Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Impact of N-acetyl-l-cysteine on SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and its sequelae: results from a large cohort study

Paola Faverio, Paola Rebora, Emanuela Rossi, Savino Del Giudice, Filippo Montanelli, Laura Garzillo, Sara Busnelli, Fabrizio Luppi, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Alberto Pesci
ERJ Open Research 2022 8: 00542-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00542-2021
Paola Faverio
1School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Respiratory Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paola Faverio
  • For correspondence: paola.faverio@unimib.it
Paola Rebora
2Bicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging B4 Center, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emanuela Rossi
2Bicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging B4 Center, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Savino Del Giudice
1School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Respiratory Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Filippo Montanelli
1School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Respiratory Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Garzillo
1School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Respiratory Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara Busnelli
1School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Respiratory Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabrizio Luppi
1School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Respiratory Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fabrizio Luppi
Maria Grazia Valsecchi
2Bicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging B4 Center, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alberto Pesci
1School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Respiratory Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Patients receiving N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) during hospitalisation for #SARSCoV2 pneumonia and discharged alive present a significantly shorter length of hospital stay compared to those who did not receive NAC https://bit.ly/3l1QsVo

To the Editor:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection may cause pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), whose pathogenesis has been partially related to an increased systemic inflammatory response with great production of pro-inflammatory cytokines causing a “cytokine storm” and an oxidative stress imbalance [1].

N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) is a precursor of reduced glutathione [2] that has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating properties that may prove beneficial in modulating the excessive inflammatory activation during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) [3]. Furthermore, NAC has been extensively used as a mucolytic agent to improve airway clearance in chronic respiratory diseases.

During the COVID-19 pandemic research hypotheses on the role of NAC have been formulated and randomised control trials (RCT) are ongoing; however, to date only a few case reports have been published [3, 4].

The aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of NAC administered during hospitalisation for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia on short-term and long-term outcomes. As short-term outcomes we considered in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of ICU stay and length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients discharged alive; as long-term outcomes we included diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) impairment, chest radiography alterations, reduced distance walked in the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and dyspnoea score (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale) at 6 months follow-up in a subset of patients included in a follow-up study. Furthermore, we will also evaluate the impact of NAC on the development of atelectasis during hospitalisation, a possible complication of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

We performed a retrospective monocentric study on 1083 consecutive adult patients hospitalised for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia at the San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy, between February 2020 and April 2021. Given that the aim was to evaluate the impact of a least 5 days of NAC administration, patients were excluded if they died or were discharged within 5 days from admission (n=177) to avoid immortal time bias. NAC was introduced, as per institutional protocol, on admission and administered at a dosage of 300 mg intravenously three times daily, switched to 600 mg per os twice daily once the patient reached clinical stability and continued until discharge. The study (STORM) was approved by the national Institutional Review Board (Spallanzani Hospital), and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT04424992.

As part of a multi-centre prospective study to evaluate pulmonary sequelae caused by SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia [5] (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04435327), we also had available follow-up data on 102 patients from the original cohort alive at discharge. The follow-up consisted of a pneumological visit at 6 months including complete pulmonary function tests and DLCO, 6MWT, mMRC scale and chest radiography.

A propensity score method was used to evaluate the impact of NAC on outcomes in the full cohort adjusting for potential confounders. We created a pseudo-population by weighting our cohort by the inverse of stabilised inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) computed by a multivariable logistic model on the propensity of NAC commencement with the following covariates: gender, age, days from symptoms onset to hospital admission, period of diagnosis (before/after 1 July 2020), chest radiograph (bilateral, unilateral or absence of pulmonary involvement) and ventilation support on admission, direct admission to the ICU, comorbidities (cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, asthma, COPD, other pulmonary diseases, diabetes, connective tissue diseases, chronic neurological disorders, dementia and anaemia), cough and dyspnoea as symptoms and concomitant commencement of systemic steroids or remdesivir. We checked balancing among the two treatment groups after weighting by standardised mean difference and compared them by weighted two-sample rank tests [6] and a weighted logistic model. A similar approach was adopted with the subsample of subjects with a follow-up visit at 6 months.

906 patients (601 (66%) males, median age 64 years, interquartile range (IQR) 55–75 years) were included in the study, 585 (64%) received at least 5 days of NAC and 321 (36%) did not receive NAC or received less than 5 days of therapy (n=27). Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are summarised in table 1. Patient's characteristics were well balanced in the two groups (NAC versus others) after weighting with standardised mean difference always lower than 0.1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Baseline patients’ characteristics and outcomes in the total original sample and in the pseudo-population weighted for the propensity score of N-Acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC)

In regards to the main outcomes, 133 patients died during hospital stay (91 in the NAC group and 42 in the control group), odds ratio (OR) of mortality from the IPTW weighted logistic regression was 1.22 (95% CI 0.83–1.81, p=0.3) for the NAC group versus the control group. 154 patients were admitted to the ICU with a median (IQR) of 2 (0–5) days after hospital admission and with a median (IQR) time spent in the ICU of 14 (8–24) days. After adjusting by the IPTW, no differences were observed between the two groups with regards to ICU admission and length of ICU stay. LOS in patients discharged at home was lower in NAC patients (weighted median (IQR) 15 (10–24) days) compared to those who did not receive NAC (weighted median (IQR) 17 (12–30) days, p=0.013) (table 1). Occurrence of atelectasis was not different among the two groups (2% in both groups, p=0.913) (table 1).

When considering the 102 patients (78% males, median (IQR) age 59 (53–63) years) who were followed up at 6 months with a pneumological visit, no differences were observed in regards to DLCO impairment (weighted percentage 24% versus 19%, OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.50–3.92), chest radiograph abnormalities (weighted percentage 18% versus 14%, OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.88–1.22) and distance walked at 6MWT (weighted median (IQR) 482 (424–540) m versus 480 (432–541) m, p=0.909) between patients who received NAC (n=64) and those who did not (n=38), respectively. mMRC was not statistically different between the two groups (p=0.281), although the weighted percentage of mMRC score ≥2 (walks slower than people of the same age because of dyspnoea) was 11% in patients who received NAC and 28% in others.

Despite the preliminary evidence of a few studies, to date, there are no definitive data on the efficacy of NAC in preventing short- and long-term negative outcomes in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia [4, 7, 8]. Indeed, our results nicely fit with those of the only double-blind RCT available until now that showed no benefit of high dose NAC administration for 20 h in the emergency department on the development of severe acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) [7]. Nevertheless, LOS and long-term outcomes were not evaluated in this RCT. Similarly, a pilot study by Taher et al. [8] did not observe any benefit from NAC administered at a dose of 40 mg·kg−1·day−1 intravenously for 3 days in mild-to-moderate COVID-19-associated ARDS on long-term (overall mortality over 28 days) and short-term outcomes (including the proportion of patients requiring MV and changes in ARDS-severity 48 and 96 h after intervention) [8].

Among the main strengths of our study, we acknowledge the inclusion of consecutive patients from a tertiary care centre with a standardised protocol to manage COVID-19. This allowed patients to receive homogeneous treatment. The standardised protocol followed the indications from the evidence-based medicine: from March to July 2020 hydroxychloroquine, prophylactic heparin and, in cases of oxygen supplementation requirement, remdesivir were administered. Use of hydroxychloroquine was then discontinued from May 2020, due to the lack of efficacy in COVID-19 patients [9]. During the subsequent months (August 2020–April 2021) and after publication of the RECOVERY trial's preliminary data [10], corticosteroid therapy was administered to all patients requiring oxygen supplementation.

Among the study limitations the following must be acknowledged: the reasons that led physicians to administer or not administer NAC were not clear, leading to possible biases despite propensity matching.

In conclusion, our study does not suggest an impact of NAC on short- and long-term outcomes including in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, DLCO impairment and chest radiography alterations at 6-month follow-up. Patients receiving NAC during hospitalisation for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia presented a shorter LOS in comparison to those who did not receive NAC. However, results of the ongoing RCTs may shed further light on the role of NAC as an add-on therapy to the standard treatment for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the STORM Steering Committee and Data Management for sharing data obtained from the COVID-STORM database.

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

  • COVID-STORM Clinicians: Giuseppe Foti, Giacomo Bellani, Giuseppe Citerio, Ernesto Contro (all Dept of Emergency, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy), Alberto Pesci (Dept of Pneumology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy), Maria Grazia Valsecchi (Bicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging B4 Center, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy) and Marina Cazzaniga (Phase I Research Center, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy); COVID-STORM Data Management: Davide Gaudesi (University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy), Emanuela Rossi (Bicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging B4 Center, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy) and Nicoletta Cordani (Phase I Research Center, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy).

  • Ethical approval: The STORM study was approved by national Institutional Review Board (Spallanzani Hospital). The SequelaeCoV study received Ethics Committee approval (ASST Monza, 3389, 21 May 2020).

  • Author contributions: A. Pesci and M.G. Valsecchi are the guarantors of this research. P. Faverio, P. Rebora, E. Rossi, S. Busnelli and A. Pesci were responsible for study concept and design. P. Faverio, S. del Giudice, F. Montanelli, L. Garzillo, S. Busnelli and F. Luppi contributed to patient recruitment and follow-up. All authors contributed to data acquisition. P. Faverio, P. Rebora, E. Rossi, S. Busnelli and M.G. Valsecchi performed data analysis. P. Faverio, P. Rebora, S. Busnelli and F. Luppi contributed to the drafting of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • This study is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier number NCT04424992.

  • Conflict of interest: P. Faverio has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: P. Rebora has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: E. Rossi has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: S. del Giudice has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: F. Montanelli has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: L. Garzillo has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: S. Busnelli has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: F. Luppi has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M.G. Valsecchi has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: A. Pesci has nothing to disclose.

  • Support statement: We acknowledge that this research was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) – Dept of Excellence project PREMIA (Precision Medicine Approach: Bringing Biomarker Research to Clinic).

  • Received September 6, 2021.
  • Accepted November 17, 2021.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2022
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hu B,
    2. Huang S,
    3. Yin L
    . The cytokine storm and COVID-19. J Med Virol 2021; 93: 250–256. doi:10.1002/jmv.26232
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. De Flora S,
    2. Balansky R,
    3. La Maestra S
    . Rationale for the use of N-acetylcysteine in both prevention and adjuvant therapy of COVID-19, 2020. FASEB J 2020; 34: 13185–13193. doi:10.1096/fj.202001807
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Shi Z,
    2. Puyo CA
    . N-acetylcysteine to combat COVID-19: an evidence review. Therapeutics and clinical risk management. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2020; 16: 1047–1055. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S273700
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Ibrahim H,
    2. Perl A,
    3. Smith D, et al.
    Therapeutic blockade of inflammation in severe COVID-19 infection with intravenous n-acetylcysteine. Clin Immunol 2020; 219: 108544. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2020.108544
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Faverio P,
    2. Luppi F,
    3. Rebora P, et al.
    Six-month pulmonary impairment after severe COVID-19: a prospective, multicenter follow-up study. Respiration 2021; 100: 1078–1087. doi:10.1159/000518141
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Lumley T,
    2. Scott AJ
    . Two-sample rank tests under complex sampling. Biometrika 2013; 100: 831–842. doi:10.1093/biomet/ast027
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. de Alencar JCG,
    2. de Lucena Moreira C,
    3. Müller AD, et al.
    Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with N-acetylcysteine for treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), 2021. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 72: e736–e741. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1443
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Taher A,
    2. Lashgari M,
    3. Sedighi L, et al.
    A pilot study on intravenous N-acetylcysteine treatment in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pharmacol Rep 2021: 73: 1650–1659. doi:10.1007/s43440-021-00296-2
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Horby P,
    2. Lim WS, et al.
    1. The RECOVERY Collaborative Group
    , Horby P, Lim WS, et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19, 2021. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 693–704. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2021436
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Elavarasi A,
    2. Prasad M,
    3. Seth T, et al.
    Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35: 3308–3314. doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06146-w
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 8 Issue 1 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 8 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of N-acetyl-l-cysteine on SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and its sequelae: results from a large cohort study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Impact of N-acetyl-l-cysteine on SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and its sequelae: results from a large cohort study
Paola Faverio, Paola Rebora, Emanuela Rossi, Savino Del Giudice, Filippo Montanelli, Laura Garzillo, Sara Busnelli, Fabrizio Luppi, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Alberto Pesci
ERJ Open Research Jan 2022, 8 (1) 00542-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00542-2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of N-acetyl-l-cysteine on SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and its sequelae: results from a large cohort study
Paola Faverio, Paola Rebora, Emanuela Rossi, Savino Del Giudice, Filippo Montanelli, Laura Garzillo, Sara Busnelli, Fabrizio Luppi, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Alberto Pesci
ERJ Open Research Jan 2022, 8 (1) 00542-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00542-2021
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics
  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Influence of anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα treatment on work productivity in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae re-emerges as a cause of community-acquired pneumonia, including frequent co-infection with SARS-CoV-2, in Germany, 2021
  • Benefit−risk assessment of brensocatib for treatment of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
Show more Research letter

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society