Prevalence, incidence and characteristics of chronic cough among adults from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

Imran Satia, Alexandra J. Mayhew, Nazmul Sohel, Om Kurmi, Kieran J. Killian, Paul M. O'Byrne, Parminder Raina
ERJ Open Research 2021 7: 00160-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00160-2021

Abstract

The global prevalence of chronic cough is highly variable, ranging from 2% to 18%. There is a lack of data on the prevalence and incidence of chronic cough in the general population. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence and incidence of chronic cough in a sample of Canadian adults, and how these are influenced by age, sex, smoking, respiratory symptoms, medical comorbidities and lung function.

Participants with chronic cough were identified from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) based on self-reported daily cough in the past 12 months. This is a prospective, nationally generalisable, stratified random sample of adults aged 45–85 years at baseline recruited between 2011 and 2015, and followed-up 3 years later. The prevalence and incidence per 100 person-years are described, with adjustments for age, sex and smoking.

Of the 30 097 participants, 29 972 completed the chronic cough question at baseline and 26 701 did so at follow-up. The prevalence of chronic cough was 15.8% at baseline and 17.6% at follow-up with 10.4–17.1% variation across seven provinces included in the CLSA comprehensive sample. Prevalence increased with age and current smoking, and was higher in males (15.2%), Caucasians (14%) and those born in North America, Europe or Oceania (14%). The incidence of chronic cough adjusted for age, sex and smoking was higher in males and in underweight and obese subjects. Subjects with respiratory symptoms, airway diseases, lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s (% predicted), cardiovascular diseases, psychological disorders, diabetes and chronic pain had a higher incidence of chronic cough.

The prevalence and incidence of chronic cough is high in the CLSA sample with geographic, ethnic and gender differences, influenced by a number of medical comorbidities.

Abstract

Canada has one of the highest prevalences of chronic cough in world and it is more common in Caucasians of European descent. Ageing, smoking, sex, clinical comorbidities and lung physiology all influence the prevalence and incidence of chronic cough. https://bit.ly/3qSBkdp

Introduction

Chronic cough, defined as a daily cough lasting >8 weeks, is a prevalent condition associated with poor quality of life [1–4]. The estimated 10% of adults globally with chronic cough report adverse psychosocial and physical effects such as exhaustion, depression and disruptions to social interactions, sleep and work [5–8]. Chronic cough is one of the most common reasons for referral to a specialist in secondary care, representing a significant burden on the healthcare system [9, 10]. Quantitative assessments of the prevalence, incidence and characteristic features of chronic cough help to identify at-risk populations and potentially causative factors, and reflects the burden of chronic cough in the general population.

The global prevalence of chronic cough is highly variable by geographic region, ranging between 2% and 18% in a systematic review and meta-analysis of 90 studies [5]. The differences by region persisted after adjustment for smoking and highlight the importance of country-specific estimates of the prevalence of chronic cough. The majority of the studies did not include chronic cough as a primary outcome and therefore did not examine the prevalence of cough stratified by demographic, physiological and clinical variables. These can influence the prevalence and incidence of chronic cough. Furthermore, there is a lack of data describing the incidence of chronic cough from large nationwide study.

The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence and incidence of chronic cough in a national sample of adults from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) who were between the ages of 45 and 85 years at the baseline and to assess how prevalence and incidence differs by age, sex, smoking, respiratory symptoms, comorbidities and lung function.

Study design and methods

Study design and population

The CLSA is a large, nationally generalisable, stratified random sample of 51 338 Canadian men and women aged 45–85 years at baseline (2011–2015) from the 10 Canadian provinces [11]. Eligible participants had to be physically and cognitively able to participate on their own and not living in institutions such as long-term care facilities. Participants were recruited in the tracking cohort (n=21 241) and the comprehensive cohort (n=30 097). Tracking-cohort participants were randomly selected from the 10 provinces and completed interviews by phone. Participants in the comprehensive cohort were randomly selected from within 25–50 km of 11 data collection sites, located in seven provinces (n=30 097). In addition to completing interviews in person, the comprehensive participants completed in-depth physical assessments and provided blood and urine samples. Details of the study design have been described elsewhere [12]. Each participant is followed every 3 years for 20 years or until death. The first follow-up was conducted between 2015 and 2018 with a retention rate of 95%. The comprehensive data from baseline and follow-up 1 were included in the current analyses. This study was approved by the Hamilton integrated research ethics board and by the CLSA scientific advisory board (project ID: 1909024).

Chronic cough definitions

Participants who self-identified as having coughed most days within the past 12 months were categorised as having a chronic cough at baseline and at follow-up. Chronic cough was further classified as a productive cough if participants reported bringing up phlegm in the morning or most days during the year. Participants who did not report the presence of phlegm were categorised as having a dry cough. Questionnaires were available in both English and French.

Respiratory symptoms and chronic conditions

Self-reported presence of respiratory symptoms including chest pain, shortness of breath upon exertion and wheezing were assessed. Participants were asked “Do you wheeze with mild to moderate exertion?”, “Do you become short of breath climbing stairs or walking up a small hill?” and “Do you get chest pain or discomfort when you walk uphill or hurry?”.

Disease definitions were based on self-reported physician diagnosis on direct questioning of participants by trained research assistants at baseline and at each follow-up. Participants were asked if they had ever been diagnosed with a list of respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic, neurological, musculoskeletal and mental health disorders. A history of infectious disease such as pneumonia or influenza in the past 12 months was also surveyed.

Spirometry

Lung function was measured with the TruFlow Easy-On Air Spirometer (ndd Medical Technologies, Zurich, Switzerland) and categorised based on the American Thoracic Society requirements and criteria. Participants screened positive for major contraindications were excluded [13]. The highest forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) from three acceptable maximal efforts were selected. Only grades A and B were accepted for analysis. The FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC ratio was recorded without bronchodilator therapy.

Chronic airflow obstruction was defined as a FEV1/FVC ratio of <0.7 as well as using the lower limit of normal (LLN). Age, height and sex were used to develop CLSA-specific prediction reference values for this total population. These were based on standard allometric principles, FEV1 and FVC increase in a positively accelerating manner with height (y = k × HeightK1) there was a proportionate increase in males relative to females at the same height (y = k × HeightK1 × (1 + K2 × Males(1))); and decreasing by a constant proportion with age (y = k × HeightK1 × (1 + K2 × Males(1) × (1−K3 × (Age)))). Grade A and B spirometry data were available in 22 547 participants.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics for demographic and health variables stratified by chronic cough status were reported as mean±se for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. The prevalence of chronic cough was assessed by age group, sex, smoking status, respiratory symptoms, FEV1 % predicted categories and chronic airway obstruction, and by the presence of asthma, COPD or both asthma and COPD. The incidence of chronic cough per 100 person-years was calculated (incidence = (new cases/total follow-up years) × 100) in the 22 547 participants who did not report the presence of chronic cough at baseline and provided chronic cough information at follow-up time. Incidence rates were stratified by the same variables used to assess the prevalence of chronic cough as well as body mass index categories, the presence of common cardiorespiratory, vascular, gastrointestinal, metabolic, neurological and mental health disorders.

The CLSA provided inflation weights, which were used for all analyses (CLSA sample weight version 1.2). The inflation weights are proportional to the reciprocal of the individual inclusion probabilities and are recalibrated to the Canadian population within strata of sex, age and geographic area [14]. Using the inflation weights allows the results to be generalisable to the catchment areas of the 11 data collection sites located in seven provinces (CLSA Methodology Working Group 2017). The survey analysis procedure in SAS was used to account for the stratified sampling technique. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4.

Results

Study population and demographics

The comprehensive cohort included 30 097 participants. A total of 29 972 completed the chronic cough question at baseline (table 1) and 26 701 did so at follow-up. Of these, 4739 (15.8%) participants reported chronic cough at baseline and 4694 (17.6%) at follow-up. The mean age of participants reporting cough was 61.5 years with more males than females reporting chronic cough at baseline (15.2% versus 12.7%) and at follow-up (16.2% and 14.4%). The majority of participants with and without cough were overweight at baseline. The prevalence of chronic cough was greatest in the underweight (19.6%) and obese (17.0%) categories. There were 2558 (8.5%) current smokers at baseline and participants with chronic cough had a two-fold higher smoking pack-year history (mean 6.7 versus 13.2 pack-years) with a prevalence of chronic cough of 34% in current smokers.

View this table:
TABLE 1

Demographics of chronic cough at baseline#

Differences across Canadian provinces, ethnic origin and country of birth

There were provincial differences in the prevalence of chronic cough across Canada (table 1). Participants from Manitoba (17.1%) had the highest prevalence of chronic cough, and Quebec the lowest prevalence at baseline (10.4%). >90% of the CLSA participants were white, with smaller representation from other ethnic backgrounds. Participants from a white background had the highest prevalence (14.0%), while black, South Asian, Asian and Arab backgrounds ranged from 5% to 8%. ∼84% were born in Canada and the USA, and along with those born in Europe and Oceania, all demonstrated a similar prevalence of ∼14%.

Effects of ageing, sex and smoking on the prevalence of chronic cough at baseline

The prevalence of chronic cough was greatest in current smokers, ranging from 27% to 44%, and was lower in former (7–21%) or nonsmokers (6–15%) (figure 1). The prevalence of chronic cough increased with age, was higher in males and was highest in current smokers in both sexes across all age groups.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1

Prevalence of chronic cough based on age, sex and smoking status at baseline.

Chronic cough-associated respiratory airways diseases, symptoms and physiology

In participants who complained of chronic cough, dry cough was reported by 51%, while 43% had cough with phlegm (6% did not report if phlegm was present or not). Participants reporting respiratory symptoms at baseline, lower FEV1 % pred, airflow obstruction (both FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7 or <LLN) or the presence of COPD, asthma or both, had a higher prevalence of chronic cough at baseline (figure 2). A FEV1 of <50% pred, combined asthma and COPD or COPD alone and wheeze had the highest prevalence. The prevalence of chronic cough in COPD was almost twice that of asthma.

FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2

The associations of symptoms, lung function, airflow obstruction and airways diseases on the prevalence of chronic cough at baseline. Data are presented as mean (95% CI). FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; CAO: chronic airflow obstruction; LLN: lower limit of normal; SOB: shortness of breath.

Factors affecting the incidence of chronic cough

26 701 participants attended for follow-up 1 (3271 lost to follow-up), and 2506 participants developed chronic cough between baseline and follow-up. The yearly incidence rate per 100 person-years of chronic cough increased from the youngest age group (45–54 years; 2.60, 95% CI 2.33–2.86) to the oldest age group (75–85 years; 4.50, 4.05–4.95) was higher in males than in females, in current smokers compared with former smokers or never-smokers, and highest in underweight and obese participants (table 2). After adjustment for age, sex and smoking, the same patterns were observed.

View this table:
TABLE 2

Incidence of chronic cough at follow-up 1 based on age, sex, smoking status and body mass index (BMI) (unadjusted and adjusted)

Adjusted incidence rates per 100 person-years of chronic cough were highest in the presence of wheezing (7.0), combined asthma/COPD (9.2), COPD (8.0) or asthma alone (5.7), airflow obstruction (either FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7 (5.8) or <LLN (6.2)) and lower FEV1 % pred (figure 3). Adjusted incidence rates were higher in those who had a prior history of stroke (6.8), anxiety (6.2), acute myocardial infarction (6.2), pneumonia (6.4) or influenza (5.8) in the past year, mood disturbance (5.8), current depression (5.7), chronic pain (5.5), migraine (5.5), diabetes (5.5), heart failure (5.6) and history of allergies (5.2) (figure 4). A history of stomach or intestinal ulcers or bowel disorders did not significantly increase the adjusted incidence rates.

FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3

Adjusted (age, sex, smoking) incidence rates of chronic cough for respiratory symptoms, airways diseases, lung function and airflow obstruction. Data are presented as mean (95% CI). FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; CAO: chronic airflow obstruction; LLN: lower limit of normal; SOB: shortness of breath.

FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4

Adjusted (age, sex, smoking) incidence rates of chronic cough in the presence of other medical comorbidities. Data are presented as mean (95% CI). AMI: acute myocardial infarction; CHF: congestive heart failure; GI: gastrointestinal.

Discussion

This is the largest population-based study to date describing the prevalence, incidence and characteristics of chronic cough in older adults across a whole country. Approximately 30 000 participants were randomly selected and nearly 27 000 were followed-up 3 years later. This study demonstrated a high prevalence of chronic cough at baseline and follow-up of 16% and 18%, respectively, in the older adult population (>45 years), with variations across centres located in seven provinces in Canada. Prevalence increased with age and current smoking and was highest in male, white subjects, and those born in Canada, USA, Europe and Oceania. The presence of coexisting respiratory symptoms, particularly wheeze, worsening FEV1 % pred, airflow obstruction, COPD and asthma were all associated with a higher prevalence. The incidence of chronic cough adjusted for age, sex and smoking status was higher with increasing age, current smokers, and being underweight or obese. Furthermore, incidence rates were highest with wheeze, FEV1 50–80% pred, airflow obstruction, airway diseases (asthma/COPD) and a history of pneumonia or influenza in the past year. A history of cardiovascular diseases, mental health and mood disorders, chronic pain and diabetes were all associated with a higher incidence of chronic cough.

A prevalence of 16–18% in the CLSA sample is one of the highest globally. A meta-analysis of 90 studies showed global prevalence estimates to be 18% for Australia, 13% for Europe, 11% for the United States, 7% for Asia and 2% for Africa [5]. The reasons for these large variations are unclear, but 19 different chronic cough definitions were identified. The most common definition was “cough ≥3 months” or “cough ≥3 months for two successive years” or “cough and phlegm ≥3 months for two consecutive years”. To our knowledge, six studies have used the current 8-week definition: in the UK (12%) [15], Finland (7.2%) [16], Copenhagen (4%) [17], South Korea (2.6%) [18], Japan (2.2%) [19] and Nigeria (1.1%) [20]. The CLSA-recruited participants were aged between 45 and 85 years at baseline, which could have influenced the high prevalence compared to the UK, Europe and the USA.

In addition, the incidence of chronic cough is much higher in the CLSA compared with the Rotterdam Study [21]. The adjusted incidence rate ranged from 3.58–5.70 per 100 person-years with increasing age, which is three to four times the overall incidence of 1.16 from the Rotterdam study. This was despite the fact there were more current smokers in the Rotterdam study (15.5%) compared with the CLSA (8.5%) and the cohort was slightly older (67.8 versus 61.5 years). A possible explanation for this difference is that the Rotterdam study had a 28.6% attrition rate (due to death or loss to follow-up) compared to ∼10% in the CLSA, and the former used the chronic bronchitis definition for chronic cough.

Although speciality chronic cough clinics show female predominance by ∼2:1 [4, 13, 22], the same pattern is not observed in population based studies. In the current study, there were more males with prevalent chronic cough (53%), and the proportion of all males compared with females who had chronic cough was higher (15.2% versus 12.7%). This is in contrast to the Copenhagen [17] and Rotterdam [21] studies, which demonstrated a slight female predominance. In this study, after adjusting for age, sex and smoking status, the incidence of chronic cough was still slightly higher in males, but the magnitude of the difference was small. Interestingly, this is consistent with studies from South Korea [18] and China [13, 23, 24], where there is no female predominance of chronic cough. We speculate that the reasons for the female predominance in cough clinics and in clinical trials may be due to greater cough frequency, intensity, disruption and impact on quality of life in females than males [3, 25, 26]. Furthermore, socioeconomic factors such as being in full-time employment or comorbid anxiety, depression and mood disorders may influence referral to speciality clinics.

Smoking is a well-known causative factor of chronic cough [17, 21, 27], but the fact that former smokers and never-smokers have similar prevalence of chronic cough at each age group is reassuring and suggests that smoking cessation should be the foremost target for intervention in all clinical encounters in primary and secondary care [28–30]. This study extends knowledge of the harmful respiratory manifestations of smoking by demonstrating that airflow obstruction, COPD and a lower FEV1 % predicted are all associated with a higher prevalence of chronic cough. This is consistent with findings from the Copenhagen General Population Study [31].

Canada is a large country with different, often extreme climates and environmental exposures. The variations in the prevalence of chronic cough throughout the different urban centres suggests the possibility that weather, changes in temperature, and air pollution could influence chronic cough. It is well known that airway nerves responsible for cough express transient receptor channels which are temperature sensitive [32, 33], and patients in clinical practice often complain of worsening cough due to changes in temperature [34]. This neuronal dysfunction is supported by heightened and exaggerated capsaicin-evoked cough responses in chronic cough, COPD and asthma [35–37]. These provincial differences require further exploration.

The majority of participants in the CLSA are white Caucasian, but there are nearly 1000 non-white participants, and their prevalence is almost half that of the white participants. Likewise, participants born in North America/Europe/Oceania have almost double the prevalence of chronic cough. The reasons for this are unclear. Studies investigating cough reflex sensitivity have no difference between Caucasian, Indian and Chinese healthy controls [38]. There may be genetic, socioeconomic, cultural or occupational exposures which are yet to be explored.

Understanding chronic cough at a population level can provide a different perspective and may identify other associated risk factors; for example, occupational exposure to dust/fumes [17] and chronic pain [39]. This study showed many other cardiovascular and mental health conditions that were associated with a higher incidence of chronic cough in a population. A potential common factor linking cerebrovascular accidents, hypertension, acute myocardial infarct and diabetes is that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are used in all these conditions and is the commonest medication to cause chronic cough as a side-effect [40]. Stroke can result in swallowing difficulties with an increased risk of aspiration. Anxiety and depression are well-known associated risk factors in speciality clinics, but we have now shown this in a population-based study. In addition, there may exist a shared mechanistic pathology between chronic pain and chronic cough, where an impairment in descending inhibitory neurons has been described in both conditions [41, 42]. The type of mood disorders increasing the risk of chronic cough is unknown, but may help in the clinical assessment and treatment of patients with chronic cough.

There are limitations to this study. First, the CLSA used a 12-month definition of chronic cough rather than 8 weeks. The 8-week cut-off is arbitrary and although useful to initiate investigations for a cause, has no inherent diagnostic or prognostic value. Recent clinical trials of chronic cough have an inclusion criteria of chronic cough >12 months [43, 44]. An amendment to the CLSA was made in 2018 to ask participants whether daily cough has lasted >8 weeks, >1 year or >5 years. These data will be collected in future follow-up visits and help to reduce any recall bias. Second, there are currently no questions on heartburn, indigestion, nasal congestion, runny nose or a physician diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or chronic rhinosinusitis. This does not allow identification of other potential associated conditions of chronic cough. Third, medication data such as inhaler therapy, proton-pump inhibitors, nasal steroids and ACE inhibitors are currently not available to identify those with potentially refractory chronic cough. Fourth, the CLSA sample represents the population living 25–50 km from the 11 data collection sites across seven provinces, and hence is not representative of the whole country. However, sites were across the provinces. Fifth, individuals visiting speciality clinics for chronic cough are likely to have more severe symptoms or are to experience more negative outcomes than those who do not attend speciality clinics [10, 13]. Thus, population-based studies may not be generalisable to patients in chronic cough clinics.

Conclusions

The prevalence of chronic cough in Canada is high at 16–18%, with geographic and ethnic differences. The prevalence increases with age, is more common in males and in current smokers. After adjusting for age, sex and smoking, the incidence of chronic cough is higher in males, increases with age and being underweight or obese. The presence of respiratory, cardiovascular, mental health disorders, chronic pain and diabetes were all associated with a higher incidence of chronic cough.

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible using the data/biospecimens collected by the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Funding for the CLSA is provided by the Government of Canada through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research under grant reference LSA 94473 and the Canada Foundation for Innovation. This research has been conducted using the CLSA dataset, Baseline and Follow-up 1 Comprehensive Dataset, under Application Number 1909024. The CLSA is led by Parminder Raina, Christina Wolfson and Susan Kirkland. The opinions expressed in this manuscript are the authors' own and do not reflect the views of the CLSA. The final manuscript was reviewed and approved by the Publication Review Committee of the CLSA.

Footnotes

  • Data availability: Data are available from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) (www.clsa-elcv.ca) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to de-identified CLSA data.

  • Author contributions: I. Satia, A.J. Mayhew, K.J. Killian, P.M. O'Byrne and P. Raina contributed substantially to the study concept and design. All authors made substantial contributions to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data for the manuscript. I. Satia, A.J. Mayhew and N. Sohel contributed substantially to drafting the manuscript. All authors contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published, and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. P. Raina had full access to all of the data in the study, and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

  • Conflict of interest: I. Satia reports grants and personal fees from Merck during the conduct of the study; and personal fees for educational talks for general practitioners from GSK and AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Merck Canada, an ERS Respire 3 Marie Curie Fellowship and an E.J. Moran Campbell Early Career Award, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: A.J. Mayhew has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: N. Sohel has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: O. Kurmi has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: K.J. Killian has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: P.M. O'Byrne reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and Medimmune, personal fees from GSK and Chiesi, and grants from Novartis, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: P. Raina has nothing to disclose.

  • Support statement: The study was funded by Merck Canada. The study sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. I. Satia is currently supported by the E.J. Moran Campbell Early Career Award, Dept of Medicine, McMaster University. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Received March 9, 2021.
  • Accepted March 9, 2021.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Millqvist E,
    3. Bieksiene K, et al.
    ERS guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough in adults and children. Eur Respir J 2020; 55: 1901136. doi:10.1183/13993003.01136-2019
    1. Irwin RS,
    2. French CL,
    3. Chang AB, et al.
    Classification of cough as a symptom in adults and management algorithms: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2018; 153: 196–209. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2017.10.016
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. French CL,
    2. Irwin RS,
    3. Curley FJ, et al.
    Impact of chronic cough on quality of life. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1657–1661. doi:10.1001/archinte.158.15.1657
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Chamberlain SA,
    2. Garrod R,
    3. Douiri A, et al.
    The impact of chronic cough: a cross-sectional European survey. Lung 2015; 193: 401–408. doi:10.1007/s00408-015-9701-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Song WJ,
    2. Chang YS,
    3. Faruqi S, et al.
    The global epidemiology of chronic cough in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 1479–1481. doi:10.1183/09031936.00218714
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Birring S,
    2. Prudon B,
    3. Carr A, et al.
    Development of a symptom specific health status measure for patients with chronic cough: Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Thorax 2003; 58: 339–343. doi:10.1136/thorax.58.4.339
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Johansson H,
    2. Johannessen A,
    3. Holm M, et al.
    Prevalence, progression and impact of chronic cough on employment in Northern Europe. Eur Respir J 2021; 57: 2003344. doi:10.1183/13993003.03344-2020
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Vernon M,
    2. Kline Leidy N,
    3. Nacson A, et al.
    Measuring cough severity: development and pilot testing of a new seven-item cough severity patient-reported outcome measure. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2010; 4: 199–208. doi:10.1177/1753465810372526
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Irwin RS,
    2. Curley FJ,
    3. French CL
    . Chronic cough. The spectrum and frequency of causes, key components of the diagnostic evaluation, and outcome of specific therapy. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 141: 640–647. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/141.3.640
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Zeiger RS,
    2. Schatz M,
    3. Butler RK, et al.
    Burden of specialist-diagnosed chronic cough in adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020; 8: 1645–1657. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2020.01.054
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Raina PS,
    2. Wolfson C,
    3. Kirkland SA, et al.
    The Canadian longitudinal study on aging (CLSA). Can J Aging 2009; 28: 221–229. doi:10.1017/S0714980809990055
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Raina P,
    2. Wolfson C,
    3. Kirkland S, et al.
    Cohort profile: the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Int J Epidemiol 2019; 48: 1752–1753j. doi:10.1093/ije/dyz173
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Jakes AD,
    3. Faruqi S, et al.
    A worldwide survey of chronic cough: a manifestation of enhanced somatosensory response. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1149–1155. doi:10.1183/09031936.00217813
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging (CLSA). CLSA Technical Document 2020: Sampling and Computation of Response Rates and Sample Weights for the Tracking (Telephone Interview) Participants and Comprehensive Participants. 2020. www.clsa-elcv.ca/doc/3965
  15. ↵
    1. Ford AC,
    2. Forman D,
    3. Moayyedi P, et al.
    Cough in the community: a cross sectional survey and the relationship to gastrointestinal symptoms. Thorax 2006; 61: 975–979. doi:10.1136/thx.2006.060087
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Lätti AM,
    2. Pekkanen J,
    3. Koskela HO
    . Defining the risk factors for acute, subacute and chronic cough: a cross-sectional study in a Finnish adult employee population. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e022950. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022950
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Çolak Y,
    2. Nordestgaard BG,
    3. Laursen LC, et al.
    Risk factors for chronic cough among 14,669 individuals from the general population. Chest 2017; 152: 563–573. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.038
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Kang MG,
    2. Song WJ,
    3. Kim HJ, et al.
    Point prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of chronic cough in the general adult population: the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2012. Medicine 2017; 96: e6486. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000006486
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Fujimura M
    . Frequency of persistent cough and trends in seeking medical care and treatment – results of an internet survey. Allergol Int 2012; 61: 573–581. 10.2332/allergolint.11-OA-0368.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Desalu O,
    2. Salami A,
    3. Fawibe A
    . Prevalence of cough among adults in an urban community in Nigeria. West Afr J Med 2011; 30: 337–341.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Arinze JT,
    2. de Roos EW,
    3. Karimi L, et al.
    Prevalence and incidence of, and risk factors for chronic cough in the adult population: the Rotterdam Study. ERJ Open Res 2020; 6: 00300–2019. doi:10.1183/23120541.00300-2019
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Everett CF,
    2. Kastelik JA,
    3. Thompson RH, et al.
    Chronic persistent cough in the community: a questionnaire survey. Cough 2007; 3: 5. doi:10.1186/1745-9974-3-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Long L,
    2. Lai K
    . Characteristics of Chinese chronic cough patients. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2019; 57: 101811. doi:10.1016/j.pupt.2019.101811
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Lai K,
    2. Long L,
    3. Yi F, et al.
    Age and sex distribution of Chinese chronic cough patients and their relationship with capsaicin cough sensitivity. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2019; 11: 871–884. doi:10.4168/aair.2019.11.6.871
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Dicpinigaitis P
    . Prevalence of urinary incontinence in women with chronic cough. Chest 2019; 155: Suppl., 300A. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.290
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Ajith AK,
    2. Rekha A,
    3. Duttagupta S, et al.
    Prevalence and factors of urinary incontinence among postmenopausal women attending the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient service in a tertiary health care center in Kochi, Kerala. Indian J Community Med 2019; 44: S30–S33. doi:10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_29_19
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Sumner H,
    2. Woodcock A,
    3. Kolsum U, et al.
    Predictors of objective cough frequency in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 943–949. doi:10.1164/rccm.201211-2000OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Farooqi MAM,
    2. Cheng V,
    3. Wahab M, et al.
    Investigations and management of chronic cough: a 2020 update from the European Respiratory Society Chronic Cough Task Force. Pol Arch Intern Med 2020; 130: 789–795. doi: 10.20452/pamw.15484
    OpenUrl
    1. Satia I,
    2. Badri H,
    3. Al-Sheklly B, et al.
    Towards understanding and managing chronic cough. Clin Med 2016; 16: s92–s97. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.16-6-s92
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Smith JA,
    2. Woodcock A
    . Chronic cough. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 183–184. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1614949
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Landt E,
    2. Çolak Y,
    3. Lange P, et al.
    Chronic cough in individuals with COPD: a population-based cohort study. Chest 2020; 157: 1446–1454. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.12.038
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Mazzone SB,
    2. Undem BJ
    . Vagal afferent innervation of the airways in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2016; 96: 975–1024. doi:10.1152/physrev.00039.2015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Huang J,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. McNaughton PA
    . Modulation of temperature-sensitive TRP channels. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2006; 17: 638–645. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.11.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Hilton E,
    2. Marsden P,
    3. Thurston A, et al.
    Clinical features of the urge-to-cough in patients with chronic cough. Respir Med 2015; 109: 701–707. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2015.03.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Hilton EC,
    2. Baverel PG,
    3. Woodcock A, et al.
    Pharmacodynamic modeling of cough responses to capsaicin inhalation calls into question the utility of the C5 end point. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 132: 847–855. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.04.042
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Satia I,
    2. Tsamandouras N,
    3. Holt K, et al.
    Capsaicin-evoked cough responses in asthmatic patients: evidence for airway neuronal dysfunction. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017; 139: 771–779. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2016.04.045
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Belvisi MG,
    2. Birrell MA,
    3. Khalid S, et al.
    Neurophenotypes in airway diseases. Insights from translational cough studies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193: 1364–1372. doi:10.1164/rccm.201508-1602OC
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Dicpinigaitis PV,
    2. Allusson VR,
    3. Baldanti A, et al.
    Ethnic and gender differences in cough reflex sensitivity. Respiration 2001; 68: 480–482. doi:10.1159/000050554
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Arinze JT,
    2. Verhamme KM,
    3. Luik AI, et al.
    The interrelatedness of chronic cough and chronic pain. Eur Respir J 2021; 57: 2002651. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02651-2020
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Dicpinigaitis PV
    . Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2006; 129: 169S–173S. doi:10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.169S
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Hilton E,
    2. Satia I,
    3. Holt K, et al.
    The effect of pain conditioning on experimentally evoked cough: evidence of impaired endogenous inhibitory control mechanisms in refractory chronic cough. Eur Respir J 2020; 56: 2001387. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01387-2020.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Lewis GN,
    2. Rice DA,
    3. McNair PJ
    . Conditioned pain modulation in populations with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain 2012; 13: 936–944. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.07.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Smith JA,
    2. Kitt MM,
    3. Morice AH, et al.
    Gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group, phase 2b trial. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8: 775–785. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30471-0
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Smith JA,
    2. Kitt MM,
    3. Butera P, et al.
    Gefapixant in two randomised dose-escalation studies in chronic cough. Eur Respir J 2020; 55: 1901615. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01615-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Email
Print
Citation Tools
Prevalence, incidence and characteristics of chronic cough among adults from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
Imran Satia, Alexandra J. Mayhew, Nazmul Sohel, Om Kurmi, Kieran J. Killian, Paul M. O'Byrne, Parminder Raina
ERJ Open Research Apr 2021, 7 (2) 00160-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00160-2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To