Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Caffeine in preterm infants: where are we in 2020?

Laura Moschino, Sanja Zivanovic, Caroline Hartley, Daniele Trevisanuto, Eugenio Baraldi, Charles Christoph Roehr
ERJ Open Research 2020 6: 00330-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00330-2019
Laura Moschino
1Dept of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanja Zivanovic
2Newborn Services, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
3Dept of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Hartley
3Dept of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniele Trevisanuto
1Dept of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eugenio Baraldi
1Dept of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles Christoph Roehr
2Newborn Services, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
3Dept of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Charles.Roehr@ouh.nhs.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Schematic of the known effects of caffeine citrate during early development on the brain, the lung and the cardiovascular system derived from animal and infant studies. The first column indicates effects on a molecular level, while the second column describes demonstrated caffeine effects in the context of the specific system. CO2: carbon dioxide; TNF: tumour necrosis factor; ELBW: extremely low birthweight; IPPV: intermittent positive pressure ventilation; PMA: post-menstrual age; BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; PDA: patent ductus arteriosus.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1

    Summary of retrospective studies, post hoc analyses, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing early versus late caffeine treatment in preterm infants

    First author, year [ref.]Study characteristics, regimen, limitationsPatient characteristicsMain significant findings
    Early caffeineLate caffeineBenefits of early caffeineDrawbacks or no effect of early caffeine
    Davis, 2010 [34]Post hoc subgroup analysis of the CAP trial
    Caffeine citrate
    20 mg·kg−1 load ≤3 DoL versus >3 DoL
    Post hoc analysis for treatment indication, not as primary outcome
    Larger reduction in days of respiratory support (p=0.02)
    Lower PMA at time of discontinuing PPV (mean difference 1.35 weeks (0.90–1.81) versus 0.55 weeks (−0.11–0.99))
    Abbasi, 2010 (abstract) [65]Retrospective cohort study
    Early caffeine (0–2 DoL) versus late caffeine (≥3 DoL)
    Retrospective, many data not available; Newcastle–Ottawa score for risk of bias 4
    166 case/control pairs, BW 500–1250 gReduced odds of IVH (OR 0.37)
    Patel, 2013 [61]Retrospective cohort study
    Caffeine initial dose <3 DoL versus ≥3 DoL
    Retrospective, single-centre; indication for caffeine therapy unknown; no protocol on caffeine use
    83 neonates
    BW 940 (730–1100) g
    GA 27.3 (25.6–28.7) weeks
    57 neonates
    BW 910 (715–1035) g
    GA 26.6 (25.3–27.7) weeks
    Decreased incidence of death or BPD (25.3% versus 52.6%) by a reduced rate of BPD (23.6% versus 50.9%)
    Reduced need for treatment of PDA (10.4% versus 36.4%)
    Lower duration of MV (6 versus 22 days)
    Saeidi, 2014 (abstract) [69]RCT
    Caffeine citrate 20 mg·kg−1 load within first 3 DoL versus ≥3 DoL
    Single-centre; small sample size; many data not available
    16 neonates
    BW 1123±244 g
    GA 29.5±2.0 weeks (BW and GA for all 36 included infants)
    20 neonatesMarginal reduction in BPD and significant reduction in apnoea
    Dobson, 2014 [32]Retrospective analysis
    Caffeine initial dose <3 DoL versus ≥3 DoL
    Retrospective; variable indications for early caffeine use among centres (hypothetically: apnoea, prophylactically, weaning from MV and reduction in BPD); possible changes in clinical practice during the study period
    14 535 neonates
    BW 1055 (630–1447) g
    GA 28.1 (25.0–31.0) weeks
    14 535 neonates
    BW 1054 (590–1460) g
    GA 28 (24.0–32.0) weeks
    Reduced risk of BPD by 7.6% (23.1% versus 30.7%);
    Reduction in MV days at 36 weeks PMA (median 11 versus 17 days)
    Reduction in PDA requiring treatment (12.3% versus 19%)
    Higher odds of death (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05–1.43; 4.5% versus 3.7%)
    Lodha, 2015 [57]Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Neonatal Network)
    Caffeine initial dose <3 DoL versus ≥3 DoL
    Retrospective; variations and inconsistency in the protocol for early caffeine use at various centres and unknown indications for caffeine use; potential variations in maintenance dose of caffeine
    3806 neonates
    BW 1070 (850–1310) g
    GA 28 (26–29) weeks
    1295 neonates
    BW 1050 (790–1360) g
    GA 28 (26–30) weeks
    Reduction in BPD or death (aOR 0.81), stemming on BPD (aOR 0.79)
    Reduced incidence of PDA (40.5% versus 46.2%) and of surgical treatment for PDA (13.3% versus 25%)
    Reduced duration of MV, HFV and CPAP on day 2; reduction in the use of postnatal steroids
    No difference in mortality (aOR 0.98)
    No difference in NEC ≥stage 2, ROP ≥stage 3, severe neurological injury (presence of parenchymal echolucency, periventricular echogenicity or PVL)
    Taha, 2014 [66]Retrospective data analysis (Alere Neonatal Database)
    Caffeine initial dose <3 DoL (0–2) versus ≥3 DoL (3–10)
    Retrospective; unknown indications for use of early caffeine
    1986 neonates
    BW 938±201 g
    GA 27.5±2.0 weeks
    965 neonates
    BW 899±216 g
    GA 27.2±2.1 weeks
    Reduced incidence of BPD (36.1% versus 46.7%, OR 0.69) and rate of BPD or death (45.5% versus 54.9%, OR 0.77)
    Lower age at first extubation (7.1 versus 10.8 days), decreased duration of MV (16.7 versus 23.7 days) and PMA to room air (34.7 versus 35.6 days)
    Lower odds of severe IVH and PDA
    Higher odds of NEC (OR 1.41)
    Dekker, 2017 [12]Unblinded RCT
    Caffeine in the delivery room versus caffeine in the NICU
    Small sample size; no placebo-controlled group
    13 neonates
    BW 870 (767–1198) g
    GA 27 (26–28) weeks
    10 neonates
    BW 960 (731–1450) g
    GA 28.5 (27–29) weeks
    Increased minute volumes (189±74 versus 162±70 mL·kg−1·min−1) and tidal volumes (5.2, IQR 3.9–6.4 mL·kg−1) versus 4.4, IQR 3.0–5.6 mL·kg−1) at 7–9 min after birthNo differences in short-term clinical outcomes (intubation rates, surfactant administration) and IVH
    Katheria, 2015 [40]Pilot RCT
    Caffeine citrate
    20 mg·kg−1 load within the first 2 h of life versus at 12 h of life
    Small sample size underpowered to achieve differences in the outcome of reducing intubation
    11 neonates
    BW 1007±169 g
    GA 27±0.9 weeks
    10 neonates
    BW 1005±239 g
    GA 27±0.9 weeks
    Reduced incidence of intubation in the first 12 h (27% versus 70%, p=0.08)
    Reduced vasopressor requirement in the first 24 h (0% versus 20%, p=0.21)
    Higher SVC flow (101±25 mL·kg−1·min−1 versus 77±24 mL·kg−1·min−1) and RVO (273±62 mL·kg−1·min−1 versus 219 ± 43 mL·kg−1·min−1)
    Similar duration of oxygen treatment, MV, IVH, PDA requiring treatment
    Park, 2015 [64]Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Early caffeine (0–2 DoL) versus late caffeine (≥3 DoL)
    Only one RCT included; one retrospective study in the meta-analysis; no analysis on the effect of caffeine on apnoea as the studies did not report it as an outcome
    30 974 neonates for primary outcomes23 873 neonates for primary outcomesReduced mortality (3.8% versus 4.2%, OR 0.90), incidence of BPD (20% versus 34.6%, OR 0.5) and rate of BPD or death (23.7% versus 37.9%, OR 0.52)
    Reduced risk of IVH, PVL, ROP requiring photocoagulation, PDA requiring treatment
    Risk of NEC and NEC requiring surgery not associated with the early use of caffeine (OR 0.97 and 1.06, respectively)
    Kua, 2017 [67]Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Early caffeine (initiated <3 DoL) in preterm infants
    No information on the indications for early versus late caffeine treatment from the studies; most of the RCTs had small sample size
    Meta-analysis of cohort studies and RCTs:
    • - Reduction of BPD 20–33%

    • - 29% reduction in the incidence of PDA (cohort studies)

    • - 59% decrease in the need for surgical closure of PDA (cohort studies)

    • - Shorter duration of MV (WMD −7.5 days)

    Increase in absolute risk of mortality with early caffeine therapy (4.7% versus 3.9%).
    No difference in rates of NEC, need for surfactant, home oxygen
    Borszewska-Kornacka, 2017 [63]Prospective cohort study
    Early (initial dose on DoL 1)
    and late (initial dose on DoL ≥2) caffeine therapy
    Possible differences in local practices between centres; no randomisation
    143 neonates
    BW 1130 (895–1450) g
    GA 29 (27–30) weeks
    143 neonates
    BW 1100 (850–1485) g
    GA 29 (27–30) weeks
    Significant lower incidence of PDA (25% versus 37%, OR 0.56)
    Reduced incidence of IVH (42.1% versus 60.1%, OR 0.48)
    Reduced duration of MV (IQR 0–4 versus IQR 1–15.9)
    No statistically significant difference in the incidence of BPD (36.4% versus 45.8%, p=0.31) and mortality rates (8.6% versus 8.5%, nonsignificiant)
    Patel, 2017 [73]Multicentre, observational cohort study
    Early caffeine (initiation on DoL 0) versus late caffeine (initiation on DoL 1–6)
    No adjustment for factors possibly associated with doctor's decision to start caffeine; highly selected infants excluding those with need of surfactant or lower Apgar score
    4528 neonates
    BW <1500 g
    GA 29 (28–30) weeks
    6605 neonates
    BW <1500 g
    GA 30 (29–31) weeks
    Similar incidence of CPAP failure (22% versus 21%, OR 1.05)
    No difference in exposure to a max FiO2 >0.3 (27% versus 32%, OR 1.05)
    No difference in duration of CPAP therapy (3 versus 2 days, OR 1.02)

    CAP: Caffeine for Apnoea of Prematurity; DoL: day of life; PMA: post-menstrual age; PPV: positive pressure ventilation; BW: birthweight; IVH: intraventricular haemorrhage; GA: gestational age; BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; PDA: patent ductus arteriosus; MV: mechanical ventilation; aOR: adjusted odds ratio; HFV: high-frequency ventilation; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; NEC: necrotising enterocolitis; ROP: retinopathy of prematurity; PVL: periventricular leukomalacia; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; IQR: interquartile range; SVC: superior vena cava; RVO: right ventricular output; WMD: weighted mean difference; FiO2: fraction of inhaled oxygen.

    • TABLE 2

      Summary of retrospective studies, post hoc analyses, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing high versus low/standard doses of caffeine citrate in preterm infants

      First author, year [ref.]Study characteristics
      Patient characteristics
      Limitations
      RegimenMain significant findings
      High caffeine doseStandard/low caffeine doseBenefits of high caffeine doseDrawbacks or no effects of high caffeine dose
      Romagnoli, 1992 [88]Single-centre RCT
      37 total neonates, 14 (controls) versus 13 versus 10 neonates, born <32 GW
      Single centre; small sample size; unclear risk of most biases with incomplete outcome data
      Group I:
      LD 10 mg·kg−1;
      MD 5 mg·kg−1
      Group II:
      LD 10 mg·kg−1;
      MD 2.5 mg·kg−1
      Decrease in the number of apnoeic spells in both treated groups compared with a control group (p<0.01)Significantly lower frequency of side-effects such as tachycardia (p<0.001) and gastrointestinal intolerance in the low-dose group (nonsignificant)
      Scanlon, 1992 [80]Single-centre RCT
      44 total neonates, 14 versus 16 neonates (14 infants treated with theophylline), born <31 GW, with frequent apnoeic attacks (≥10 in 8 h or 4 in 1 h)
      Single centre; small sample size; unclear risk of most biases with incomplete outcome data
      LD 50 mg·kg−1;
      MD 12 mg·kg−1
      LD 25 mg·kg−1;
      MD 6 mg·kg−1
      Number of apnoea events·day−1 reduced by 1/3 within 24 h by standard dose treatment versus a reduction by >50% by the higher dose treatment within the same time period
      Steer, 2003 [81]Single-centre RCT
      45 versus 40 versus 42 neonates <32 GW ventilated for >48 h
      Single centre; small sample size
      High dose:
      LD 60 mg·kg−1;
      MD 30 mg·kg−1
      Moderate dose:
      LD 30 mg·kg−1;
      MD 15 mg·kg−1
      LD 6 mg·kg−1;
      MD 3 mg·kg−1
      Reduction in documented apnoea episodes (p<0.02);
      Trend to decrease in failure of extubation in the two highest dose groups (24% versus 25% versus 45%, p=0.06)
      Steer, 2004 [82]Multicentre RCT
      Total of 234 neonates, 113 versus 121 neonates, born <30 GW ventilated for >48 h;
      Data on long-term neurodevelopment to be considered with caution due to 18% loss at follow-up and not being the primary outcome
      MD 20 mg·kg−1 before a planned extubation or 6 h within an unplanned extubationMD 5 mg·kg−1 before a planned extubation or 6 h within an unplanned extubationReduced rate of extubation failure (15.0% versus 29.8%, RR 0.51; NNT 7)
      Reduction in documented apnoea episodes (4 (1–12) versus 7 (2–22), p<0.01)
      ignificant difference in duration of MV in infants <28 GW (mean 14.4 days versus 22.1 days, p=0.01)
      No difference in mortality, major morbidities, severe disability
      Gray, 2011 [89]Multicentre RCT
      Total of 287 neonates, 120 versus 126 neonates, born <30 GW
      Some incomplete outcome data (e.g. age at starting treatment)
      LD 80 mg·kg−1;
      MD 20 mg·kg−1
      LD 20 mg·kg−1;
      MD 5 mg·kg−1
      Significantly greater mean general quotient in the high-dose group (98.0±13.8 versus 93.6±16.5, p=0.048)
      Nonsignificant trend for benefit in the high-dose caffeine group for death or major disability (15.4% versus 24.2%; RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.49–1.14)
      No difference in temperament and behaviour
      Mohammed, 2015 [83]Single-centre RCT
      60 versus 60 neonates, born <32 GW
      Single centre; small sample size
      LD 40 mg·kg−1;
      MD 20 mg·kg−1
      LD 20 mg·kg−1;
      MD 10 mg·kg−1
      Reduction in extubation failure (p<0.05)
      Reduction in frequency of apnoea (p<0.001)
      Significant increase in episodes of tachycardia (p<0.05)
      No difference in the incidence of BPD
      No difference in the incidence of ROP, IVH, PVL or LOS
      McPherson, 2015 [85]Single-centre RCT
      Total of 74 neonates, 37 versus 37 neonates, born ≤30 GW
      Pilot study with small sample size only powered to detect differences in the primary outcome of microstructural brain development at term-equivalent age
      LD 80 mg·kg−1 over a 36-h period (40–20–10); MD 10 mg·kg−1LD 30 mg·kg−1 over a 36-h period (20–10); MD 10 mg·kg−1Increased incidence of cerebellar haemorrhage in the high-dose group (36% versus 10%, p=0.03), more deviant neurological signs (p=0.04) at term-equivalent age
      No differences in diffusion measures at term-equivalent age and developmental outcomes at 2 years
      Zhao, 2016 [90]Single-centre RCT
      164 total infants, 82 versus 82 neonates, born <32 GW
      Single-centre; possible selection, detection and reporting biases
      LD 20 mg·kg−1;
      MD 15 mg·kg−1
      LD 20 mg·kg−1;
      MD 5 mg·kg−1
      Reduction in the frequency of apnoea (10 versus 18, p=0.009)
      Higher success rate of ventilator removal (85% versus 70%, p=0.015)
      No significant difference in death during hospitalisation, CLD and duration of hospital stay
      No significant difference in tachycardia, irritability, difficulty in feeding, hyperglycaemia, hypertension, digestive disorders and electrolyte disturbances
      Vliegenthart, 2018 [84]Systematic review and meta-analysis including 6 RCTs with a total of 620 preterm infants; GA ≤32 GW
      Overall quality of the outcome measures (GRADE) considered low to very low due to imprecision and inconstancy of the effect estimates; small sample sizes of the included studies
      LD 10–80 mg·kg−1;
      MD 5–30 mg·kg−1
      LD 6–30 mg·kg−1;
      MD 2.5–20 mg·kg−1
      In the subgroup analysis for therapy duration >14 days, significant reduction in the combined outcome of mortality or BPD at 36 weeks PMA (3 studies, 428 patients) (TRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59–0.98) and in BPD rates alone (TRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54–0.97)
      Reduction in extubation failure (TRR 0.51, 95% CI 0.37–0.70)
      No difference in mortality at discharge or at 12 months
      Increased risk of tachycardia in the HD group (RR 3.39, 95% CI 1.50–7.64)
      No difference in NEC, SIP, ROP, IVH, hyperglycaemia.
      Considerations: no meta-analysis on differences in apnoea frequency due to diverse definition of the outcome
      No meta-analysis on duration of respiratory support due to data reported in IQR
      Inadequate power to detect small but clinical relevant differences
      Considerable differences in administered caffeine doses between studies
      Brattström, 2019 [87]Systematic review and meta-analysis including 6 RCTs with a total of 816 preterm infants (GA ≤32 GW); LD 20–80 mg·kg−1; MD 3–20 mg·kg−1
      Low quality of evidence mainly due to imprecision of the estimates, few events, small sample sizes and the wide confidence intervals of the meta-analysis
      LD >20 mg·kg−1;
      MD >10 mg·kg−1
      Doses lower than the high-caffeine groupReduction in BPD at 36 weeks PMA (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60–0.96)
      Fewer cases of extubation failure (as defined by study authors, RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36–0.71) and apnoeas (mean difference −5.68, −6.15—5.22), and shorter duration of MV (mean difference −1.69, −2.13—1.25) in the HD group
      No difference in mortality (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.53–1.38)
      No difference in IVH ≥3 (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.71–2.79)
      Chen, 2018 [92]Systematic review and meta-analysis including 13 RCTs with 1515 infants, GA <32 GW
      Variable maintenance doses within the high- and low-dose range; only few trials assessing outcomes such as extubation failure, frequency of apnoea, apnoea duration; most studies in Chinese with low quality
      Variable LD
      MD 10–20 mg·kg−1
      Variable LD
      MD 5–10 mg·kg−1
      Higher efficacy rate in the HD group (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.18–1.45)
      Higher success rate of ventilator removal (3 studies, RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.04–2.90)
      Lower extubation failure rate in the HD group (3 studies, RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.35–0.71)
      Lower frequency of apnoea and shorter apnoea duration in the HD group (MD −1.55, 95% CI −2.72–−0.39 and MD −4.85, 95% CI −8.29–−1.40)
      Lower incidence of BPD in the HD group (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68–0.91)
      Higher incidence of tachycardia in the HD group (RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.30–3.12)

      GW: gestational weeks; LD: loading dose; MD: maintenance dose; RR: risk ratio; NNT: number needed to treat; MV: mechanical ventilation; BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; ROP: retinopathy of prematurity; IVH: intraventricular haemorrhage; PVL: periventricular leukomalacia; LOS: late-onset sepsis; CLD: chronic lung disease; GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; PMA: post-menstrual age; TRR: typical risk ratio; HD: high dose; NEC: necrotising enterocolitis; SIP: spontaneous intestinal perforation; IQR: interquartile range; GA: gestational age.

      PreviousNext
      Back to top
      Vol 6 Issue 1 Table of Contents
      ERJ Open Research: 6 (1)
      • Table of Contents
      • Index by author
      Email

      Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

      NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

      Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
      Caffeine in preterm infants: where are we in 2020?
      (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
      (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
      CAPTCHA
      This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
      Print
      Citation Tools
      Caffeine in preterm infants: where are we in 2020?
      Laura Moschino, Sanja Zivanovic, Caroline Hartley, Daniele Trevisanuto, Eugenio Baraldi, Charles Christoph Roehr
      ERJ Open Research Jan 2020, 6 (1) 00330-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00330-2019

      Citation Manager Formats

      • BibTeX
      • Bookends
      • EasyBib
      • EndNote (tagged)
      • EndNote 8 (xml)
      • Medlars
      • Mendeley
      • Papers
      • RefWorks Tagged
      • Ref Manager
      • RIS
      • Zotero
      Share
      Caffeine in preterm infants: where are we in 2020?
      Laura Moschino, Sanja Zivanovic, Caroline Hartley, Daniele Trevisanuto, Eugenio Baraldi, Charles Christoph Roehr
      ERJ Open Research Jan 2020, 6 (1) 00330-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00330-2019
      Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
      Full Text (PDF)

      Jump To

      • Article
        • Abstract
        • Abstract
        • Background
        • The effects of caffeine in preterm infants
        • Caffeine timing: early versus late
        • Caffeine dosage: high versus low/standard dose
        • Caffeine pharmacokinetics
        • Conclusions
        • Footnotes
        • References
      • Figures & Data
      • Info & Metrics
      • PDF

      Subjects

      • Paediatric pulmonology
      • Tweet Widget
      • Facebook Like
      • Google Plus One

      More in this TOC Section

      • Role of digital health in pulmonary rehabilitation
      • Healthcare experiences of adults with COPD in community care
      • Multimorbidity in bronchiectasis
      Show more Reviews

      Related Articles

      Navigate

      • Home
      • Current issue
      • Archive

      About ERJ Open Research

      • Editorial board
      • Journal information
      • Press
      • Permissions and reprints
      • Advertising

      The European Respiratory Society

      • Society home
      • myERS
      • Privacy policy
      • Accessibility

      ERS publications

      • European Respiratory Journal
      • ERJ Open Research
      • European Respiratory Review
      • Breathe
      • ERS books online
      • ERS Bookshop

      Help

      • Feedback

      For authors

      • Instructions for authors
      • Publication ethics and malpractice
      • Submit a manuscript

      For readers

      • Alerts
      • Subjects
      • RSS

      Subscriptions

      • Accessing the ERS publications

      Contact us

      European Respiratory Society
      442 Glossop Road
      Sheffield S10 2PX
      United Kingdom
      Tel: +44 114 2672860
      Email: journals@ersnet.org

      ISSN

      Online ISSN: 2312-0541

      Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society