Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • ERS Author FAQs
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • ERS Author FAQs
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Use of the ReCIVA device in breath sampling of patients with acute breathlessness: a feasibility study

Karl A. Holden, Wadah Ibrahim, Dahlia Salman, Rebecca Cordell, Teresa McNally, Bharti Patel, Rachael Phillips, Caroline Beardsmore, Michael Wilde, Luke Bryant, Amisha Singapuri, Paul Monks, Chris Brightling, Neil Greening, Paul Thomas, Salman Siddiqui, Erol A. Gaillard
ERJ Open Research 2020 6: 00119-2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00119-2020
Karl A. Holden
1NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
5These authors contributed equally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Karl A. Holden
Wadah Ibrahim
1NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
5These authors contributed equally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dahlia Salman
2Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Cordell
3Dept of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Teresa McNally
1NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bharti Patel
1NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachael Phillips
4NIHR Leicester Clinical Research Facility, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Beardsmore
1NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Wilde
3Dept of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luke Bryant
3Dept of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amisha Singapuri
1NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Monks
3Dept of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Brightling
1NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil Greening
1NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Thomas
1NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Salman Siddiqui
1NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
5These authors contributed equally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erol A. Gaillard
1NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
5These authors contributed equally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: eag15@leicester.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Investigating acute multifactorial undifferentiated breathlessness and understanding the driving inflammatory processes can be technically challenging in both adults and children. Being able to validate noninvasive methods such as breath analysis would be a huge clinical advance. The ReCIVA® device allows breath samples to be collected directly onto sorbent tubes at the bedside for analysis of exhaled volatile organic compounds (eVOCs). We aimed to assess the feasibility of using this device in acutely breathless patients.

Methods Adults hospitalised with acute breathlessness and children aged 5–16 years with acute asthma or chronic stable asthma, as well as healthy adult and child volunteers, were recruited. Breath samples were collected onto sorbent tubes using the ReCIVA® device and sent for analysis by means of two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCxGC-MS). The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was used to assess the perceived task workload of undertaking sampling from the patient's perspective.

Results Data were available for 65 adults and 61 children recruited. In total, 98.4% of adults and 75.4% of children were able to provide the full target breath sample using the ReCIVA® device. NASA-TLX measurements were available in the adult population with mean values of 3.37 for effort, 2.34 for frustration, 3.8 for mental demand, 2.8 for performance, 3.9 for physical demand and 2.8 for temporal demand.

Discussion This feasibility study demonstrates it is possible and acceptable to collect breath samples from both adults and children at the bedside for breathomics analysis using the ReCIVA® device.

Abstract

It is feasible to collect breath samples for breath analysis at the bedside using the ReCIVA device in acutely breathless adults and children https://bit.ly/2ZTonWo

Footnotes

  • Support statement: Research funding was provided by the MRC and EPSRC Stratified Medicine Grant for Molecular Pathology Nodes (grant number MR/N005880/1). The research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre – Respiratory and Cardiovascular Themes, NIHR, Leicester Clinical Research Facility, the British Lung Foundation and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, to whom we are extremely grateful. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Health Service and NIHR or the Department of Health. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Conflict of interest: K.A. Holden reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: W. Ibrahim reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: D. Salman reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: R. Cordell reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: T. McNally reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: B. Patel reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: R. Phillips reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: C. Beardsmore reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Wilde reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: L. Bryant reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: A. Singapuri reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: P. Monks reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study.

  • Conflict of interest: C. Brightling reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck, Gossamer, 4DPharma, Boehringer Ingelheim and Mologic, personal fees from TEVA, grants from Genentech/Roche, and personal fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: N. Greening reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study; research funding and lecture honoraria from GSK, and lecture honoraria and conference travel from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and Chiesi, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: P. Thomas reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study; and grants from TOXI-triage (this project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 653409), outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: S. Siddiqui reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study; grants from TOXI-triage (this project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 653409), personal fees from Owlstone Medical Ltd and Mundipharma, and advisory board fees from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Chiesi and Roche, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: E.A. Gaillard reports grants from the Medical Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EMBER Node Consortium, the British Lung Foundation, and the Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, during the conduct of the study; consultancy fees paid to the University of Leicester from Boehringer Ingelheim and Anaxsys, investigator-led research grants from Circassia, Gilead and Chiesi Ltd, and a research collaboration grant from Medimmune, outside the submitted work.

  • Received March 6, 2020.
  • Accepted July 17, 2020.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2020
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 6 Issue 4 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 6 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Use of the ReCIVA device in breath sampling of patients with acute breathlessness: a feasibility study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Use of the ReCIVA device in breath sampling of patients with acute breathlessness: a feasibility study
Karl A. Holden, Wadah Ibrahim, Dahlia Salman, Rebecca Cordell, Teresa McNally, Bharti Patel, Rachael Phillips, Caroline Beardsmore, Michael Wilde, Luke Bryant, Amisha Singapuri, Paul Monks, Chris Brightling, Neil Greening, Paul Thomas, Salman Siddiqui, Erol A. Gaillard
ERJ Open Research Oct 2020, 6 (4) 00119-2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00119-2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Use of the ReCIVA device in breath sampling of patients with acute breathlessness: a feasibility study
Karl A. Holden, Wadah Ibrahim, Dahlia Salman, Rebecca Cordell, Teresa McNally, Bharti Patel, Rachael Phillips, Caroline Beardsmore, Michael Wilde, Luke Bryant, Amisha Singapuri, Paul Monks, Chris Brightling, Neil Greening, Paul Thomas, Salman Siddiqui, Erol A. Gaillard
ERJ Open Research Oct 2020, 6 (4) 00119-2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00119-2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • Design and methods
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Noninterventional monitoring of expiratory flow limitation
  • Controlled versus free breathing for MBNW in healthy adults
  • Aspiration and severe exacerbations in COPD
Show more Original articles

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • ERS author centre

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society