HE and observed under the light microscope. Although less specific as a diagnostic technique than the IHC and PCR, the presence of structures consistent with infection by the parasite was confirmed in 67 out of 72 tissue sections from the lung cancer patients and in one out of 10 of the non-cancer control group. In the latter case, this corresponded to the sample that was positive for the PCR amplifications and IHC. The remaining lung cancer samples could not be reliably confirmed as potentially infected by this method, but could have possessed less visible structures such as tachyzoites. Using the HE staining technique, infected cells, macrophages and some tissue cysts were observed (figure 3) but no free tachyzoites could be detected.

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Anti-Toxoplasma gondii antigen immunostaining of human lung and control tissues. a) Cell culture derived T. gondii RH strain tachyzoites stained with polyclonal anti-T. gondii antibodies. Brown staining indicates detection of T. gondii. Positive control (×400 magnification, scale bar = 100 µm). b) Human lung section stained with polyclonal anti-T. gondii antibodies with primary antibodies omitted. Negative control (×400 magnification, scale bar = 100 µm). c) Cells derived from a C2C12 culture (mouse myoblast cell line) which is T. gondii free and stained with polyclonal anti-T. gondii antibodies. Negative control (×400 magnification, scale bar = 100 µm). d) Lung tissue from a T. gondii infected wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) stained with polyclonal anti-T. gondii antibodies. Brown staining indicates detection of T. gondii. Positive control (×400 magnification, scale bar = 100 µm). e) Human lung section, from subject 1045, stained with polyclonal anti-T. gondii antibodies. T. gondii cysts can be seen (examples indicated with white arrows) (×400 magnification, scale bar = 100 µm). f) Human lung section, from subject 1040, stained with polyclonal anti-T. gondii antibodies. Alveolar macrophages infected with T. gondii can be seen (×400 magnification, scale bar = 100 µm). g) Human lung section, from subject 1028, stained with polyclonal anti-T. gondii antibodies. By observation of cell morphology, fibroblasts infected with T. gondii can be seen (examples indicated with white arrows) (×400 magnification, scale bar = 100 µm). h) Human lung section, from subject 975, stained with polyclonal anti-T. gondii antibodies. Ruptured T. gondii cysts and free T. gondii tachyzoites can be seen (×400 magnification, scale bar = 100 µm).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Life cycle stages of Toxoplasma gondii and type of infection in lung cancer patients (n=72) as identified by immunohistochemistry

FIGURE 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3

Haematoxylin and eosin staining of human lung sections. a) Infected alveolar macrophage with four visible tachyzoites (red arrow) in subject 1040 (×400 magnification, scale bar = 10 µm). b) Tissue cyst from subject 1070 (×400 magnification, scale bar = 10 µm) and (c) young tissue cyst in subject 1028 (×400 magnification, scale bar = 10 µm).

By quantifying the Toxoplasma infection intensity among the 72 lung cancer patients, we were able to evaluate any relationship between parasitic load and presence of COPD or other demographic factors. Our cohort did not show any significant association between Toxoplasma infection load with patient smoking history (both total exposure (p>0.05) or current exposure (p>0.05)) or airflow obstruction in COPD (p>0.05). All other analyses conducted had non-significant p-values (p>0.05) except for a parasitologically unrelated association between COPD and sex (males>females; p<0.05).

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the prevalence of T. gondii in clinical samples from patients with lung cancer using PCR and T. gondii specific IHC. Surprisingly, of the 72 subjects admitted to hospital for examination for lung cancer, all (100%) showed evidence of infection of lung tissue by the parasite T. gondii. A significant difference was observed between the prevalence in these lung cancer patients and in a non-cancer control group. Of the lung cancer patients, 95.8% showed evidence of active infection as opposed to being in the dormant (cyst) stage. Four stages of infection were observed by IHC: cysts, infected macrophages, other cell types infected and free-living tachyzoites. Given that the background levels of infection in the UK are considered to be low at 10% and the global infection rate is 30% [2], this represents an extremely high infection rate in these cancer patients. While detailed prevalence figures have not recently been determined for the catchment area sampled, it is unlikely that it significantly deviates from the national average. The most recent studies in the UK show infection in a range of 7–34% [2, 28–30]. In our study, we were able to evaluate Toxoplasma infection in 10 samples from healthy subjects without cancer who were specifically recruited as controls and were similarly age range matched with the cancer patients (although with a lower average age). We acknowledge some limitations in the control group; however, it was difficult to achieve a suitably sized and matched control group due to the potential risks of lung biopsy techniques. For example, one limitation was the comparison of lung tissue versus bronchial tissue. However, as T. gondii can infect any nucleated cell types and that both tissue types will have the same exposure to parasite infection, we consider minimal impact of these limitations on the conclusions. We also acknowledge potential bias due to the relatively small control sample size and younger average age of the control population, which is again related to the difficulty and risks associated with sampling healthy subjects. However, taken alongside the many studies of prevalence in the UK [2, 28–30], this study has demonstrated an unexpectedly high prevalence of Toxoplasma infection in lung cancer patients compared with control subjects and with the expected UK prevalence in people without cancer.

Toxoplasmosis has been reported to increase the fatality rate in a variety of cancers such as Hodgkin's disease, leukaemia, melanoma and brain cancer [31–35]. However, Toxoplasma infection causing complications in lung cancer has been reported only rarely. A case report demonstrated that a T. gondii infection was detected in a patient with lung cancer [36]. The diagnosis was based on tachyzoites present in bronchoalveolar lavage and detection of specific IgM antibodies. Most of the studies that investigate the link between cancer and T. gondii infection are based on serological prevalence detection of the parasite in cohorts of cancer patients rather than by direct investigation of tissue samples. Overall 8.38% of examined patients with malignant neoplasms in China were seropositive for antibodies against T. gondii. However, when nested PCR detection was used on the same samples, only 3.55% of these patients were positive [37]. In another study from China [38], much higher prevalence was detected, with 35.56% of the cancer patients overall being positive for anti-T. gondii IgG. The highest prevalence of infection, in this study [38], was observed in lung cancer patients (60.94%) followed by cervical cancer patients (50%). Among 356 cancer patients, 21 (5.9%) cases were found to be IgG-positive and 8 (2.3%) were IgM-positive, and five of them were found to have both IgG and IgM antibodies [39]. The total seroprevalence of Toxoplasma infection in this study was 6.8% [39]. A study in Iran concluded that 45.2% of cancer patients were seropositive for T. gondii [40]. High seropositivity rates were detected in women with breast cancer (86.4%) [41]. In a study comparing national figures from 37 countries [42], it was found that brain cancers are 1.8 times more common in countries where T. gondii infections are more prevalent than in those where it is virtually absent. Overall, the studies that investigate cancer and T. gondii infection generally show no particular link, although these studies are rarely specifically addressing the link or are controlled against a healthy cohort. As far as we can determine, our study is the first that specifically investigates the link between cancer affected lung tissue and T. gondii. Unfortunately, while we recognise the value of it, we were not able to investigate the seropositivity of our cohort of cancer patients since there is no formal process of Toxoplasma testing as part of lung cancer diagnostic protocols. Subsequent follow-up is not possible due to some subjects having passed away since diagnosis and the length of time since diagnosis could complicate the serological outcomes. Our study suggests that routine serological testing for Toxoplasma may be of value in lung cancer diagnostic protocols.

Using additional data associated with our sample set, the relationship between patient health and T. gondii infection was investigated to see if there were any further factors associating with patient health. We investigated which factors were associated with predicting whether an individual had normal lung function (no COPD) or “patients” (COPD) using logistic regression. This multiple regression analysis takes into account that the data are not normally distributed and follows a binomial distribution. We investigated the effects of age and sex, as well as a range of different smoking parameters (smoker, non-smoker and pack-year smoking history) and Toxoplasma infection measures (Toxoplasma intensity of infection, presence of free tachyzoites, acute or active infection). We only looked at one smoking and one infection related measure at a time, but considered all possible combinations (e.g. smoker and parasite intensity, then smoker and free tachyzoites, then smoker and acute infection) and each factor on its own (e.g. smoker). The final model we selected included only sex as a factor and we showed that males were more likely to have an obstruction than females in our cohort. There was no significant effect of smoking or stage/extent of Toxoplasma infection on the likelihood of being a lung “patient” (i.e. having COPD) in this sample set. While the sex relationship is clearly of interest in relation to lung disease, it does not have relevance to the T. gondii infection reported here. COPD has been linked to a higher risk in the male population, until more recently when it is now predicted that incidence in females will overtake that of males as a possible result of an increased proportion of female smokers in Western societies [43]. We recognise that there are limitations in our regression analyses and there were many potentially confounding parameters where no data were available. For example, most studies on T. gondii infection include risk factors for infection. As no previous studies on lung cancer patients have revealed such striking prevalence levels as this study, there has been little reason to investigate parasitological parameters. In the future, detailed studies are required which involve more specific questions pertinent to the results presented here.

The high frequency of T. gondii infection in these lung cancer patients raises questions about whether the two conditions are linked. It is unlikely that there is a direct cause and effect linkage as there are no reported causative effects of T. gondii infection on producing cancers, as far as we are aware. However, many types of cancer can cause immunomodulatory effects on affected tissues and individuals [44] and Toxoplasma infection may also provoke a state of immunosuppression by affecting thymic related T-cell activity as systemic Toxoplasma infection triggers a long-term defect in the generation and function of naïve T-lymphocytes [5, 45–48]. Furthermore, pulmonary toxoplasmosis is generally considered to be rare in immunocompetent hosts [49], further supporting the idea that these patients are immunocompromised (at least locally within the lung tissue). Based on the observations reported in this article, a high proportion of lung cancer patients potentially could be at risk of acute infection or reactivation of chronic infection from T. gondii. This could lead to complications such as pulmonary toxoplasmosis, a serious condition causing a high mortality rate, which could seriously affect general wellbeing and interfere with treatment. Further research is required to establish the wider significance of these findings but in the meantime, we suggest that all lung cancer patients (and possibly patients with other cancers) should be considered at risk of T. gondii infection and, if necessary, monitored to prevent further complications during their treatments.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.

Supplementary Table 00143-2018_Table_S1

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank those people who have participated anonymously in this study, Geoff Parr (School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, UK) and Salford Analytical Services for their expertise in microscopy and image capture, and Ross Gordon (School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, UK) for his help with the project.

Footnotes

  • This article has supplementary material available from openres.ersjournals.com

  • Conflict of interest: J. Bajnok reports grants from British Society of Parasitology (provision of a travel grant to attend a conference), during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Tarabulsi reports grants from Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau (PhD studentship funding), during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: H. Carlin has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: K. Bown has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: T. Southworth has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: J. Dungwa has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: D. Singh reports personal fees from Apellis, Cipla, Genentech, Peptinnovate and Skyepharma, grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingleheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark, Menarini, Merck, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Pulmatrix, Teva, Therevance and Verona, all outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: Z-R. Lun reports their laboratory is supported by a National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFD0500400), outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: L. Smyth reports grants from Kidscan (charity grant funds for leukaemia research), outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: G. Hide reports grants from Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau (provision of funding to cover one of the authors’ PhD fees and research costs. Some of these research costs were used to purchase consumables to support this project. The funding was to support M. Tarabulsi and research consumables used by her and her PhD supervisor (G.Hide), grants from British Society of Parasitology (provision of a travel grant to J. Bajnok for attendance at a conference), during the conduct of the study.

  • Support Statement: The authors would like to thank the University of Salford, The Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau and the British Society of Parasitology for funding this research. This report is independent research supported by the National Institute for Health Research South Manchester Respiratory and Allergy Clinical Research Facility at the University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Received August 29, 2018.
  • Accepted March 23, 2019.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2019
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Wilson CB,
    2. Nizet V,
    3. Maldonado Y, et al.
    1. Peyron F,
    2. Wallon M,
    3. Kieffer F, et al.
    Toxoplasmosis. In: Wilson CB, Nizet V, Maldonado Y, et al., eds. Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant. Philadelphia, Elsevier Saunders, 2015; pp. 949–1042.
  2. ↵
    1. Pappas G,
    2. Roussos N,
    3. Falagas M
    . Toxoplasmosis snapshots: global status of Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and implications for pregnancy and congenital toxoplasmosis. Int J Parasitol 2009; 39: 1385–1394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Dubey J
    . Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2010.
  4. ↵
    1. Gao X,
    2. Zhao Z,
    3. He Z, et al.
    Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women in China. Parasitology 2011; 139: 139–147.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Montoya J,
    2. Liesenfeld O
    . Toxoplasmosis. Lancet 2004; 363: 1965–1976.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Giakoumelou S,
    2. Wheelhouse N,
    3. Cuschieri K, et al.
    The role of infection in miscarriage. Hum Reprod Update 2015; 22: 116–133.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Haq S,
    2. Abushahama M,
    3. Gerwash O, et al.
    High frequency detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in human neonatal tissue from Libya. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2016; 110: 551–557.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Hide G
    . Role of vertical transmission of Toxoplasma gondii in prevalence of infection. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2016; 14: 335–344.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Krick J,
    2. Remington J
    . Toxoplasmosis in the adult an overview. N Engl J Med 1978; 298: 550–553.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Robert-Gangneux F,
    2. Sterkers Y,
    3. Yera H, et al.
    Molecular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients: a 3-year multicenter retrospective study. J Clin Microbiol 2015; 53: 1677–1684.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Evans T,
    2. Schwarztman J
    . Pulmonary toxoplasmosis. Semin Respir Infect 1991; 6: 51–57.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Peng H,
    2. Chen X,
    3. Lindsay D
    . A review: competence, compromise, and concomitance-reaction of the host cell to Toxoplasma gondii infection and development. J Parasitol 2011; 97: 620–628.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Yuan Z,
    2. Gao S,
    3. Liu Q, et al.
    Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in cancer patients. Cancer Lett 2007; 54: 731–774.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Duncanson P,
    2. Terry R,
    3. Smith J, et al.
    High levels of congenital transmission of Toxoplasma gondii in a commercial sheep flock. Int J Parasitol 2001; 31: 1699–1703.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Terry R,
    2. Smith J,
    3. Duncanson P, et al.
    MGE-PCR: a novel approach to the analysis of Toxoplasma gondii strain differentiation using mobile genetic elements. Int J Parasitol 2001; 31: 155–161.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Williams R,
    2. Morley E,
    3. Hughes J, et al.
    High levels of congenital transmission of Toxoplasma gondii in longitudinal and cross-sectional studies on sheep farms provides evidence of vertical transmission in ovine hosts. Parasitology 2005; 130: 301–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hughes J,
    2. Thomasson D,
    3. Craig P, et al.
    Neospora caninum: Detection in wild rabbits and investigation of co-infection with Toxoplasma gondii by PCR analysis. Exp Parasitol 2008; 120: 255–260.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Morley E,
    2. Williams R,
    3. Hughes J, et al.
    Evidence that primary infection of Charollais sheep with Toxoplasma gondii may not prevent foetal infection and abortion in subsequent lambings. Parasitology 2008; 135: 169–173.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Bajnok J,
    2. Boyce K,
    3. Rogan M, et al.
    Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in localized populations of Apodemus sylvaticus is linked to population genotype not to population location. Parasitology 2015; 142: 680–690.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Su C,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Dubey J
    . Genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii by multilocus PCR-RFLP markers: a high resolution and simple method for identification of parasites. Int J Parasitol 2006; 36: 841–848.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shwab E,
    2. Zhu X,
    3. Majumdar D, et al.
    Geographical patterns of Toxoplasma gondii genetic diversity revealed by multilocus PCR-RFLP genotyping. Parasitology 2013; 141: 453–461.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Jones C,
    2. Okhravi N,
    3. Adamson P, et al.
    Comparison of PCR detection methods for B1, P30, and 18S rDNA genes of T. gondii in aqueous humor. Investigative Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2000; 41: 634–644.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Plumb J,
    2. Smyth L,
    3. Adams H, et al.
    Increased T-regulatory cells within lymphocyte follicles in moderate COPD. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 89–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Work TM,
    2. Massey JG,
    3. Lindsay DS, et al.
    Toxoplasmosis in three species of native and introduced Hawaiian Birds. J Parasitol 2002; 88: 1040–1042.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Roe WD,
    2. Howe L,
    3. Baker E, et al.
    An atypical genotype of Toxoplasma gondii as a cause of mortality in Hector's dolphins (Cephalorhynchus hectori). Vet Parasitol 2013; 192: 67–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Lynch M,
    2. Raphael S,
    3. Mellor L, et al.
    Medical Laboratory Technology and Clinical Pathology. 2nd Edn.  Philadelphia, London, Toronto, WB Saunders Co, 1969.
  22. ↵
    R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013. www.R-project.org/
  23. ↵
    1. Joynson D
    . Epidemiology of toxoplasmosis in the U.K. Scand J Inf Dis 1992; 8: 65–69.
    OpenUrl
    1. Flatt A,
    2. Flatt A,
    3. Shetty N
    . Seroprevalence and risk factors for toxoplasmosis among antenatal women in London: a re-examination of risk in an ethnically diverse population. Eur J Pub Health 2013; 23: 648–652.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Public Health Wales. Toxoplasmosis: how common is it? 2010. www.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/888/page/44347. Date last accessed: June 14, 2018. Date last updated: May 05, 2017.
  25. ↵
    1. Vietzke W,
    2. Gelderman A,
    3. Grimley P, et al.
    Toxoplasmosis complicating malignancy. Experience at the National Cancer Institute. Cancer 1968; 21: 816–887.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Carey R,
    2. Kimball A,
    3. Armstrong D, et al.
    Toxoplasmosis. Clinical experiences in a cancer hospital. Am J Med 1973; 54: 30–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Israelski D,
    2. Remington J
    . Toxoplasmosis in patients with cancer. Clin Inf Dis 1993; 17: S423–S435.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zhou P,
    2. Chen Z,
    3. Li H, et al.
    Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans in China. Parasit Vectors 2011; 4: 165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Scerra S,
    2. Coignard-Biehler H,
    3. Lanternier F, et al.
    Disseminated toxoplasmosis in non-allografted patients with hematologic malignancies: report of two cases and literature review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2013; 32: 1259–1268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Lu N,
    2. Liu C,
    3. Wang J, et al.
    Toxoplasmosis complicating lung cancer: a case report. Int Med Case Rep J 2015; 8: 37–40.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Wang L,
    2. He L,
    3. Meng D, et al.
    Seroprevalence and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii in cancer patients in Anhui Province, Eastern China. Parasit Vectors 2015; 8: 162.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Cong W,
    2. Liu G,
    3. Meng Q, et al.
    Toxoplasma gondii infection in cancer patients: prevalence, risk factors, genotypes and association with clinical diagnosis. Cancer Lett 2015; 359: 307–313.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Shen Q,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Fang Q, et al.
    [Seroprevalance of Toxoplasma gondii infection and genotyping of the isolates from cancer patients in Anhui, Eastern China]. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi 2014; 32: 366–370.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Ghasemian M,
    2. Maraghi S,
    3. Saki J, et al.
    Determination of Antibodies (IgG, IgM) against Toxoplasma gondii in patients with cancer. Iranian J of Parasitol 2007; 2: 1–6.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Kalantari N,
    2. Ghaffari S,
    3. Bayani M, et al.
    Preliminary study on association between toxoplasmosis and breast cancer in Iran. Asian Pacific J Trop Biomed 2015; 5: 44–47.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Thomas F,
    2. Lafferty K,
    3. Brodeur J, et al.
    Incidence of adult brain cancers is higher in countries where the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii is common. Biol Lett 2012; 8: 101–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Gan WQ,
    2. Man SF,
    3. Postma DS, et al.
    Female smokers beyond the perimenopausal period are at increased risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res 2006; 7: 52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Franklin R,
    2. Liao W,
    3. Sarkar A, et al.
    The cellular and molecular origin of tumor-associated macrophages. Science 2014; 344: 921–925.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Canessa A,
    2. Bono V,
    3. Leo P, et al.
    Cotrimoxazole therapy of Toxoplasma gondii encephalitis in AIDS patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Inf Dis 1992; 11: 125–130.
    OpenUrl
    1. Ajzenberg D,
    2. Yera H,
    3. Marty P, et al.
    Genotype of 88 Toxoplasma gondii isolates associated with Toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients and correlation with clinical findings. J Infect Dis 2009; 199: 1155–1167.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ahmadpour E,
    2. Daryani A,
    3. Sharif M, et al.
    Toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Dev Ctries 2014; 8: 1503–1510.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Kugler D,
    2. Flomerfelt F,
    3. Costa D, et al.
    Systemic toxoplasma infection triggers a long-term defect in the generation and function of naive T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 2016; 213: 3041–3056.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. de Souza Giassi K,
    2. Costa A,
    3. Apanavicius A, et al.
    Tomographic findings of acute pulmonary toxoplasmosis in immunocompetent patients. BMC Pulmon Med 2014; 14: 185.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 5 Issue 2 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
High frequency of infection of lung cancer patients with the parasite Toxoplasma gondii
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
High frequency of infection of lung cancer patients with the parasite Toxoplasma gondii
Jaroslav Bajnok, Muyassar Tarabulsi, Helen Carlin, Kevin Bown, Thomas Southworth, Josiah Dungwa, Dave Singh, Zhao-Rong Lun, Lucy Smyth, Geoff Hide
ERJ Open Research Apr 2019, 5 (2) 00143-2018; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00143-2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
High frequency of infection of lung cancer patients with the parasite Toxoplasma gondii
Jaroslav Bajnok, Muyassar Tarabulsi, Helen Carlin, Kevin Bown, Thomas Southworth, Josiah Dungwa, Dave Singh, Zhao-Rong Lun, Lucy Smyth, Geoff Hide
ERJ Open Research Apr 2019, 5 (2) 00143-2018; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00143-2018
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Supplementary material
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Lung cancer
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Original articles

  • Endobronchial autologous BM-MSCs in IPF patients
  • Effect of β-blockers on the risk of COPD exacerbations
  • Recurrence of symptoms after childhood LRTI
Show more Original articles

Lung cancer

  • Gene expression profile of EMT in tumours of NSCLC patients
  • CT on lung cancer screening
  • Exosomes from EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma induce a partial/hybrid EMT
Show more Lung cancer

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society