Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Limitations of a 6-min walk test to assess the efficacy of menthol for breathlessness

Masashi Kanezaki, Satoru Ebihara
ERJ Open Research 2022 8: 00090-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00090-2022
Masashi Kanezaki
1Dept of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Tokyo International University, Kawagoe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Masashi Kanezaki
  • For correspondence: mkaneza@tiu.ac.jp
Satoru Ebihara
2Dept of Rehabilitation Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

l-Menthol is a novel treatment option for breathlessness in patients with COPD. However, the clinical application of menthol for the treatment of exertional breathlessness in these patients warrants further research. https://bit.ly/3D6rLiJ

To the Editor:

Walking is a vital component of physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Exertional multidimensional breathlessness in daily life can reduce walking speed and time in patients with established COPD [1]. Improvement in breathlessness beyond a minimal clinically significant difference brought about by pulmonary rehabilitation, pharmaceutical bronchodilators and opioids has been reported [2–4]. However, despite guideline-directed disease-specific therapy, some patients with COPD experience residual breathlessness. Therefore, the application of a novel symptom-based treatment that is widely available will benefit patients with long-term breathlessness.

l-menthol is attracting attention as a potential novel symptom-based treatment for breathlessness in patients with COPD. The use of l-menthol for breathlessness in healthy volunteers dates back to a 1990 report by Nishino et al. [5]. l-menthol, compared to control, decreased breathlessness induced by inspiratory loading [5]. Subsequently, in 2002, the transient receptor potential melastatin 8 gene (TRPM8) was cloned and reported to have the potential for activation by not only cold stimuli but also by a cooling agent, menthol [6]. Respiratory peripheral afferent input from the stimulation of TRPM8 channels on the trigeminal and the vagal neurons plays a key role in monitoring airway flow and in generating a cooling sensation in the upper airway. In 2017, we reported distinct evidence that the cooling sensation evoked by l-menthol, a TRPM8 agonist, alleviates breathlessness induced by constant-load cycling exercise and fixed inspiratory flow-resistive loaded breathing in healthy volunteers [7]. Moreover, in a clinical randomised controlled trial in older adults with and without COPD, we demonstrated that the cognitive illusion of inspiratory airway flow due to olfactory stimulation by l-menthol alleviated sensory and affective dimensions of breathlessness during inspiratory resistive breathing without a corresponding change in ventilation, breathing pattern or inspiratory neural drive assess by surface electromyogram of the parasternal intercostal muscles [8]. Thus, the cognitive illusion of inspiratory flow via olfactory stimulation by l-menthol may represent an attractive option for alleviating breathlessness [8].

The physical activity and 6-min walking tasks performed at the patient's self-imposed intensity of effort are unable to unify the exercise stimulus causing breathlessness in the intervention and control arms. For this reason, to explore the possibility of using l-menthol to alleviate breathlessness during daily physical activities in patients with COPD, it is necessary to investigate the effect of l-menthol on breathlessness during standardised exercise stimuli. In addition, when examining the impact of any intervention on exertional breathlessness, the same exercise or ventilatory load should be used consistently in the intervention and placebo conditions. On these bases, the neural inspiratory drive, tidal volume and the frequency of breathing can be altered by placebo or active conditions, which require careful monitoring. However, the 6-min walk test is a form of field walking exercise in which the patient self-paces and does not provide a direct measure of the breathlessness response (or change in breathlessness response). Therefore, it has been recognised that the 6-min walk test should not be used as a measure of exertional breathlessness in clinical practice and research [9–11].

We recently read the article by Prieur et al. [12] published in ERJ Open Research. We would like to thank them for their investigation on the effect of menthol-containing chewing gum on breathlessness during real-world exercise tasks using the 6-min walk test. However, there are some questions that may benefit readers.

First, they reported that menthol reduced breathlessness by at least 1 point in 21 participants (33%) [12] and a positive effect on exercise tolerance was observed in 40 participants (63%) [12]. We request the details of the respiratory rate, inspiratory volume and oxygen saturation following the 6-min walk test in the 40 participants who showed improvement in their 6-min walk distance with menthol and the 23 participants who did not. Although assessing the intensity of breathlessness at the end of a 6-min walk test fails to determine the effect of menthol on breathlessness upon exertion, this would provide essential insights into whether the participants in the menthol and placebo conditions had comparable breathing conditions.

Second, there are two main forms of menthol, l-menthol and d-menthol, and the efficacy of the l form of menthol in breathlessness has been previously reported [3–5]. However, the type or the amount of menthol used in the authors’ study [12] was unclear, which prevents further clinical application. Moreover, it is unclear whether the given gum was retained in the mouth during the 6-min walk test, as the study only reports them chewing it before. Therefore, we request information on whether the gum was also retained in the mouth during the exertion and details of the menthol compounds contained in the gum be provided.

Finally, although TRPM8 is not a so-called olfactory receptor, l-menthol can stimulate the olfactory and trigeminal nerves, and these nerves should be maintained to have an effect of l-menthol. However, the authors did not exclude patients with COPD with an impaired sense of smell. The lack of this screening is likely to inhibit testing of the efficacy of menthol and placebo, especially as patients with COPD are known to possess nasal symptoms [13].

L-menthol is highly accessible and versatile. Different methods of administering menthols such as crystal nasal inhalation [5], mouth swishing of diluted solutions [14], chewing gum [12] and olfactory stimulation [7, 8, 15] exist, but further research is needed to determine which methods are safe and effective, and in what dosages. Moreover, the clinical application of menthol for the treatment of breathlessness on exertion in patients with chronic respiratory diseases requires further research.

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received February 21, 2022.
  • Accepted March 15, 2022.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2022.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Kanezaki M,
    2. Tamaki A,
    3. Terada K, et al.
    Linguistic validation of the Japanese version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile and relation to physical activity in patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17: 223–230. doi:10.2147/COPD.S339285
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Oba Y,
    2. Sarva ST,
    3. Dias S
    . Efficacy and safety of long-acting beta-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist combinations in COPD: a network meta-analysis. Thorax 2016; 71: 15–25. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206732
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Verberkt CA,
    2. Van Den Beuken-Van Everdingen MHJ,
    3. Schols JMGA, et al.
    Effect of sustained-release morphine for refractory breathlessness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on health status: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2020; 180: 1306–1314. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3134
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. McCarthy B,
    2. Casey D,
    3. Devane D, et al.
    Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2: CD003793.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Nishino T,
    2. Tagaito Y,
    3. Sakurai Y
    . Nasal inhalation of I-menthol reduces respiratory discomfort associated with loaded breathing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 309–313. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.156.1.9609059
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Peier AM,
    2. Moqrich A,
    3. Hergarden AC, et al.
    A TRP channel that senses cold stimuli and menthol. Cell 2002; 108: 705–715. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00652-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kanezaki M,
    2. Ebihara S
    . Effect of the cooling sensation induced by olfactory stimulation by l-menthol on dyspnoea: a pilot study. Eur Respir J 2017; 49: 1601823. doi:10.1183/13993003.01823-2016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Kanezaki M,
    2. Terada K,
    3. Ebihara S
    . Effect of olfactory stimulation by L-menthol on laboratory-induced dyspnea in COPD. Chest 2020; 157: 1455–1465. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.12.028
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Ekstrom M
    . Why treatment efficacy on breathlessness in laboratory but not daily life trials? The importance of standardized exertion. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2019; 13: 179–183. doi:10.1097/SPC.0000000000000444
    OpenUrl
    1. Lewthwaite H,
    2. Koch EM,
    3. Tracey L, et al.
    Standardized measurement of breathlessness during exercise. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2019; 13: 152–160. doi:10.1097/SPC.0000000000000443
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Lewthwaite H,
    2. Jensen D,
    3. Ekstrom M
    . How to assess breathlessness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2021; 16: 1581–1598. doi:10.2147/COPD.S277523
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Prieur G,
    2. Beaumont M,
    3. Delorme M, et al.
    Short-term effects of menthol on walking dyspnoea in patients with COPD: a randomised, single blinded, cross-over study. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7: 00450-2021. doi:10.1183/23120541.00450-2021
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Hasegawa K,
    2. Sato S,
    3. Tanimura K, et al.
    Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and nasal symptoms affect the severity of bronchitis symptoms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Investig 2018; 56: 230–237. doi:10.1016/j.resinv.2018.01.001
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Flood TR,
    2. Waldron M,
    3. Jeffries O
    . Oral L-menthol reduces thermal sensation, increases work-rate and extends time to exhaustion, in the heat at a fixed rating of perceived exertion. Eur J Appl Physiol 2017; 117: 1501–1512. doi:10.1007/s00421-017-3645-6
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Kanezaki M,
    2. Terada K,
    3. Ebihara S
    . l-Menthol – a new treatment for breathlessness? Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2021; 15: 233–238. doi:10.1097/SPC.0000000000000569
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 8 Issue 2 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 8 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Limitations of a 6-min walk test to assess the efficacy of menthol for breathlessness
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Limitations of a 6-min walk test to assess the efficacy of menthol for breathlessness
Masashi Kanezaki, Satoru Ebihara
ERJ Open Research Apr 2022, 8 (2) 00090-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00090-2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Limitations of a 6-min walk test to assess the efficacy of menthol for breathlessness
Masashi Kanezaki, Satoru Ebihara
ERJ Open Research Apr 2022, 8 (2) 00090-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00090-2022
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • It is time to end our love affair with SABA in asthma?
  • Nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing
  • Lung cancer with comorbid interstitial pneumonia
Show more Correspondence

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society