Abstract
Internet images associated with breathlessness and COPD are mainly aimed at clinicians, more likely to be negative, and are gender and culturally exclusive compared with other cardiorespiratory conditions https://bit.ly/2DMfs0r
To the Editor:
Visual art is a powerful, creative drive that has been used to convey ideas, express feelings and tell stories since early humans drew cave paintings. Artistic representation of disease is evident throughout history and includes portraits, medical and religious illustrations, artworks inspired by particular conditions, and even self-portraits by artists suffering from illness [1]. Notably, the Australian artist Alison Mackay recently won the Gallipoli Art Prize for her painting “Breathe”. This artwork depicting nine gas masks from World Wars 1 and 2 was painted in response to the devastating Australian bushfires in early 2020, when many people were wearing breathing masks to protect themselves from the choking smoke [2].
Importantly artworks depicting illness may both reflect and influence community perceptions of disease, and therefore contribute to the perpetuation of negative or positive associations with illnesses. Negative perceptions of some illnesses, such as COPD, can lead to stigma and shame [3] and have detrimental effects upon individuals’ quality of life, coping mechanisms and self-management strategies [4]. In contrast, positive immersion in the medical humanities may improve clinician empathy and communication [5, 6], and for patients may alter illness perception.
Whereas cardiorespiratory conditions are underrepresented in classical art forms such as poetry, film, art and storytelling [5], in recent years the internet has offered a wealth of information (of variable accuracy) on multiple health topics, including many different types of images and cartoons. As people increasingly turn to the internet for health information, this study aimed to examine the content of online images related to breathlessness for cardiorespiratory conditions in order to understand the purpose of the image and identify positive or negative depictions.
Online searches using the Google search engine were carried out in September 2019 using the search terms: “breathlessness and COPD”, “breathlessness and asthma”, “breathlessness and heart disease” and “breathlessness and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis”. “Breathlessness” was chosen as a search term as it is one of the most common symptoms in respiratory illnesses [1, 4, 7]. The search was limited to the first 100 images to reduce the frequency of duplicate images, including the use of stock photos. The images were captured in screenshots and the website link saved, due to the daily changes in the order and types of images displayed via Google images searches. Included images were categorised and compared by two authors (F. Berenyi and N. Smallwood) between September 2019 and January 2020, with the first 20 images reviewed together and the next 80 separately. Any discrepancies in categorisation were discussed between authors. The categories included: intended type of image, target audience and purpose of image. Image types were further categorised as: diagram, infographic, graphic, photo, cartoon, figure, table and other (e.g. presentation slide, poster, book cover and graphics interchange format (GIF)). If the image was a photo involving a person, further details were recorded including approximate age (child, young, middle-aged, elderly), gender and ethnicity. The target audience (defined as clinician, patient or either) was determined according to type of image, language used, original website source for the image and the website content.
Most online images associated with COPD were educational, including diagrams, tables and figures from journal articles, presentation slides and medical education websites, with these images being targeted towards health professionals (table 1). In contrast, the majority of images relating to asthma, heart disease or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were intended for a lay audience (patients or carers), with the apparent purpose being education and illness engagement. Images were sourced from a wide variety of internet sites, including patient advocacy sites, education-based sites and lung foundation websites, as well as blogs, Pinterest and slideshare sites.
Online visual representation of cardiorespiratory illnesses
Images depicting a human (in photo or cartoon form) were further categorised into those with positive or negative associations or neither. Negative images were more common in COPD than in other conditions, and included photos of people who appeared distressed while coughing, grimacing, and struggling to walk. Home oxygen therapy and cigarettes more commonly featured in relation to COPD than other illnesses. Positive images were most common in the asthma and breathlessness search, and included photos of people smiling or appearing calm, wearing active-wear, standing outside in picturesque environments, or holding inhalers while appearing relaxed. While colours can also be associated with positivity or negativity, there were no trends in either positive or negative images in terms of colour schemes for picture settings or clothes of any human subjects.
Men were the principal subjects in most online images associated with COPD (80.0%) and heart disease (60.0%), whereas the photos related to asthma included mostly women (71.8%). Images related to COPD mostly depicted middle-aged or elderly people (80.0%), whereas asthma images most commonly portrayed young people (66.7%) and heart disease images were mainly of middle-aged individuals (46.6%). Across all the online searches over 80% of the photos involved white people.
The English language phrase “a picture is worth a thousand words” emphasises the power of art, as a picture may convey an idea more quickly and effectively than the written word. Indeed, a visual image provides a nonverbal demonstration of an idea, emotion or story at a glance, often more effectively than written text. The addition of pictures, particularly those that are culturally relevant, to written and verbal information improves illness understanding and attention [8]. It is notable therefore that the majority of images identified in these online searches depicted people of white ethnicity, which does not accurately reflect the populations affected by these conditions. Furthermore, the online images related to these chronic cardiorespiratory conditions were for the most part not relevant to the affected populations.
Few previous studies have examined health-related, online art. Paige et al. [9] studied images associated with COPD on the website Pinterest and found that the majority of pictures contained general health information and self-management strategies. However, the most “liked” images were those with photographs, indicating photos generated higher levels of user engagement [9]. However, in contrast to our study, the photos on Pinterest were mostly of women. Their finding may be explained by the fact that Pinterest is a site marketed towards women. Stellefson et al. [10] explored COPD information available on YouTube. They found that there were far fewer COPD educational videos compared with other leading causes of illness, and the quality and accuracy of the content was highly variable [10]. Therefore, current research (including our study) suggests that while social media and internet resources are important tools in improving patient understanding and engagement, the information currently available may be neither relevant nor accurate. Furthermore, negative images may impact upon quality of life and perpetuate community stigma and negativity towards COPD.
Our finding that most internet images associated with breathlessness and COPD are mainly aimed at clinicians, more likely to be negative, and are gender and culturally exclusive, highlight the current online opportunities (particularly for clinicians and patient advocacy groups) to overcome negativity and stigma and better educate our patients, their caregivers and the community.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: F. Berenyi has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: S. Booth has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: A. Spathis has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: N. Smallwood has nothing to disclose.
- Received August 3, 2020.
- Accepted August 3, 2020.
- Copyright ©ERS 2020
This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.