Reference equations for tidal breathing parameters using structured light plethysmography

Shayan Motamedi-Fakhr, Richard Iles, Nicki Barker, John Alexander, Brendan G. Cooper
ERJ Open Research 2021 7: 00050-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00050-2021

Abstract

Tidal breathing measurements can be used to identify changes in respiratory status. Structured light plethysmography (SLP) is a non-contact tidal breathing measurement technique. Lack of reference equations for SLP parameters makes clinical decision-making difficult. We have developed a set of growth-adjusted reference equations for seven clinically pertinent parameters of respiratory rate (fR), inspiratory time (tI), expiratory time (tE), duty cycle (tI/total breath time), phase (thoraco-abdominal asynchrony (TAA)), relative thoracic contribution (RTC) and tidal inspiratory/expiratory flow at 50% volume (IE50).

Reference equations were developed based on a cohort of 198 seated healthy subjects (age 2–75 years, height 82–194 cm, 108 males). We adopted the same methodological approach as the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) report on spirometric reference equations. 5 min of tidal breathing was recorded per subject. Parameters were summarised with their medians. The supplementary material provided is an integral part of this work and a reference range calculator is provided therein.

We found predicted fR to decrease with age and height rapidly in the first 20 years and slowly thereafter. Expected tI, tE and RTC followed the opposite trend. RTC was 6.7% higher in females. Duty cycle increased with age, peaked at 13 years and decreased thereafter. TAA was high and variable in early life and declined rapidly with age. Predicted IE50 was constant, as it did not correlate with growth.

These reference ranges for seven key measures ensure that clinicians and researchers can identify tidal breathing patterns in disease and better understand and interpret SLP and tidal breathing data.

Abstract

A set of reference equations for seven key tidal breathing parameters measured using structured light plethysmography (SLP) to help clinicians better understand and interpret SLP data and the value of tidal breathing patterns https://bit.ly/2Og2H3h

Introduction

While spirometry is the cornerstone of traditional lung function assessment, it is not always possible to obtain reliable spirometry in patients who cannot perform the forced manoeuvres. In addition, there is evidence that respiratory viruses can be transmitted in aerosols generated by asymptomatic individuals [1], especially during the forced manoeuvres of lung function tests [2]. Measurement of tidal breathing patterns is easier to perform, provides a complementary method to traditional lung function and breathing assessment in children and adults [3, 4] and minimises cross-infection risk.

Structured light plethysmography (SLP) is an established technique for non-contact measurement of respiratory motion [5–11]. A checkerboard pattern of light is projected onto the subject's thoraco-abdominal wall. Using two precisely angled cameras the three-dimensional coordinates of each intersection point on the checkerboard is determined and tracked over time. Displacement on the axis perpendicular to the surface of the thoraco-abdominal wall can be spatially averaged over different regions (compartments; e.g. chest and/or abdomen) to generate one-dimensional compartment-specific time-series (figure 1). It is worth noting that some of the parameters studied here have been previously validated against tidal breathing data measured using a spirometer [5].

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1

Working principle of structured light plethysmography. The green trace corresponds to the thoracic movement, the blue trace shows the abdominal movement and the purple trace is the summation of blue and green traces, reflecting the movement of the entire thoraco-abdominal wall.

The pattern of tidal breathing can be derived from the displacement of the thoraco-abdominal wall and a number of tidal breathing parameters can be calculated from this pattern. We report seven key tidal breathing parameters measured using SLP: respiratory rate (fR), inspiratory time (tI), expiratory time (tE), duty cycle (tI/ttot), thoraco-abdominal asynchrony (TAA), relative thoracic contribution (RTC) and tidal inspiratory/expiratory flow at 50% of tidal volume (IE50; also a surrogate measure of airway obstruction [6]). The calculation of IE50 is not based on absolute flow and volume measurements; rather, it is derived from the movement of the thoraco-abdominal wall (analogous to volume) and the first derivative of thoraco-abdominal wall movement (analogous to flow).

We provide a set of growth-adjusted reference equations for these parameters. They were selected as they had shown clinical utility. Supplementary table 1 lists these parameters, their definitions and their clinical utility. These are the first reference data of this kind, and the authors anticipate that it will aid clinicians and researchers to better quantify, understand and interpret SLP data and tidal breathing patterns. The supplementary material provided is an integral part of this study and it is highly recommended that readers who seek further detail consult it as they go through the study.

Materials and methods

Data

SLP data from clinical and research measurements collected from multiple sites (Queen Elizabeth (QE) Hospital, Birmingham, UK; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; University Hospital North Midlands (UHNM), Stoke-on-Trent, UK) were collated retrospectively. Data collected from QE were control data for an α1-antitrypsin deficiency study [12]. Data from Addenbrooke's Hospital were a mix of data for healthy and unhealthy subjects recruited for validation of SLP. Data from UHNM were control cohorts of two asthma studies [6, 7]. All studies had been approved by their respective ethics committees and we obtained informed consent prior to data acquisition.

SLP data were captured using Thora-3Di (PneumaCare Limited, Cambridge, UK). Inclusion criteria were subjects with no history of respiratory disease, who had 5 min of SLP capture in seated position and had a body mass index <40 kg·m−2. Subjects wore a taut white t-shirt (or the test was done on bare skin). In total, 73 datasets were excluded from the analysis, details of which can be found in the supplementary material (data section). This left 198 clean SLP captures, each containing quiet tidal breathing (at rest) which passed the quality checks. The quality checking criteria for SLP signal are detailed in the SLP signal processing section in the report by Motamedi-Fakhr et al. [8]. Parameters were summarised for each 5-min epoch by taking the median. Each dataset was accompanied by subject age, sex, height and weight. Ethnicity was not specified. None of the subjects were sedated for measurement. Age of subjects ranged from 2 to 75 years, height between 82 and 194 cm and weight between 14 and 149 kg. Further information on data quality assessment, exclusions and demographic information can be found in the supplementary material (data section).

Statistical analyses

We adopted the same methodological approach as the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) publication on spirometric normative equations [13]. The Generalised Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) package in R (version 3.5.2; www.r-project.org) was used to develop the reference equations [14]. GAMLSS is capable of modelling the expected value (µ, M or mean), coefficient of variation (sigma or σ) and skewness (lambda or λ) of a distribution. We assessed scatterplots of each parameter against age, height, weight and sex to identify the regressors. Distribution of the dependent variable (e.g. fR, tI, tE) was visualised using histograms. For each parameter, various combinations of independent variables (e.g. age, height, weight, sex), their higher powers and their interactions were tested. Schwarz–Bayesian criterion was used to identify the most parsimonious model [15]. Normal Q–Q plots, worm plots [16] and visual assessment of the distribution of the residuals were done to ensure each fit was sufficiently representative. The model for each parameter and its considerations are detailed in the supplementary material (equations section).

Results

An SLP normative value calculator Excel spreadsheet was developed to facilitate calculation of reference ranges for the studied parameters. The calculator is colour coded to simulate a “traffic light” approach. In addition, it is possible to manually input observed values for each parameter and automatically obtain their corresponding z-scores. The calculator spreadsheet is available in the supplementary material. In the following section, the growth-related trend for each parameter is depicted. The black line shows the expected or predicted value, the blue line is the upper limit of normal (ULN), and the green line is the lower limit of normal (LLN). The probability of observing a value lower than the LLN or higher than the ULN is 2.5%.

Respiratory rate

Figure 2 shows growth-related change in median fR. Height entries are estimated rather than observed (see the visual representation of the reference equations section in the supplementary material for more information); the graph provides only an approximate guidance on the overall trend; for actual values use the normative value calculator spreadsheet.

FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2

Growth-related changes in median respiratory rate (fR). LLN: lower limit of normal; ULN: upper limit of normal.

Inspiratory time

Figure 3 depicts the growth-related changes in median tI. tI increases rapidly during early life and up to age ∼20 years (where the slope falls to 0.1), and almost linearly thereafter. Height entries are estimated and therefore the graph only provides guidance on the overall trend.

FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3

Growth-related change in median inspiratory time (tI). LLN: lower limit of normal; ULN: upper limit of normal.

Expiratory time

The model for tE depends only on age; therefore, figure 4 accurately depicts the age-related changes in median tE.

FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4

Growth-related change in median expiratory time (tE). LLN: lower limit of normal; ULN: upper limit of normal.

Duty cycle

tI/ttot increases during early life, peaks at age 13 years, and decreases gradually thereafter. tI/ttot is dependent on both age and height, and therefore figure 5 provides approximate guidance on the overall trend.

FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5

Growth-related change in median duty cycle (tI/ttot). LLN: lower limit of normal; ULN: upper limit of normal; tI: inspiratory time; ttot: total breath time.

Relative thoracic contribution

Figure 6 shows the age-related changes for RTC for males and females separately. RTC increases with age and is ∼6.7% higher in females across all ages. Figure 6 can be used directly for interpretation, as the model does not depend on height.

FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6

Growth-related change in median relative thoracic contribution (RTC) in males and females. LLN: lower limit of normal; ULN: upper limit of normal.

Thoraco-abdominal asynchrony

TAA was modelled with age only, and as such figure 7 can be used directly for interpretation. TAA is high and variable during early life and decreases considerably in both magnitude and variability with age.

FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7

Growth-related change in median thoraco-abdominal asynchrony (TAA). LLN: lower limit of normal; ULN: upper limit of normal.

IE50

Given the current sample size, IE50 does not appear to significantly correlate with age, height or sex. Therefore, the expected value and the upper and lower limits of normal are constant. Figure 8 provides a visual clarification of this.

FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8

Tidal inspiratory/expiratory flow at 50% volume (IE50) does not correlate with age, height or sex. Expected value, LLN and ULN were 1.29, 0.96 and 1.88, respectively. LLN: lower limit of normal; ULN: upper limit of normal.

Discussion

This study provides, for the first time, a preliminary set of normative (reference) equations for seven tidal breathing parameters of respiratory rate (fR), inspiratory time (tI), expiratory time (tE), duty cycle, thoraco-abdominal asynchrony (TAA), relative thoracic contribution (RTC) and IE50 measured using SLP. Here, we discuss our findings regarding each parameter in relation to the existing body of literature.

Respiratory rate

Normative equations or reference ranges for fR have been covered in the literature for infants [17] and children aged ≤3 years by Gagliardi and Rusconi [18]. They used body weight as the sole predictor of respiratory rate in 635 infants and children weighing 14–20 kg. These data are similar, with fR ranging from 18 to 35 breaths·min−1 (judging from the scatterplot in figure 2 therein) and between 18 and 32 breaths·min−1 in our study.

For children aged 4–16 years Wallis et al. [19] provide a set of normative equations based on direct measurement of fR by observing the movement of the chest in 1109 healthy resting children in a seated position. The reported ULN and LLN (i.e. upper and lower 2.5%) are narrower than in our study.

Furthermore, our expected values and trend of changing fR with age agrees with a review article providing reference equation for fR in the first 18 years of life. Fleming et al. [20] reported a rapid reduction in fR and its variability, most pronounced during early life, particularly in those aged 2–3 years.

In adults, the norm seems to be a constant 12–20 breaths·min−1 range for fR [21]. Looking at the entire age range, our results suggest a more rapid decline in approximately the first 20 years of life and a small linear reduction thereafter. The reported expected values for adults are well within the suggested range, potentially indicating agreement.

Inspiratory time, expiratory time and duty cycle

Normative values or reference equations are not well established for tI and tE during quiet tidal breathing. Most studies pertain to mechanical ventilation. However, indications of what might constitute a normal tI and tI/ttot do exist. Tobin et al. [22] reported a normal tI of 1.6±0.3 s in young healthy subjects (aged 20–50 years, n=47) and 1.67±0.35 s in older healthy subjects (aged 60–81 years, n=18). Note that the reported values are mean±sd measured in the supine position. The average age for the young and old cohorts were 29 and 69 years, respectively. Using our equation to calculate tI by substituting 29 years for age and the predicted height from our data (≈174 cm), the predicted value was 1.54 s. For a 69-year-old with an estimated height of ∼170 cm, the predicted tI was 1.59 s. This is a crude comparison, and the discrepancies can be attributed to different measurement devices (SLP versus respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP)), subject position (seated versus supine), summary statistic (median versus mean) and possibly to a different demographic. However, the trend and the difference between old and young cohorts is confirmed in our data. We found that tI increases with age and height up to ∼20 years of life and more slowly thereafter.

tE is similar to tI. There are few published studies looking at normative tE in tidal breathing in healthy subjects. Those published do not overlap with the age range investigated in this study. In short, our results suggest that tE increases more rapidly during the first 20 years of life and gradually (linearly) thereafter.

Duty cycle (tI/ttot) has also been primarily used in relation to mechanical ventilation [23]. We have observed an increase in duty cycle in children up to 13 years and a gradual decrease with age thereafter. Parreira et al. [24] measured tI/ttot in 104 healthy subjects in the supine position using calibrated RIP bands. They reported a significant difference between males and females in the younger cohort (aged 20–39 years), but not in the other age bands. In our equation for tI/ttot, sex has not been identified as a determining factor (tI/ttot was predicted by age and height only). Using optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) with 83 healthy adult subjects, Mendes et al. [25] reported that tI/ttot did not change with posture or sex, which confirms our finding. Furthermore, actual values reported for expected tI/ttot in healthy adults are broadly similar to ours, with Tobin et al. [22] and Parreira et al. [24] reporting an average tI/ttot of approximately 0.42±0.03 and 0.39±0.04, respectively. Wilkens et al. [26] reported an average duty cycle of 0.37 in 10 healthy adults at rest using OEP. This appears to be lower than our estimated expected value for similar age and height, although this difference might be explained by the small sample size (10 versus 198) and use of an alternative summary statsitic (mean versus median). There are no published normative values of tI/ttot for children, and therefore our study provides these unique data.

Thoraco-abdominal asynchrony

Phase-angle or thoraco-abdominal asynchrony has been used to assess respiratory function in children [6, 7, 27] and adults [8, 28]. Based on our data, TAA is high and variable during early life and reduces in both magnitude and variability with age. Mayer et al. [29] report an average TAA of 15.7° in a cohort of 50 young children (aged 3–5 years) in the seated position. This agrees with our results, as does the apparent trend of decreasing TAA with age (see figure 7 in [29]). Parreira et al. [24] report phase angle in adults, but the reported values are considerably higher than ours (approximately 5° versus 13°). This is probably due to the difference in position of subjects (supine versus seated). A higher TAA in the supine position compared to seated is shown in Mayer et al. [29]. TAA in healthy subjects in a seated position is reported elsewhere [28, 30]. The number of healthy subjects is low (n=10 and n=9 at rest, respectively), and the method for calculation of phase differs slightly from what has been used herein. The reported values for phase in these studies can take either a negative or positive number, whereas in our study TAA is an absolute measure of asynchrony (a non-negative number) [27]. Looking at the absolute values of the reported TAA in healthy subjects at rest, we see a rough agreement with our results (low TAA in adult subjects, generally ∼5° and not exceeding 10°).

Relative thoracic contribution

RTC characterises the spatial dynamics of the thoraco-abdominal motion. This parameter has been studied in monitoring of several patient groups: post-thoracic surgery [31], neuromuscular disease [9], dysfunctional breathing [32], COPD [33] and in weaning patients from mechanical ventilators [34]. In our study, we have found that RTC increases with age and is ∼6.7% higher in females than in males across all ages included in the study. Our results partially fit with the account of ribcage contribution when it comes to females having a higher ribcage contribution [25], but differs in the reported trend of decreasing ribcage contribution with age in adult subjects, seen in that and other studies [25, 35]. In infants and very young children, the trend seems to be the opposite, with RTC increasing with age [36]. A comparison between reported values for RTC in children [37] and adults [25] also indicates that ribcage contribution may increase from childhood to adulthood, and that is where we have seen the most pronounced increase in our study. Reported values for ribcage contribution seem to be inconsistent [25, 37, 38], but most studies agree that RTC is higher in females and that ribcage contribution decreases with age in healthy seated adults. We speculate that this discrepancy may be due to inclusion of both children and adults in determining the reference equation. Additionally, our study has the largest sample size in comparison to the aformentioned studies, which may carry with it deeper insight.

IE50

IE50 is as defined by Kaplan et al. [39] and is not studied as extensively as some of the other tidal breathing parameters; as such, published normative values or reference equations for IE50 are currently unknown. As a surrogate measure of airway obstruction [6] it quantifies the effective shape of tidal breathing flow/volume loop at the middle point (tidal volume=50%). IE50 was not found to correlate with age, sex or height in our study; therefore, its expected value (1.29) and upper and lower limits of normal (0.96 and 1.88, respectively) remained constant across the population.

Limitations

The sample size could be criticised for a normative value study. However, it should be emphasised that SLP is still novel, and as such a large volume of data are yet to be collected. Interest in SLP is growing, and new data will augment the datasets presented. Although a sample size of 198 is not representative of an entire population, distribution analysis of the parameters allowed accurate modelling of the predictive equations. Our recent small-scale clinical validation of the developed reference equations confirms this and shows promise [40]. More information on the validation study can also be found in the final section of the supplementary material. This is an extremely valuable starting point for interpretation of breathing pattern data as evidenced in the discussion, as well as for SLP.

Another shortcoming of the study was in recruitment of healthy subjects, which was based on having no history of a respiratory disease. It would have been ideal to have basic spirometry and smoking history available. In addition, since ethnicity data were not recorded, reference equations were not adjusted for ethnicity.

Conclusion

We have provided a set of growth-adjusted reference equations for seven tidal breathing parameters measured using SLP. Expected normative values for fR, tI, tI/ttot and TAA agree well with previous studies.

RTC in females was higher than in males, which is in line with the existing literature. However, the increasing trend of adult RTC with age in our study contradicts the commonly reported reduction with age. We suspect this is due to inclusion of both children and adult subjects in our models. Expected values for normal RTC as a whole remain inconsistent in the literature.

We have unique normative values for tE and IE50. These equations may facilitate further use of these parameters in future research and clinical necessity.

A reference range calculator (an Excel spreadsheet) is provided in the supplementary material which should help clinicians and researchers better interpret SLP data and tidal breathing in general. This may be of particular benefit given the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, since tidal breathing may be an alternative, non-aerosol-generating procedure for lung function assessment.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.

Supplementary material 00050-2021.supplement

Calculator 00050-2021.calculator

Acknowledgement

We sincerely thank Sanja Stanojevic (The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada) for her invaluable input on using GAMLSS and guidance on developing reference equations. We are grateful to Hamzah Hmeidi, Amna Khalid, Jenny Conlon and Angelique Laubscher (PneumaCare Limited, Cambridge, UK) and James Stockley and Liam O'Reilly (University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK) for the collection of high-quality data that was donated to this reference cohort, and of course we remain indebted to all participants in the measurement collection.

Footnotes

  • This article has supplementary material available from openres.ersjournals.com

  • Conflict of interest: S. Motamedi-Fakhr is a full-time employee of PneumaCare Limited.

  • Conflict of interest: R. Iles is a past employee, founder and shareholder of PneumaCare.

  • Conflict of interest: N. Barker has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: J. Alexander has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: B.G. Cooper reports that his department has had the free loan of Thora 3 Di device from Pneumacare for the past 5 years as it has developed clinical use of the device.

  • Received January 22, 2021.
  • Accepted February 25, 2021.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Anderson EL,
    2. Turnham P,
    3. Griffin JR, et al.
    Consideration of the aerosol transmission for COVID-19 and public health. Risk Anal 2020; 40: 902–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13500
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Miller MR,
    2. Hankinson J,
    3. Brusasco V, et al.
    Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 319–338.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Lødrup Carlsen KC
    . Tidal breathing at all ages. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2000; 55: 427–434.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Hull JH,
    2. Lloyd JK,
    3. Cooper BG
    . Lung function testing in the COVID-19 endemic. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8: 666–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30246-0
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Motamedi-Fakhr S,
    2. Iles R,
    3. Barney A, et al.
    Evaluation of the agreement of tidal breathing parameters measured simultaneously using pneumotachography and structured light plethysmography. Physiol Rep 2017; 5: e13124. http://doi.wiley.com/10.14814/phy2.13124
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Hmeidi H,
    2. Motamedi-Fakhr S,
    3. Chadwick E, et al.
    Tidal breathing parameters measured using structured light plethysmography in healthy children and those with asthma before and after bronchodilator. Physiol Rep 2017; 5: e13168.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Hmeidi H,
    2. Motamedi-Fakhr S,
    3. Chadwick EK, et al.
    Tidal breathing parameters measured by structured light plethysmography in children aged 2–12 years recovering from acute asthma/wheeze compared with healthy children. Physiol Rep 2018; 6: e13752. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13752
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Motamedi-Fakhr S,
    2. Wilson RC,
    3. Iles R
    . Tidal breathing patterns derived from structured light plethysmography in COPD patients compared with healthy subjects. Med Devices 2016; 10: 1–9.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Fleck D,
    2. Curry C,
    3. Donnan K, et al.
    Investigating the clinical use of structured light plethysmography to assess lung function in children with neuromuscular disorders. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0221207. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221207
    OpenUrl
    1. Dizdar EA,
    2. Bozkaya D,
    3. Sari FN, et al.
    Tidal breathing parameters measured by structured light plethysmography in newborns: is it feasible in neonatal intensive care unit? Am J Perinatol 2020; in press [http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708883].
  11. ↵
    1. Niérat MC,
    2. Dubé BP,
    3. Llontop C, et al.
    Measuring ventilatory activity with structured light plethysmography (SLP) reduces instrumental observer effect and preserves tidal breathing variability in healthy and COPD. Front Physiol 2017; 8: 316. doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00316
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. O'Reilly L,
    2. Sapey E,
    3. Desando S, et al.
    The effect of posture on ventilation using structured light plethysmography (SLP) in alpha 1 anti-trypsin deficiency (A1AT). Eur Respir J 2014; 44: Suppl. 58, P4268.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Quanjer PH,
    2. Stanojevic S,
    3. Cole TJ, et al.
    Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 1324–1343.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Rigby RA,
    2. Stasinopoulos DM
    . Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. JR Stat Soc Ser C (Applied Stat) 2005; 54: 507–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Schwarz G
    . Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 1978; 6: 461–464.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. van Buuren S,
    2. Fredriks M
    . Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modelling growth reference curves. Stat Med 2001; 20: 1259–1277. doi:10.1002/sim.746
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Fuchs O,
    2. Latzin P,
    3. Thamrin C, et al.
    Normative data for lung function and exhaled nitric oxide in unsedated healthy infants. Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 1208–1216.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Gagliardi L,
    2. Rusconi F
    . Respiratory rate and body mass in the first three years of life. Arch Dis Child 1997; 76: 151–154.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Wallis LA,
    2. Healy M,
    3. Undy MB, et al.
    Age related reference ranges for respiration rate and heart rate from 4 to 16 years. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90: 1117–1121. doi:10.1136/adc.2004.068718
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Fleming S,
    2. Thompson M,
    3. Stevens R, et al.
    Normal ranges of heart rate and respiratory rate in children from birth to 18 years of age: a systematic review of observational studies. Lancet 2011; 377: 1011–1018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Royal College of Physicians (RCP). National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2: Standardising the Assessment of Acute-Illness Severity in the NHS. London, RCP, 2017. Available from: www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/national-early-warning-score-news-2
  22. ↵
    1. Tobin MJ,
    2. Chadha TS,
    3. Jenouri G, et al.
    Breathing patterns: 1. Normal subjects. Chest 1983; 84: 202–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-3692(15)33498-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Koga T,
    2. Watanabe K,
    3. Sano M, et al.
    Breathing intolerance index: a new indicator for ventilator use. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 85: 24–30. doi:10.1097/01.phm.0000184237.62628.e1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Parreira VF,
    2. Bueno CJ,
    3. França DC, et al.
    Breathing pattern and thoracoabdominal motion in healthy individuals: influence of age and sex. Rev Bras Fisioter 2010; 14: 411–416. doi:10.1590/S1413-35552010000500010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Mendes LPS,
    2. Vieira DSR,
    3. Gabriel LS, et al.
    Influence of posture, sex, and age on breathing pattern and chest wall motion in healthy subjects. Braz J Phys Ther 2020; 24: 240–248.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Wilkens H,
    2. Weingard B,
    3. Lo Mauro A, et al.
    Breathing pattern and chest wall volumes during exercise in patients with cystic fibrosis, pulmonary fibrosis and COPD before and after lung transplantation. Thorax 2010; 65: 808–814. doi:10.1136/thx.2009.131409
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Stocks S,
    2. Sly P,
    3. Tepper RS, et al.
    1. Allen JL,
    2. Sivan Y
    . Measurements of chest wall function. In: Stocks S, Sly P, Tepper RS, et al. Infant Respiratory Function Testing. New York, Wiley-Liss, 1996; pp. 329–351.
  28. ↵
    1. Fregonezi G,
    2. Sarmento A,
    3. Pinto J, et al.
    Thoracoabdominal asynchrony contributes to exercise limitation in mild asthmatic subjects. Front Physiol 2018; 9: 719.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Mayer OH,
    2. Clayton RG,
    3. Jawad AF, et al.
    Respiratory inductance plethysmography in healthy 3- to 5-year-old children. Chest 2003; 124: 1812–1819.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Pereira MC,
    2. Porras DC,
    3. Lunardi AC, et al.
    Thoracoabdominal asynchrony: two methods in healthy, COPD, and interstitial lung disease patients. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0182417.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Elshafie G,
    2. Kumar P,
    3. Motamedi-Fakhr S, et al.
    Measuring changes in chest wall motion after lung resection using structured light plethysmography: a feasibility study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 23: 544–547. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivw185
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Boulding R,
    2. Stacey R,
    3. Niven R, et al.
    Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification. Eur Respir Rev 2016; 25: 287–294.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Cavalcanti AGL,
    2. Rattes Lima CSF,
    3. Barros de Sá R, et al.
    Influence of posture on the ventilatory pattern and the thoraco-abdominal kinematics of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Physiother Theory Pract 2014; 30: 490–494. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2014.901458
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Priori R,
    2. Chakrabarti B,
    3. Angus R, et al.
    Contributions of rib cage (RC) and abdomen (AB) to tidal volume are useful indicators for the assessment of difficult-to-wean patients. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: Suppl. 56, P4644.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Kaneko H,
    2. Horie J
    . Breathing movements of the chest and abdominal wall in healthy subjects. Respir Care 2012; 57: 1442–1451.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Hershenson MB,
    2. Colin AA,
    3. Wohl ME, et al.
    Changes in the contribution of the rib cage to tidal breathing during infancy. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 141: 922–925. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/141.4_Pt_1.922
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Brant TCS,
    2. Parreira VF,
    3. Mancini MC, et al.
    Padrão respiratório e movimento toracoabdominal de crianças respiradoras orais. [Breathing pattern and thoracoabdominal motion in mouth-breathing children]. Rev Bras Fisioter 2008; 12: 495–501. doi:10.1590/S1413-35552008005000010
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Verschakelen JA,
    2. Demedts MG
    . Normal thoracoabdominal motions. Influence of sex, age, posture, and breath size. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151: 399–405. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.151.2.7842198
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Kaplan V,
    2. Zhang JN,
    3. Russi EW, et al.
    Detection of inspiratory flow limitation during sleep by computer assisted respiratory inductive plethysmography. Eur Respir J 2000; 15: 570–578. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15.24.x
    OpenUrlAbstract
  40. ↵
    1. Motamedi Fakhr S,
    2. Barker N,
    3. Alexander J, et al.
    Small-scale clinical validation of structured light plethysmography (SLP) preliminary reference equations. Eur Respir J 2020; 56: 3367.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Email
Print
Alerts
Citation Tools
Reference equations for tidal breathing parameters using structured light plethysmography
Shayan Motamedi-Fakhr, Richard Iles, Nicki Barker, John Alexander, Brendan G. Cooper
ERJ Open Research Apr 2021, 7 (2) 00050-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00050-2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

Subjects