Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

ERS International Congress, Madrid, 2019: highlights from the Airway Diseases, Asthma and COPD Assembly

Lies Lahousse, Thomas Bahmer, Sara Cuevas-Ocaña, Pauline Flajolet, Alexander G. Mathioudakis, Melissa McDonnell, Lena Uller, Florence Schleich, Sergio Dortas Junior, Marco Idzko, Dave Singh, Fabio L.M. Ricciardolo, Ian M. Adcock, Omar Usmani, Antonio Spanevello, Sara J. Bonvini
ERJ Open Research 2020 6: 00341-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00341-2019
Lies Lahousse
1Dept of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lies Lahousse
Thomas Bahmer
2University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Dept for Internal Medicine I, Kiel, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara Cuevas-Ocaña
3Wolfson Centre for Stem cells, Tissue Engineering and Modelling (STEM), Dept of Stem Cell Biology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pauline Flajolet
4Respiratory Pharmacology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander G. Mathioudakis
5Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
6North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexander G. Mathioudakis
Melissa McDonnell
7Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lena Uller
8Respiratory Immunopharmacology, Dept of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Florence Schleich
9Dept of Respiratory Medicine, CHU Sart-Tilman Liege, GIGA I3, Liege, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergio Dortas Junior
10Serviço de Imunologia, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho (HUCFF-UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
11Universidade Iguaçu (UNIG), Nova Iguaçu, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sergio Dortas Junior
Marco Idzko
12Dept of Pneumology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dave Singh
13Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio L.M. Ricciardolo
14Dept of Clinical and Biological Sciences, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) San Luigi Hospital, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian M. Adcock
15National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Omar Usmani
15National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio Spanevello
16University of Insubria, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS, Varese, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara J. Bonvini
4Respiratory Pharmacology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sara.bonvini10@imperial.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The European Respiratory Society (ERS) International Congress 2019 in Madrid, Spain, was a platform for scientific discussion of the highest quality scientific research, cutting-edge techniques and innovative new therapies within the respiratory field. This article discusses some of the high-quality research studies presented at that Congress, with a focus on airway diseases, including asthma, COPD, small airways, bronchiectasis and cough, presented through the Airway Diseases, Asthma and COPD Assembly (Assembly 5) of the ERS. The authors establish the key take-home messages of these studies, compare their findings and place them into context of current understanding.

Abstract

This article discusses some of the high-quality research studies presented at #ERSCongress in Madrid, with a particular focus on airway diseases, presented through the Airway Diseases, Asthma and COPD Assembly (Assembly 5) http://bit.ly/2RpDVvv

Introduction

Over 22 000 delegates from 134 countries attended the 2019 European Respiratory Society (ERS) International Congress in Madrid, Spain, and had the opportunity to participate in more than 420 scientific and educational sessions discussing cutting-edge clinical and scientific advances. Around 20% of the 4440 high-quality research abstracts that were presented at the Congress focused on airway diseases. Similar to those published in previous years [1, 2], this article aims to compare, contrast and critically appraise only some of the research data that were presented during the ERS Congress.

Asthma

Mechanisms and physiology

The underlying mechanism of asthma is airway inflammation. This heterogeneous condition is a result of genetic predisposition and environmental factors (e.g. allergens) that can affect epithelia, macrophages and dendritic cells, triggering an inflammatory cascade. This can result in non-type 2 (non-T2) neutrophilic inflammation activated by Th1 and Th17 pathways, remodelling involving fibroblast and airway smooth muscle effects, or T2 eosinophilic inflammation (allergic asthma) [3]. Several interesting sessions and symposia aimed to investigate the mechanisms behind the development of asthma the Congress.

Key features of asthma include reversible bronchoconstriction, inflammation and extracellular matrix remodelling. Targets for these were highlighted by several studies at the ERS Congress 2019 in in vivo animal and ex vivo models. Budesonide-induced decrease of interleukin (IL)-5 production was shown not to affect allergen-induced bronchoconstriction or airway hyperresponsiveness in a novel guinea pig asthma model, recapitulating steroid-resistant asthma [4]. Another study demonstrated that activation of the TRPM3 ion channel in epithelial cells leads to the release of tachykinins that activate the neurokinin (NK)2 receptor on airway smooth muscle causing bronchoconstriction. This highlighted TRPM3 as a potential novel therapeutic target [5]. In addition, the therapeutic benefit of inhaled calcilytics was described in hyperresponsiveness [6], IgE/Th2 and alarmin-driven airway inflammation [7]. Regarding neutrophilic asthma, inhaled insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 peptide was reported as novel therapeutic target for severe non-T2 asthma through the modulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the lung [8]. Furthermore, as horses naturally develop asthma, unlike conventional research animals, an equine asthma model consisting of decellularised lung scaffolds [9] was proposed as a platform for the study of cell–extracellular matrix interactions and remodelling in asthma [10].

Innovative views on the microbiome and ageing were also explored at the ERS Congress 2019, such as the ALRIgHT project (Applied Lung Bacteria for Health), describing the importance of lung-colonising bacteria after birth for establishing a healthy lung microbiota and for the susceptibility to allergic asthma [11]. Interestingly, in silico analysis (Netlogo version 6.1.1) demonstrated a correlation between eotaxin-1 (CCL11) levels and asthma severity. This study identified shorter telomeres in subjects, including children, with severe asthma compared to mild asthma and controls, which could be due to CCL11 promoting superoxide secretion and double-strand breaks, then inducing reduction of telomere length and contributing to an accelerated ageing phenotype [12].

Epidemiology

One aspect in the management of patients with asthma across all age and disease severity spectra that might have been underrepresented in recent years is the role of sex hormones (Hot Topic 432). Menarche and menopause seem to be associated with disease onset and worsening lung function, and perimenstrual asthma could be a disease phenotype that was been reported >30 years ago but not gained much appreciation since [13]. In the data-driven, cluster-based approach of the Severe Asthma Research Program cohort, Moore et al. [14] also identified a “late-onset female obese phenotype with moderate reductions in [forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)]” and the description of sex-related asthma phenotypes as well as sex-specific intervention studies might be a rewarding goal application for the future. In line with this unmet need to better understand sex-specific asthma phenotypes and potential tailored treatment options, therapeutic regimen changes during pregnancy might also be studied in more detail in order to reduce the risk of asthma attacks for both mothers and unborn children [15].

Biomarkers

Although parameters such as blood eosinophil count, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, sputum eosinophil count and total IgE levels have been widely used to determine the type and severity of asthma, more specific biomarkers are still needed to better tailor patient treatments. As highlighted by Kian Fan Chung (Imperial College, London, UK) in a Guidelines Session, the identification of molecular phenotypes in addition to clinical parameters is not only important for the correct diagnosis and management of asthma, but it is also key to identifying patients who would potentially respond to new therapies, especially for T2 severe asthma [3]. Gene set variation analysis [16] of sputum samples from the Unbiased Biomarkers in Prediction of Respiratory Disease Outcomes cohort identified three transcriptome-associated clusters (TACs): TAC1, driven by T2 eosinophilic asthma mechanisms (IL-33, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) receptor and CCR3); TAC2, driven by non-T2 neutrophilic asthma related to the inflammasome, interferon and tumour necrosis factor pathways; and TAC3, driven by non-T2 asthma associated with oxidative stress, ageing or the IL-6 trans-signalling pathway [17, 18]. For patients with low eosinophil counts, who do not benefit from current treatment options, anti-IL6 trans-signalling/receptor inhibition and anti-IL-17 approaches were mentioned as a proof of concept.

Exciting poster discussion sessions revealed TSLP, but not ezrin, as an early biomarker of airway epithelial dysfunction in acute allergic asthma [19]. Although matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) are proposed as biomarkers for asthma severity, as part of the late-breaking abstracts, high serum MMP3 levels were reportedly induced by steroid use, highlighting a need to determine therapeutic effects on new biomarkers [20].

The identification of specific biomarkers brings additional advantages for the detection of asthma phenotypes. Easy-to-use devices measuring exhaled air parameters were highlighted on several occasions as valuable support for the rapid, noninvasive and early detection of asthma, especially in symptomatic children [21]. Molecular biomarkers such as exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can be detected by electronic nose technology for metabolomic analyses [22] and VOCs measured by gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry have been able to discriminate between various asthma inflammatory phenotypes [23]. The Inflammacheck (Exhalation Technology, Cambridge, UK) device could detect exhaled hydrogen peroxide as a marker of lung disease, including mild and severe asthma [24]. Moreover, a late-breaking abstract highlighted that SpiroNose (Breathomix, Reeuwijk, the Netherlands) data obtained by vital capacity manoeuvres provides the highest accuracy in the cross comparison of controls and asthma, COPD and lung cancer patients [25].

Exacerbations

The ERS Congress also hosted sessions on exacerbations. Exacerbation frequency is a relevant clinical outcome in both severe and mild asthma, and its reduction a major therapeutic goal. The recently updated Global Initiative for Asthma strategy document [26] suggests moving away from a short-acting β2-agonist (SABA)-only treatment paradigm in patients with mild asthma (Hot Topic Session 245). Post hoc analyses of the Symbicort Given as Needed in Mild Asthma 1 trial and other studies further substantiate that exacerbation frequency and number of night-time awakenings could be reduced with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/formoterol as needed strategy [27–29]. In a Swedish nationwide drug and patient registry including 365 324 patients considered to be treated for asthma, possible consequences of SABA overuse (three or more canisters with 150 doses) were analysed. Results indicated a dose-dependent relationship between SABA overuse and asthma-related exacerbations irrespective of the underlying controller therapy with ICS [30, 31]. Distinct patient groups, i.e. males, adolescents and older patients, were more likely to overuse SABA compared with females and those in the 18–24-year age group [30, 31], and distinct patient beliefs might further amplify the problem [32]. These results emphasise a need for closer monitoring of SABA usage, which might be feasible via so called “connected” or “smart” inhalers. The field of digital therapeutics is rapidly emerging and combines remote sensor technology with personalised health behaviour intervention. Several manufacturers already offer sensor devices, mobile applications and cloud-based software but evidence-based results are necessary to support their adoption in daily practice and well-defined guidelines for their development might be necessary [33]. Currently, it is not clear which aspects of digital intervention programmes contribute most to improved symptom control and it may be argued that the mere electronical provision of established tools is not yet a digital intervention [34–37].

Asthma guidelines update

The international ERS/American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines on the definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma, published in the European Respiratory Journal in 2014, is one of the most influential documents in the field of severe asthma in recent years [38]. It is currently referenced by >350 PubMed Central articles and reaches high public attention as one of the top 5% of all research documents scored by Altmetric. Severe asthma is defined as asthma that requires high-dose ICS as well as a second controller (and/or systemic corticosteroid) [38]. As a result of their importance in treatment, several studies investigated the role of ICS in asthma. One particularly interesting study investigated the therapeutic index of three ICS (fluticasone furoate (FF), fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide), along with placebo, in an escalated-dose, randomised, incomplete-block, crossover study in 54 asthmatic patients. Interestingly, within the approved dose ranges used for asthma, FF showed a better therapeutic index with more protection against airway hyperresponsiveness and less systemic activity than FP and budesonide [39].

The therapeutic landscape has experienced a paradigm shift, with several novel treatments now being used to treat severe asthma. Three monoclonal antibodies against IL-5 or its receptor have been granted market access: mepolizumab in 2014 [40–42], reslizumab in 2016 [43–46] and benralizumab in 2017 [47–50]. Some of these biologics have shown great potential, with mepolizumab showing significant reductions in exacerbations and use of oral corticosteroids in REALITI-A, a 2-year, “real-world” cohort study of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma; better outcomes than were seen in earlier clinical trials [51]. Just recently, the anti-IL-4/13 receptor antibody dupilumab was also approved for use in patients with severe asthma [52–54]. For scientific evaluation of the body of evidence and clinical guidance of the use of these and other new treatment regimens, a joint ERS/ATS task force was formed in 2017, and subsequently identified and formulated six specific questions using the PICO (Patient Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome) format [55]. Questions focus on optimal patient identification for antibody therapies in adulthood and childhood as well as on the use of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) and macrolides (i.e. azithromycin and clarithromycin) in patients with severe asthma. For the first time, patient representatives were part of the task force and significantly contributed to the Task Force Report (session 44) [3]. While this document integrates the highest level of evidence from placebo-controlled clinical trials, novel perspectives on the clinical trial data and the hetero­geneity of the recruited patient populations might be derived from the application of cluster-based asthma phenotypes in post hoc, discriminant function-based analyses [55].

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

COPD epidemiology and biomarkers

At the 2019 ERS Congress, many interesting data were presented concerning the epidemiology of COPD. Worldwide, COPD has a prevalence of ∼10% and some of the largest countries, including India and China, represent 60–70% of all cases of COPD [56]. The first results of EPISCAN II, which aimed to estimate the prevalence of COPD in the general Spanish population, revealed that COPD remained underdiagnosed in three out of four subjects, and that COPD prevalence among women is rising (prevalence is at 15% in males but already approaching 10% in females). A third of the population was shown to be former smokers and a fifth current smokers, but it is important to note that almost half of these population-based COPD subjects had no smoking history [57]. Cigarette smoke remains to be the key risk factor for the development of COPD [58]; however, there is growing interest in gaining a better understanding of nonsmoking COPD in order to optimise pharmacotherapy in these patients. Besides the harmful effect of cigarette smoke, there is more to understand on the effects of biomass pollution, infections, a history of asthma and other developmental or genetic risk factors. Air pollution may also play a role, and there is a need to investigate the effect of rising electronic cigarette sales on lung development in young people.

COPD remains an umbrella term that groups different clinical entities with multiple causes and it remains important to better understand these causes because they can reveal treatable traits. Alongside offering better disease management strategies, identifying these traits can also yield better treatment options for related pathologies that do not meet the definition of COPD but might share risk factors with it, such as “preserved ratio, impaired spirometry” (PRISm) or chronic cough. Patients with PRISm (FEV1/forced vital capacity ≥0.7 and FEV1 <80% of predicted) demonstrate an increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, with mortality rates similar to COPD [59]. Moreover, one third of PRISm patients transitioned towards COPD over 5 years follow-up. Chronic cough can also present in the absence of COPD but is observed to be a common trait among COPD patients. Around 10% of the COPD individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study had chronic cough, and demonstrated lower lung function, more symptoms (including wheezing, dyspnoea and chest tightness), and higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, leukocytes, neutrophils and eosinophils in their blood [60]. Systemic inflammation and manifestations remain substantial drivers of the morbidity and mortality burden in COPD.

COPD has been shown to have an adverse effect on the quality of life of sufferers. Among >2000 COPD individuals aged 40–85 years within the Norwegian HUNT Study, symptoms of anxiety were indeed strongly associated with worse health status and increased risk of exacerbations, independent of the severity of disease. In addition, symptoms of depression were associated with increased mortality among these COPD individuals independent of other major comorbidities [61]. These comorbidities or the general decline in resilience (frailty) are important prognostic markers besides lung function, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), degree of dyspnoea and exacerbations in COPD. Cardiac comorbidities are most likely also the reason why cardiac biomarkers, including the N-terminal fragment of pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and troponin T, are such strong predictors of future hospitalisations as well as early and late mortality in patients admitted with COPD exacerbations [62]. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that it is impossible to have one biomarker indicating disease activity in all COPD patients. Therefore, several optimal and clinically useful markers associated with specific mechanisms of the disease, ideally treatable traits, are increasingly investigated, including higher blood eosinophils for corticosteroid-responsive eosinophilic airway inflammation, CRP for acute (bacterial) exacerbations, and (a combination of) genetic variants, such as α1-antitrypsin deficiency, for emphysema. Less fancy, but luckily also less expensive, remains the clinical utility of worsening symptoms, including shortness of breath, chest pain and cough, to indicate increased disease activity, and evaluation of therapy adherence and inhaler technique to indicate poor treatment response.

COPD exacerbations

Acute exacerbations are largely responsible for the health and socioeconomic burden posed by COPD [63, 64]. While their management remains unchanged for decades, it has become clear that exacerbations are heterogeneous and require a personalised treatment approach [65, 66]. For this reason, diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers were evaluated in high-quality studies presented at the Congress. Blood eosinophils represent one of the most thoroughly evaluated biomarkers in COPD exacerbations. In an observational cohort involving 388 hospitalised patients with COPD exacerbation, Kostikas et al. [67] confirmed that higher eosinophil count (≥2%) is associated with lower disease severity at presentation and better clinical outcomes (mortality and duration of hospitalisation). However, they also observed a reduced re-exacerbation rate during 1 year of follow-up among patients who presented with higher eosinophils. This contrasts with previous reports, suggesting higher eosinophils are associated with more frequent exacerbations [68]. A post hoc analysis of the DYNAGITO trial, involving 7743 patients with a history of exacerbations, did not find an association between blood eosinophil count and risk of future exacerbations either [69]. This controversy may be explained by the sample size, inclusion of patients with no exacerbations and concomitant administration of ICS to the majority of the participants from the newer studies, which significantly impact blood eosinophils in COPD and reduced the exacerbation rate [70].

Several studies evaluated cardiac biomarkers during exacerbations. A longitudinal study of 383 patients with COPD, which captured high-sensitivity troponin during stable disease and 335 episodes of hospitalisation, found troponin to be increased by 40% during exacerbations [71]. Another study assessed the prognostic value of NT-proBNP and troponin T in 176 patients with COPD exacerbations, including 32 with raised NT-proBNP (>220 pmol·L−1) and 19 with raised troponin T (>50 ng·L−1) at presentation. Both biomarkers were associated with early and late mortality, and future risk of exacerbations and cardiac hospitalisations [72]. A potential limitation of such studies is the poor specificity of the diagnostic criteria of COPD exacerbations [73]. Indeed, it is very challenging to differentiate COPD exacerbations from other pathologies such as episodes of heart failure decompensation [74]. Moreover, both diseases often co-exist. In a real-life observational study of 119 smokers with COPD presenting with acute worsening of their respiratory symptoms, there was poor diagnostic agreement between the emergency and respiratory departments, while a final diagnosis of concomitant COPD exacerbation and heart failure was finally attributed to 40% of the participants [75]. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in eight patients with high and 15 patients with normal NT-proBNP during admission with an exacerbation and later, during stable disease, confirmed that biventricular ejection fraction impairment is common during exacerbations [76]. Patients with normal NT-proBNP had a significantly increased right ventricular systolic volume, which may represent a compensatory mechanism. Overall, to interpret the role of cardiac biomarkers in COPD exacerbations, it is crucial to exclude misdiagnosed patients with cardiac decompensation, and to assess carefully for coexisting acute and cardiac pathology.

Long-term home noninvasive ventilation for COPD

The new ERS guideline on long-term home (LTH) noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for the management of COPD, which was presented during the Congress, issued four conditional recommendations that were based on evidence of low or very low certainty [77]. More specifically, LTH-NIV is recommended for patients with 1) chronic stable hypercapnic COPD or 2) persisting hypercapnia following a life-threatening episode of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure requiring acute NIV. LTH-NIV settings should be titrated aiming to arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) (high-intensity NIV). Finally, fixed pressure support, rather than adaptive or autotitrating pressure modes, should be used as the first choice of ventilator mode in patients with COPD using LTH-NIV. These recommendations were based on data from relatively small, nonblinded studies with heterogeneous findings. More recent studies that included patients with higher PaCO2 at baseline and used high-intensity LTH-NIV settings achieved better treatment adherence, which resulted in better outcomes [77, 78]. Recognising the absence of adequate, high-quality data that would allow the development of more specific clinical and technical recommendations, this guideline also highlighted several unmet research needs, highlighting the need for high-quality interventional research in this area. Indeed, numerous studies focusing on LTH-NIV were presented during the Congress, including two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating LTH-NIV initiation at home versus in the hospital. These trials involved 608 and 67 patients with stable hypercapnic COPD respectively [79, 80]. Both trials demonstrated noninferiority of initiating LTH-NIV at home, with regards to the impact of NIV on PaCO2. The larger (Dutch) trial also evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the intervention and identified an impressive cost reduction of over €3200 per patient initiating NIV at home [81].

Small airways

Challenges of assessing small airway disease in asthma and COPD

Small airways are increasingly being incriminated in asthma and COPD pathophysiology, and the last 5 years have seen several significant research outputs in this field that have highlighted the importance of the small airways in routine clinical practice [82]. In this context, in 2019, the Assembly hosted a postgraduate symposium chaired by Mario Cazzola (University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy) and Matteo Bonini (University of Trento, Trent, Italy) on small airways to highlight the recent advances in the field with respect to pathophysiology, assessments, treatments and patient-reported outcomes [83]. In an industry symposium, numerous physiological tests, such as oscillometry, body plethysmography and multiple-breath washout (MBW), were shown to evaluate different levels of the airway tree but there has been no homogenised approach validated to assess small airway disease (SAD). The Assessment of Small Airways Involvement in Asthma (ATLANTIS) was the first multinational, large-scale study aiming to determine the optimal approach for characterising SAD. Published in 2019 [84], this study showed that SAD is present across all asthma severities, with an increased prevalence in severe asthma, and a combination of impulse oscillometry (IOS), spirometry and lung volumes was able to delineate two clinically relevant subtypes of mild and severe SAD with asthma.

The 2019 Congress further emphasised that combining spirometry and oscillometry could bring valuable information to improve asthma management and identify phenotypes missed by current tests. As such, some patients were found to be hyperresponsive to mannitol using the forced oscillation technique (FOT) while FEV1 measurement did not show a response [85]. Using MBW, Trinkmann et al. [86] were able to differentiate between adult healthy controls and asthmatic patients, with some asthmatic patients having normal spirometry but abnormal sulfur hexafluoride MBW readings [87]. Alternatively, previous studies pointed out that SAD could be an early change in asthma prior to spirometric alterations [88]. In a 5-year paediatric cohort, a subset of children with allergic rhinitis seemed to have increased FOT parameters upon allergic rhinitis exacerbation before developing asthma [89, 90].

The notion that assessing SAD could harbour predictive value, and help to identify early stages and distinct phenotypes is also the subject of intense investigation in COPD [91]. Evaluating FOT parameters may have a predictive value in distinguishing COPD patients in Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease grade 1 from non-COPD controls [92], while MBW parameters were found to be higher in frequent than infrequent COPD exacerbators [93]. A combination of IOS, MBW and spirometry could also help to delineate clusters of COPD phenotypes according to predominant features of emphysema, central obstruction or SAD [94].

While additional studies confirmed the utility of FOT for assessing SAD [95, 96], others did not find a correlation between FOT and other parameters reflecting peripheral airway obstruction [97]. As highlighted by the ATLANTIS study, each single variable is likely to provide different mechanistic insights and this needs further investigation. In the previously mentioned study by Gove et al. [93], only ventilation heterogeneity in the acinar lung zone was different between frequent and infrequent COPD exacerbators, out of 12 parameters tested.

Insights in SAD pathophysiology in asthma and COPD

Moving away from their conception of as a “quiet zone”, small airways are increasingly recognised as an important site of inflammation and remodelling [98]. Bazan-Socha et al. [99] found that fixed airflow limitation and histological signs of airway remodelling correlated better with computed tomography changes in distal than proximal airways in asthmatic patients. Interestingly, those patients had eosinophilia and higher circulating periostin, but also higher blood neutrophils and circulating ADAM33 [100]. Of note, ADAM33 gene polymorphism has already been associated with asthma [101].

The 2019 Congress highlighted the role of the lung microbiome disturbance in airway disease. Determined by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) studies, asthmatic patients' microbiomes seem to differ in relative composition from controls [102]. Huang et al. [103] also demonstrated contrasting gradients of lung bacterial composition relating to measures of small airways obstruction using the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study cohort.

With ever-growing concerns, environmental causes of airway disease also received attention at the 2019 Congress. Not only does the common plasticiser dibutyl phthalate appear to exacerbate the early asthmatic response (EAR) and late asthmatic response (LAR), but it also increases the recruitment of CD206+ CD163+ macrophages in the BAL of asthmatic patients [104].

Challenges in delivering therapies to the small airways

One great challenge is to deliver therapies that can reach the small airways [105]. Extrafine particles (defined as <2.1 µm mass median aerodynamic diameter) [106] seem to improve deposition in the periphery [107]. New single-inhaler, extrafine therapies are being tested, such as in the TRIGGER and TRIMARAN trials in uncontrolled asthma, emphasising the benefit of the addition of LAMA in a subset of patients [108–110]. The associated challenge is to accurately assess their deposition in disease, warranting new pharmacokinetic approaches. Using in silico models with functional respiratory imaging, Topole et al. [111] simulated a higher peripheral deposition of extrafine beclomethasone/formoterol/glycopyrronium compared to non-extrafine fluticasone. Innovative spatial pharmacokinetics methods were presented, either to estimate drug concentrations at the epithelium lining fluid with better accuracy than BAL [112] or to directly estimate drug free exposure in situ using RNAscope (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Newark, CA, USA) [113].

Bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis is a chronic inflammatory lung disease characterised radiologically by the permanent dilation of bronchi, and clinically by persistent cough and sputum production and recurrent respiratory tract infections [114]. It is a heterogeneous disease in terms of its presentation, clinical course and response to treatment. Its pathophysiology is best depicted by the vicious vortex model which demonstrates the interplay driving airway dysfunction, inflammation, infection and remodelling, with each pathophysiological process contributing to all the others [115].

There is an unmet clinical need in bronchiectasis for biomarkers that reflect disease activity or predict treatment responsiveness. Chalmers et al. [116] previously showed that neutrophil elastase can predict disease severity and progression in terms of airway infection and risk of future exacerbations. The group has since developed a novel point-of-care neutrophil elastase assay lateral flow device that can provide assessment of elastase activity from sputum in minutes to identify patients at increasing risk of airway infection and future exacerbations [117]. The group also identified elevated sputum pregnancy zone protein (PZP) in bronchiectasis patients, and showed that elevated levels are associated with disease severity, frequent exacerbations and airway infection in bronchiectasis patients. PZP is released from neutrophils during degranulation and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, and may therefore provide a novel link between chronic neutrophilic inflammation and impaired host immunity to infection [118]. Sputum heparin-binding protein (HBP), recently implicated as a sputum marker of airway inflammation and bacterial load in cystic fibrosis, was also identified as a potential biomarker of bronchiectasis severity. The effect of HBP on ciliary beat frequency and epithelial integrity in air–liquid interface models of bronchiectasis patients at concentrations found in sputum suggest a potential impact on epithelial defence against infection [119].

Data pertaining to the effect of systemic inflammatory markers in bronchiectasis have been somewhat ambiguous to date. Although it is likely that a sustained level of inflammation does contribute to disease progression and health status, many of these patients have significant comorbidities that could account for this sustained inflammatory effect [120]. Several presentations at the 2019 Congress focused on the predictive ability of systemic inflammatory markers during exacerbations, with CRP shown to be associated with exacerbations and disease severity, with a trend for sputum calprotectin in predicting exacerbations [121]; CRP, white cell count, neutrophils and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) useful in predicting mortality [122]; and CRP an NLR useful in predicting hospitalisations [123]. Platelet aggregation assessed by measurement of soluble platelet selectin was associated with bronchiectasis disease severity in the stable state, although the clinical consequences of this finding are yet to be fully defined [124].

Endotyping bronchiectasis patients may help to determine patient suitability for therapeutic clinical trials and target individualised treatment approaches. Proteomic analysis of sputum and serum of bronchiectasis patients identified three inflammatory endotypes driving disease heterogeneity (airway neutrophilia, systemic inflammation, and eosinophilic and epithelial inflammation) potentially representing different “treatable traits” (with disease severity markedly worse in the neutrophilic group) [125]. Similarly, proteomic and microbiomic analysis suggests that sputum NETs are associated with proteobacteria dysbiosis and loss of microbiome diversity in bronchiectasis; and that bronchiectasis patients, independent of COPD, are predominantly associated with a proteobacteria-dominant microbiome profile with a lower microbiome diversity than COPD patients alone, and a proteomic profile over-represented by a neutrophilic endotype [126, 127].

Respiratory viruses in the context of bronchiectasis have failed to attract much interest to date. Two studies presented at the 2019 Congress suggested that viral analysis of bronchiectasis patients detects viral carriage in 63%, predominantly parainfluenza virus 3, in the Cohort of Asian and Matched European Bronchiectasis [128]. In an Italian study, respiratory viruses were only detected in 13%, with no seasonal differences in detection rates and no associations with chronic bacterial infections [129]. However, those with positive viral detection were noted to have a higher rate of daily sputum production, a history of chronic sinusitis, and a history of frequent exacerbations in the previous year compared to those with negative viral detection. Further work on the role of viruses in bronchiectasis is needed.

Several large, real-life cohort studies were presented using data from the European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC), a prospective dataset from >30 European countries, and lung cancer screening programmes. These included the identification of risk factors for new isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which alongside standard markers of bronchiectasis disease severity, included ICS use, macrolide use, high daily sputum production and management in a nonspecialist centre [130]. Disease severity did not predict new isolation of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), with analysis showing the classical risk factors of female sex, low BMI and older age to be significant on logistic regression, along with ICS use and a history of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) (OR 3.06, 95% 1.01–9.24), suggesting that coexistence of these two conditions is frequent and that ABPA patients should perhaps be screened for NTM infection. ICS are generally only used to treat comorbidities in bronchiectasis, particularly patients with asthma or eosinophilic COPD [131]. Lung cancer screening programmes suggest a pick-up prevalence of ∼11% for bronchiectasis, with a coexisting diagnosis of COPD in 48% and a subsequent diagnosis of lung cancer in 7% of bronchiectasis patients [132, 133]. Looking at determinants of survival in bronchiectasis, initial data from EMBARC suggest that symptoms, exacerbations and P. aeruginosa infection are potentially modifiable risk factors for death. Given the lower mortality in specialist centres despite high disease severity, management in a specialist centre may improve quality of care and reduce mortality in bronchiectasis [134].

No approved therapies currently exist for bronchiectasis, and many clinical trials have failed to meet their primary endpoints because of heterogeneous treatment responses and the inherent difficulty of identifying patients likely to respond. An RCT of home-based airway clearance showed an improved cough severity with sustained benefit at 12 months follow-up [135]. A study assessing the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in bronchiectasis showed successful improvements in anxiety and depression with completion of rehabilitation [136]. Several studies focussed on the therapeutic and mechanistic effects of macrolides at the 2019 Congress. Whilst macrolide use was associated with considerable improvements in the Brody and Bhalla radiological scores after 1 year [137], an individual patient data meta-analysis across participants from three RCTs also showed significant improvements in exacerbations and quality of life independent of P. aeruginosa infection or baseline exacerbation frequency [138], and an exploratory analysis of inflammatory pathways surprisingly showed that neutrophilic inflammation was lower in P. aeruginosa patients versus those without, and that azithromycin did not attenuate inflammatory profiles [139]. A separate study of sputum inflammatory markers after a year of macrolide treatment suggested that, although increasing disease severity and the presence of an exacerbation were reflected by upregulation of proinflammatory markers, azithromycin did not result in attenuation of the baseline inflammatory response in bronchiectasis [140].

Many bronchiectasis treatments are antibiotic-related and thus carry the risk of antibiotic resistance. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections are highly prevalent, and associated with frequent use of antibiotics and disease severity [141]. Recent hospitalisation, exacerbation frequency, recent antibiotic use and systemic corticosteroids were found to contribute to MDR in hospitalised patients with an acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis [142]. Strategies to reduce the risk of MDR in bronchiectasis are needed.

Although biomarker development, disease endotyping and the identification of treatable traits are in their infancy in bronchiectasis, they hold therapeutic promise for patients in facilitating a personalised, specialist approach to patient care.

Airway sensory nerves and cough

Cough is driven by activation of airway sensory nerves housed within the vagus nerve. These nerves, when activated, initiate reflex events such a cough and bronchospasm through a parasympathetic nerve reflex, which are upregulated in airway diseases including asthma and COPD. When cough persists for >8 weeks, the cough is diagnosed as chronic. Chronic cough is an unmet medical need that lowers the quality of life of sufferers [143]. Cough and airway sensory nerves remained a topic of interest at the 2019 Congress, with a well-attended industry-funded session on chronic cough with presentations from leaders in the field, a guidelines update, and a number of symposia and sessions that helped to highlight key developments in the field.

The P2X3 receptor antagonist Gefapixant remains the only cough therapeutic developed in recent years that has shown efficacy, with a phase 1 trial demonstrating a 75% drop in daytime objective cough frequency in patients with treatment-refractory chronic cough [144]. However, patients also developed dysgeusia, which led to some reports of nonadherence. The effects on taste have been attributed to the fact that the antagonist can also cause its effects through the P2X2/3 heterotrimer, which can affect taste perception, as well as the P2X3 homotrimer, which is thought to be responsible for the effect on cough. Data was presented on a novel P2X3 antagonist, S-600918, which was shown to be more selective for P2X3 over the P2X2/3 heterotrimer and was shown to influence daytime objective cough frequency with a minimal effect on taste. However, there was a large effect of the placebo in this trial [145].

Despite the promising effect of Gefapixant, novel targets are also required. A late-breaking abstract highlighted the potential role of a NK1 receptor antagonist in the treatment of chronic cough. Daily administration of 30 mg of the NK1 antagonist orvepitant reduced cough in patients with refractory chronic cough, with higher efficacy in patients with higher cough frequency. However, the placebo in this study also showed a significant effect on cough, and patients exhibited side-effects, including somnolence, indicating that further investigation is required [146].

Cough is often a key symptom of a number of different respiratory diseases, including asthma. Several presentations at the 2019 Congress aimed to look at the characteristics of patients with chronic cough. Mannitol and citric acid cough tests were shown to discriminate chronic cough patients from healthy controls, as patients with chronic cough were more sensitive to both stimuli, and that mannitol challenge could also separate cough in asthmatics, which could be an important challenge test in diagnosis [147]. It was also demonstrated that uncontrolled asthmatic patients had more severe cough, which correlated to symptoms and health status but not to measures of Th2 inflammation, suggesting that further investigation is required to determine the pathways behind the enhanced airway sensory nerve activity seen in disease [148].

The transient receptor potential ankyrin (TRPA)1 ion channel was suggested as a possible target that could account for this upregulation. Although the poster did not focus on cough, the authors were investigating the LAR, an airway reflex initiated following activation of airway sensory nerves [149]. Using a novel, potent and selective TRPA1 antagonist in an ovalbumin-sensitised guinea pig model, it was shown that this reduced both the airway hyperresponsiveness associated with EAR and the LAR by 51% and 36%, respectively, with no effect on inflammatory cell counts [150]. TRPA1 has also been implicated in cough in both animal models and humans [151], suggesting that this could be a key novel target in the upregulation of sensory nerve response in disease.

Concluding remarks

As demonstrated throughout this article, the ERS International Congress in Madrid highlighted the innovative and exciting novel research developments within the airway disease landscape. With such a large number of submissions and presentations showcased throughout the Congress, this highlights the high level of interest from both basic and clinical researchers for tackling the global problems of asthma and COPD through determining key mechanisms in order to develop novel therapies.

Acknowledgements

Alexander G. Mathioudakis is supported by the National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR Manchester BRC).

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: L. Lahousse reports society awards sponsored by AstraZeneca and Chiesi, and expert consultation for Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH and Novartis, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: T. Bahmer reports personal fees for lecturing and advice from Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis and Roche, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: S. Cuevas Ocaña has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: P. Flajolet has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: A.G. Mathioudakis has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M. McDonnell has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: L. Uller has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: F. Schleich has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: S. Dortas Junior has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Idzko has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: D. Singh reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark, Gossamerbio, Menarini, Mundipharma, Novartis, Peptinnovate, Pfizer, Pulmatrix, Theravance and Verona, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: F.LM. Ricciardolo has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: I.M. Adcock has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: O. Usmani reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and Chiesi; personal fees from Aerocrine, Napp, Mundipharma, Sandoz, Takeda, Zentiva, Cipla and Pearl Therapeutics; and grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Prosonix and Edmond Pharma, all outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: A. Spanevello has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: S.J. Bonvini has nothing to disclose.

  • Received December 4, 2019.
  • Accepted January 14, 2020.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2020
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Andersson C,
    2. Bonvini SJ,
    3. Horvath P, et al.
    Research highlights from the 2017 ERS International Congress: airway disease in focus. ERJ Open Res 2018; 4: 00163-2017.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Schleich F,
    2. Bikov A,
    3. Mathioudkis AG, et al.
    Research highlights from the 2018 European Respiratory Society International Congress: airway disease. ERJ Open Res 2019; 5: 00225-2018. doi:10.1183/23120541.00225-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Holguin F,
    2. Cardet JC,
    3. Chung KF, et al.
    Management of severe asthma: a European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guideline. Eur Respir J 2019; 55: 1900588. doi:10.1183/13993003.00588-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Ramos Ramirez P,
    2. Noreby M,
    3. Olsson HK, et al.
    Budesonide-induced decrease of IL-5 production does not affect allergen-induced bronchoconstriction or AHR in a novel guinea pig asthma model. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA4081.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Bonvini SJ,
    2. Adcock JJ,
    3. Kobold NK, et al.
    A novel role for TRPM3 in Airway Smooth Muscle Contraction. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA4956.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Yarova PL,
    2. Stewart AL,
    3. Sathis V, et al.
    Calcium-sensing receptor antagonists abrogate airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation in allergic asthma. Sci Transl Med 2015; 7: 1–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Huang P,
    2. Mansfield B,
    3. Du X, et al.
    Therapeutic effects of topical calcilytic in IgE/Th2 and alarmin-driven surrogates of human asthma. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA4958.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Kim SR,
    2. Lee YC,
    3. Park HJ, et al.
    An inhaled IGFBP-3 peptide attenuates steroid-resistant neutrophilic bronchial asthma through modulation of ER stress. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA4955.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Da Palma RK,
    2. Fratini P,
    3. Schiavo Matias GS, et al.
    Equine lung decellularization: a potential approach for in vitro modeling the role of the extracellular matrix in asthma. J Tissue Eng 2018; 9: 2041731418810164.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Palma R,
    2. Cereta A,
    3. Gulmaraes L, et al.
    Characterisation of axellular lung scaffolds derived from equine asthma model. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA599.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Remot A,
    2. Descamps D,
    3. Noordine ML, et al.
    Bacteria isolated from lung modulate asthma susceptibility in mice. ISME J 2017; 11: 1061–1074. doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.181
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Barbé-Tuana F,
    2. Grun L,
    3. Pitrez P, et al.
    Association between shorter telomeres’ length and eotaxin-1 in children with severe asthma, an indicative of accelerated aging. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA3594.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Gibbs CJ,
    2. Coutts II,
    3. Lock R, et al.
    Premenstrual exacerbation of asthma. Thorax 1984; 39: 833–836. doi:10.1136/thx.39.11.833
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Moore WC,
    2. Meyers DA,
    3. Wenzel SE, et al.
    Identification of asthma phenotypes using cluster analysis in the Severe Asthma Research Program. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181: 315–323. doi:10.1164/rccm.200906-0896OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Robijn A,
    2. Jensen M,
    3. Mclaughlin K, et al.
    Evaluating inhaled corticosteroid use among pregnant women with asthma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2558.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Pavlidis S,
    2. Takahashi K,
    3. Ng Kee Kwong F, et al.
    “T2-high” in severe asthma related to blood eosinophil, exhaled nitric oxide and serum periostin. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1800938. doi:10.1183/13993003.00938-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Ostling J,
    2. van Geest M,
    3. Schfied JPR, et al.
    IL-17-high asthma with features of a psoriasis immunophenotype. JACI 2019; 144: 1198–1213.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Kuo CS,
    2. Pavlidid S,
    3. Loza M, et al.
    T-helper cell type 2 (Th2) and non-Th2 molecular phenotypes of asthma using sputum transcriptomics in U-BIOPRED. Eur Respir J 2017; 49: 1602135. doi:10.1183/13993003.02135-2016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Kalinauskaite-Zukauske V,
    2. Januskevicius A,
    3. Jaulaityte I, et al.
    Thymic stromal lymphopoietin, but not ezrin, could be an early biomarker of airway epithelial dysfunction in acute allergic asthma. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA1702.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. James A,
    2. Gomez C,
    3. Thorngren JO, et al.
    Matrix metalloproteinases in serum and sputum reflect distinct processes of relevance to asthma. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA3802.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Juusela M,
    2. Aaltonen V,
    3. Sarna S, et al.
    Particles in exhaled air (PExA) method – repeatability in children. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA1705.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Brinkman P,
    2. Wagener AH,
    3. Hekking PP, et al.
    Identification and prospective stability of electronic node (eNose)-derived inflammatory phenotypes in patients with severe asthma. JACI 2019; 143: 1811–1820.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Schleich FN,
    2. Zanella D,
    3. Stefanuto PH, et al.
    Exhaled volatile organic compounds are able to discriminate between neutrophilic and eosinophilic asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200: 444–453.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Jones M,
    2. Neville D,
    3. Gates J, et al.
    EXhaled Hydrogen peroxide As a marker of Lung diseasE - the EXHALE 1A study. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA1712.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. de Vries R,
    2. Dagelet Y,
    3. Dijkers E, et al.
    Late Breaking Abstract - Technical validation of breath analysis by eNose in disease diagnosis: Tidal breathing vs. vital capacity manoeuvre. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA3904.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, 2019. www.ginasthma.org.
  27. ↵
    1. Reddel H,
    2. Bateman ED,
    3. Fitzgerald M, et al.
    Exacerbation risk after night-time walking due to asthma in SYGMA 1. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA3715.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Fitzgerald M,
    2. O'Byrne P,
    3. Bateman ED, et al.
    Number needed to treat (NNT) to have an additional patient free from a severe or moderate/severe exacerbation: post-hoc analysis of SYGMA 1 in mild asthma. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA3716.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Hardy J,
    2. Baggott C,
    3. Fingleton J, et al.
    Late Breaking Abstract - Open label trial of budesonide/formoterol reliever therapy in milk asthma. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA5332.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Janson C,
    2. Nwaru B,
    3. Hasvold LP, et al.
    Late Breaking Asthma - SABA overuse and risk of mortality in a nationwide Swedish asthma cohort (HERA). Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA2105.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Janson C,
    2. Nwaru B,
    3. Hasvold LP, et al.
    Use of short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) and exacerbations in a nationwide Swedish asthma cohort (HERA). Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2554.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Horne R,
    2. Chan A,
    3. Haughney J, et al.
    Late Breaking Abstract-Identifying and addressing patient beliefs driving SABA use and over reliance. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA5333.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Bodina R,
    2. Grinovero M,
    3. Corsico A, et al.
    Digital Therapy in the treatment of asthma and COPD - Epidemiology of development and use of an emerging health technology in Respiratory Medicine. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA735.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Khusial R,
    2. Honkoop P,
    3. Usmani O, et al.
    myAirCoach: mHealth assisted self management in patients with uncontrolled asthma, a randomized control trial. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA745.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Lahousse L,
    2. Vanoverschelde A
    . Improving inhaler technique in asthma/COPD by mHealth: a Belgian RCT. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2235.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Bischoff E,
    2. Boer L,
    3. Van Der Heijden M, et al.
    A smart MHealth tool versus a paper action plan to support self management of COPD exacerbations: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2238.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Sulku J,
    2. Jansson C,
    3. Melhus H, et al.
    Critical handling errors with dry powder, metered dose and soft mist inhaler devices in an observational COPD study. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA4258.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    1. Chung KF,
    2. Wenzel SE,
    3. Brozek JL, et al.
    International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 343. doi:10.1183/09031936.00202013
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Daley-Yates P,
    2. Brealey N,
    3. Kumar B, et al.
    Dose responses for topical efficacy and systematic activity, dose equivalence and relative therapeutic index for fluticasone furoate (FF), fluticasone proprionate (FP and budesonide (BUD) in asthmatic subjects. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA2106.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    1. Bel EH,
    2. Wenzel SE,
    3. Thompson PJ, et al.
    Oral glucocorticoid-sparing effect of mepolizumab in eosinophilic asthma. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1189–1197. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1403291
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ortega HG,
    2. Liu MC,
    3. Pavord ID, et al.
    Mepolizumab treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1198–1207. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1403290
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Chupp GL,
    2. Bradford ES,
    3. Albers FC, et al.
    Efficacy of mepolizumab add-on therapy on health-related quality of life and markers of asthma control in severe eosinophilic asthma (MUSCA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3b trial. Lancet Respir Med 2017; 5: 390–400. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30125-X
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Bjermer L,
    2. Lemiere C,
    3. Maspero J, et al.
    Reslizumab for inadequately controlled asthma with elevated blood eosinophil levels: a randomized phase 3 study. Chest 2016; 150: 789–798. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.03.032
    OpenUrl
    1. Castro M,
    2. Mathur S,
    3. Hargreave F, et al.
    Reslizumab for poorly controlled, eosinophilic asthma: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 184: 1125–1132. doi:10.1164/rccm.201103-0396OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Castro M,
    2. Zangrilli J,
    3. Wechsler ME, et al.
    Reslizumab for inadequately controlled asthma with elevated blood eosinophil counts: results from two multicentre, parallel, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet Respir Med 2015; 3: 355–366. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00042-9
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Corren J,
    2. Weinstein S,
    3. Janka L, et al.
    Phase 3 study of reslizumab in patients with poorly controlled asthma. Chest 2016; 150: 799–810. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.03.018
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. FitzGerald JM,
    2. Bleecker ER,
    3. Nair P, et al.
    Benralizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody, as add-on treatment for patients with severe, uncontrolled, eosinophilic asthma (CALIMA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016; 388: 2128–2141. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31322-8
    OpenUrl
    1. Nair P,
    2. Wenzel S,
    3. Rabe KF, et al.
    Oral glucocorticoid-sparing effect of benralizumab in severe asthma. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 2448–2458. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1703501
    OpenUrl
    1. Bleecker ER,
    2. FitzGerald JM,
    3. Chanez P, et al.
    Efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with severe asthma uncontrolled with high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists (SIROCCO): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016; 388: 2115–2127. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31324-1
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Castro M,
    2. Wenzel SE,
    3. Bleecker ER, et al.
    Benralizumab, an anti-interleukin 5 receptor α monoclonal antibody, versus placebo for uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma: a phase 2b randomised dose-ranging study. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2: 879–890. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70201-2
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Harrison T,
    2. Canonica GW,
    3. Gemzoe K, et al.
    Late Breaking Abstract- Effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab in real-world clinical practice: the REALITI-A study. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA1659.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. ↵
    1. Wenzel S,
    2. Castro M,
    3. Corren J, et al.
    Dupilumab efficacy and safety in adults with uncontrolled persistent asthma despite use of medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled pivotal phase 2b dose-ranging trial. Lancet 2016; 388: 31–44. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30307-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rabe KF,
    2. Nair P,
    3. Brusselle G, et al.
    Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in glucocorticoid-dependent severe asthma. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2475–2485. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1804093
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Castro M,
    2. Corren J,
    3. Pavord ID, et al.
    Dupilumab efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2486–2496. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1804092
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Bleecker ER,
    2. Li X,
    3. Newbold P, et al.
    Benralizumab treatment and SARP cluster analysis. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA1659.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. ↵
    1. Celli BR,
    2. Wedzicha JA
    . Update on clinical aspects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 1257–1266. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1900500
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Soriano JB,
    2. Alfageme I,
    3. Miravitlles M, et al.
    A new study of the prevalence of COPD in Spain: EPISCAN II. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA3317.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. ↵
    1. Sethi JM,
    2. Rochester CL
    . Smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med 2000; 21: 67–86. doi:10.1016/S0272-5231(05)70008-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Wijnant S,
    2. De Roos E,
    3. Kavousi M, et al.
    Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) and mortality: the Rotterdam Study. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA4421.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. ↵
    1. Dahl M,
    2. Landt E,
    3. Colak Y, et al.
    Impact of chronic cough in individuals with COPD: a population-based cohort study. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA4427.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. ↵
    1. Vikjord S,
    2. Mai XM,
    3. Brumpton B, et al.
    The association of anxiety and depression with mortality, symptom burden and health care utilization in a COPD cohort. The HUNT Study, Norway. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA4428.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. Shafuddin E,
    2. Chang C,
    3. Hancox R
    . Cardiac biomarkers and outcomes of COPD exacerbations. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA4290.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. ↵
    1. Vogelmeier CF,
    2. Criner GJ,
    3. Martinez FJ, et al.
    Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report: GOLD Executive Summary. Eur Respir J 2017; 49: 1700214. doi:10.1183/13993003.00214-2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Wedzicha JA,
    2. Miravitlles M,
    3. Hurst JR, et al.
    Management of COPD exacerbations: a European Respiratory Society/ American Thoracic Society Guideline. Eur Respir J 2017; 49: 1600791. doi:10.1183/13993003.00791-2016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Bafadhel M,
    2. McKenna S,
    3. Terry S, et al.
    Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: identification of biologic clusters and their biomarkers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 184: 662–671. doi:10.1164/rccm.201104-0597OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Mathioudakis AG,
    2. Chatzimavridou-Grigoriadou V,
    3. Corlateanu A, et al.
    Procalcitonin to guide antibiotic administration in COPD exacerbations: a meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev 2017; 26: 160073. doi:10.1183/16000617.0073-2016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Kostikas K,
    2. Papathanasiou E,
    3. Papaioannou A, et al.
    Blood eosinophils as predictor of outcomes in hospitalized COPD exacerbations: results from a prospective study. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA2147.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. ↵
    1. Vedel-Krogh S,
    2. Nielsen SF,
    3. Lange P, et al.
    Blood eosinophils and exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Copenhagen General Population Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193: 965–974. doi:10.1164/rccm.201509-1869OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Calverley PMA,
    2. Jenkins C,
    3. Wedzicha JA
    . Eosinophil counts as a predictor of future COPD exacerbations in the DYNAGITO trial. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA 2149.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. ↵
    1. Mathioudakis A,
    2. Foden P,
    3. Vestbo J
    . Blood eosinophil count (EOS) can accurately predict responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in COPD, but only if measured while patients are not receiving steroids. Eur Respir J 2018; 52: Suppl. 62, OA2125.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. ↵
    1. Soyseth V,
    2. Kononova N,
    3. Einvik G
    . Cardiac troponin increases in COPD patients hospitalised for pneumonias as well as exacerbations. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA4286.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. ↵
    1. Shafuddin E,
    2. Chang C,
    3. Hancox RJ
    . Cardiac biomarkers and outcomes of COPD exacerbations. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA4290.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  64. ↵
    1. Mathioudakis AG,
    2. Janner J,
    3. Moberg M, et al.
    A systematic evaluation of the diagnostic criteria for COPD and exacerbations used in randomised controlled trials on the management of COPD exacerbations. ERJ Open Res 2019; 5: 00136-2019. doi:10.1183/23120541.00136-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Lahousse LL,
    2. Vanfleteren LEGW
    . When the heart steals your breath away. Respiration 2019; 97: 199–201. doi:10.1159/000493760
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Tine M,
    2. Turato G,
    3. Lokar Oliani K, et al.
    Acute exacerbation of COPD in emergency room: just COPD exacerbations? Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA5220.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. ↵
    1. Shafuddin E,
    2. Chang C,
    3. Hancox RJ
    . Cardiac function during exacerbations of COPD assessed using cardiac MRI. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA1919.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  68. ↵
    1. Ergan B,
    2. Oczkowski S,
    3. Rochwerg B, et al.
    European Respiratory Society guideline on long-term home non-invasive ventilation for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: 1901003. doi:10.1183/13993003.01003-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. Murphy PB,
    2. Rehal S,
    3. Arbane G, et al.
    Effect of home noninvasive ventilation with oxygen therapy vs oxygen therapy alone on hospital readmission or death after an acute COPD exacerbation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017; 317: 2177–2186. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.4451
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Köhnlein T,
    2. Windisch W,
    3. Köhler D, et al.
    Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for the treatment of severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled clinical trial. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2: 698–705. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70153-5
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. van den Biggelaar RJM,
    2. Hazenberg A,
    3. Cobben NAM, et al.
    Initiation of non-invasive home mechanical ventilation in the hospital compared with initiation at home: the Dutch Homerun trial. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA3826.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  72. ↵
    1. Duiverman ML,
    2. Bladder G,
    3. Vonk JM, et al.
    Home initiation of chronic high-intensity noninvasive ventilation in COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure: the RECONSIDER trial. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, RCT451.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  73. ↵
    1. Bonini M,
    2. Usmani OS
    . The role of the small airways in the pathophysiology of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2015; 9: 281–293. doi:10.1177/1753465815588064
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Usmani OS,
    2. Singh D,
    3. Spinola M, et al.
    The prevalence of small airways disease in adult asthma: A systematic literature review. Respir Med 2016; 116: 19–27. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2016.05.006
    OpenUrl
  75. ↵
    1. Postma DS,
    2. Brightling C,
    3. Baldi S, et al.
    Exploring the relevance and extent of small airways dysfunction in asthma (ATLANTIS): baseline data from a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2019; 7: 402–416. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30049-9
    OpenUrl
  76. ↵
    1. Nasr A,
    2. Romberg K,
    3. Nihlen U, et al.
    Forced oscillation technique measuring peripheral airway involvement during mannitol challenge. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA354.
    OpenUrl
  77. ↵
    1. Trinkmann F,
    2. Götzmann J,
    3. Saur D, et al.
    Multiple breath washout testing in adults with pulmonary disease and healthy controls – can fewer measurements eventually be more? BMC Pulm Med 2017; 17: 185. doi:10.1186/s12890-017-0543-y
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. Trinkmann F,
    2. Lenz S,
    3. Schäfer J, et al.
    Multiple breath washout (MBW) testing using SF6 – feasibility and clinical applications in adults with bronchial asthma. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA349.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  79. ↵
    1. Singer F,
    2. Abbas C,
    3. Yammine S, et al.
    Abnormal small airways function in children with mild asthma. Chest 2014; 145: 492–499. doi:10.1378/chest.13-0784
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Skylogianni E,
    2. Triga M,
    3. Bolis K, et al.
    The march from subclinical small-airways dysfunction to asthma in children with allergic rhinitis. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA965.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  81. ↵
    1. Skylogianni E,
    2. Triga M,
    3. Douros K, et al.
    Small-airway dysfunction precedes the development of asthma in children with allergic rhinitis. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2018; 46: 313–321. doi:10.1016/j.aller.2017.09.025
    OpenUrl
  82. ↵
    1. McDonough JE,
    2. Yuan R,
    3. Suzuki M, et al.
    Small-airway obstruction and emphysema in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1567–1575. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1106955
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Gao L,
    2. Wu Y,
    3. Wang H, et al.
    Forced oscillation technique for sensitive detection of early-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2631.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  84. ↵
    1. Gove K,
    2. Conway J,
    3. Ostridge K, et al.
    Comparison of small airways disease measures between frequent and infrequent COPD exacerbators. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA1120.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  85. ↵
    1. Trinkmann F,
    2. Gawlitza J,
    3. Schäfer J, et al.
    Novel lung function tests can improve phenotyping and differential therapy in COPD. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA3379.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  86. ↵
    1. Shirai T,
    2. Hirai K,
    3. Gon Y, et al.
    Forced oscillation technique may identify severe asthma. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2632.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  87. ↵
    1. Nasr A,
    2. Jarenbäck L,
    3. Bjermer L, et al.
    Assessment of expiratory vs inspiratory resistance and reactance using FOT as a measure of air trapping. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2634.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  88. ↵
    1. Ong-Salvador R,
    2. Dijkers E,
    3. Van Steenwijk R
    . The role of R5-19 in assessing peripheral airway obstruction. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA1117.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  89. ↵
    1. Lipworth B,
    2. Manoharam A,
    3. Anderson W
    . Unlocking the quiet zone:the small airway asthma phenotype. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2: 497–506. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70103-1
    OpenUrl
  90. ↵
    1. Bazan-Socha S,
    2. Zuk J,
    3. Kozlik P, et al.
    Relationship of airway structural changes and lung function abnormalities with blood and BAL biomarkers in asthma. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA505.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  91. ↵
    1. Kozlik P,
    2. Zuk J,
    3. Bartyzel S, et al.
    The relationship of airway structural changes to blood and bronchoalveolar lavage biomarkers, and lung function abnormalities in asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2019; 50: 15–28. doi:10.1111/cea.13501
    OpenUrl
  92. ↵
    1. Li H,
    2. Yan LP,
    3. Wang K, et al.
    Association between ADAM33 polymorphisms and asthma risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res 2019; 20: 38. doi:10.1186/s12931-019-1006-1
    OpenUrl
  93. ↵
    1. Yang L,
    2. Liu BC,
    3. Liu T, et al.
    Microbiome in lower respiratory tract of steroid- free patients with asthma. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA533.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  94. ↵
    1. Huang Y,
    2. Opron K,
    3. Erb-Downward J, et al.
    Lung microbiota associations with clinical features of COPD in the SPIROMICS cohort. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA3580.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  95. ↵
    1. Maestre D,
    2. Huff RD,
    3. Schwartz C, et al.
    Di-butyl phthalate (DBP) augments allergen-induced lung function decline and alters lower airway innate immunology in crossover human study. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  96. ↵
    1. Usmani OS,
    2. Biddiscombe MF,
    3. Barnes PJ
    . Regional lung deposition and bronchodilator response as a function of β2-agonist particle size. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 172: 1497–1504. doi:10.1164/rccm.200410-1414OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Hillyer EV,
    2. Price DB,
    3. Chrystyn H, et al.
    Harmonizing the nomenclature for therapeutic aerosol particle size: a proposal. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2018; 31: 111–113. doi:10.1089/jamp.2017.1396
    OpenUrl
  98. ↵
    1. Usmani OS
    . Small-airway disease in asthma: pharmacological considerations. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2015; 21: 55–67. doi:10.1097/MCP.0000000000000115
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Virchow JC,
    2. Kuna P,
    3. Paggiaro P, et al.
    Single inhaler extrafine triple therapy in uncontrolled asthma (TRIMARAN and TRIGGER): two double-blind, parallel-group, randomised, controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet 2019; 394: 1737–1749. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32215-9
    OpenUrl
    1. Virchow JC,
    2. Paggiaro P,
    3. Canonica WG, et al.
    Effect of extrafine medium strength (MS) ICS-containing triple therapy on exacerbations in asthmatics with persistent airflow limitation: A post-hoc analysis of the TRIMARAN study. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA3719.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  100. ↵
    1. Canonica WG,
    2. Virchow JC,
    3. Singh D, et al.
    Effect of high extrafine strength (HS) ICS-containing triple therapy on exacerbations in patients with severe asthma and persistent airflow limitation: Post-hoc analysis of the TRIGGER study. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA5339.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  101. ↵
    1. Topole E,
    2. Usmani O,
    3. Mignot B, et al.
    Lung deposition of extrafine vs non-extrafine triple therapies in patients with COPD using Functional Respiratory Imaging (FRI). Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA3167.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  102. ↵
    1. Sadiq MW,
    2. Holz O,
    3. Ellinghusen B, et al.
    Spatial pharmacokinetics of inhaled drugs in human lung – evaluation of regional lung targeting by direct sampling of epithelial lining fluid. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA2103.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  103. ↵
    1. Skogberg G,
    2. Jackson S,
    3. Fihn BM, et al.
    RNAscope in situ hybridization allows spatial estimation of free drug exposure through quantification of drug induced gene expression. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA3377.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  104. ↵
    1. Chalmers JD,
    2. Chang AB,
    3. Chotirmall SH, et al.
    Bronchiectasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018; 4: 45. doi:10.1038/s41572-018-0042-3
    OpenUrl
  105. ↵
    1. Flume PA,
    2. Chalmers JD,
    3. Olivier KN
    . Advances in bronchiectasis: endotyping, genetics, microbiome, and disease heterogeneity. Lancet 2018; 392: 880–890. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31767-7
    OpenUrl
  106. ↵
    1. Chalmers JD,
    2. Moffitt KL,
    3. Suarez-Cuartin SO, et al.
    Neutrophil elastase activity is associated with exacerbations and lung function decline in bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 1384–1393. doi:10.1164/rccm.201605-1027OC
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  107. ↵
    1. Shoemark A,
    2. Cant E,
    3. Carreto L, et al.
    A point of care neutrophil elastase activity assay identifies bronchiectasis severity, airway infection and risk of exacerbation. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA4947.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  108. ↵
    1. Finch S,
    2. Shoemark A,
    3. Dicker AJ, et al.
    Characterisation of sputum pregnancy zone protein in bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2167.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  109. ↵
    1. Smith A,
    2. Lang J,
    3. Keir HR, et al.
    Heparin binding protein in sputum compromises epithelial defence and relates to bronchiectasis severity. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2172.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  110. ↵
    1. McDonnell MJ,
    2. Aliberti S,
    3. Goeminne PC, et al.
    Comorbidities and the risk of mortality in patients with bronchiectasis: an international multicentre cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2016; 4: 969–979. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30320-4
    OpenUrl
  111. ↵
    1. Raats D,
    2. Decaesteker T,
    3. Fogelström M, et al.
    Cross-sectional evaluation of serum and sputum calprotectin in bronchiectasis disease monitoring. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2678.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  112. ↵
    1. Scioscia G,
    2. Amaro R,
    3. Alcaraz V, et al.
    The role of systemic markers of inflammation in bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2884.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  113. ↵
    1. Çetinkaya A,
    2. Uysal MA,
    3. Niksarlıoglu EY, et al.
    Can Neutrophil/lymphocyte Ratio, C-reactive protein (CRP) and Procalcitonin predict the hospitalisation time in patients with lower tract respiratory infections? Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA3849.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  114. ↵
    1. Méndez R,
    2. Moscardó A,
    3. Latorre A, et al.
    Platelet activation correlates with disease severity in bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2168.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  115. ↵
    1. Shoemark A,
    2. Smith A,
    3. Giam A, et al.
    Inflammatory molecular endotypes in bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2170.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  116. ↵
    1. Huang JT,
    2. Dicker A,
    3. Shoemark A, et al.
    Endotyping of COPD, bronchiectasis and their overlap syndrome by integrated sputum proteome/microbiome. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA473.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  117. ↵
    1. Keir HR,
    2. Fong CJ,
    3. Tan B, et al.
    Neutrophil extracellular traps and the lung microbiome in bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA5142.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  118. ↵
    1. Thng KX,
    2. Mac Aogáin M,
    3. Ali NABM, et al.
    Viral prevalence in stable bronchiectasis: analysis of the Cohort of Asian and Matched European Bronchiectasis (CAMEB). Eur Respir J 2019; 54: PA2875.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  119. ↵
    1. Gramegna A,
    2. Aliberti S,
    3. Zucchetti S, et al.
    Respiratory viruses in stable state bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2171.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  120. ↵
    1. Burgel P,
    2. Polverino E,
    3. Harworth C, et al.
    Risk factors for new P. aeruginosa isolation in bronchiectasis- data from the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC). E Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2163.
    OpenUrl
  121. ↵
    1. Ringshausen FC,
    2. Chalmers JD,
    3. Polverino E, et al.
    New isolation of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in patients with bronchiectasis - data from the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC). Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2937.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  122. ↵
    1. Nuñez Garcia L,
    2. Zambrano Chacón MA,
    3. Gotera Rivera C, et al.
    Prevalence of bronchiectasis in a lung cancer screening program. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA3025.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  123. ↵
    1. Sanchez-Carpintero Abad M,
    2. Zulueta JJ,
    3. De Torres JP, et al.
    Prevalence and burden of bronchiectasis in a lung cancer screening program. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2902.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  124. ↵
    1. Aliberti S,
    2. Menendez R,
    3. Blasi F, et al.
    Determinants of survival in the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC). Eur Respir J 2019; 54: OA4949.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  125. ↵
    1. Herrero Cortina B,
    2. San Miguel-Pagola M,
    3. Francín-Gallego M, et al.
    Long-term efficacy of a home-based airway clearance programme to improve cough severity in patients with bronchiectasis: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA4948.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  126. ↵
    1. Wynne S,
    2. Patel S,
    3. Barker RE, et al.
    The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on anxiety and depression symptoms in bronchiectasis: a propensity-matched study. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA663.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  127. ↵
    1. Terpstra L,
    2. Altenburg J,
    3. Mohamed Hoesein F, et al.
    The effect of maintenance azithromycin on radiological features in patients with bronchiectasis. E Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2865.
    OpenUrl
  128. ↵
    1. Altenburg J,
    2. Chalmers JD,
    3. Lonergan M, et al.
    Long term macrolide antibiotics for the treatment of bronchiectasis in adults – individual participant data meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA4945.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  129. ↵
    1. Terpstra L,
    2. Vijverberg S,
    3. Sabogal Piñeros Y, et al.
    The effect of azithromycin on sputum inflammatory markers in bronchiectasis – analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA4946.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  130. ↵
    1. Sabogal Piñeros YS,
    2. Altenburg J,
    3. Vijverberg S, et al.
    Explorative analyses of inflammatory pathways and the effect of azithromycin in bronchiectasis patients. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2671.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  131. ↵
    1. Perez J,
    2. Polverino E,
    3. Alvares A, et al.
    Prevalence of relevant multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens in a bronchiectasis (BE) cohort. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA4580.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  132. ↵
    1. Martinho Pereira PS,
    2. Gomes L,
    3. Costa J, et al.
    Multidrug resistant bacteria in bronchiectasis exacerbations. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2872.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  133. ↵
    1. French CL
    . Impact of chronic cough on quality of life. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1657–1661. doi:10.1001/archinte.158.15.1657
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  134. ↵
    1. Abdulqawi R,
    2. Dockry R,
    3. Holt K, et al.
    P2X3 receptor antagonist (AF-219) in refractory chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet 2014; 14: 61255–1.
    OpenUrl
  135. ↵
    1. Niimi A,
    2. Ishirhara H,
    3. Hilda H, et al.
    Phase 2a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of a novel P2X3 receptor antagonist S-600918 in patients with refractory chronic cough. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, RCT452.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  136. ↵
    1. Smith J,
    2. Ballantyne E,
    3. Kerr M, et al.
    The neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist orvepitant improves chronic cough symptoms: results from a Phase 2b trial. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA600.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  137. ↵
    1. Brannan J,
    2. Nurmi H,
    3. Latti A, et al.
    Mannitol and citric acid tests similarly identify subjects with chonic cough. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, OA3287.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  138. ↵
    1. Holmes J,
    2. Heaney L,
    3. Birring S, et al.
    Association between cough frequency, health status and Th2 inflammation in severe asthma. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA2720.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  139. ↵
    1. Raemdonck K,
    2. de Alba J,
    3. Birrell MA, et al.
    A role for sensory nerves in the late asthmatic response. Thorax 2012; 67: 19–25. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200365
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  140. ↵
    1. Van de Berg MPM,
    2. Nikboer-Brinksma S,
    3. Bos S, et al.
    A novel TRPA1 antagonist inhibits ovalbumin-induced bronchoconstriction in guinea pig models. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, PA4210.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  141. ↵
    1. Birrell MA,
    2. Belvisi MG,
    3. Grace M, et al.
    TRPA1 agonists evoke coughing in guinea pig and human volunteers. AJRCCM 2009; 180: 1042–1047.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 6 Issue 1 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 6 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
ERS International Congress, Madrid, 2019: highlights from the Airway Diseases, Asthma and COPD Assembly
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
ERS International Congress, Madrid, 2019: highlights from the Airway Diseases, Asthma and COPD Assembly
Lies Lahousse, Thomas Bahmer, Sara Cuevas-Ocaña, Pauline Flajolet, Alexander G. Mathioudakis, Melissa McDonnell, Lena Uller, Florence Schleich, Sergio Dortas Junior, Marco Idzko, Dave Singh, Fabio L.M. Ricciardolo, Ian M. Adcock, Omar Usmani, Antonio Spanevello, Sara J. Bonvini
ERJ Open Research Jan 2020, 6 (1) 00341-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00341-2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
ERS International Congress, Madrid, 2019: highlights from the Airway Diseases, Asthma and COPD Assembly
Lies Lahousse, Thomas Bahmer, Sara Cuevas-Ocaña, Pauline Flajolet, Alexander G. Mathioudakis, Melissa McDonnell, Lena Uller, Florence Schleich, Sergio Dortas Junior, Marco Idzko, Dave Singh, Fabio L.M. Ricciardolo, Ian M. Adcock, Omar Usmani, Antonio Spanevello, Sara J. Bonvini
ERJ Open Research Jan 2020, 6 (1) 00341-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00341-2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Asthma
    • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    • Small airways
    • Bronchiectasis
    • Airway sensory nerves and cough
    • Concluding remarks
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Asthma and allergy
  • COPD and smoking
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Highlights from the Paediatric Assembly
  • Highlights from the Respiratory Intensive Care Assembly
  • Highlights from the Airway Diseases Assembly
Show more Congress Highlights

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society