Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

INTREPID: single- versus multiple-inhaler triple therapy for COPD in usual clinical practice

David M.G. Halpin, Sally Worsley, Afisi S. Ismaila, Kai-Michael Beeh, Dawn Midwinter, Janwillem W.H. Kocks, Elaine Irving, Jose M. Marin, Neil Martin, Maggie Tabberer, Neil G. Snowise, Chris Compton
ERJ Open Research 2021 7: 00950-2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00950-2020
David M.G. Halpin
1University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: d.halpin@nhs.net
Sally Worsley
2GSK R&D, Stevenage, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Afisi S. Ismaila
3Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA
4Dept of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kai-Michael Beeh
5Insaf Respiratory Research Institute, Wiesbaden, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dawn Midwinter
6GSK R&D, Brentford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janwillem W.H. Kocks
7General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
8University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
9Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elaine Irving
2GSK R&D, Stevenage, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jose M. Marin
10University Hospital Miguel Servet, IIS Aragón and CIBERES, Zaragoza, Spain
11CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jose M. Marin
Neil Martin
12Global Medical Affairs, GSK, Brentford, UK
13Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maggie Tabberer
14Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Brentford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil G. Snowise
12Global Medical Affairs, GSK, Brentford, UK
15Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Compton
16Global Respiratory Franchise, GSK, Brentford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Study design. MITT: multiple-inhaler triple therapy; LAMA: long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist; LABA: long-acting β2-agonist; ICS: inhaled corticosteroid; CAT: COPD Assessment Test; FF: fluticasone furoate; UMEC: umeclidinium; VI: vilanterol; R: randomisation; BEC: blood eosinophil count. #: where available, peripheral BECs were collected using the historical value closest to the patient's consenting visit and no later than 36 months prior to visit 1; ¶: patients were asked, if possible, to withhold short-acting β2-agonists or short-acting anticholinergics for ≥4 h and not to take either their single-inhaler triple therapy or MITT until after the clinic visit at week 24 to enable measurement of trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). If this was not possible or had not been done, FEV1 was still measured; +: safety information was collected at all scheduled or usual care visits recorded in the electronic case report form.

  • FIGURE 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2

    Patient disposition. ITT: intention-to-treat; FF: fluticasone furoate; UMEC: umeclidinium; VI: vilanterol; MITT: multiple-inhaler triple therapy; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s. #: patients may have been excluded for multiple reasons. Patients who were randomised in error (n=17) are also identified as excluded due to eligibility. For those withdrawing from the study or randomised treatment only one primary reason is recorded. A patient completed randomised study treatment if they did not prematurely discontinue randomised study treatment and attended visit 2 (week 24). A patient who continued on all components of the randomised treatment and added additional medication to their maintenance treatment were considered as modifying their randomised treatment (intercurrent event), but were not considered to have prematurely discontinued from randomised treatment; ¶: one patient who withdrew >1 day after randomisation and did not take any study medication was included in the ITT population.

  • FIGURE 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3

    Proportion of COPD Assessment Test (CAT) responders at week 24. Missing CAT scores were imputed using multiple imputation based on the randomised treatment arm characteristics assuming missing at random. Response is defined as a CAT score ≥2 units below baseline. Data labels above bars are n (%). FF: fluticasone furoate; UMEC: umeclidinium; VI: vilanterol; MITT: multiple-inhaler triple therapy.

  • FIGURE 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4

    Proportion of COPD Assessment Test (CAT) responders at week 24 by prior medication strata. MITT: multiple-inhaler triple therapy; FF: fluticasone furoate; UMEC: umeclidinium; VI: vilanterol; ICS: inhaled corticosteroid; LAMA: long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist; LABA: long-acting β2-agonist.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • TABLE 1

    Patient characteristics at screening (intention-to-treat population)

    FF/UMEC/VINon-ELLIPTA MITTTotal
    Patients154515473092
    Age years67.8±8.7867.8±8.5967.8±8.68
    Male837 (54)818 (53)1655 (54)
    BMI kg·m−227.84±5.93
    n=1536
    28.05±6.05
    n=1538
    27.95±5.99
    n=3074
    COPD exacerbation history in the prior 12 months
     Moderate
      0409 (26)405 (26)814 (26)
      1639 (41)645 (42)1284 (42)
      ≥2497 (32)497 (32)994 (32)
     Severe
      01349 (87)1361 (88)2710 (88)
      1155 (10)139 (9)294 (10)
      ≥241 (3)47 (3)88 (3)
     Moderate/severe
      0363 (23)361 (23)724 (23)
      1615 (40)610 (39)1225 (40)
      ≥2567 (37)576 (37)1143 (37)
    CAT score20.8±6.76
    n=1543
    20.5±6.62
    n=1547
    20.7±6.69
    n=3090
    Peripheral blood eosinophil count#n=605n=572n=1177
     <150 cells·µL−1208 (34)223 (39)431 (37)
     ≥150 cells·µL−1397 (66)349 (61)746 (63)
    Actual prior medication use strata
     ICS+LAMA+LABA1226 (79)1235 (80)2461 (80)
     ICS+LABA126 (8)126 (8)252 (8)
     LABA+LAMA192 (12)183 (12)375 (12)
     Missing¶1 (<1)3 (<1)4 (<1)

    Data are presented as n, mean±sd or n (%). FF: fluticasone furoate; UMEC: umeclidinium; VI: vilanterol; MITT: multiple-inhaler triple therapy; BMI: body mass index; CAT: COPD Assessment Test; ICS: inhaled corticosteroid; LAMA: long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist; LABA: long-acting β2-agonist. #: historical eosinophils were recorded as the most recent measure taken within the previous 36 months; ¶: stratum is considered missing if the combination of maintenance treatments taken in the 14 days prior to randomisation do not meet any of the three defined strata groups.

    • TABLE 2

      Change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and trough FEV1 at week 24

      FF/UMEC/VI populationNon-ELLIPTA MITT populationFF/UMEC/VI versus non-ELLIPTA MITT
      Patients910904
      FEV1#
       Patients691675
       FEV1 mL1446 (1425–1467)1396 (1375–1418)50 (26–73); p<0.001
       FEV1 mL change from baseline77 (57–98)28 (6–49)
      Trough FEV1
       Patients301292
       FEV1 mL1498 (1462–1534)1445 (1404–1486)53 (9–96); p=0.017
       FEV1 mL change from baseline¶100 (64–135)47 (6–88)

      Data are presented as n or least-squares mean (95% CI), unless otherwise stated. FF: fluticasone furoate; UMEC: umeclidinium; VI: vilanterol; MITT: multiple-inhaler triple therapy. #: data include both trough and non-trough values; ¶: patients with imputed FEV1, n=82 (FF/UMEC/VI), n=115 (non-ELLIPTA MITT). Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 value recorded while patients have withheld COPD maintenance, short-acting β2-agonist and short-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist treatment. For COPD maintenance treatments taken once daily, FEV1 was considered as trough if the patient withheld the LABA and LAMA components of the maintenance treatment for ≥16 h. For COPD maintenance treatments taken twice daily, FEV1 was considered as trough if the patient withheld the LABA and LAMA components of the maintenance treatment for ≥8 h.

      • TABLE 3

        Incidence of on-randomised-treatment adverse events#

        FF/UMEC/VINon-ELLIPTA MITT
        Patients n (%)Events rate¶ (n)Patients n (%)Events rate¶ (n)
        Patients n15451547
        Total duration at risk patient-years636.7685.8
        Any adverse event250 (16)590.6 (376)151 (10)322.2 (221)
         Any treatment-related adverse event145 (9)329.8 (210)44 (3)77.3 (53)
         Any adverse event leading to study withdrawal115 (7)279.6 (178)32 (2)70.0 (48)
        Any SAE114 (7)257.6 (164)114 (7)255.2 (175)
         Any treatment-related SAE13 (<1)20.4 (13)6 (<1)10.2 (7)
        Any fatal SAE8 (<1)20.4 (13)8 (<1)23.3 (16)
         Any treatment-related fatal SAE0000
        Serious AESIs
         Cardiovascular effects29 (2)55.0 (35)23 (1)39.4 (27)
         Decreased BMD and associated fractures6 (<1)9.4 (6)4 (<1)7.3 (5)
         Infective pneumonia27 (2)44.0 (28)32 (2)46.7 (32)
         LRTI excluding infective pneumonia7 (<1)11.0 (7)10 (<1)14.6 (10)

        FF: fluticasone furoate; UMEC: umeclidinium; VI: vilanterol; MITT: multiple-inhaler triple therapy; SAE: serious adverse event; AESI: adverse event of special interest; BMD: bone mineral density; LRTI: lower respiratory tract infection. #: the recording of adverse events was limited to treatment-related adverse events, SAEs and adverse events leading to study treatment discontinuation or study withdrawal. Refer to supplementary tables S6 and S7 for further details; ¶: event rate per 1000 patient-years, calculated as number of events × 1000, divided by the total duration at risk.

        Supplementary Materials

        • Figures
        • Tables
        • Supplementary Material

          Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.

          Supplementary material 00950-2020.SUPPLEMENT

        PreviousNext
        Back to top
        Vol 7 Issue 2 Table of Contents
        ERJ Open Research: 7 (2)
        • Table of Contents
        • Index by author
        Email

        Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

        NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

        Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
        INTREPID: single- versus multiple-inhaler triple therapy for COPD in usual clinical practice
        (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
        (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
        CAPTCHA
        This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
        Print
        Citation Tools
        INTREPID: single- versus multiple-inhaler triple therapy for COPD in usual clinical practice
        David M.G. Halpin, Sally Worsley, Afisi S. Ismaila, Kai-Michael Beeh, Dawn Midwinter, Janwillem W.H. Kocks, Elaine Irving, Jose M. Marin, Neil Martin, Maggie Tabberer, Neil G. Snowise, Chris Compton
        ERJ Open Research Apr 2021, 7 (2) 00950-2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00950-2020

        Citation Manager Formats

        • BibTeX
        • Bookends
        • EasyBib
        • EndNote (tagged)
        • EndNote 8 (xml)
        • Medlars
        • Mendeley
        • Papers
        • RefWorks Tagged
        • Ref Manager
        • RIS
        • Zotero
        Share
        INTREPID: single- versus multiple-inhaler triple therapy for COPD in usual clinical practice
        David M.G. Halpin, Sally Worsley, Afisi S. Ismaila, Kai-Michael Beeh, Dawn Midwinter, Janwillem W.H. Kocks, Elaine Irving, Jose M. Marin, Neil Martin, Maggie Tabberer, Neil G. Snowise, Chris Compton
        ERJ Open Research Apr 2021, 7 (2) 00950-2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00950-2020
        del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
        Full Text (PDF)

        Jump To

        • Article
          • Abstract
          • Abstract
          • Introduction
          • Materials and methods
          • Results
          • Discussion
          • Supplementary material
          • Acknowledgements
          • Footnotes
          • References
        • Figures & Data
        • Info & Metrics
        • PDF

        Subjects

        • COPD and smoking
        • Pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics
        • Tweet Widget
        • Facebook Like
        • Google Plus One

        More in this TOC Section

        Original articles

        • Endobronchial autologous BM-MSCs in IPF patients
        • Effect of β-blockers on the risk of COPD exacerbations
        • Recurrence of symptoms after childhood LRTI
        Show more Original articles

        COPD

        • Admissions following first exacerbation-related hospitalisation
        • Improving the wellbeing of caregivers of patients with COPD
        • Arterial remodelling in smokers, and patients with small airway disease and COPD
        Show more COPD

        Related Articles

        Navigate

        • Home
        • Current issue
        • Archive

        About ERJ Open Research

        • Editorial board
        • Journal information
        • Press
        • Permissions and reprints
        • Advertising

        The European Respiratory Society

        • Society home
        • myERS
        • Privacy policy
        • Accessibility

        ERS publications

        • European Respiratory Journal
        • ERJ Open Research
        • European Respiratory Review
        • Breathe
        • ERS books online
        • ERS Bookshop

        Help

        • Feedback

        For authors

        • Instructions for authors
        • Publication ethics and malpractice
        • Submit a manuscript

        For readers

        • Alerts
        • Subjects
        • RSS

        Subscriptions

        • Accessing the ERS publications

        Contact us

        European Respiratory Society
        442 Glossop Road
        Sheffield S10 2PX
        United Kingdom
        Tel: +44 114 2672860
        Email: journals@ersnet.org

        ISSN

        Online ISSN: 2312-0541

        Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society