Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Conservative management of COVID-19 associated hypoxaemia

Thomas Voshaar, Patrick Stais, Dieter Köhler, Dominic Dellweg
ERJ Open Research 2021 7: 00134-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00134-2021
Thomas Voshaar
1Bethanien Hospital Moers, Moers, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Stais
1Bethanien Hospital Moers, Moers, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dieter Köhler
2Kloster Grafschaft, Schmallenberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominic Dellweg
2Kloster Grafschaft, Schmallenberg, Germany
3Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: d.dellweg@fkkg.de
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This correspondence argues that happy hypoxaemic patients should not be intubated as long as they remain happy https://bit.ly/3csrpWO

From the authors:

We would like to thank W. Windisch and colleagues for their recognition of our work. Their comments refer to the Early View version of our article, which was immediately uploaded upon acceptance but is not the final, copy-edited version. Unfortunately, there were some technical formatting changes between our submitted version and the version that was uploaded to the ERJ Open Research website. In table 2, for instance, temperature, saturation, respiratory rate, heart rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure refer to measurements taken on admission under room air conditions, which explains why the saturation values differ from the nadir oxygen saturation values shown in figure 3.

The referencing was also impacted by this process, which has been corrected in the final version. All measurements of oxygen saturation were performed by means of pulse oximetry, as correctly pointed out by W. Windisch and colleagues. Thus, according to studies on comparative measurements of SaO2 and SpO2 [1, 2], we would have rather overestimated the oxygenation in our patients, which strengthens our finding that hypoxaemia was well tolerated. Values are labelled SpO2 in the proofread version. We are surprised, however, that W. Windisch and colleagues confused the terms “clinical work of breathing” and “measured work of breathing”. Our protocol clearly uses the term “clinical work of breathing”, which is characterised by the clinical picture or so-called gestalt, as previously suggested by Tobin and co-workers [3, 4]. The absolute measured work of breathing by means of oesophageal pressure and airflow measurements is a poor predictor of the success of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) techniques in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure, and only the reduction in respiratory work during NIV predicts failure or success [5]. The clinical picture of respiratory stress and respiratory muscle overload is characterised by rapid, shallow breathing. A more rapid and shallow breathing pattern might result in a reduced measured work of breathing even when corrected for alveolar ventilation, as members of our group have previously shown [6]. We would like to emphasise once more that our study was of a retrospective nature. Oesophageal pressure measurements are not the standard of care during noninvasive respiratory support in hypoxic respiratory failure. Especially in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, these catheters might induce leakage during mask application and increase the risk of spreading infectious aerosols. W. Windisch and colleagues furthermore suggest that the respective measurements for determination of the oxygen content were collected in a staggered fashion. This, of course, is untrue. Measurements were performed on the same day in timely association. Inspired fraction of oxygen (FIO2) in spontaneously breathing patients were calculated as suggested by Shapiro et al. [7] and details on oxygen therapy are usually completely documented in well-organised care settings.

The last and most important issue is treatment escalation protocols. W. Windisch and colleagues propose to include newer versions of the guidelines [8, 9] in our paper. Of course, we had to cite the guidelines that were valid at the time we collected our data. It is of particular importance that the guideline we refer to [10] recommends aiming for a SpO2 ≥90% and recommends making the indication for the use of nasal high-flow or NIV with caution. However, all the newer guidelines W. Windisch and colleagues mentioned agree to use the arterial oxygen tension/FIO2 ratio (Horovitz index) as one indicator for intubation [8, 9]. However, the Horovitz index is, to a certain extent, a marker of the oxygen uptake performance of the respiratory system. It in no way provides any information about the amount of available oxygen and the oxygen supply in the body. Our protocol is new in this regard. W. Windisch and colleagues complain that none of our patients met the pre-defined oxygen content cut-off and that none of our patients was intubated based on a lack of oxygen supply. This is exactly true and is the main message of our work. If oxygen supply parameters are selected wisely, intubations can potentially be avoided. Our investigation describes only a small, retrospective investigation presented by a minor group of researchers who would like to encourage other clinicians to use markers of oxygen supply for future protocols. We are still convinced that happy hypoxaemic patients should not be intubated as long as they remain happy!

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: T. Voshaar has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: P. Stais has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: D. Köhler has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: D. Dellweg has nothing to disclose.

  • Received February 27, 2021.
  • Accepted March 4, 2021.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2021
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sjoding MW,
    2. Dickson RP,
    3. Iwashyna TJ, et al.
    Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: 2477–2478.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Thijssen M,
    2. Janssen L,
    3. le Noble J, et al.
    Facing SpO2 and SaO2 discrepancies in ICU patients: is the perfusion index helpful? J Clin Monit Comput 2020; 34: 693–698.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Tobin MJ
    . Basing respiratory management of COVID-19 on physiological principles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 201: 1319–1320. doi:10.1164/rccm.202004-1076ED
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Tobin MJ,
    2. Jubran A,
    3. Laghi F
    . Noninvasive strategies in COVID-19: epistemology, randomised trials, guidelines, physiology. Eur Respir J 2021; 57: 2004247. doi:10.1183/13993003.04247-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Tonelli R,
    2. Fantini R,
    3. Tabbì L, et al.
    Early inspiratory effort assessment by esophageal manometry predicts noninvasive ventilation outcome in de novo respiratory failure: a pilot study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202: 558–567. doi:10.1164/rccm.201912-2512OC
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Dellweg D,
    2. Haidl P,
    3. Siemon K, et al.
    Impact of breathing pattern on work of breathing in healthy subjects and patients with COPD. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2008; 161: 197–200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Shapiro B,
    2. Harrison R,
    3. Trout C
    . Clinical Application of Respiratory Care. 2nd Edn. Chicaco, Yearbook Medical Publishers, 1979.
  8. ↵
    1. Windisch W,
    2. Weber-Carstens S,
    3. Kluge S, et al.
    Invasive and non-invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19. Dtsch Ärzteblatt Int 2020; 117: 528–533. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2020.0528
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Kluge S,
    2. Janssens U,
    3. Welte T, et al.
    S2k guideline – recommendations for inpatient therapy of patients with COVID-19. Pneumologie 2021; 75: 88–112.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Kluge S,
    2. Janssens U,
    3. Welte T, et al.
    German recommendations for critically ill patients with COVID-19. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfallmed 2020; 115: Suppl. 3, 111–114. doi:10.1007/s00063-020-00689-w
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 7 Issue 2 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 7 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Conservative management of COVID-19 associated hypoxaemia
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Conservative management of COVID-19 associated hypoxaemia
Thomas Voshaar, Patrick Stais, Dieter Köhler, Dominic Dellweg
ERJ Open Research Apr 2021, 7 (2) 00134-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00134-2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Conservative management of COVID-19 associated hypoxaemia
Thomas Voshaar, Patrick Stais, Dieter Köhler, Dominic Dellweg
ERJ Open Research Apr 2021, 7 (2) 00134-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00134-2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Interpreting lung oscillometry results
  • Interpreting lung oscillometry results
  • It is time to end our love affair with SABA in asthma?
Show more Correspondence

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society