Abstract
Somatostatin receptor functional imaging is of limited utility as an imaging biomarker in LAM, but other PET/CT modalities may be of use https://bit.ly/3l6BVZp
To the Editor:
Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a progressive, low-grade, metastasising neoplasm of women that is characterised by infiltration of the lung parenchyma with abnormal smooth muscle-like cells, resulting in cystic lung destruction [1]. While forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) is the current standard outcome measure used in LAM, there are limitations to its use as a true surrogate of disease severity and it may underestimate disease burden. Additionally, pulmonary function testing depends on patient cooperation and there can be significant intertest variation. Despite vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-D being an excellent diagnostic test and biomarker of prognosis [2], it is not elevated in all patients; hence, other biomarkers of disease activity and prognosis are required. Due to the neoplastic nature and the activation of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling in LAM, it has previously been investigated whether LAM lesions would demonstrate increased metabolic uptake of [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) on positron emission tomography (PET) scanning. However, no significant uptake of FDG was demonstrated in LAM lesions or angiomyolipomas (AMLs), and this radiotracer was not deemed suitable to determine disease burden or activity in sporadic or tuberous sclerosis-associated LAM (TSC-LAM) patients [3]. Patients with LAM may develop chylous complications, including chyloptysis, chylous ascites and chylothorax [4, 5]. Additionally, TSC-LAM can be associated with neuroendocrine tumours that overexpress somatostatin receptors, and octreotide, a somatostatin analogue, is an effective therapy for chylothorax in a variety of conditions, including in LAM [6, 7]. While it is not known whether somatostatin receptors are expressed in LAM lesions, it is known that somatostatin and urotensin II are closely related neuropeptides, and directly activate both urotensin receptors and somatostatin receptors [8]. Urotensin II and urotensin receptors are present and expressed to a greater extent in the lungs of LAM patients compared to normal lungs [9]. In prior reports, octreotide scintigraphy demonstrated increased uptake of radiolabelled octreotide diffusely throughout the lungs and kidneys, suggesting the presence of somatostatin receptors or analogous receptors in LAM [10]. Gallium-68-linked somatostatin receptor PET radiotracers such as 68Ga-DOTA-TyI3-octreotide (DOTATOC) (68Ga-DOTA PET/computed tomography (CT)) utilise a radiolabelled somatostatin analogue peptide that binds with high affinity to the somatostatin receptors. 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT offers many advantages over octreotide scintigraphy, with significantly higher target-to-background ratio, superior spatial resolution, better sensitivity and potential for simpler quantification [11]. We hypothesised that 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT could be a useful molecular imaging technique in LAM that could demonstrate disease burden.
Following local institutional review board approval (reference number RS20-014), patients were recruited from the LAM clinic at St Vincent's University Hospital (Dublin, Ireland) and provided informed written consent. Sporadic LAM patients were selected that were not on mTOR inhibitor therapy. Age- and sex-matched control patients were included from the national neuroendocrine service who had 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT with normal lung parenchyma.
All 68Ga-DOTA-chelated somatostatin analogue peptide PET/CT examinations were performed on a Siemens Biograph mCT PET-CT system (Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). A standard PET acquisition from skull base to upper thighs was acquired after injection of 122.6±12.6 MBq of 68Ga-DOTATOC with an average tracer uptake time of 61±5 min. Non-attenuation-corrected and attenuation-corrected datasets were reconstructed. The low-dose, unenhanced CT component was performed with patients maintaining normal shallow respiration, using a standardised protocol with 140 kV, pitch 1.375 and automatic milliamperes (15–100 mA, noise index 40). CT images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 2.5 mm. A standard clinical PET time-of-flight ordered subset expected maximisation reconstruction using two iterations, 24 subsets and a Gaussian filter was performed. PET images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 2.5 mm and pixel size of 4 mm.
Qualitative and semiquantitative analysis was performed in a random order, blinded to the clinical information. Qualitative global assessment of pulmonary 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake was performed using a three-point visual scale: 1, less than mediastinal blood pool (MBP); 2, greater than MBP but less than liver; 3, greater than liver. Semiquantitative maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) measures of pulmonary 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake were performed in each lobe by drawing a region of interest (ROI) of ∼1 cm in each lobe. For patients with LAM, the ROI was drawn in cyst-adjacent parenchyma. A freehand ROI was outlined in the arch of the aorta, avoiding the aortic walls, to define SUVmax MBP. A target to background ratio (TBR) was calculated for each lobe by dividing the lobar SUVmax by MBP SUVmax.
Four female patients aged 49, 53, 55 and 82 years, with LAM, underwent whole-body 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT. Three of the patients were post-menopausal and one perimenopausal. The median diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was 59.75% of predicted, median FEV1 was 58.5% of predicted and median VEGF-D was 641 pg·mL−1. There was no qualitative difference in tracer uptake in any region of the lung or extrathoracically in LAM patients compared to controls, with all studies having a score of 1 (i.e. less than MBP) (figure 1a–d) Moreover, there was no significant difference in the overall mean lobar SUVmax of LAM lungs except in the left upper lobe (0.33) compared to control (0.2075) (p=0.0275); however, this is unlikely to be of any significant importance (figure 1e). Crucially, there were no differences in the TBR in any lobe of LAM patients compared to controls (figure 1f), indicating that there was no significant uptake of 68Ga-DOTATOC in the lungs of patients compared to controls. There were no significant correlations between mean SUVmax or TBR values and pulmonary function measures in patients with LAM. Of note, there were incidental findings noted of moderate hydronephrosis in one patient requiring intervention and a pulmonary nodule that required surveillance.
The results of this pilot study indicate that there is no demonstrably increased uptake of 68Ga-DOTATOC in LAM and that somatostatin receptor analogue functional imaging is unlikely to be of utility as an imaging biomarker in this disease. Despite the small number of studies, the severity of LAM varied in this group. The DLCO ranged from 25% to 110% of predicted. Three LAM patients had AMLs, with two having undergone surgical removal. No patient was on rapamycin at the time of imaging, although one patient had been previously but stopped due to side-effects and two patients have since been commenced on rapamycin. Two patients required supplemental oxygen. There were no significant differences in radiotracer uptake, indicating a lack of signal for this modality. This current study using 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT suggests that earlier proposals that there is somatostatin receptor-bearing tissue in LAM is likely to be incorrect and that treatment with octreotide is unlikely to be of benefit through any direct mechanism [10]. This is important to report as it excludes this imaging approach or other somatostatin molecular imaging modalities in LAM in the future. Other functional imaging approaches may be of benefit in the future, such as 68Ga-NEB PET/CT [12] or carbon-11-labelled glutamine PET/CT, designed to assess whether increased glutamine uptake in LAM lesions, previously demonstrated in mechanistic preclinical studies of LAM, has utility as a clinically meaningful biomarker [13]. Further studies are required to identify improved diagnostic and prognostic approaches in LAM.
Footnotes
Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.
Author contributions: C. McCarthy and D.J. Murphy conceived and designed the study. B. Gaffney, E. Lynn, M.P. Keane and C. McCarthy identified and recruited patients. D.J. Murphy and J.D. Dodd interpreted radiological imaging. All authors drafted the manuscript. C. McCarthy is the guarantor of the paper.
Support statement: This study was funded by The LAM Foundation: grant number LAM0144SG01-20. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.
- Received June 15, 2021.
- Accepted July 20, 2021.
- Copyright ©The authors 2021
This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org