Lung function trajectory and biomarkers in the Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study

Dinh S. Bui, Alvar Agusti, Haydn Walters, Caroline Lodge, Jennifer L. Perret, Adrian Lowe, Gayan Bowatte, Raisa Cassim, Garun S. Hamilton, Peter Frith, Alan James, Paul S. Thomas, Debbie Jarvis, Michael J. Abramson, Rosa Faner, Shyamali C. Dharmage
ERJ Open Research 2021 7: 00020-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00020-2021

Abstract

Background and objective Different lung function trajectories through life can lead to COPD in adulthood. This study investigated whether circulating levels of biomarkers can differentiate those with accelerated (AD) from normal decline (ND) trajectories.

Methods The Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study (TAHS) is a general population study that measured spirometry and followed up participants from ages 7 to 53 years. Based on their forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) trajectories from age 7 to 53 years, this analysis included those with COPD at age 53 years (60 with AD and 94 with ND) and controls (n=720) defined as never-smokers with an average FEV1 trajectory. Circulating levels of selected biomarkers determined at 53 and 45 years of age were compared between trajectories.

Results Results showed that CC16 levels (an anti-inflammatory protein) were lower and C-reactive protein (CRP) (a pro-inflammatory marker) higher in the AD than in the ND trajectory. Higher CC16 levels were associated with a decreased risk of belonging to the AD trajectory (OR=0.79 (0.63–0.98) per unit increase) relative to ND trajectory. Higher CRP levels were associated with an increased risk of belonging to the AD trajectory (OR=1.07, 95% CI: 1.00–1.13, per unit increase). Levels of CC16 (area under the curve (AUC)=0.69, 95% CI: 0.56–0.81, p=0.002), CRP (AUC=0.63, 95% CI: 0.53–0.72, p=0.01) and the combination of both (AUC=0.72, 95% CI: 0.60–0.83, p<0.001) were able to discriminate between the AD and ND trajectories. Other quantified biomarkers (interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10 and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)) were not significantly different between AD, ND and controls.

Conclusions Circulating levels of CRP and CC16 measured in late adulthood identify different lung function trajectories (AD versus ND) leading to COPD at age 53 years.

Abstract

In the general population, two circulating biomarkers (CRP and CC16) are associated with different lung function trajectories leading to COPD in adulthood https://bit.ly/3wqWfb3

Introduction

COPD has been traditionally considered a self-inflicted disease caused by tobacco smoking and characterised by an accelerated age-related decline (AD) of the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) [1]. Research over the past few years, however, has shown that only about half of adult COPD patients have followed this AD trajectory, whereas the other half never achieved normal peak lung function in early adulthood and develop COPD following a normal rate of FEV1 decline (ND) [2–4]. Importantly, these latter patients suffer a higher prevalence and an earlier incidence of cardio-metabolic comorbidities and premature death [5], so identifying what trajectory a given COPD patient has followed when seen in the clinic for the first time in their fifties or sixties may have implications for prognosis and management [6, 7]. In real life, however, spirometry is rarely measured in childhood, adolescence or early adulthood [4], so circulating biomarkers associated with different life-long lung function trajectories leading to COPD may be potentially useful for the appropriate stratification of adult COPD patients.

The Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study (TAHS) is a general population study that began in 1968 when 8583 Tasmanian children born in 1961 (7 years of age) were enrolled [8, 9]. Spirometry (and clinical assessment) were repeated at 13, 18, 45, 50 and 53 years [8, 9]. Previous analysis of the TAHS cohort have identified six distinct FEV1 trajectories from age 7 to 53 years (figure 1) [3]. The prevalence of COPD at age 53 years increased exponentially between them (figure 1). Accordingly, TAHS offers a unique opportunity to explore the hypothesis that some circulating biomarkers may be differentially associated with the AD and ND trajectories leading to adult COPD. To test this hypothesis, we contrasted the serum levels of a panel of biomarkers determined in adulthood (45 and 53 years), including club cell secretory protein (CC16), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, in individuals with COPD at age 53 years who had followed a life-long AD versus ND trajectory in TAHS.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1

Six lung function trajectories from age 7 to 53 years identified in the Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study (TAHS) [3]. Table shows the prevalence of each of these six trajectories as well as the proportion of participants in each trajectory with evidence of COPD at the age of 53 years. For further explanations, see text. FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity. Reproduced and modified from [3] with permission from the publisher.

Methods

Study design, participants and ethics

The design and methods of TAHS have been summarised above and reported in detail elsewhere [8, 9]. In 1968, 8583 students (98.8% of all school students aged 7 years and born in Tasmania) were recruited. The children underwent a clinical examination including spirometry, and their parents completed a questionnaire. Follow-up studies were conducted at 13, 18, 45, 50 and 53 years with spirometry measured. In 2002, when the participants were 45 years old, we traced 7562 (88.1%) of the original 1968 cohort, and 5729 (78.4%) of those traced completed a postal survey. A subgroup of these respondents, enriched for cases of asthma or cough reported in childhood or adulthood, were invited to participate in another clinical study, which included spirometry and collection of blood samples (n=1405). In the most recent TAHS follow-up in 2012, all those from the original cohort who were alive (53 years) and had up-to-date contact details were invited to attend a clinical visit, where pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry was measured again, and a new peripheral venous sample was obtained and processed [8]. The TAHS study was approved by ethics committees of all participating institutions, and all participants signed their written informed consent.

Biomarker quantification

The serum levels of CRP and CC16 were quantified by ELISA in blood samples obtained at both 45 and 53 years of age; and levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α were quantified for only blood samples at 45 years as published elsewhere [10–12].

Lung function trajectories over time and COPD at 53 years

In our previous analysis, we applied a group-based trajectory modelling technique to model FEV1 trajectories from 7 to 53 years [3]. We identified six distinct trajectories three of which were associated with an increased risk of COPD (defined as post-bronchodilator FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.7) at 53 years (figure 1). Among these three “disadvantaged” trajectories, one (namely “early below average, accelerated decline”) had accelerated lung function decline, while the other two (namely “below average” and “persistently low”) had lower lung function from childhood and normal lung function decline in adulthood.

Data analysis

For the current analysis, we included 154 COPD cases at 53 years who had followed the three “disadvantaged” FEV1 trajectories (figure 1). These COPD cases were classified into two COPD groups: (1) COPD cases included in the “early below average, accelerated decline” FEV1 trajectory (n=60), labelled here as accelerated decline (AD); and (2) COPD cases included in the “below average” or “persistently low” FEV1 trajectories, labelled here as normal decline (ND) (n=94). These two COPD groups (AD and ND) were primary comparison groups in this analysis. We additionally included a control group who were never-smoker participants in the “average” FEV1 trajectory who had normal lung function at age 53 (n=702), labelled here as controls (C).

Results are summarised as n (%), mean±sd or median (interquartile range), as appropriate. Groups were compared using t-test, Kruskal–Wallis test and chi-squared test where appropriate. Levels of biomarkers were then associated with lung function trajectories using regression models, adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, current asthma, smoking status, cumulative smoking exposure (pack-years) and childhood asthma and pneumonia. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the ability of biomarkers to discriminate among trajectories as indicated by the area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals. All analyses were performed with STATA V.15.1 (Stata Corporation 2019, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Table 1 presents the main characteristics of C, AD and ND participants at age 53 years. Main observations were that: the proportion of females was higher in C, intermediate in AD and lowest in ND; body mass index (BMI) was higher in AD than in ND; the prevalences of current smoking and parental smoking were similar in AD and in ND but cumulative smoking exposure was higher in AD; both AD and ND had more childhood pneumonia/pleurisy, and were diagnosed with asthma in childhood and adulthood more frequently than C; and finally, by definition, spirometry was normal in C, whereas airflow limitation at the age of 53 was generally more severe in AD than in ND.

View this table:
TABLE 1

Main characteristics of controls, accelerated decline and normal decline at age 53 years

Table 2 presents the biomarker levels determined in the three groups at 45 or 53 years of age. Compared with C, AD participants had higher CRP and lower CC16 levels, both at 45 and 53 years of age. They also showed reduced concentrations of the Th2-related cytokines IL-4 and IL-5, while IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α levels were similar to C. By contrast, ND participants showed a biomarker pattern that resembled that of C, with normal CRP levels and mildly reduced CC16 concentrations and normal IL-4, IL-5, IL-6 and IL-10 values, although they had slightly increased TNF-α concentrations (table 2, supplementary figure S1). Finally, CC16 levels were significantly lower in the AD than in the ND trajectories, both at 45 and 53 years, and CRP levels were higher in the AD than in the ND trajectory at 53 years. The remaining measured biomarkers were not different between AD and ND (table 2). In the sensitivity analysis when smokers with normal lung function were added to the control group (C), we observed similar findings (supplementary table S1). Between 45 and 53 years, CC16 increased by 0.59 (95% CI: 0.38–0.81, sd=2.9) unit. CRP reduced by 0.77 (95% CI: 0.43–1.1; sd=4.6) unit.

View this table:
TABLE 2

Biomarker values (median (IQR)) in controls (C), accelerated decline (AD) and normal decline (ND) participants

Regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, current asthma, smoking, pack-years and childhood factors, including childhood asthma and pneumonia, showed that higher CC16 levels at 53 years (OR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.63–0.98, per 1 unit increase in CC16 level) and 45 years (OR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.52–0.91, per 1 unit increase in CC16 level) were associated with a decreased risk of belonging to the AD trajectory relative to ND as the reference (table 3). Higher levels of CRP at 53 years were associated with an increased risk of AD (OR=1.07, 95% CI: 1.00–1.13, per 1 unit increase in CRP level) relative to ND as the reference. Although BMI has been associated with increased CRP levels, additional adjustment for BMI did not appreciably change our findings. ROC analysis showed that the combined consideration of CC16 and CRP levels had an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.60–0.83, p<0.001) to discriminate the AD from the ND trajectories (figure 2). The Youden method identified a cut-off point for CC16 is 5.11, which has a corresponding sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 71%. For CRP, the cut-off point is 4.72 with a sensitivity of 55% and specificity of 70%.

View this table:
TABLE 3

Adjusted association between CC16 and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and the two COPD groups

FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (and corresponding area under the curve (AUC) values) of CC16 (top row), C-reactive protein (CRP) (middle row) and the combination of both biomarkers (bottom row) in the three-potential comparison in the Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study. CRP and CC16 were measured at 53 years in this figure. AD: accelerated decline group. ND: early low–normal decline group. For further explanations, see text.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated biomarkers associated with different lung function trajectories leading to COPD in middle age. The main and novel observations of this analysis are that the AD trajectory was associated with significantly higher CRP and lower CC16 circulating levels than the ND one; and the combined assessment of these two biomarkers can effectively discriminate between the two trajectories among adults with COPD.

It is now well accepted that different lung function trajectories can lead to COPD in adulthood [2–4, 13, 14] albeit their relationship with circulating biomarkers is unclear. Guerra et al. [15] have recently shown using several cohorts with different, limited age ranges that low concentrations of CC16 in serum are associated with reduced lung function in childhood, accelerated lung function decline in adulthood, and development of moderate airflow limitation in adult populations [15]. In a subsequent publication, they showed that CC16 levels increased from birth to childhood to 32 years of age, likely related to increasing body/lung size with age, that there was intra-subject tracking of CC16 levels across all ages, and that several environmental (maternal age at delivery, maternal smoking and parental education) and genetic (sex and the single nucleotide polymorphism rs3741240) factors were associated with CC16 levels [16]. Our results confirm that CC16 is an important biomarker in this context, although two important differences with these previous studies are worth noting. First, Guerra et al. [15, 16] combined different cohorts followed during varying periods of time, whereas our cohort studied the same participants followed from infancy (7 years) to late adulthood (53 years) [8, 9]. Second, whereas Guerra et al. explored the predictive value of CC16 determined early in life, we used the reverse approach and explored the potential usefulness of quantifying CC16 (and other biomarkers) in late adulthood to estimate the trajectory that the individual with chronic airflow limitation in adulthood has already followed, a scenario which resembles much more current clinical practice. Finally, it is also important to acknowledge that, in patients with moderate to severe COPD recruited into the ECLIPSE study, Vestbo et al. [17] showed that CC16, CRP and fibrinogen were significantly associated with the FEV1 value determined at recruitment (63 years of age), and that the values of CC16 (p=0.04) and CRP (p=0.07) were related to the annual rate of FEV1 change during 3 years follow-up, with no relationship observed for other biomarkers investigated (IL-6, IL-8, surfactant protein D and TNF-α) neither with basal FEV1 or change over time.

We investigated the ability of CC16 and CRP to differentiate between the two COPD groups. CC16 was found to have better predictive ability. Although the combination of CRP and CC16 improved the predictive ability compared to CC16 alone, this improvement is relatively small and not statistically significant.

Our observation that the AD trajectory leading to COPD was associated with higher CRP and lower CC16 levels supports that an excessive inflammatory response may be an important endotype underlying this trajectory [18], whereas the fact that the ND trajectory was associated with a much more “normal” biomarker pattern suggests that inflammation is not the main endotype underlying this trajectory and that poor lung development mechanisms are likely to play a more relevant pathogenic role here [19]. If so, it is possible that individuals in the AD trajectory (identified by low CC16 and high CRP levels) may benefit most from treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs, whereas those in the ND trajectory (and no evidence of abnormal inflammatory response) are unlikely to do so. This hypothesis may be explored in previous randomised controlled trials, if blood samples are available for analysis, or considered in the design of future ones, thus helping to delineate more clearly any potential therapeutic effect or to repurpose existing drugs [20].

Our study has both strengths and limitations. The fact that participants in TAHS have been followed since childhood to late adulthood allows for lifetime trajectories that capture both lung growth and decline, which is a clear strength. Lack of replication is a limitation. Unfortunately, the uniqueness of TAHS makes it impossible to validate our observations in other cohorts. We acknowledge that our selection of biomarkers based on available data at the time the study was set up is a limitation, and exploration of other candidates using unbiased proteomics is warranted [21–26] and will occur with a future planned follow-up. As we only had data on biomarkers at 45 and 53 years, having such data over time from childhood would have provided more information on the longitudinal association with lung function trajectories leading to COPD. Although different spirometers were used in different follow-ups in TAHS, we used standardised measures (z-scores) to develop lung function trajectories, which reduces the impact of this limitation. As TAHS spans six decades, loss to follow-up is not unexpected. However, those participating at 53 years had similar baseline characteristics to those lost to follow-up, suggesting that the attrition is unlikely to explain our findings. We were able to control for smoking in this study; however, stratified analyses for smoking were not possible owing to small sample sizes. Finally, while we have assessed serum levels of the biomarkers, further studies measuring CC16 levels in the sputum and EBC are required to provide a direct measure of the airway pathology.

In conclusion this study shows that two circulating biomarkers (CC16 and CRP) are differentially associated with the AD and ND trajectories leading to COPD in adulthood and that their combined assessment can significantly discriminate between trajectories with potential implications both for clinical practice and future research.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.

Supplementary material 00020-2021.SUPPLEMENT

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the TAHS study participants and previous investigators. We thank Prof. Mark Jenkins, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, a TAHS investigator, but not a co-author of this manuscript, for his assistance with obtaining funds and data collection. We also acknowledge all the respiratory scientists who collected data in the lung function laboratories of Tasmania, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and New South Wales; the research interviewers, data entry operators and research officers. Finally, we thank the Archives Office of Tasmania for providing data from the 1968 TAHS questionnaires.

Footnotes

  • This article has supplementary material available from openres.ersjournals.com

  • Author contributions: Study concept and design: S.C. Dharmage, H. Walters, M.J. Abramson, R. Faner and A. Agusti. Acquisition of data: S.C. Dharmage, H. Walters, P.S. Thomas, C. Lodge and J.L. Perret. Analysis and interpretation of data: D.S. Bui, S.C. Dharmage, R. Faner and Alvar Agusti. Drafting of the manuscript: D.S. Bui, R. Faner, A. Agusti, S.C. Dharmage and C. Lodge. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors. Statistical analysis: D.S. Bui, R. Faner, A. Agusti and S.C. Dharmage. Obtained funding: S.C. Dharmage, H. Walters, M.J. Abramson, R. Faner and A. Agusti.

  • Conflict of interest: D.S. Bui has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: A. Agusti has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: H. Walters has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: C. Lodge has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: J.L. Perret has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: A. Lowe has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: G. Bowatte has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: R. Cassim has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: G.S. Hamilton has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: P. Frith has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: A. James has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: P.S. Thomas has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: D. Jarvis has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M.J. Abramson has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: R. Faner has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: S.C. Dharmage has nothing to disclose.

  • Support statement: TAHS was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia under NHMRC project grant scheme (299901 and 1021275) and NHMRC European collaborative grant scheme (1101313) as part of ALEC (Ageing Lungs in European Cohorts funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 633212); The University of Melbourne; Clifford Craig Medical Research Trust of Tasmania; the Victorian, Queensland & Tasmanian Asthma Foundations; The Royal Hobart Hospital; Helen MacPherson Smith Trust; and GlaxoSmithKline. S.C. Dharmage, A. Lowe, J.L. Perret, C. Lodge and H. Walters are supported by the NHMRC of Australia. R. Faner is recipient of a Miguel Servet Research Program Contract of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FEDER, CP16/00039, PI17/00379 and PI18/00018).

  • Received January 11, 2021.
  • Accepted June 4, 2021.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Fletcher C,
    2. Peto R
    . The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction. Br Med J 1977; 1: 1645–1648. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.6077.1645
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Lange P,
    2. Celli B,
    3. Agusti A, et al.
    Lung-function trajectories leading to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 111–122. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411532
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bui DS,
    2. Lodge CJ,
    3. Burgess JA, et al.
    Childhood predictors of lung function trajectories and future COPD risk: a prospective cohort study from the first to the sixth decade of life. Lancet Respir Med 2018; 6: 535–544. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30100-0
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Agusti A,
    2. Faner R
    . Lung function trajectories in health and disease. Lancet Respir Med 2019; 4: 358–364. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30529-0
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Agustí A,
    2. Noell G,
    3. Brugada J, et al.
    Lung function in early adulthood and health in later life: a transgenerational cohort analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2017; 5: 935–945. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30434-4
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Agusti A,
    2. Faner R
    . COPD beyond smoking: new paradigm, novel opportunities. Lancet Respir Med 2018; 6: 324–326. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30060-2
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Agusti A,
    2. Alcazar B,
    3. Cosio B, et al.
    Time for a change: anticipating the diagnosis and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 2020; 56: 2002104. doi:10.1183/13993003.02104-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Miller MR,
    2. Hankinson J,
    3. Brusasco V, et al.
    Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 319–338. doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00034805
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Matheson MC,
    2. Abramson MJ,
    3. Allen K, et al.
    Cohort Profile: the Tasmanian Longitudinal Health STUDY (TAHS). Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46: 407–408i.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Vestbo J,
    2. Anderson W,
    3. Coxson HO, et al.
    Evaluation of COPD longitudinally to identify predictive surrogate end-points (ECLIPSE). Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 869–873. doi:10.1183/09031936.00111707
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Agusti A,
    2. Calverley P,
    3. Celli B, et al.
    Characterisation of COPD heterogeneity in the ECLIPSE cohort. Respir Res 2010; 11: 122. doi:10.1186/1465-9921-11-122
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kandane-Rathnayake RK,
    2. Tang ML,
    3. Simpson JA, et al.
    Adult serum cytokine concentrations and the persistence of asthma. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2013; 161: 342–350. doi:10.1159/000346910
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Agusti A,
    2. Hogg JC
    . Update on the pathogenesis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 1248–1256. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1900475
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Guerra S,
    2. Martinez FD
    . The complex beginnings of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 201: 641–642. doi:10.1164/rccm.201912-2363ED
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Guerra S,
    2. Halonen M,
    3. Vasquez MM, et al.
    Relation between circulating CC16 concentrations, lung function, and development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease across the lifespan: a prospective study. Lancet Respir Med 2015; 3: 613–620. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00196-4
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Zhai J,
    2. Stern DA,
    3. Sherrill DL, et al.
    Trajectories and early determinants of circulating CC16 from birth to age 32 years. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 198: 267–270. doi:10.1164/rccm.201712-2398LE
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Vestbo J,
    2. Edwards LD,
    3. Scanlon PD, et al.
    Changes in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second over time in COPD. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1184–1192. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1105482
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Woodruff PG,
    2. Agusti A,
    3. Roche N, et al.
    Current concepts in targeting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease pharmacotherapy: making progress towards personalised management. Lancet 2015; 385: 1789–1798. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60693-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Martinez FD
    . Early-life origins of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 871–878. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1603287
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Holgate S,
    2. Agusti A,
    3. Strieter RM, et al.
    Drug development for airway diseases: looking forward. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2015; 14: 367–368. doi:10.1038/nrd4645
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Agusti A,
    2. Edwards LD,
    3. Rennard SI, et al.
    Persistent systemic inflammation is associated with poor clinical outcomes in COPD: a novel phenotype. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e37483. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037483
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Faner R,
    2. Tal-Singer R,
    3. Riley JH, et al.
    Lessons from ECLIPSE: a review of COPD biomarkers. Thorax 2014; 69: 672. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204778
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Moon JY,
    2. Cho YJ,
    3. Sin D
    . Use of biomarkers in COPD: clinical implications. BRN Reviews 2018; 4: 84–107.
    OpenUrl
    1. Fermont JM,
    2. Masconi KL,
    3. Jensen MT, et al.
    Biomarkers and clinical outcomes in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax 2019; 74: 439–446. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-211855
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Celli BR,
    2. Anderson JA,
    3. Brook R, et al.
    Serum biomarkers and outcomes in patients with moderate COPD: a substudy of the randomised SUMMIT trial. BMJ Open Respir Res 2019; 6: e000431. doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000431
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Stockley RA,
    2. Halpin DMG,
    3. Celli BR, et al.
    COPD biomarkers and their Interpretation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 199: 1195–1204. doi:10.1164/rccm.201810-1860SO
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Email
Print
Alerts
Citation Tools
Lung function trajectory and biomarkers in the Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study
Dinh S. Bui, Alvar Agusti, Haydn Walters, Caroline Lodge, Jennifer L. Perret, Adrian Lowe, Gayan Bowatte, Raisa Cassim, Garun S. Hamilton, Peter Frith, Alan James, Paul S. Thomas, Debbie Jarvis, Michael J. Abramson, Rosa Faner, Shyamali C. Dharmage
ERJ Open Research Jul 2021, 7 (3) 00020-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00020-2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

Subjects