Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

4-week daily airway clearance using oscillating positive-end expiratory pressure versus autogenic drainage in bronchiectasis patients: a randomised controlled trial

Galit Livnat, Naama Yaari, Nili Stein, Lea Bentur, Moneera Hanna, Maya Harel, Yochai Adir, Michal Shteinberg
ERJ Open Research 2021 7: 00426-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00426-2021
Galit Livnat
1Pediatric Pulmonology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
2Cystic Fibrosis Center, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
3Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naama Yaari
4Dept of Physical Therapy, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nili Stein
5Dept of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lea Bentur
3Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
6Pediatric Pulmonology and CF Center, The Ruth Rappaport Children's Hospital, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Moneera Hanna
6Pediatric Pulmonology and CF Center, The Ruth Rappaport Children's Hospital, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maya Harel
7Pulmonology Institute, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yochai Adir
3Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
7Pulmonology Institute, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michal Shteinberg
2Cystic Fibrosis Center, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
3Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
7Pulmonology Institute, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michal Shteinberg
  • For correspondence: michalsh@technion.ac.il
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Flow of participants through the study. AD: autogenic drainage; AE: adverse event; AWC: airway clearance; MBW: multiple breath washout; oPEP: oscillating positive expiratory pressure; PEx: pulmonary exacerbation.

  • FIGURE 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2

    Results of lung clearance index (LCI) before and after 4 weeks of daily airway clearance according to method of airway clearance. Each coloured line represents one individual participant. AD: autogenic drainage; oPEP: oscillating positive expiratory pressure.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1

    Baseline characteristics of patients

    ParameterADoPEP
    Subjects n2625
    Age years (mean±sd)66.7±12.365.7±13.4
    Sex (female n(%)/male n(%))19 (73.1)/7(26.9)14 (56.0)/11 (44.0)
    Lung function: FEV1 % (mean±sd)96.1±18.3**81.3±18.1**
    Lung function: FVC % (mean±sd)101.7±16.5*89.6±20.0*
    LCI (mean±sd)10.0±2.19.0±2.5
    Daily sputum production mL (median; IQR)17.5 (5.0; 41.3)15.0 (5.0; 20.0)
    Sputum bacterial infection* n (%)9 (34.6)13 (54.2)
    Sputum purulence scale (0–1/2–3) n (%) 13 (59.1)/9 (40.9)15 (62.5)/9 (37.5)
    Previous PEx/year (median, IQR)n=26 2 (1; 4)*n=24 1 (0; 2)*
    Treatment at baseline n (%)
     ICS5 (19.2)8 (32.0)
     LABA5 (20.0)9 (36.0)
     LAMA0 (0)3 (12.0)
     Hypertonic saline19 (73.1)20 (80.0)
     Performing exercise14 (53.8)12 (48.0)
    CT findings
     Number of infected lobes on CT (median, IQR)n=21 2.0 (2.0, 3.5)n=20 2.0 (2.0, 3.75)
     Reiff index (median, IQR)n=24 3.0 (2.0, 4.0)n=25 3 (2, 4.5)
    Findings on auscultation n (%)
     Wheeze1 (3.8)3 (12.0)
     Rales9 (34.6)9 (36.0)

    Sputum bacterial infection relates to any positive culture from a respiratory sample in the past 12 months. Sputum purulence was noted on a scale from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating transparent-yellow and 3 being green with traces of blood. AD: autogenic drainage; oPEP: oscillating positive expiratory pressure; sd, standard deviation; FEV1 %: forced expiratory volume in 1 s, per cent predicted; FVC: forced vital capacity, percent predicted; LCI: lung clearance index; IQR: interquartile range; PEx: pulmonary exacerbations in the previous 12 months; ICS: inhaled corticosteroids; LABA: long-acting β-agonists; LAMA: long-acting muscarinic agonists; CT: computed tomography. *: p<0.05; **: p<0.001.

    • TABLE 2

      Effects of treatment on symptoms and lung function

      ADoPEPp-value
      Subjects n2524
      Change in sputum purulence# n (%)>0.99
       Improved4 (20)5 (23)
       Unchanged13 (65)13 (59)
       Worsened3 (15)4 (18)
      Change in sputum quantity n (%)0.044
       Less sputum6 (24)12 (52)
       More sputum19 (76)11 (48)
       Change in sputum quantity (mL); median (range) randomisation to end of study17.5 (5–42.5) to 15 (5–45)15 (5–25) to 5  (5–20)0.386
      LCI change after 4 weeks¶ n (%)0.847
       Improved8 (32)6 (25)
       Unchanged7 (28)8 (33)
       Worsened10 (40)10 (42)
      FEV1 % change after 4 weeks, median (range)0.05 (−23–7.6)0 (−11.8–10.5)0.71

      AD: autogenic drainage; oPEP: oscillating positive expiratory pressure; LCI: lung clearance index; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s. #: sputum purulence was recorded on a four-point scale. Values in bold represent p<0.05. ¶: improvement, a decrease of 0.5 or more; worsening, an increase of 0.5 or more; unchanged, difference <0.5 in any direction.

      • TABLE 3

        Effects on quality of life

        QoL domainADoPEP
        Baseline4 weeksp-valueBaseline4 weeksp-value
        Subjects n2524
        Respiratory symptoms67 (44–79.5)70 (50–79.5)0.73265 (46–77)72 (48.8–80.3)0.139
        Physical functioning60 (20–83.5)67 (37–86.5)0.39353.5 (21.8–93)60 (36.5–87)0.412
        Vitality44 (27.5–66.8)67 (44–67)0.02744 (1–100)50 (33–67)0.231
        Role functioning73 (53–87)87 (56.5–93)0.07370 (41.8–87)73 (48.5–80)0.970
        Emotional functioning83 (54–100)83 (62.5–100)0.61179 (60.3–92)79 (67–98)0.690
        Social functioning50 (21–67)58 (37.5–76.5)0.042n=23 58 (42–83)n=23 58 (44–75)0.919
        Treatment burdenn=20 56 (33–78)n=20 44 (33–64.3)0.085n=20 56 (35.8–75.3)n=20 56 (33.3–67)0.458
        Health perceptions42 (33–67)58 (42–75)0.17733 (25–58)42 (33–64.8)0.048

        Scores presented as median (interquartile range) unless otherwise stated. Domains of the quality of life questionnaire for bronchiectasis (QoL-B) [21] were scored on a scale of 0 (worst) to 100 (best) and compared between baseline and end-of-study visits. QoL: quality of life; AD: autogenic drainage; oPEP: oscillating positive expiratory pressure. Values in bold represent p<0.05.

        PreviousNext
        Back to top
        Vol 7 Issue 4 Table of Contents
        ERJ Open Research: 7 (4)
        • Table of Contents
        • Index by author
        Email

        Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

        NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

        Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
        4-week daily airway clearance using oscillating positive-end expiratory pressure versus autogenic drainage in bronchiectasis patients: a randomised controlled trial
        (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
        (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
        CAPTCHA
        This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
        Print
        Citation Tools
        4-week daily airway clearance using oscillating positive-end expiratory pressure versus autogenic drainage in bronchiectasis patients: a randomised controlled trial
        Galit Livnat, Naama Yaari, Nili Stein, Lea Bentur, Moneera Hanna, Maya Harel, Yochai Adir, Michal Shteinberg
        ERJ Open Research Oct 2021, 7 (4) 00426-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00426-2021

        Citation Manager Formats

        • BibTeX
        • Bookends
        • EasyBib
        • EndNote (tagged)
        • EndNote 8 (xml)
        • Medlars
        • Mendeley
        • Papers
        • RefWorks Tagged
        • Ref Manager
        • RIS
        • Zotero
        Share
        4-week daily airway clearance using oscillating positive-end expiratory pressure versus autogenic drainage in bronchiectasis patients: a randomised controlled trial
        Galit Livnat, Naama Yaari, Nili Stein, Lea Bentur, Moneera Hanna, Maya Harel, Yochai Adir, Michal Shteinberg
        ERJ Open Research Oct 2021, 7 (4) 00426-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00426-2021
        del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
        Full Text (PDF)

        Jump To

        • Article
          • Abstract
          • Abstract
          • Introduction
          • Methods
          • Results
          • Discussion
          • Acknowledgements
          • Footnotes
          • References
        • Figures & Data
        • Info & Metrics
        • PDF

        Subjects

        • CF and non-CF bronchiectasis
        • Tweet Widget
        • Facebook Like
        • Google Plus One

        More in this TOC Section

        Original research articles

        • Effects of bepotastine
        • Association between blood eosinophil count and small airway eosinophils in smokers with and without COPD
        • Tozorakimab in patients hospitalised with COVID-19
        Show more Original research articles

        Bronchiectasis

        • Pulmonary exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis
        • EB-OCT or CT for evaluating progression of bronchiectasis
        • Patient attitudes to nebulised antibiotics in bronchiectasis
        Show more Bronchiectasis

        Related Articles

        Navigate

        • Home
        • Current issue
        • Archive

        About ERJ Open Research

        • Editorial board
        • Journal information
        • Press
        • Permissions and reprints
        • Advertising

        The European Respiratory Society

        • Society home
        • myERS
        • Privacy policy
        • Accessibility

        ERS publications

        • European Respiratory Journal
        • ERJ Open Research
        • European Respiratory Review
        • Breathe
        • ERS books online
        • ERS Bookshop

        Help

        • Feedback

        For authors

        • Instructions for authors
        • Publication ethics and malpractice
        • Submit a manuscript

        For readers

        • Alerts
        • Subjects
        • RSS

        Subscriptions

        • Accessing the ERS publications

        Contact us

        European Respiratory Society
        442 Glossop Road
        Sheffield S10 2PX
        United Kingdom
        Tel: +44 114 2672860
        Email: journals@ersnet.org

        ISSN

        Online ISSN: 2312-0541

        Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society