Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Radiation therapy for augmenting the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a case-controlled study

Chinthaka B. Samaranayake, Elizabeth McCaffrey, John Coucher, Margot Lehman, G. Tao Mai, Michelle A. Murphy
ERJ Open Research 2020 6: 00189-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00189-2019
Chinthaka B. Samaranayake
1Dept of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital Health Service District, Woolloongabba, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chinthaka B. Samaranayake
  • For correspondence: chinthaka.samaranayake@health.qld.gov.au
Elizabeth McCaffrey
2Dept of Medical Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital Health Service District, Woolloongabba, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Coucher
3Dept of Diagnostic Radiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital Health Service District, Woolloongabba, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margot Lehman
4Dept of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital Health Service District, Woolloongabba, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Tao Mai
4Dept of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital Health Service District, Woolloongabba, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle A. Murphy
1Dept of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital Health Service District, Woolloongabba, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of previous radiation therapy on outcomes from nivolumab in advanced NSCLC, and found that previous radiation therapy resulted in significantly higher survival in patients treated with nivolumab for advanced NSCLC http://bit.ly/3btOFSL

To the Editor:

Nivolumab, a human IgG4 anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody, has been shown to have promising results in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [1, 2]. Despite the improved outcomes compared to chemotherapy, only ∼20% of patients had a sustained favourable response, which highlights the need to identify measures that can augment the efficacy of immunotherapy in NSCLC [3].

Previous studies have demonstrated that radiation acts as an immune stimulus, facilitating immune mediators to enable antitumour responses within and outside the radiation field [4]. Multiple mechanisms have been shown to be involved in the systemic immune response from radiation therapy [5]. Preclinical studies also suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab can have a synergistic effect to radiation with enhancement of the antitumour T-cell activity [6], which should theoretically result in a greater clinical response in patients with NSCLC. There is also evidence to suggest an augmented abscopal effect from the combined treatment [7].

Despite the strong preclinical evidence, the impact of previous radiation therapy on the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in real-world clinical practice in patients with NSCLC is less well defined. Here, we present the findings of a pilot case-controlled study investigating the impact of radiation therapy on outcomes with nivolumab in patients with advanced NSCLC in a large thoracic oncology unit in Brisbane, Australia.

Consecutive patients with metastatic or progressive locally advanced NSCLC, who had previous radiation therapy to the chest and subsequently received nivolumab (RT group, n=23) were compared to a control group comprised of an age, sex, tumour histology and performance status matched cohort of patients who did not have previous radiation therapy prior to receiving nivolumab (non-RT group, n=23), between January 2015 and June 2017. Disease response was assessed with RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) version 1.1 [8]. The primary co-endpoints of the study were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The adverse effects of therapy were graded according to the CATCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event) classification. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Queensland Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (REC/17/QPAH/338).

A total of 46 patients were included in the study with a median age of 62 years (IQR 55–67 years). All patients had metastatic or progressive locally advanced disease at baseline and the other clinical variables were equal between the two groups. The performance status at baseline was also very closely matched between the two groups. All patients had platinum-based chemotherapy before receiving nivolumab. The majority of patients had received one line of chemotherapy (84.8%, n/N=39/46). A total of 17.4% (n/N=4/23) of patients in the RT group and 13.0% (n/N=3/23) of patients in the non-RT group received more than one line of chemotherapy before starting nivolumab. Table 1 summarises the patient characteristics of the two groups at the time of initiating nivolumab.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Baseline characteristics

The RT group had received a mean±sd of 53.3±12.3 Gy radiation therapy to the chest at a median of 11 months (interquartile range 8.6–12.8 months) prior to commencing nivolumab. A total of 78.3% (n/N=18/23) patients received radiation concurrently with chemotherapy for locally advanced disease at the time of initial diagnosis. These patients received 58.4±5.0 Gy radiation over a median of 30 fractions (range 25–30). Nivolumab was initiated due to development of new metastatic disease or progression on follow-up imaging after completing the concurrent chemoradiotherapy in these patients. The other five (21.7%) patients received radiation therapy to the chest for symptom control (airway obstruction or haemoptysis) and received 26.8±6.3 Gy radiation therapy over a median of 10 fractions (range 5–20). A total of four (17.4%) patients in the RT group also received extrathoracic radiation therapy prior to nivolumab. The extrathoracic radiation therapy was for brain metastases in two patients and symptomatic skeletal lesions in the other two. None of the patients in the control group received any thoracic or extrathoracic radiation therapy.

Nivolumab was given on an intention-to-treat basis at a median dose intensity of 99% (range 98–100%), adjusted to body weight at a dose of 3 mg·kg−1, until unequivocal progression or intolerable toxicity. The median overall follow-up of patients while receiving treatment with nivolumab was 9.6 months (range 0.1–17.8 months).

The median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 3.4–5.3 months) in the RT group compared to 1.4 months (95% CI 1.0–1.8 months) in the non-RT group (p=0.01). The median OS was 10.3 months (95% CI 8.6–11.9 months) in the RT group compared to 5.3 months (95% CI 2.0–8.2 months) in the non-RT group (p=0.04). The objective response rate after four cycles of nivolumab was 30.4% (n/N=7/23) in the RT group and 17.4% (n/N=4/23) in the non-RT group (p=0.23). Stable disease was seen in a further 8.9% (n/N=2/23) of patients in RT group compared to 4.3% (n/N=1/23) in the non-RT group after four cycles of nivolumab. Immunotherapy was discontinued in patients who had disease progression after four cycles. The RT group received a median of nine cycles of nivolumab (range 1–47) and the non-RT group received a median five cycles of nivolumab (range 1–34) (p=0.01). The dose of radiation or the time interval between radiation and nivolumab did not have a statistically significant correlation with outcomes.

Immune-related complications were seen in 30.4% (n=7) and 13.0% (n=3) of patients in the RT and non-RT groups respectively (p=0.17). Grade 3 pneumonitis occurred in one patient in the RT group and two patients in the non-RT group. Additionally, in the RT group, grade 3 hepatitis (n=1) and grade 2 thyroiditis (n=2), colitis (n=2) and rash (n=1) were seen. In the non-RT group, grade 2 thyroiditis (n=1) and colitis (n=1) were seen. One patient in the non-RT group developed both thyroiditis and pneumonitis related to immunotherapy. Among the seven patients in the RT group who had immune-related complications, the PFS was 4.1 months compared to 4.6 months in patients who did not have immune-related complications (p=0.21). The median OS among the patients in the RT group who had immune-related complications was 12.5 months compared to 8.9 months in patients who did not have immune-related complications (p=0.09).

This pilot study demonstrates very encouraging findings of previous radiation therapy augmenting the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC. These findings are in line with other limited clinical studies on this topic. Shaverdian et al. [9] demonstrated an improved PFS and OS with previous radiation compared to no radiation (4.4 versus 2.1 months for PFS and 10.7 months versus 5.3 months for OS respectively) on a retrospective secondary analysis of patients in the phase 1 KEYNOTE-001 study in a single centre who received pembrolizumab at variable doses.

The PACIFIC trial, which assessed the efficacy of durvalumab consolidative therapy following chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced (stage III) NSCLC, was very promising [10]. The median PFS was 17.2 months (95% CI 13.1–23.9 months) in the durvalumab group compared to 5.6 months (95% CI 4.6–7.7 months) in the placebo group. The 12-month OS rate was 83.1% (95% CI 79.4–86.2%) in the durvalumab group compared to 75.3% (95% CI 69.2–80.4%) in the placebo group. The response rate was also higher with durvalumab than with placebo (30.0% versus 17.8%, p<0.001). Significantly better outcomes seen with durvalumab, including much lower rates of new distal metastases, suggest that sequential chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy may have potentially induced antitumour immune responses and contributed to elimination of unknown distal micrometastases. The patients in our study mostly had advanced metastatic disease at the time of inclusion and therefore the results cannot be directly compared to the PACIFIC trial. However, combining immunotherapy and radiation therapy seems to result in beneficial effects in both locally advanced and metastatic disease. There is currently insufficient evidence to determine whether there are differences in outcomes between anti-PD1 versus anti-PD1 ligand (PDL1) agents when combined with radiation therapy in advanced NSCLC.

The optimal timing and sequence of combined radiation therapy and immunotherapy is yet to be clarified. In the PACIFIC trial, immunotherapy was given between 1 and 46 days after completion of the last radiation dose. There is some evidence to suggest that immunotherapy administration concurrently with radiation therapy may provide a better immune response [11]. However, in the study by Shaverdian et al. [9], patients who received thoracic radiotherapy did so a median of 11.5 months before the first cycle of pembrolizumab, which was similar to our cohort. These results suggest that the patients seem to have prolonged immune related benefits of radiation therapy, which is enhanced by the subsequent immunotherapy. These results also suggest that the augmentation of immunotherapy efficacy with radiation can occur with both anti-PD-1 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and anti-PDL1 (durvalumab) agents in NSCLC.

Our study also demonstrates the interesting finding of a trend towards an increased rate of immune-related complications in patients who received radiation therapy prior to immunotherapy. This has been shown on other studies, with Shaverdian et al. [9] reporting a trend towards a higher rate of pulmonary toxicity in patients who received pembrolizumab after radiation therapy. Furthermore, our study also shows a trend towards a longer median OS in patients who had immune-related complications compared to the patients who did not have immune-related complications within the RT group, although the number of patients within these subgroups in this study are too small to draw strong conclusions. The heightened immune response that leads to better survival and favourable disease response seems to also result in an increased rate of complications, which are both augmented by radiation therapy. The findings highlight the importance of close monitoring for immune-related complications when combining radiation therapy and immunotherapy.

The results of the study may partly be explained by the abscopal effect, aqn enhanced response from immunotherapy seen at metastatic sites outside of the initial radiation fields [7]. Even small doses of radiation therapy to single sites have been shown to trigger a heightened immune response at metastatic sites with immunotherapy, particularly in patients with low tumour PDL1 expression [12]. However, the optimal combinations, sequences and doses to generate an abscopal effect are not well defined [13]. There is also increasing preclinical and clinical evidence to suggest that irradiation of multiple sites may enhance the effects of immunotherapy compared to single-site irradiation [14]. Our study did not evaluate the effects of extrathoracic radiation, as only a small proportion of patients in the RT group had received extrathoracic radiation, and therefore could not be accurately generalised to the whole group.

This study has several limitations. Even though majority of patients in both the RT group and the control group had metastatic disease at the time of inclusion, the stage at the time of initial diagnosis was more likely to be stage III than stage IV in the RT group. The tumour burden at initial diagnosis and rate of progression of the malignancy prior to receiving nivolumab was not formally assessed, which raises the possibility of differences in disease severity between the two treatment groups. There was a trend towards a higher mean baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the non-RT group, although this was not significantly different (380.5 versus 264.8 U·L−1, p=0.08). A recent meta-analysis showed that a high pre-treatment LDH level correlated with shorter PFS and OS in patients treated with immunotherapy for NSCLC [15] but the effect sizes were small. There is evidence to suggest that due to the mechanism of action of immunotherapy agents, a significant disease response can be seen in some patients with high tumour burden [16]. Therefore, the rate of change in LDH with immunotherapy may be a better indirect marker of disease response [16], which was not assessed in our study. Furthermore, the study did not have sufficient power to detect statistically significant differences in disease response rates and adverse effects such as pneumonitis.

In summary, the present study shows new and interesting clinical data for radiation therapy augmenting the efficacy of immunotherapy, leading to better survival in advanced NSCLC. Despite the limitations, this pilot study provides valuable initial evidence in a real-world setting for a novel approach of therapy in advanced NSCLC. The results of larger randomised clinical trials are needed to determine the optimal doses and sequence of the combined therapy to gain the maximal clinical benefit.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: C.B. Samaranayake has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: E. McCaffrey has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: J. Coucher has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Lehman has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: G.T. Mai has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M.A. Murphy has nothing to disclose.

  • Received July 31, 2019.
  • Accepted January 20, 2020.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2020
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Borghaei H,
    2. Paz-Ares L,
    3. Horn L, et al.
    Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1627–1639. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1507643
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Brahmer J,
    2. Reckamp KL,
    3. Baas P, et al.
    Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 123–135. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1504627
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Horn L,
    2. Spigel DR,
    3. Vokes EE, et al.
    Nivolumab versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: two-year outcomes from two randomized, open-label, phase III trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057). J Clin Oncol 2017; 35: 3924–3933. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.74.3062
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Formenti SC,
    2. Demaria S
    . Radiotherapy to convert the tumor into an in situ vaccine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 84: 879–880. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.06.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Park B,
    2. Yee C,
    3. Lee K-M
    . The effect of radiation on the immune response to cancers. Int J Mol Sci 2014; 15: 927–943. doi:10.3390/ijms15010927
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Twyman-Saint Victor C,
    2. Rech AJ,
    3. Maity A, et al.
    Radiation and dual checkpoint blockade activate non-redundant immune mechanisms in cancer. Nature 2015; 520: 373–377. doi:10.1038/nature14292
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Weichselbaum RR,
    2. Liang H,
    3. Deng L, et al.
    Radiotherapy and immunotherapy: a beneficial liaison? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017; 14: 365–379. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.211
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Eisenhauer EA,
    2. Therasse P,
    3. Bogaerts J, et al.
    New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 228–247. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Shaverdian N,
    2. Lisberg AE,
    3. Bornazyan K, et al.
    Previous radiotherapy and the clinical activity and toxicity of pembrolizumab in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a secondary analysis of the KEYNOTE-001 phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 895–903. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30380-7
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Antonia SJ,
    2. Villegas A,
    3. Daniel D, et al.
    Overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 2342–2350. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1809697
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Dovedi SJ,
    2. Illidge TM
    . The antitumor immune response generated by fractionated radiation therapy may be limited by tumor cell adaptive resistance and can be circumvented by PD-L1 blockade. Oncoimmunology 2015; 4: e1016709. doi:10.1080/2162402X.2015.1016709
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Theelen W,
    2. Peulen HMU,
    3. Lalezari F, et al.
    Effect of pembrolizumab after stereotactic body radiotherapy vs pembrolizumab alone on tumor response in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of the PEMBRO-RT phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5: 1276–1282. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1478
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Dagoglu N,
    2. Karaman S,
    3. Caglar HB, et al.
    Abscopal effect of radiotherapy in the immunotherapy era: systematic review of reported cases. Cureus 2019; 11: e4103–e4103.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Brooks ED,
    2. Chang JY
    . Time to abandon single-site irradiation for inducing abscopal effects. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019; 16: 123–135. doi:10.1038/s41571-018-0119-7
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Zhang Z,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Yan X, et al.
    Pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase may predict outcome of advanced non small-cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis. Cancer Med 2019; 8: 1467–1473. doi:10.1002/cam4.2024
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Buder-Bakhaya K,
    2. Hassel JC
    . Biomarkers for clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment – a review from the melanoma perspective and beyond. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 1474. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.01474
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 6 Issue 1 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 6 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Radiation therapy for augmenting the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a case-controlled study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Radiation therapy for augmenting the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a case-controlled study
Chinthaka B. Samaranayake, Elizabeth McCaffrey, John Coucher, Margot Lehman, G. Tao Mai, Michelle A. Murphy
ERJ Open Research Jan 2020, 6 (1) 00189-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00189-2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Radiation therapy for augmenting the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a case-controlled study
Chinthaka B. Samaranayake, Elizabeth McCaffrey, John Coucher, Margot Lehman, G. Tao Mai, Michelle A. Murphy
ERJ Open Research Jan 2020, 6 (1) 00189-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00189-2019
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Lung cancer
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • rs2070600 SNP regulates AGER splicing and sputum sRAGE
  • Procoagulant microparticles and COVID-19
  • Cancer referral and interventional pulmonology during COVID-19
Show more Original research letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society