Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Vitamin D replacement in children with acute wheeze: a dose-escalation study

Christos Stefanidis, Andrew Bush, Christopher Newby, Chinedu Nwokoro, Susan Liebeschuetz, Imogen P. Skene, Christopher J. Griffiths, Adrian R. Martineau
ERJ Open Research 2022 8: 00609-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00609-2021
Christos Stefanidis
1Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research; Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: c.stefanidis@outlook.com
Andrew Bush
2Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research; Imperial College and Royal Brompton Hospital, Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Newby
1Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research; Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chinedu Nwokoro
1Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research; Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Liebeschuetz
3Dept of Paediatrics, Newham University Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Imogen P. Skene
4Emergency Department Research Office, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher J. Griffiths
1Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research; Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adrian R. Martineau
1Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research; Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Vitamin D supplementation at the current UK recommended level (400 IU·day−1) or enhanced supplementation (1000 IU·day−1) failed to achieve adequate levels of vitamin D (>75 nmol·L−1) in vitamin-D-insufficient children with acute wheeze https://bit.ly/3J43Ouo

To the Editor:

Meta-analyses report protective effects of vitamin D supplementation against asthma exacerbations and acute respiratory infections in adults [1–3], but data relating to effects of vitamin D on risk of preschool wheeze and asthma attacks in childhood are more limited [4]. In preparation for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of vitamin D in children with recurrent preschool wheeze or school-age asthma, we carried out a dose-escalation study to find the daily vitamin D3 supplementation regimen that is most effective in elevating circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations in these children. We hypothesised that daily oral vitamin D3 supplementation of 1000 IU would be more effective than 400 IU (UK recommendation [5]) in elevating the circulating 25(OH)D concentration to ≥75 nmol·L−1 at 3 months in vitamin-D-insufficient children with recurrent preschool wheeze or school-age asthma.

Children were recruited from primary and secondary care if they were aged 1–4 years with ≥2 self-reported episodes of acute wheeze requiring unscheduled healthcare attendances in the preceding year (preschool children), or aged 5–12 years with doctor-diagnosed asthma and ≥1 self-reported asthma attack requiring an unscheduled healthcare attendance in the preceding year (school children). Exclusion criteria were baseline 25(OH)D level ≥75 nmol·L−1, concurrent vitamin D supplementation, or a history of other chronic or acute respiratory or systemic conditions. Approval was by Brent Ethics Committee (ref 16/LO/1218). Written informed consent was obtained from parents of all children, with assent additionally obtained from children aged ≥7 years.

Oral vitamin D3 (Fultium-D3 drops; Internis Pharmaceuticals Ltd) was initially administered at a dose of 400 IU·day−1 for 3 months (phase 1). The dose was increased to 1000 IU·day−1 for a further 3 months (phase 2) if the 25(OH)D concentration at the end of phase 1 was <150 nmol·L−1; otherwise, no dosing increment was applied during phase 2. Concentrations of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 in capillary blood were measured from a fingerprick at baseline and at the end of phases 1 and 2 using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry and summed to give the total circulating 25(OH)D concentration [6]. Nasal epithelial lining fluid was sampled at baseline and at the end of phases 1 and 2 using nasosorption [7]. Nasal concentrations of cytokines and chemokines were determined using a multiplex assay (Meso Scale Discovery, #15050D). At baseline, body weight was measured with a validated scale. Children aged 5–12 years completed a baseline childhood asthma control test (c-ACT) under their parent's/legal guardian's supervision. The volume of residual vitamin D3 supplement was assessed at the end of phases 1 and 2.

Co-primary outcomes were the proportions of participants attaining 25(OH)D ≥75 nmol·L−1 at the end of phases 1 and 2. Secondary outcomes were mean concentrations of 25(OH)D in capillary blood and concentrations of inflammatory mediators in nasal epithelial lining fluid. The proportions of children attaining serum 25(OH)D concentrations ≥75 nmol·L−1 or ≥100 nmol·L−1 at the end of phases 1 versus 2 were compared using McNemar's test. Mean 25(OH)D levels and c-ACT score by visits were compared using paired t-tests. Univariate linear regression was applied to determine independent predictors (body weight and age) of the response to vitamin D supplementation during phases 1 and 2. End-phase mean cytokine and chemokine concentrations were compared using paired t-tests with correction for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini and Hochberg method with a false discovery rate of 5% [8].

40 children had baseline 25(OH)D <75 nmol·L−1 and were offered vitamin D, of whom eight withdrew from the study (withdrew consent/assent or consistently failed to attend scheduled study visits and did not reply to telephone calls) and one was excluded from statistical analyses as dosing was unchanged during phase 2. Mean±sd baseline body weight for all children was 27.8±17.4 kg (n=31), with 15.4±2.7 kg for preschool children (n=15) and 39.5±17.2 kg for school children (n=16). At baseline, 12 out of 16 (75%) school children had uncontrolled asthma (c-ACT score ≤19), and four out of 16 (25%) had controlled asthma (c-ACT score >19). 11 out of 31 (35.5%) children attained 25(OH)D ≥75 nmol·L−1 at the end of phase 1 versus 16 out of 31 (51.6%) at the end of phase 2 (p=0.06). All children who attained 25(OH)D ≥75 nmol·L−1 at the end of phase 1 maintained 25(OH)D ≥75 nmol·L−1 at the end of phase 2. Four out of 31 (12.9%) children (all preschool children) attained 25(OH)D ≥100 nmol·L−1 at the end of phase 1 versus 12 out of 31 (38.7%) (10 preschool children and two school children) at the end of phase 2 (p=0.13). Mean 25(OH)D concentration increased from baseline to the end of phase 1 (mean change 23.6 nmol·L−1, 95% CI 15.1–32.1 nmol·L−1; p<0.001) and from the end of phase 1 to the end of phase 2 (mean change 12.7 nmol·L−1, 95% CI 1.4–23.9 nmol·L−1; p=0.03) (figure 1).

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations by study time-point in a) all participants (n=31), b) the subset of participants with preschool wheeze (n=15) and c) the subset of participants with school-age asthma (n=16). The dotted line represents the threshold denoting optimal 25(OH)D concentration (>75 nmol·L−1). p-values from paired t-tests.

10 out of 15 (66.7%) and 11 out of 15 (73.3%) preschool children attained 25(OH)D ≥75 nmol·L−1 at the end of phases 1 and 2, respectively (p>0.99). One out of 16 (6.3%) and five out of 16 (31.3%) school children attained 25(OH)D ≥75 nmol·L−1 at the end of phases 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.13). We reasoned that a greater proportion of preschool children versus school children attaining 25(OH)D ≥75 nmol·L−1 might arise as a consequence of differences in body weight and age, as reported elsewhere [9]. We found that the 25(OH)D response to vitamin D supplementation during phases 1 or 2 was not associated with body weight (mean difference per additional kg of body weight during phase 1 was −0.2 nmol·L−1, 95% CI −0.9 to 0.4 nmol·L−1, p=0.47; mean difference per additional kg of body weight during phase 2 was −0.1 nmol·L−1, 95% CI −1.1 to 0.1 nmol·L−1, p=0.12). The 25(OH)D response to vitamin D supplementation during phase 1 was not associated with age (mean difference per additional year of age was 0.7 nmol·L−1, 95% CI −2.5 to 3.9 nmol·L−1; p=0.66). However, there was a trend for an inverse association between the 25(OH)D response to vitamin D supplementation during phase 2 with age (mean difference per additional year of age was −3.3 nmol·L−1, 95% CI −6.7 to 0.1 nmol·L−1; p=0.06). In preschool children, mean circulating 25(OH)D concentration increased from baseline to the end of phase 1 (mean change 28.7 nmol·L−1, 95% CI 11.9–45.4 nmol·L−1; p=0.002) and from the end of phase 1 to the end of phase 2 (mean change 24.3 nmol·L−1, 95% CI 4.0–44.6 nmol·L−1; p=0.02). In school children, mean circulating 25(OH)D concentration increased significantly from baseline to the end of phase 1 (mean change 18.9 nmol·L−1, 95% CI 11.9–25.9 nmol·L−1; p<0.001), but no increase was seen between the end of phase 1 and the end of phase 2 (mean change 1.7 nmol·L−1, 95% CI −8.3 to 11.8 nmol·L−1; p=0.72) (figure 1). No participant experienced hypervitaminosis D (25(OH)D >220 nmol·L−1) or any adverse reaction. The highest 25(OH)D concentrations were 181 nmol·L−1 in a school child at the end of phase 1, and 175 nmol·L−1 in a preschool child at the end of phase 2. Mean c-ACT score was not associated with baseline 25(OH)D concentration, or with the response to vitamin D supplementation during phases 1 or 2 (p≥0.19). There were no statistically significant changes in nasal epithelial lining fluid cytokines or chemokines.

The volume of vitamin D3 supplement returned at the end of phase 1 was higher than the expected volume based on 100% adherence in 10 out of 13 (76.9%) school children and in seven out of 14 (50.0%) preschool children. At the end of phase 2, two out of seven (28.6%) preschool children returned their vitamin D3 supplement with a higher residual volume than was compatible with 100% adherence. Only a limited number of vials were handed back at the end of phases 1 (27 vials) and 2 (12 vials).

Neither vitamin D replacement regimen investigated was particularly effective in elevating 25(OH)D concentrations to ≥75 nmol·L−1 in vitamin-D-insufficient children with preschool wheeze or asthma: nearly half the children failed to attain 25(OH)D concentration ≥75 nmol·L−1 after 3 months of supplementation with 1000 IU vitamin D3. A greater proportion of preschool children attained 25(OH)D concentrations ≥75 nmol·L−1 at the end of phases 1 (10 out of 15 versus one out of 16) and 2 (11 out of 15 versus five out of 16) compared to school children (p≥0.001). A daily oral dose of 400 IU vitamin D safely elevated circulating 25(OH)D levels by a mean of 23.6 nmol·L−1 at 3 months. Escalation of this dose to 1000 IU·day−1 resulted in a further mean increase of 12.7 nmol·L−1. Stratification of the analysis by age group revealed that increases in 25(OH)D were higher among preschool versus school children.

The main strength of the study is the prospective, individual tailoring of supplementation and the use of a fingerprick to measure 25(OH)D levels, which was well tolerated. We acknowledge that we did not record information on prescribed asthma treatments. Additionally, we highlight the fact that we excluded children who received vitamin D supplementation at the time of enrolment as they were more likely to have a circulating 25(OH)D concentration ≥75 nmol·L−1; this may have limited the generalisability of our findings. The main limitation related to monitoring adherence: weighing returned bottles only reveals what medication has not been taken, and we cannot know if the missing drops were taken regularly, all at once before return (dose-dumping) or discarded. Better adherence in preschool versus school children may therefore explain their higher attained 25(OH)D levels. Alternatively, children with asthma may have dysregulated vitamin D metabolism associating with a blunted 25(OH)D response to vitamin D3 supplementation, as recently reported in adults [10]. Finally, reference ranges for 25(OH)D levels are based on requirements to support optimal bone health; the levels needed to support optimal immune function are unknown.

Our data have implications for the design of RCTs of vitamin D supplementation in preschool wheeze and school-age asthma. It cannot be assumed that conventional supplementation will achieve adequate levels in all participants. Given the safety data here, it would seem reasonable initially to supplement children who are vitamin D deficient with 1000 IU rather than 400 IU·day−1, since this regimen resulted in higher mean attained 25(OH)D levels without increasing risk of hypervitaminosis D; it may be that doses of >1000 IU·day−1 are needed to prevent exacerbations. The use of smart phone applications for remote direct observation of daily vitamin D3 supplement intake may be an inexpensive method to address adherence accurately and allow researchers to prompt participants with poor adherence [11]. Financial incentives or rewards for those whose adherence can be documented remotely can optimise adherence and encourage patients to complete the study as per protocol [12].

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the children and their parents/carers who participated in the research.

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

  • Author contributions: C. Stefanidis, A. Bush, A.R. Martineau and C.J. Griffiths conceived the study and contributed to study design. C. Stefanidis, A. Bush, A.R. Martineau, C.J. Griffiths, C. Nwokoro, S. Liebeschuetz and I.P. Skene participated in implementation of the study. C. Stefanidis, A. Bush, A.R. Martineau, C.J. Griffiths and C. Newby performed data analysis. C. Stefanidis, A. Bush and A.R. Martineau wrote the first draft of the article; all other authors critically reviewed it and approved the final version.

  • Conflict of interest: All authors have nothing to disclose.

  • Received October 28, 2021.
  • Accepted January 31, 2022.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2022.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jolliffe DA,
    2. Greenberg L,
    3. Hooper RL, et al.
    Vitamin D supplementation to prevent asthma exacerbations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet Respir Med 2017; 5: 881–890. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30306-5
    OpenUrl
    1. Martineau AR,
    2. Cates CJ,
    3. Urashima M, et al.
    Vitamin D for the management of asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 9: CD011511. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011511.pub2
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Jolliffe DA,
    2. Camargo CA Jr.,
    3. Sluyter JD, et al.
    Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data from randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2021; 9: 276–292. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00051-6
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Stefanidis C,
    2. Martineau AR,
    3. Nwokoro C, et al.
    Vitamin D for secondary prevention of acute wheeze attacks in preschool and school-age children. Thorax 2019; 74: 977–985. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213278
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition
    . Vitamin D and Health. 2016. Available from: www.gov.uk/government/publications/sacn-vitamin-d-and-health-report
  5. ↵
    1. Shea RL,
    2. Berg JD
    . Self-administration of vitamin D supplements in the general public may be associated with high 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations. Ann Clin Biochem 2017; 54: 355–361. doi:10.1177/0004563216662073
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Hansel TT,
    2. Tunstall T,
    3. Trujillo-Torralbo M-B, et al.
    A comprehensive evaluation of nasal and bronchial cytokines and chemokines following experimental rhinovirus infection in allergic asthma: increased interferons (IFN-γ and IFN-λ) and type 2 inflammation (IL-5 and IL-13). EBioMedicine 2017; 19: 128–138. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.033
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Benjamini Y,
    2. Hochberg Y
    . Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Methodol 1995; 57: 289–300. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Zittermann A,
    2. Ernst JB,
    3. Gummert JF, et al.
    Vitamin D supplementation, body weight and human serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D response: a systematic review. Eur J Nutr 2014; 53: 367–374. doi:10.1007/s00394-013-0634-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Jolliffe DA,
    2. Stefanidis C,
    3. Wang Z, et al.
    Vitamin D metabolism is dysregulated in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202: 371–382. doi:10.1164/rccm.201909-1867OC
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Shields MD,
    2. AlQahtani F,
    3. Rivey MP, et al.
    Mobile direct observation of therapy (MDOT) – a rapid systematic review and pilot study in children with asthma. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0190031. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Jackson T,
    2. Shields MD,
    3. Heaney LG, et al.
    The impact of financial incentives on the implementation of asthma or diabetes self-management: a systematic review. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0187478. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187478
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 8 Issue 2 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 8 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vitamin D replacement in children with acute wheeze: a dose-escalation study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Vitamin D replacement in children with acute wheeze: a dose-escalation study
Christos Stefanidis, Andrew Bush, Christopher Newby, Chinedu Nwokoro, Susan Liebeschuetz, Imogen P. Skene, Christopher J. Griffiths, Adrian R. Martineau
ERJ Open Research Apr 2022, 8 (2) 00609-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00609-2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Vitamin D replacement in children with acute wheeze: a dose-escalation study
Christos Stefanidis, Andrew Bush, Christopher Newby, Chinedu Nwokoro, Susan Liebeschuetz, Imogen P. Skene, Christopher J. Griffiths, Adrian R. Martineau
ERJ Open Research Apr 2022, 8 (2) 00609-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00609-2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Asthma and allergy
  • Paediatric pulmonology
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Profiles of host responses in plasma and LRT during ARF
  • Expansion of ST2-expressing macrophages in BOS
  • S. pneumoniae re-emerges as a cause of CAP
Show more Research letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society