Abstract
Large airway collapse (LAC) is a frequently encountered clinical problem, caused by tracheobronchomalacia +/− excessive dynamic airway collapse, yet there are currently no universally accepted diagnostic criteria. We systematically reviewed studies reporting a diagnostic approach to LAC in healthy adults and patients, to compare diagnostic modalities and criteria used. Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies between 1989 and 2019. Studies that reported a diagnostic approach using computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging or flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy were included. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate the prevalence of LAC in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic obstructive airway diseases. We included 41 studies, describing 10 071 subjects (47% female) with a mean±sd age of 59±9 years. Most studies (n=35) reported CT findings, and only three studies reported bronchoscopic findings. The most reported diagnostic criterion was a ≥50% reduction in tracheal or main bronchi calibre at end-expiration on dynamic expiratory CT. Meta-analyses of relevant studies found that 17% (95% CI: 0–61%) of healthy subjects and 27% (95% CI: 11–46%) of patients with chronic airways disease were classified as having LAC, using this threshold. The most reported approach to diagnose LAC utilises CT diagnostics, and at a threshold used by most clinicians (i.e., ≥50%) may classify a considerable proportion of healthy individuals as being abnormal and having LAC in a quarter of patients with chronic airways disease. Future work should focus on establishing more precise diagnostic criteria for LAC, relating this to relevant physiological and disease sequelae.
Abstract
CT is mostly used to diagnose LAC, and at a threshold used by most clinicians (i.e. ≥50%) that would classify a large proportion of healthy individuals as being abnormal and LAC in a quarter of patients with chronic airway diseases https://bit.ly/3izAuSk
Footnotes
Submitted article, peer reviewed.
Author contributions: A. Mitropoulos, F. Almaghlouth and W-J. Song performed the systematic review and meta-analysis. A. Mitropoulos, W-J. Song and J.H. Hull contributed substantially to the study design, data analysis and the writing of the manuscript. M.I. Polkey and S. Kemp contributed to the interpretation of the results. A. Mitropoulos takes full responsibility for the integrity of the systematic review as a whole.
Conflict of interest: All authors declare that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest or nonfinancial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Support statement: We would like to thank the RELACS charity and the Royal Brompton Hospital Charity that funded A. Mitropoulos’ salary.
This article has supplementary material available from openres.ersjournals.com.
- Received February 1, 2021.
- Accepted June 3, 2021.
- Copyright ©The authors 2021
This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org