Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

High-flow oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation: a randomised physiological crossover study of alveolar recruitment in acute respiratory failure

Elise Artaud-Macari, Michael Bubenheim, Gurvan Le Bouar, Dorothée Carpentier, Steven Grangé, Déborah Boyer, Gaëtan Béduneau, Benoit Misset, Antoine Cuvelier, Fabienne Tamion, Christophe Girault
ERJ Open Research 2021 7: 00373-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00373-2021
Elise Artaud-Macari
1Rouen University Hospital, Medical Intensive Care Unit, F-76000, Rouen, France
2Rouen University Hospital, Pulmonary, Thoracic Oncology and Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, F-76000, Rouen, France
3Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, EA3830, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000, Rouen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elise Artaud-Macari
Michael Bubenheim
4Rouen University Hospital, Dept of Clinical Research and Innovation, F-76000, Rouen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Bubenheim
Gurvan Le Bouar
1Rouen University Hospital, Medical Intensive Care Unit, F-76000, Rouen, France
2Rouen University Hospital, Pulmonary, Thoracic Oncology and Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, F-76000, Rouen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dorothée Carpentier
1Rouen University Hospital, Medical Intensive Care Unit, F-76000, Rouen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Grangé
1Rouen University Hospital, Medical Intensive Care Unit, F-76000, Rouen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Déborah Boyer
1Rouen University Hospital, Medical Intensive Care Unit, F-76000, Rouen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gaëtan Béduneau
1Rouen University Hospital, Medical Intensive Care Unit, F-76000, Rouen, France
3Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, EA3830, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000, Rouen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benoit Misset
1Rouen University Hospital, Medical Intensive Care Unit, F-76000, Rouen, France
5Dept of Intensive Care, Liège University Hospital, Liège, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antoine Cuvelier
2Rouen University Hospital, Pulmonary, Thoracic Oncology and Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, F-76000, Rouen, France
3Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, EA3830, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000, Rouen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Antoine Cuvelier
Fabienne Tamion
1Rouen University Hospital, Medical Intensive Care Unit, F-76000, Rouen, France
6Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, IRIB, Inserm U 1096, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000, Rouen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christophe Girault
1Rouen University Hospital, Medical Intensive Care Unit, F-76000, Rouen, France
3Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, EA3830, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000, Rouen, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christophe Girault
  • For correspondence: Christophe.girault@chu-rouen.fr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Comparative effects between high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) on global and regional tidal volume (VT) variation in all patients (n=16). Analysis of VT variation between HFNC and NIV in a) global lung, b) region of interest (ROI)1, c) ROI2, d) ROI3, e) ROI4, f) consolidation area. Data points represent VT values for individual patients with HFNC and NIV, and the horizontal line represents the median value. *: p<0.05 by Wilcoxon's test for dependent variable.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • TABLE 1

    Patient characteristics and outcome data

    PatientsAge (years)SexBMI (kg·m−2)SAPSIISOFALocalisation of lung consolidation (ROI1, 2, 3 or 4)Delay between admission and inclusion (days)IntubationICU length of stay (days)Death
    163M2527430N6N
    222F2825343N5N
    338M2222424N6N
    419M1715216N10N
    555M3331313N2N
    653M40569315N17N
    771M2627132N3N
    886M2547412N7N
    946F3616336N5N
    1042M2132142N6N
    1127M2312612N2N
    1254F2121532Y17Y
    1347F2128243N4N
    1469F2248939Y23N
    1556F2633233N6N
    1633F4620244N5N
    Total or median (IQR)50 (37–58)7 F
    9 M
    25 (22–29)27 (21–32)3 (2–4)4 ROI1
    1 ROI2
    7 ROI3
    4 ROI4
    3 (2–5)2 Y
    14 N
    6 (5–8)1 Y
    15 N

    BMI: body mass index; SAPSII: Simplified Acute Physiology Score II; SOFA: Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment; ROI: region of interest; ICU: intensive care unit; IQR: interquartile range; M: male; F: female; Y: yes; N: no.

    • TABLE 2

      Comparison between physiological effects of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC)

      NIVHFNCHFNC–NIV
      Median (IQR)Median (IQR)Median (95% CI)p-value#
      VT global (units)3161 (1884–3805)2323 (1497–2891)−678.0 (−947.5– −322.0)0.001
      VT ROI1 (units)887 (657–1033)590 (464–774)−204.5 (−279.5– −122.0)0.0007
      VT ROI2 (units)686 (413–925)445 (262–656)−214.0 (−309.0– −130.0)0.0003
      VT ROI3 (units)743 (498–1008)589 (271–909)−118.5 (−221.5–0.0)0.04
      VT ROI4 (units)444 (318–861)450 (286–664)−93.5 (−200.0–7.5)0.06
      VT consolidation (units)778 (338–1002)489 (198–783)−133.0 (−215.0– −53.5)0.004
      EELI global (units)4083 (2928–5134)2921 (1706–4850)−570.5 (−1649.5–824.0)0.4
      EELI ROI1 (units)842 (646–1144)562 (215–1000)−329.0 (−570.5– −110.0)0.01
      EELI ROI2 (units)960 (469–1406)408 (355–1152)−174.0 (−563.0–79.5)0.1
      EELI ROI3 (units)767 (336–1124)618 (370–1251)−101.0 (−487.0–476.0)0.5
      EELI ROI4 (units)846 (488–971)447 (373–738)−196.0 (−491.5–733.0)0.4
      EELI consolidation (units)899 (767–1144)486 (381–946)−322.5 (−588.5–178.5)0.1
      Respiratory rate (breaths·min−1)24 (22–27)23 (21–26)−2 (−4–4)0.6
      SpO2/FiO2 ratio167 (143–200)163 (140–200)−4.5 (−15.5– −2.0)0.001
      SpO2 (%)100 (98–100)97 (96–100)−2 (−3–0)0.010
      Heart rate (beats·min−1)84 (68–98)90 (78–104)1 (−2–5)0.8
      SBP (mmHg)119 (108–131)125 (113–137)3 (−1–11)0.2
      MAP (mmHg)80 (76–89)85 (77–94)2 (−3–5)0.6
      Dyspnoea score (0–10)5 (0–5)5 (2–5)0 (−1–1)0.7
      Patient comfort score (0–10)4 (2–5)5 (4–7)0 (−1–4)0.7

      Bold type represents statistical significance. IQR: interquartile range; VT: tidal volume variation; ROI: region of interest; EELI: end-expiratory lung impedance; SpO2: pulse oxygen saturation; FiO2: inspiratory oxygen fraction; SBP: systolic blood pressure; MAP: mean arterial pressure. #: Wilcoxon signed rank test.

      • TABLE 3

        Comparison between physiological effects of face mask (FM) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC)

        FMHFNCHFNC–FM
        Median (IQR)Median (IQR)Median (95% CI)p-value#
        VT global (units)2240 (1421–2752)2323 (1497–2891)−3.0 (−138.5–153.5)0.9
        VT ROI1 (units)618 (440–692)590 (464–774)−30.0 (−96.0–35.0)0.3
        VT ROI2 (units)408 (295–703)445 (262–656)−18.5 (−63.5–37.0)0.4
        VT ROI3 (units)597 (287–816)589 (271–909)14.5 (−27.5–113.0)0.5
        VT ROI4 (units)290 (200–708)450 (286–664)15.0 (−21.0–77.0)0.4
        VT consolidation (units)290 (233–760)489 (198–783)2.5 (−57.0–40.5)0.9
        EELI global (units)1444 (992–3468)2921 (1706–4850)826.0 (399.5–2361.0)<0.0001
        EELI ROI1 (units)278 (91–634)562 (215–1000)161.5 (−19.5–322.5)0.05
        EELI ROI2 (units)325 (181–531)408 (355–1152)187.5 (−31.5–464.0)0.1
        EELI ROI3 (units)378 (125–446)618 (370–1251)220.0 (57.0–719.0)0.01
        EELI ROI4 (units)309 (130–499)447 (373–738)169.5 (31.0–1104.0)0.01
        EELI consolidation (units)283 (125–477)486 (381–946)138.0 (24.5–613.0)0.01
        Respiratory rate (breaths·min−1)25 (23–28)23 (21–26)−3 (−6–1)0.2
        SpO2/FiO2 ratio152 (147–152)163 (140–200)16.0 (−6.0–48.0)0.1
        SpO2 (%)100 (97–100)97 (96–100)0 (−2–1)0.5
        Heart rate (beats·min−1)82 (72–102)90 (78–104)1 (−2–4)0.4
        SBP (mmHg)118 (107–133)125 (113–137)6 (0–9)0.1
        MAP (mmHg)81 (74–92)85 (77–94)2 (1–7)0.01
        Dyspnoea score (0–10)0 (0–5)5 (2–5)0 (0–3)0.3
        Patient comfort score (0–10)8 (4–9)5 (4–7)−2 (−4–0)0.1

        Bold type reprensents statistical significance. IQR: interquartile range; VT: tidal volume variation; ROI: region of interest; EELI: end-expiratory lung impedance; SpO2: pulse oxygen saturation; FiO2: inspiratory oxygen fraction; SBP: systolic blood pressure; MAP: mean arterial pressure. #: Wilcoxon signed rank test.

        • TABLE 4

          Comparison between physiological effects of face mask (FM) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV)

          FMNIVNIV–FM
          Median (IQR)Median (IQR)Median (95% CI)p-value#
          VT global (units)2402 (1641–3050)3161 (1884–3805)606.0 (441.5–792.0)<0.0001
          VT ROI1 (units)593 (566–737)887 (657–1033)182.5 (97.0–269.0)0.001
          VT ROI2 (units)479 (321–683)686 (413–925)182.5 (122.5–251.0)<0.0001
          VT ROI3 (units)649 (427–836)743 (498–1008)132.5 (73.5–194.5)0.0002
          VT ROI4 (units)383 (259–772)444 (318–861)98.5 (17.0–178.0)0.02
          VT consolidation (units)593 (160–819)778 (338–1002)151.0 (58.0–215.5)0.009
          EELI global (units)1999 (764–2779)4083 (2928–5134)1810.5 (857.0–2646.0)0.001
          EELI ROI1 (units)327 (115–618)842 (646–1144)518.0 (315.5–779.0)<0.0001
          EELI ROI2 (units)361 (135–880)960 (469–1406)457.5 (130.0–818.0)0.009
          EELI ROI3 (units)317 (144–567)767 (336–1124)414.0 (76.0–678.5)0.02
          EELI ROI4 (units)382 (115–572)846 (488–971)374.0 (108.0–670.5)0.01
          EELI consolidation (units)562 (160–776)899 (767–1144)404.5 (59.0–718.0)0.02
          Respiratory rate (breaths·min−1)26 (25–30)24 (22–27)−2 (−6–2)0.6
          SpO2/FiO2 ratio152 (145–152)167 (143–200)21.0 (2.5–50.0)0.03
          SpO2 (%)100 (96–100)100 (98–100)0 (0–2)0.3
          Heart rate (beats·min−1)85 (79–103)84 (68–98)−1 (−3–5)0.8
          SBP (mmHg)122 (109–129)119 (108–131)−1 (−7–11)1.0
          MAP (mmHg)84 (77–91)80 ( 76–89)−1 (−2–4)1.0
          Dyspnoea score (0–10)2 (0–5)5 (0–5)0 (−1–3)0.5
          Patient comfort score (0–10)8 (5–10)4 (2–5)−3 (−5− −1)0.001

          Bold type reprensents statistical significance. IQR: interquartile range; VT: tidal volume variation; ROI: region of interest; EELI: end-expiratory lung impedance; SpO2: pulse oxygen saturation; FiO2: inspiratory oxygen fraction; SBP: systolic blood pressure; MAP: mean arterial pressure. #: Wilcoxon signed rank test.

          Supplementary Materials

          • Figures
          • Tables
          • Supplementary Material

            Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.

            Supplementary material 00373-2021.SUPPLEMENT

            FIGURE S1 Study protocol, electrode position of the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) belt and lung volume modelization. A. Progress of the experiment: after study inclusion, the first patient included received NIV in period 1 followed by HFNC in period 2. Then, the following patient received HFNC and NIV in the reverse order of the previous patient. To minimize the residual effect from period 1, patients received FM between the 2 periods. Oxygenation was delivered during at least 15 minutes. During this time, EIT measures were recorded. Electrical impedance tomography lay out: B. 16 electrodes united within the same belt were placed on the thorax of the patient facing the alveolar zone of condensation. The reference electrode R was placed on the abdomen. C. Functional EIT images in the acquisition zone defined by the belt. D. Subdivision of the acquisition area into 4 standardized quadrants or regions of interest (ROI) numbered from 1 to 4. 00373-2021.figureS1

            FIGURE S2 Electrical impedance tomography recordings. EIT: electrical impedance tomography, A: respiratory rate, global and regional tidal variation (TV) in the four regions of interest (ROI) chosen. End-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) measured by EIT in global lung and in each ROI showing the evolution of EELI between B: face mask (green arrows) and NIV (pink arrows) periods; C: HFNC (red arrows) and face mask (green arrows) periods. 00373-2021.figureS2

            TABLE S1 Comparison of patients' characteristics at inclusion by treatment sequence 00373-2021.tableS1

            TABLE S2 Effect of first treatment on patients' characteristics just before second treatment 00373-2021.tableS2

          PreviousNext
          Back to top
          Vol 7 Issue 4 Table of Contents
          ERJ Open Research: 7 (4)
          • Table of Contents
          • Index by author
          Email

          Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

          NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

          Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
          High-flow oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation: a randomised physiological crossover study of alveolar recruitment in acute respiratory failure
          (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
          (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
          CAPTCHA
          This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
          Print
          Citation Tools
          High-flow oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation: a randomised physiological crossover study of alveolar recruitment in acute respiratory failure
          Elise Artaud-Macari, Michael Bubenheim, Gurvan Le Bouar, Dorothée Carpentier, Steven Grangé, Déborah Boyer, Gaëtan Béduneau, Benoit Misset, Antoine Cuvelier, Fabienne Tamion, Christophe Girault
          ERJ Open Research Oct 2021, 7 (4) 00373-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00373-2021

          Citation Manager Formats

          • BibTeX
          • Bookends
          • EasyBib
          • EndNote (tagged)
          • EndNote 8 (xml)
          • Medlars
          • Mendeley
          • Papers
          • RefWorks Tagged
          • Ref Manager
          • RIS
          • Zotero
          Share
          High-flow oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation: a randomised physiological crossover study of alveolar recruitment in acute respiratory failure
          Elise Artaud-Macari, Michael Bubenheim, Gurvan Le Bouar, Dorothée Carpentier, Steven Grangé, Déborah Boyer, Gaëtan Béduneau, Benoit Misset, Antoine Cuvelier, Fabienne Tamion, Christophe Girault
          ERJ Open Research Oct 2021, 7 (4) 00373-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00373-2021
          del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
          Full Text (PDF)

          Jump To

          • Article
            • Abstract
            • Abstract
            • Introduction
            • Material and methods
            • Results
            • Discussion
            • Supplementary material
            • Acknowledgements
            • Footnotes
            • References
          • Figures & Data
          • Info & Metrics
          • PDF

          Subjects

          • Acute lung injury and critical care
          • Tweet Widget
          • Facebook Like
          • Google Plus One

          More in this TOC Section

          • Longitudinal passive cough monitoring
          • Severe PH-CLD and loss of small pulmonary vessels on CT
          • Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on severe asthma care
          Show more Original research articles

          Related Articles

          Navigate

          • Home
          • Current issue
          • Archive

          About ERJ Open Research

          • Editorial board
          • Journal information
          • Press
          • Permissions and reprints
          • Advertising

          The European Respiratory Society

          • Society home
          • myERS
          • Privacy policy
          • Accessibility

          ERS publications

          • European Respiratory Journal
          • ERJ Open Research
          • European Respiratory Review
          • Breathe
          • ERS books online
          • ERS Bookshop

          Help

          • Feedback

          For authors

          • Instructions for authors
          • Publication ethics and malpractice
          • Submit a manuscript

          For readers

          • Alerts
          • Subjects
          • RSS

          Subscriptions

          • Accessing the ERS publications

          Contact us

          European Respiratory Society
          442 Glossop Road
          Sheffield S10 2PX
          United Kingdom
          Tel: +44 114 2672860
          Email: journals@ersnet.org

          ISSN

          Online ISSN: 2312-0541

          Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society