Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Defining end-systolic pressure for single-beat estimation of right ventricle–pulmonary artery coupling: simple… but not really

Inderjit Singh, Hannah Oakland, Ahmed Elassal, Paul M. Heerdt
ERJ Open Research 2021 7: 00219-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00219-2021
Inderjit Singh
1Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Dept of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: inderjit.singh@yale.edu
Hannah Oakland
1Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Dept of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hannah Oakland
Ahmed Elassal
2Dept of Anaesthesiology, Division of Applied Hemodynamics, Yale New Haven Hospital and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul M. Heerdt
2Dept of Anaesthesiology, Division of Applied Hemodynamics, Yale New Haven Hospital and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul M. Heerdt
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Surrogates of right ventricle (RV) end-systolic pressure (ESP) used to determine RV–pulmonary artery coupling vary across studies. ESP using point of maximal time varying elastance provides most accurate estimate of actual ESP. https://bit.ly/3xuqX3B

To the Editor:

Functional adaptation of the right ventricle (RV) to its afterload plays an important prognostic role in pulmonary hypertension (PH) [1]. The preferred “multibeat” (MB) method for assessing RV–pulmonary vascular interaction involves the measurement of end-systolic elastance (Ees), the slope of the end-systolic pressure (ESP) to end-systolic volume over sequential heart beats with varying preload. The Ees value is then matched to simultaneous pulmonary arterial (PA) elastance at end systole (Ea), calculated as ESP pressure divided by stroke volume (SV). The ratio of Ees to Ea (Ees/Ea) is termed RV–PA coupling, preservation of which indicates maintenance RV functioning in the face of increasing afterload [1]. However, while the MB method is generally regarded as the reference standard, it requires continuous, accurate measurement of RV volume and is therefore not readily applicable in most clinical settings.

An alternative approach to determining Ees/Ea is the “single beat” (SB) method that incorporates a prediction of Pmax (the theoretical pressure generated by the RV during an isovolumic beat), an estimate of ESP, and a measurement of SV [2]. A common assumption of the SB method has been that mean PA pressure (mPAP) [3–6] or peak RV systolic pressure (RVSP) [7] represent adequate surrogates for ESP. However, in a hypertensive RV, the mPAP frequently underestimates the ESP [8]; while in a normotensive RV, the peak RVSP tends to overestimate ESP. To overcome these limitations, Tello et al. [8] developed a correction equation (ESP=1.65×mPAP−7.79) that demonstrates a strong correlation with measured ESP from the MB method. Following this, Richter et al. [9] demonstrated a significant correlation between the SB and MB methods. However, in this study, the ESP for SB estimation of Ees and Ea was derived from a presumably linear end-systolic pressure volume relationship (ESPVR), not as a specifically defined point in the cardiac cycle. More recently, Heerdt et al. [10] described a method to define the point of maximal time-varying elastance for individual beats based upon the second derivative of the right ventricular pressure (RVP) waveform, and used this point to determine ESP for SB estimation of RV ejection fraction.

Using an experimental dataset, the current study estimated RV ESP using the different methods described in published reports for SB calculation of Ees/Ea and determined the accuracy and precision of each relative to ESP directly measured from the ESPVR. In addition, the correlation between Ees/Ea calculated using each estimate of ESP and that defined by MB analysis was determined.

Archived measurements of mPAP, RVP and RV volume recorded from 13 anesthetised swine (50–55 kg) under protocols approved by the institutional animal care and use committee, and in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals were used for the study. All pressure data had been acquired by micromanometry and volume by calibrated conductance catheter before and during interventions to alter RV afterload alone or in combination with inotropic manipulation. Under each condition, data were recorded at steady-state and during transient occlusion of the inferior vena cava to reduce preload. From steady-state recordings of RVP and volume, Pmax was predicted as previously described [10], SV derived, and SB measures of Ees and Ea calculated using ESP defined by four different methods: 1) RV pressure at the point of estimated maximal time varying elastance (ESPtve) [10]; 2) mPAP [3]; 3) adjusted mPAP [8]; and 4) peak RVSP [7]. From MB caval occlusion data, Ees was determined as the slope of the ESPVR and Ea was calculated as ESP/SV with end-systole defined as the point of maximal pressure/volume ratio [11]. A dataset was constructed containing 39 simultaneous measures (three from each animal) of ESP defined by different methods, SB Ees and Ea calculated using the different measures of ESP, and MB Ees and Ea.

Comparison between measured RV ESP and that defined by different SB methods was performed using linear regression to define correlation, Bland–Altman plots to define accuracy and precision of estimated data, and four quadrant concordance plots with a 10% zone of exclusion to assess uniformity of directional change [12]. Measurements were considered potentially interchangeable when the average difference between them (bias) was <10% of the mean of measured ESP values, and the overall error calculated as: (bias standard deviation×1.96)/mean of all data compared was ≤30%. These criteria are consistent with previously reported method comparison studies in swine involving haemodynamics [13]. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, LLC, La Jolla, CA, USA) and SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

There was strong correlation between measured ESP and all estimates (figure 1). Bland–Altman analysis indicated that the ESPtve demonstrated acceptable accuracy and precision with a bias of −2.5±1.2 mmHg (8% of the mean of measured ESP values) and an overall mean error of 8%. Adjusted mPAP provided an ESP estimate that was slightly more accurate (bias=0.9±3.5 mmHg, 3% of the measured ESP mean) but less precise (mean error=21%). In contrast, the poorest ESP estimate was mPAP which was neither accurate (bias= −7.6±3.8 mmHg, 21% of the measured ESP mean) or precise (mean error=26%). Concordance between measured ESP and the different estimates was 100% except for RVSP (92%, data not shown).

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Correlation between measured right ventricle end-systolic pressure (RV ESP) and estimated RV ESP using different single beat methods. Data presented as means and 95% confidence intervals of the linear regression functions. Red line denotes the line of identity (left-hand panels). Bland–Altman plot showing the mean difference between methods (bias) and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) and their respective confidence intervals between estimated and measured RV ESP (right-hand panels). mPAP: mean pulmonary arterial pressure; RVSP: right ventricle systolic pressure.

With pooled data, the only difference between MB and SB Ees/Ea occurred when mPAP was used as a surrogate for ESP (ANOVA on ranks with all comparisons to MB Ees/Ea, data not shown). However, for individual data points significant correlation with MB Ees/Ea was evident for only the ESPtve (r=0.5, p=0.0009) and adjusted mPAP (r=0.3, p=0.02) methods.

The present study demonstrates that among the different methods for estimating ESP, the approach based upon approximation of the point of maximal time varying elastance (ESPtve) provided greatest accuracy and precision while mPAP provided the worst. However, when adjusted using the equation reported by Tello et al. [8], mPAP did yield an estimate of ESP that was accurate and acceptably precise (figure 1). In contrast, although peak RVSP demonstrated strong linear correlation with measured ESP when RVP was high, the relationship overall appears nonlinear with RVSP overestimating the measured ESP when RVP was low (figure 1). Presumably, this reflects the fact that with a normotensive RV there is continued ejection well beyond the point of peak RVSP due to the high capacitance and low resistance pulmonary circulation [14], resulting in ESP being reached later in the cardiac cycle. Overall, the study results highlight previous reports [8] that although mPAP is correlated with RV ESP and has been frequently used as a surrogate [3–6], it progressively underestimates ESP as RVP rises (figure 1).

Across all methods, a significant relationship between both pooled and individual SB and MB Ees/Ea data was evident only for ESPtve and adjusted mPAP. This underscores the importance of considering how ESP was defined when interpreting absolute values for Ees/Ea reported in the literature.

Results from the current study need to be interpreted in the context of limitations. Data for analysis were compiled from 13 anesthetised, ventilated pigs with acute pulmonary vasoconstriction. Further work is required for clinical validation of the study results across different PH phenotypes. In addition, while the study results are broadly consistent with the concept that SB measures of Ees/Ea using ESPtve can effectively represent the MB reference standard, specific definition of the accuracy and precision of this representation is beyond the scope of the current investigation.

In summary, the current study demonstrates that estimation of ESP using an RVP-based approximation of the point of maximal time varying elastance can provide an accurate and precise value. This method eliminates the need for simultaneous measurement of mPAP when performing SB analysis of RV Ees/Ea.

Footnotes

  • Submitted article, peer reviewed

  • Author contributions: I. Singh, H. Oakland and P.M. Heerdt contributed to conception and design of the work, interpretation of the data and writing. A. Elassal and P.M. Heerdt contributed to data acquisition and analysis. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and are accountable for all aspects of the work.

  • Conflict of interest: I. Singh has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: H. Oakland has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: A. Elassal has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: P.M. Heerdt reports grants from NTT Research and IMPERATiV, and an ownership interest in RVMetrics, LLC (dissolved in 2020), outside the submitted work.

  • Support statement: This study was support by National Institutes of Health grant 2T32GM086287-11 (to A. Elassal). Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Received March 27, 2021.
  • Accepted June 25, 2021.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2021
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Vonk-Noordegraaf A,
    2. Haddad F,
    3. Chin KM, et al.
    Right heart adaptation to pulmonary arterial hypertension: physiology and pathobiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 25 Suppl., D22–D33. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.027
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Brimioulle S,
    2. Wauthy P,
    3. Ewalenko P, et al.
    Single-beat estimation of right ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationship. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003; 284: H1625–H1630. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01023.2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Philip JL,
    2. Chesler NC
    . Know your limitations: assumptions in the single-beat method for estimating right ventricular-pulmonary vascular coupling. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 198: 707–709. doi:10.1164/rccm.201805-1000ED
    OpenUrl
    1. Rajaratnam A,
    2. Rehman S,
    3. Sharma P, et al.
    Right ventricular load and contractility in HIV-associated pulmonary hypertension. PLoS ONE 2021; 16: e0243274. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243274
    OpenUrl
    1. Contijoch F,
    2. Wong D,
    3. Igata S, et al.
    Association between preoperative dynamic measures of vascular load and postoperative hemodynamics in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2021; 18: 551. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-685RL
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Singh I,
    2. Rahaghi FN,
    3. Naeije R, et al.
    Right ventricular-arterial uncoupling during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: role of pulmonary vascular dysfunction. Chest 2019; 156: 933–943. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.109
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Metkus TS,
    2. Mullin CJ,
    3. Grandin EW, et al.
    Heart rate dependence of the pulmonary resistance x compliance (RC) time and impact on right ventricular load. PLoS ONE 2016; 11: e0166463. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166463
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Tello K,
    2. Richter MJ,
    3. Axmann J, et al.
    More on single-beat estimation of right ventriculo-arterial coupling in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 198: 816–818. doi:10.1164/rccm.201802-0283LE
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Richter MJ,
    2. Peters D,
    3. Ghofrani HA, et al.
    Evaluation and prognostic relevance of right ventricular-arterial coupling in pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 201: 116–119. doi:10.1164/rccm.201906-1195LE
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Heerdt PM,
    2. Kheyfets V,
    3. Charania S, et al.
    A pressure-based single beat method for estimation of right ventricular ejection fraction: proof of concept. Eur Respir J 2020; 55: 1901635. doi:10.1183/13993003.01635-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Sagawa K ML,
    2. Suga H,
    3. Sunagawa K
    . Cardiac contraction and the pressure–volume relationship. New York, Oxford University Press, 1988.
  10. ↵
    1. Thiele RH,
    2. McMurry TL
    . Data agnosticism and implications on method comparison studies. Anesth Analg 2015; 121: 264–266. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000810
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Berlin DA,
    2. Manoach S,
    3. Oromendia C, et al.
    Automated expiratory ventilation assistance through a small endotracheal tube can improve venous return and cardiac output. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019; 7: 6. doi:10.1186/s40635-018-0217-y
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Richter MJ,
    2. Hsu S,
    3. Yogeswaran A, et al.
    Right ventricular pressure-volume loop shape and systolic pressure change in pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2021; 320: L715–L725. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00583.2020
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 7 Issue 3 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 7 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Defining end-systolic pressure for single-beat estimation of right ventricle–pulmonary artery coupling: simple… but not really
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Defining end-systolic pressure for single-beat estimation of right ventricle–pulmonary artery coupling: simple… but not really
Inderjit Singh, Hannah Oakland, Ahmed Elassal, Paul M. Heerdt
ERJ Open Research Jul 2021, 7 (3) 00219-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00219-2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Defining end-systolic pressure for single-beat estimation of right ventricle–pulmonary artery coupling: simple… but not really
Inderjit Singh, Hannah Oakland, Ahmed Elassal, Paul M. Heerdt
ERJ Open Research Jul 2021, 7 (3) 00219-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00219-2021
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Pulmonary vascular disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Sex differences in pulmonary AVM in HHT
  • Epidemiology of unexplained chronic cough in adults
  • Comparison of the ACQ and patient diaries
Show more Research letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society