Abstract
Objective We aimed to assess adherence to the Australian national guideline (COPD-X) against audited practice, and to document the outcomes of patients hospitalised with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at discharge and 28 days after.
Methods A prospective clinical audit of COPD hospital admission from five tertiary care hospitals in five states of Australia was conducted. Post-discharge follow-up was conducted via telephone to assess for readmission and health status.
Results There were 207 admissions for acute exacerbation (171 patients; mean 70.2 years old; 50.3% males). Readmission rates at 28 days were 25.4%, with one (0.6%) death during admission and eight (6.1%) post-discharge within 28 days. Concordance to the COPD-X guidance was variable; 22.7% performed spirometry, 81.1% had blood gases collected when forced expiratory volume in 1 s was <1 L, 99.5% had chest radiography performed, 95.1% were prescribed systemic corticosteroids and 95% were prescribed antibiotic therapy. There were 89.1% given oxygen therapy and 92.6% when arterial oxygen tension was <80 mmHg; 65.6% were given ventilatory assistance when pH was <7.35. Only 32.4% were referred to pulmonary rehabilitation but 76.8% had general practitioner follow-up arranged.
Conclusion When compared against clinical practice guidelines, we found important gaps in management of patients admitted with COPD throughout tertiary care centres in Australia. Strategies to improve guideline uptake are needed to optimise care.
Abstract
A multisite audit of hospital admissions for patients experiencing #AECOPD in Australia highlighted important gaps in management when compared against national guidelines. Further focus on how we can improve guideline uptake by clinicians is needed. http://bit.ly/2VjGnHw
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: J.L. Cousins has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: R. Wood-Baker has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: P.A.B. Wark has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: I.A. Yang has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: P.G. Gibson reports a Practitioner Fellowship from the NHMRC; participation in educational symposia and in studies funded by AstraZeneca and by GlaxoSmithKline; and participation in educational symposia funded by Boehringer Ingelheim and by Novartis, all outside the submitted work.
Conflict of interest: A. Hutchinson has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: D. Sajkov has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: S.A. Hiles reports salary from grants paid to her institution (University of Newcastle) by GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work.
Conflict of interest: S. Samuel has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: V.M. Mcdonald reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and GSK, and personal fees from Menarini, outside the submitted work.
- Received September 30, 2019.
- Accepted February 18, 2020.
- Copyright ©ERS 2020
This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.