Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Particle flow rate from the airways as fingerprint diagnostics in mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled study

Filip Hallgren, Martin Stenlo, Anna Niroomand, Ellen Broberg, Snejana Hyllén, Malin Malmsjö, Sandra Lindstedt
ERJ Open Research 2021 7: 00961-2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00961-2020
Filip Hallgren
1Dept of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Transplantation, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Stenlo
2Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
3Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
4Dept of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
5Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Niroomand
3Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
4Dept of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
5Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
6Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ellen Broberg
2Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
3Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
4Dept of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
5Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Snejana Hyllén
2Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
3Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
4Dept of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
5Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Malin Malmsjö
4Dept of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra Lindstedt
1Dept of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Transplantation, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
3Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
4Dept of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
5Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sandra Lindstedt
  • For correspondence: sandra.lindstedt_ingemansson@med.lu.se
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Flowchart after arrival at the intensive care unit (ICU). The patients were randomised to either volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) or pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) including a recruitment manoeuvre (RM) as the first line of treatment. The mechanical ventilation was thereafter set to pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) in all patients until recovery from anaesthesia when the ventilator was switched to pressure-support ventilation (PSV) to facilitate spontaneous breathing. Figure created with BioRender.com.

  • FIGURE 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2

    There was a significantly lower particle flow rate (PFR) when using pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) compared to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). Ventilation with pressure support ventilation (PSV) resulted in significantly higher PFR compared to PRVC. Statistical tests were conducted using the Mann–Whitney test. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.0001 (****) and p<0.05 (*).

  • FIGURE 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3

    No significant difference was found in either ventilator mode when comparing particle flow rate (PFR) before and after the recruitment manoeuvre (RM). There was no significant difference between volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) before and after the recruitment manoeuvre. ns: not significant.

  • FIGURE 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4

    a) Distribution of particles according to size in the different ventilation modes. When looking at particle flow rate (PFR) according to the different particle size bins (1–8) we can distinguish distinct patterns linked to different ventilation modes. In pressure support ventilation (PSV), there was a significantly higher PFR for all particle sizes (1–8) compared to the other ventilation modes. Statistical tests were conducted using the Kruskal–Wallis test. b) PFR for particle sizes 1–4 in the different ventilation modes. A significant difference was found between pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) for particle sizes 1–4. A significant difference between PRVC and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) was found for particle sizes 1–3. No difference was found when comparing VCV to PCV for particle sizes 1–4. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.001 (***), p<0.01 (**), p<0.05 (*) and p>0.05 (not significant, ns).

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1

    Haemodynamic parameters, train-of-four (TOF) and blood gases during measurement at arrival in the intensive care unit (baseline), before and after recruitment manoeuvre, and before extubation

    ParametersBaselineBefore recruitment manoeuvreAfter recruitment manoeuvreEnding
    SBP mmHg104.9±3.1116.4±3.1118.2±2.4127.6±3.5
    DBP mmHg54.5±1.860.2±2.260.9±2.062.7±2.1
    MAP mmHg69.8±2.177.3±2.377.7±2.081.2±2.2
    CVP mmHg1.3±0.83.4±0.73.4±0.86.6±0.9
    HR beats·min−176.9±1.975.8±1.974.1±2.280.4±2.2
    SAT %98.5±0.498.8±0.499.5±0.297.8±0.4
    TOF %92.9±5.3
    PH7.38±07.35±0
    PCO2 mmHg38.7±0.843.2±1.1
    PO2 mmHg132.8±5.798.3±3.3

    Data presented as mean±sem. SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; MAP: mean arterial pressure; CVP: central venous pressure; HR: heart rate; SAT: saturation; PCO2: carbon dioxide tension; PO2: oxygen tension.

    • TABLE 2

      Ventilator settings and respiratory parameters at arrival in the intensive care unit (baseline), before and after recruitment manoeuvre, and before extubation

      ParametersBaselineBefore recruitment manoeuvreAfter recruitment manoeuvreEnding
      Ventilation modeVCV:PCV (1:1)VCV:PCV (1:1)PRVCPSV
      PEEP cmH2O5.2±0.15.2±0.15.1±0.12.4±0.2
      PIP cmH2O17.0±0.917.0±0.514.6±0.412.8±0.2
      Pmean cmH2O8.9±0.29.0±0.38.7±0.25.1±0.2
      PS cmH2O, in PCV and PSV11.0±0.610.9±0.610.0±0.1
      RR breaths·min−114.4±0.214.4±0.314.3±0.216.2±1.0
      VT INSP mL509.0±15.6518.5±16.2506.6±11.2586.5±37.8
      VT EXP mL501.7±15.8507.0±15.9496.1±10.7580.7±41.5
      MV L·min−17.3±0.37.2±0.27.1±0.28.6±0.3
      Cdyn mL/cmH2O51.5±2.853.3±2.754.4±2.052.8±4.4
      FIO2 %42.0±1.040.7±0.840.0±0.932.2±0.6
      I:E1:21:21:2

      Data presented as mean±sem. PEEP: positive end expiratory pressure; PIP: peak inspiratory pressure; Pmean: mean pressure; PS: pressure support; RR: respiratory rate; VT: tidal volume; MV: minute ventilation; Cdyn: dynamic compliance; FIO2: inspiratory oxygen fraction; I:E: inspiratory–expiratory ratio; VCV: volume-controlled ventilation; PCV: pressure-controlled ventilation; PRVC: pressure-regulated volume control; PSV: pressure support ventilation.

      • TABLE 3

        Patient demographics

        Volume-controlled ventilation (VCV)Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV)Total
        Patients, n151530
        Sex male/female, n (%)13 (87)/2 (13)9 (60)/ 6 (40)22 (73)/8 (27)
        Type of surgery, n
         CABG8715
         AVR6410
         CABG and AVR145
        Age years, mean±sd70.3±11.167.5±9.468.9±10.2
        SmokingNoNoNo
        Normal chest radiographYesYesYes
        Normal renal functionYesYesYes
        EF>55%YesYesYes

        CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; AVR: aortic valve replacement.

        PreviousNext
        Back to top
        Vol 7 Issue 3 Table of Contents
        ERJ Open Research: 7 (3)
        • Table of Contents
        • Index by author
        Email

        Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

        NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

        Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
        Particle flow rate from the airways as fingerprint diagnostics in mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled study
        (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
        (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
        CAPTCHA
        This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
        Print
        Citation Tools
        Particle flow rate from the airways as fingerprint diagnostics in mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled study
        Filip Hallgren, Martin Stenlo, Anna Niroomand, Ellen Broberg, Snejana Hyllén, Malin Malmsjö, Sandra Lindstedt
        ERJ Open Research Jul 2021, 7 (3) 00961-2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00961-2020

        Citation Manager Formats

        • BibTeX
        • Bookends
        • EasyBib
        • EndNote (tagged)
        • EndNote 8 (xml)
        • Medlars
        • Mendeley
        • Papers
        • RefWorks Tagged
        • Ref Manager
        • RIS
        • Zotero
        Share
        Particle flow rate from the airways as fingerprint diagnostics in mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled study
        Filip Hallgren, Martin Stenlo, Anna Niroomand, Ellen Broberg, Snejana Hyllén, Malin Malmsjö, Sandra Lindstedt
        ERJ Open Research Jul 2021, 7 (3) 00961-2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00961-2020
        del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
        Full Text (PDF)

        Jump To

        • Article
          • Abstract
          • Abstract
          • Introduction
          • Method
          • Results
          • Discussion
          • Acknowledgements
          • Footnotes
          • References
        • Figures & Data
        • Info & Metrics
        • PDF

        Subjects

        • Acute lung injury and critical care
        • Tweet Widget
        • Facebook Like
        • Google Plus One

        More in this TOC Section

        Original research articles

        • Bacterial DNA amplifies neutrophilic inflammation in IL-17-exposed airways
        • PERSPIRE: a cohort study
        • Ipratropium bromide in EILO
        Show more Original research articles

        Critical care

        • Feasibility of TBLC in patients with VV-ECMO
        • Insights from the ASPIRE registry
        Show more Critical care

        Related Articles

        Navigate

        • Home
        • Current issue
        • Archive

        About ERJ Open Research

        • Editorial board
        • Journal information
        • Press
        • Permissions and reprints
        • Advertising

        The European Respiratory Society

        • Society home
        • myERS
        • Privacy policy
        • Accessibility

        ERS publications

        • European Respiratory Journal
        • ERJ Open Research
        • European Respiratory Review
        • Breathe
        • ERS books online
        • ERS Bookshop

        Help

        • Feedback

        For authors

        • Instructions for authors
        • Publication ethics and malpractice
        • Submit a manuscript

        For readers

        • Alerts
        • Subjects
        • RSS

        Subscriptions

        • Accessing the ERS publications

        Contact us

        European Respiratory Society
        442 Glossop Road
        Sheffield S10 2PX
        United Kingdom
        Tel: +44 114 2672860
        Email: journals@ersnet.org

        ISSN

        Online ISSN: 2312-0541

        Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society