Abstract
Accumulating evidence proves that endothelial dysfunction is involved in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) progression. We previously demonstrated that the endothelial surface glycocalyx has a critical role in maintenance of vascular integrity. Here, we hypothesised that serum factors of severe COVID-19 patients affect the glycocalyx and result in endothelial dysfunction.
We included blood samples of 32 COVID-19 hospitalised patients at the Leiden University Medical Center, of which 26 were hospitalised in an intensive care unit (ICU) and six on a non-ICU hospital floor; 18 of the samples were obtained from convalescent patients 6 weeks after hospital discharge, and 12 from age-matched healthy donors (control) during the first period of the outbreak. First, we determined endothelial (angiopoietin 2 (ANG2)) and glycocalyx degradation (soluble thrombomodulin (sTM) and syndecan-1 (sSDC1)) markers in plasma.
In the plasma of COVID-19 patients, circulating ANG2 and sTM were elevated in patients in the ICU. Primary lung microvascular endothelial cell (HPMEC) and human glomerular microvascular endothelial cell (GEnC) cultured in the presence of these sera led to endothelial cell glycocalyx degradation, barrier disruption, inflammation and increased coagulation on the endothelial surface, significantly different compared to healthy control and non-ICU patient sera. These changes could all be restored in the presence of fucoidan.
In conclusion, our data highlight the link between endothelial glycocalyx degradation, barrier failure and induction of a procoagulant surface in COVID-19 patients in ICU which could be targeted earlier in disease by the presence of heparan sulfate mimetics.
Abstract
The heparan sulfate mimetic fucoidan reduces endothelial activation induced by severe #COVID19 serum, restores the endothelial glycocalyx and the cell–cell barrier, and reverses the endothelial pro-coagulable state https://bit.ly/3tsG2mJ
Introduction
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly spread worldwide and has led to an unprecedented global pandemic since late 2019 [1]. Most of the COVID-19 cases are asymptomatic or cause only mild illness [2]. However, in a considerable proportion of patients, respiratory illness that requires hospitalisation occurred, which could then develop into progressive disease and lead to hypoxaemic respiratory failure, requiring long-term ventilatory support [3, 4]. Besides severe respiratory symptoms during hospitalisation at the intensive care unit (ICU), a high incidence of thromboembolism events was observed [5]. Acute respiratory distress syndrome and coagulopathy are leading causes of COVID-19 patient mortality [6], while endothelial dysfunction is reported to be involved in both acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and coagulopathy [7, 8]. Consistent with autopsy findings that severe lung endothelial injury was observed in patients who succumbed to COVID-19 [9], COVID-19 could be considered as a vascular disease, and vascular dysfunction might play a critical role in the pathogenesis of ARDS and coagulopathy.
The glycocalyx is a key regulator of endothelial cell integrity and homeostasis. It regulates vascular barrier permeability, prevents inflammation and ensures vessel patency [10–13]. It is a gel-like layer composed of the glycosaminoglycans heparan sulfate (HS), hyaluronan (HA), chondroitin sulfate and associated proteins that covers the luminal surface of vascular endothelial cells [14]. Inflammation-induced glycocalyx degradation can lead to hyperpermeability of blood vessels, vasodilation disorders, microvascular thrombosis and increased leukocyte adhesion [15]. In previous studies, glycocalyx destruction and dysfunction was observed in sepsis, acute kidney injury and ARDS, and was associated with worse patient outcome [15, 16]. Recently, it was reported that the endothelial glycocalyx-degrading enzyme heparanase contributed to vascular leakage and inflammation, and its activity was associated with disease severity in COVID-19 patients [11, 17]. Meanwhile, the MYSTIC study also provided evidence that glycocalyx health, as measured by changes in the perfused boundary region, was a predictive prognostic marker for COVID-19 septic patients [18].
Here we test whether preservation of the endothelial glycocalyx might be an effective intervention to improve vascular health. For this, we examined the possible beneficial effects of the HS mimetic fucoidan [19] in restoring endothelial functionality.
Material and methods
For detailed information see the supplementary material.
BEAT-COVID cohort study population and study design
A prospective observational cohort study was set up, in which patients with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection after hospital admission were recruited from April 2020 until August 2020, before the use of medication such as dexamethasone and vaccines were implemented (supplementary figure S1). Plasma and serum samples were collected from 32 patients, of which 26 were hospitalised in the ICU and six on a non-ICU medical floor. In 18 of the 32 included patients, follow-up data were obtained 6 weeks after discharge from the hospital. In addition, samples of 12 age-matched controls were obtained. Patient characteristics are shown in supplementary table S1. Owing to the limited amount of material per sample that could be obtained, pooled sera were used in some experiments as indicated. The trial was registered in the Dutch Trial Registry (NL8589). 12 age-matched healthy donors with a male:female ratio of 2:1 were included after confirmed negative SARS-CoV-2 IgG. Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethical Committee Leiden-Den Haag-Delft (NL73740.058.20).
Circulating markers of endothelial dysfunction and glycocalyx shedding
Plasma samples were used to measure angiopoietin 2 (Ang-2, DANG20; R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK), soluble thrombomodulin (sTM, M850720096; Diaclone, Besançon, France) and soluble syndecan-1 (sSDC1, DY2780, R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer's respective protocols.
Endothelial barrier function assay
Endothelial barrier function analysis was performed with impedance-based cell monitoring using the electric cell-substrate impedance sensing system (ECIS Zθ; Applied Biophysics, New York, NY, USA). ECIS plates (96W20idf PET; Applied Biophysics) were pre-treated with 10 mM L-cysteine and coated with 1% gelatine for primary human glomerular microvascular endothelial cells (GEnCs; ACBRI-128; Cell Systems, Kirkland, WA, USA) or without 1% gelatine for primary pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HPMECs; PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany). HPMECs (passage 5) were seeded at a concentration of 4.5×105 cells well−1 and for GEnCs (p5), the concentration was 3×105 cells well−1 in EGM medium (basal medium MV, C-22220; PromoCell) supplemented with C-39220 (PromoCell) and 1% antibiotics (penicillin/streptomycin, 15070063; Gibco, Paisley, UK) at 37°C and 5% CO2.
Initial baseline resistance was measured for 2 h before endothelial cells were seeded into the plate. Multiple frequency/time mode was used for the real-time assessment of the barrier function. Once the stable monolayer was formed, endothelial cells were incubated with 10% serum (healthy (n=12), COVID-19 non-ICU (n=8) and ICU (n=26)) and measured for 20 h. Afterwards, modelling data Rb, which represents barrier function, could be generated.
In additional experiments, HPMECs were exposed to 10% healthy serum (n=12) and COVID-19 ICU serum (n=26) with or without fucoidan (10 µg mL−1, gift from MicroVascular Health Solutions LLC, Alpine, UT, USA). The natural fucoidan provided (Iso 9000 and GMP certified from Omnipharm, S.A.S, Chambéry, France) was extracted from Laminaria japonica as a powder of 91.20% purity and further tested, for instance, on the presence of heavy metals (arsenic, lead, cadmium, mercury) or microbiology parameters (European Pharmacopoeia VIII, Ed 2,6,12: total plate count, yeast, mould, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp.). A 50× times stock solution was prepared by dissolving the appropriate amount of powder in milliQ water and passed through a 0.22 µm filter before use.
RNA isolation and reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR
RNA of cultured cells was isolated using RNeasy Mini Kit (74106; Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RT-PCR analysis was conducted using SYBR Select Master Mix (4472908; Applied Biosystems, Landsmeer, The Netherlands) and specific primers as indicated in supplementary table S2. Gene expression was normalised to GAPDH of five separate experiments.
Immunoblotting analysis
Western blots were performed from protein extracts of HPMECs [12]. 10% Mini-PROTEAN® TGX™ Protein Gels (4561031; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Veenendaal, The Netherlands) were used for protein size separation, and proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes (1704156; Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked in 5% milk in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 0.01% tween20 (PBST) at room temperature for 1 h and further incubated with primary antibodies rabbit anti-human intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)1 (4915; Cell Signaling Technology Europe B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands), rabbit anti-human total NF-κB p65 (8242; Cell Signalling Technology), rabbit anti-human phosphor-NF-κB p65 (Ser536) (3033; Cell Signalling Technology) or mouse anti-human GAPDH (MA5-15738; Thermo Fisher, Landsdmeer, the Netherlands) overnight at 4°C. Protein was detected using HRP-conjugated antibody (P0447 and P0448; Dako, Amstelveen, The Netherlands) and Western Lightning Plus-ECL, Enhanced Chemiluminescence Substrate (NEL103001EA; PerkinElmer, Groningen, The Netherlands). Intensity of the bands were analysed using ImageJ software. Relative intensity was determined by levels of GAPDH.
Immunofluorescence of cultured cells
HPMECs (p5) were cultured in eight-well chamber slides (80826, ibiTreat, µ-Slide 8 Well). Confluent monolayers were incubated with 10% pooled serum (healthy control (pooled n=12), non-ICU (pooled n=8) and ICU (pooled n=26)) in no fetal calf serum (FCS) EGM medium for 24 h. Next, cells were fixed with 4% PFA and 0.2% Triton-X100 in Hanks’ buffered salt solution (HBSS) or 4% PFA in HBSS (for HS and LEA staining) for 10 minutes at room temperature, blocked with 3% goat serum in HBSS and incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled Lycopersicon esculentum (LEA-FITC, L0401; Sigma, Houten, The Netherlands), Mouse Anti-Human VE-cadherin (55-7H1; BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany), Mouse Anti-heparan sulfate (10E4, 370255-1; AMSBIO, Abingdon, UK) or Mouse Anti-TM (MA5-11454; Thermo Fisher) at 4°C overnight, followed by an appropriate secondary antibody and phalloidin-TRITC (VE-cadherin samples) for 1 h. Finally, Hoechst 33528 (1/1000) was added and cells were viewed using a LEICA SP8 WLL confocal microscope (Leica, Rijswijk, The Netherlands). Fluorescent images were analysed using Image J software. Quantification is described in the supplementary material.
FX activation by extrinsic tenase complex (TF-FVIIa)
Confluent HPMECs were incubated with 10% control (n=12), COVID-19 non-ICU (n=8) and ICU serum (n=26, with or without presence of fucoidan) in no FCS medium for 24 h. Cell culture supernatants were collected and centrifuged for ELISA assays. Factor VIIa (80 µL, 10 nM, HCVIIA-0031; Haematologic Technologies, Huissen, The Netherlands) was added and incubated for 15 minutes at 37°C and 5% CO2. The reaction was initiated by adding factor X (80 µL, 400 nM, HCX-0050; Haematologic Technologies) to detect the production of active factor X. Aliquots were quenched in HBSS supplemented with 50 mM EDTA to stop the reaction and determined by SpecXa conversion (250 μM) at 405 nm.
Thrombin generation assay
Confluent HPMECs were incubated with 10% healthy (n=12), COVID-19 non-ICU (n=8) and ICU serum (n=26, with or without presence of fucoidan) in no FCS medium for 24 h. Thrombin generation curves were obtained by supplementing normal pooled plasma. Thrombin formation was initiated by adding substrate buffer (FluCa-kit, 86197; Thrombinoscope BV, Leiden, The Netherlands) to the plasma. Thrombin formation was determined using Thrombinoscope software.
Markers of endothelial dysfunction and glycocalyx shedding in cell cultured supernatant
Supernatants collected were used to measure ANG2, sTM, interleukin (IL)-6 (M9316, Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and von Willebrand factor (VWF) (A0082, Dako).
Statistics
Data are presented as mean±sd, unless indicated otherwise. For all experiments, three to five independent experiments were performed. Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene test were performed to evaluate the normality and variances first. Then nonpaired/paired 2-tailed t-tests were used to assess the differences between two groups. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test and Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparisons test were assessed for multiple groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software version 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 8 (Graphpad Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). A significance level of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
COVID-19 leads to endothelial dysfunction and glycocalyx degradation
Overall endothelial health in COVID-19 patients was assessed by measuring plasma ANG2 concentrations, which were found to be significantly increased in COVID-19 patients on the ICU (figure 1a). ANG2 levels of non-ICU patients were not distinguishable from control levels or recovered patients 6 weeks after discharge. Circulating fragments of sTM, one of the glycocalyx components, were also markedly increased in COVID-19 ICU patients compared to healthy controls, non-ICU patients and after recovery (figure 1b). Shedding of the glycocalyx core protein, sSDC1, was found not to be significantly raised in COVID-19 ICU patients in comparison to healthy controls or non-ICU patients (figure 1c). Pearson's correlation between each of two markers was analysed and showed that ANG2 moderately correlated with sTM and sSDC1 (R=0.49, p<0.0001 and R=0.33, p=0.015, respectively), and sTM positively correlated with sSDC1 (R=0.50, p=0.0002), indicating that endothelial dysfunction could lead to glycocalyx shedding (figure 1d–f).
Endothelial glycocalyx degradation in presence of COVID-19 ICU serum
To determine the effect of systemic blood factors during COVID-19 disease on endothelial surface glycocalyx expression, HPMECs were cultured in the presence of 10% pooled serum of either healthy controls, COVID-19 non-ICU and COVID-19 ICU patients for 24 h and stained for overall glycocalyx presence (LEA-FITC), for heparan sulfates (HS) and thrombomodulin (TM). The COVID-19 ICU group showed a marked reduced surface expression of LEA-FITC (figure 2a and b), TM (figure 2a and c) and HS (supplementary figure S2a,b), compared to healthy control and COVID-19 non-ICU groups.
COVID-19 ICU serum induced loss of endothelial cell barrier function
Next, the ability of COVID-19 serum to disrupt the barrier integrity of primary human microvascular endothelial cells was tested. In contrast to healthy controls and COVID-19 non-ICU patients, serum from COVID-19 ICU patients induced a reduction in resistance of both HPMECs and GEnCs (figure 3a and c). The calculated areas under the curve for the final 15 h showed that the COVID-19 ICU samples were significantly below healthy control samples, especially in HPMECs (figure 3b and d). The modelling value for barrier function, Rb, representing cell–cell contacts, resulted in a similar reduction upon exposure to serum of COVID-19 ICU patients (figure 3e–h). Interestingly, we could find differences in vascular bed susceptibility in response to COVID-19 ICU patient sera, showing that the lung-originating HPMECs were more sensitive than the kidney-isolated GEnCs. While resistance and barrier function decreased in HPMECs during the entire incubation time, in GEnCs both factors started to recover after 15 h (figure 3a, c, e and g). Reduction of VE-cadherin, together with reduced cellular junction area, and increasing stress fibre formation in response to COVID-19 ICU patient serum in comparison to COVID-19 non-ICU and healthy control sera confirmed this endothelial cell barrier loss (figure 3i and j). This observed barrier function reduction correlated with the increased plasma levels of ANG2, sTM and sSDC1, linking endothelial cell activation and glycocalyx shedding to possible endothelial loss of barrier function in patients (figure 3k).
Fucoidan restores glycocalyx and ameliorates endothelial cell activation induced by COVID-19 serum
To test whether loss of surface glycocalyx could be restored, we cultured HPMECs in the presence of both ICU patient sera and the HS mimetic fucoidan (10 µg mL−1). Supplementation of fucoidan during culture in the presence of ICU serum dramatically restored the glycocalyx as was shown by LEA-FITC staining (figure 4a and b) and TM expression (figure 4a and c).
One of the mechanisms of glycocalyx loss is through enzymatic HS degradation by heparanase (HPSE-1), which is elevated in the plasma of COVID-19 patients [17]. In our in vitro cultured HPMECs in the presence of 10% pooled patient or healthy control serum, we observed significantly induced HPSE-1 gene expression in cells from the ICU patient group without a change in the non-ICU group (supplementary figure S3a). Mechanistically, we observed that addition of fucoidan showed a trend of decreasing HPSE-1 gene expression (supplementary figure S3a) in the ICU patient group, which coincided with reduced syndecan-1 gene expression (SDC1) and was significantly restored after fucoidan supplementation (supplementary figure S3b).
Further evaluation of endothelial cell dysfunction in the presence of patient sera showed that compared to healthy controls, gene expression of ANGPT2, ICAM-1 and IL-6 were significantly upregulated in the presence of COVID-19 ICU sera (figure S3c-e), while no effect was found with COVID-19 non-ICU samples. At protein level, ICAM-1 expression was also increased in the presence of COVID-19 ICU serum (figure 4d and e). Since endothelial activation could induce NFκB activation, we then detected the NFκB phosphorylation levels and found a marked activation of these factors in endothelial cells in the presence of COVID-19 ICU sera, without significant changes between healthy control, COVID-19 non-ICU and fucoidan supplementation groups (figure 4d and f). This increased endothelial activation was further corroborated by the induced amount of released VWF and ANG2, from the Weibel–Palade bodies upon activation and secretion of IL-6 and shedding of sTM by these cells (supplementary figure S4). When comparing the response on individual patient serum level, fucoidan reduced these markers significantly (figure 4g–j), in line with the observed normalisation of ICAM-1 expression (figure 4d and e).
Glycocalyx restoration could protect endothelial cell barrier function
As fucoidan supplementation could restore the glycocalyx and reduce inflammation, we used ECIS to further investigate the effects of fucoidan on protection of the endothelial barrier function. After 24 h of culturing the HPMECs with the various serum samples, addition of fucoidan had no effect during the first 7–8 h. However, in the following time period, endothelial barrier integrity of HPMECs exposed to serum from COVID-19 ICU patients recovered significantly (figure 5a–d). Several samples even reached similar levels to control samples (figure 5b and d). Additionally, VE-cadherin and F-actin staining also showed a similar trend that fucoidan could strengthen the cell–cell contacts against COVID-19 ICU serum exposure (figure 5e and f).
Fucoidan inhibits the formation of a procoagulant cell surface upon COVID-19 serum treatment
To test whether serum from COVID-19 ICU patients is capable of inducing a procoagulant cell surface, explaining the reported high incidence of (micro)thrombosis in COVID-19 ICU patients [20], we first examined tissue factor gene expression (F3) changes. Indeed, F3 was significantly upregulated in COVID-19 ICU patient samples (supplementary figure S5a), and the presence of fucoidan normalised this expression again to control levels. Next, the production of factor Xa on endothelial cell surface was induced by 10% serum from healthy controls and COVID-19 patients (figure 6a) which resulted in a significant increase in factor Xa production in COVID-19 ICU samples compared to samples from healthy controls and COVID-19 non-ICU, indicating the formation of procoagulant cell surface (supplementary figure S5b and c). Consistent with the observed reduction in F3 mRNA expression with fucoidan present, FX activation was considerably reduced within 1 h and 2 h (figure 6b and c).
Thrombin release (figure 6d), another product of the common coagulation pathway, was significantly increased in the COVID-19 ICU group, indicating serum from ICU patients could lead to endothelial cell hypercoagulable state (supplementary figure S5d). When comparing the COVID-19 ICU groups with and without fucoidan added, thrombin peak height, similar to the phenotype in Xa generation assay, showed a significant decrease in fucoidan-treated COVID-19 ICU samples (figure 6f). Correlating FXa and thrombin generation with the plasma levels of ANG2, sTM and sSDC1, we found a link between endothelial activation, glycocalyx degradation and endothelial cell surface coagulable state (figure 6g).
Discussion
Our current study underpins the critical role for loss of the endothelial glycocalyx in severe COVID-19 infections. At a patient level, the endothelial activation marker ANG2 and glycocalyx shedding related markers sTM and sSDC1 were all increased in COVID-19 patients in ICU. At a cellular level, the loss of the endothelial glycocalyx induced by sera of these patients resulted in cellular activation, increased permeability and a hypercoagulable surface. Intervention with the HS mimetic fucoidan restored not only the endothelial glycocalyx but subsequently reduced the endothelial activation state and restored the permeability barrier and anticoagulant cell surface.
Increased circulating ANG2 levels have been associated with diminished respiratory function, increased coagulation activity, acute kidney injury and higher mortality in COVID-19 patients [18, 21–23]. Inhibition of the protective ANG1/TIE2 signalling cascade by ANG2 is a central regulator in protecting the vasculature against thrombus formation and vascular stabilisation [24, 25]. Consistent with our findings, a decrease in plasma ANG2 levels upon recovery argues for ANG2 as a sensitive marker for acute endothelial dysfunction. The observed lower ANG2 levels in our study, together with the relative low levels of sTM and sSDC1, in comparison to non-COVID-19 septic ICU patients, could argue that COVID-19 is a more locally presenting disease [26]. sTM has been reported to be associated with COVID-19 adverse outcome [27], and loss of endothelial surface TM was observed in COVID-19 lung autopsies [28]. We observed that once the microvascular lung endothelial cells were activated, the relatively highly expressed TM (supplementary figure S6) was shed, resulting in a procoagulant cell surface that indicates possible local vulnerability of lung microvessels.
We previously revealed that increased breakdown of HS by heparanase could lead to diminished glycocalyx coverage [29]. Further studies suggest that heparanase activity, the only mammalian enzyme which could degrade HS, was elevated in COVID-19 patients and associated with disease severity [17, 30]. Our observation of increased HPSE-1 mRNA expression upon ICU COVID-19 serum-treated endothelial cells corresponded with reduced LEA-FITC, HS and TM surface expression [31], the induced upregulation of ANG2 and heparanase and loss of endothelial cell barrier function. These findings provide increasing evidence linking endothelial glycocalyx as an additional component of vascular barrier with the ANG/TIE2 signalling pathway to maintain endothelial cell homeostasis. Additionally, lung microvascular endothelial cells were more sensitive to COVID-19 ICU serum than glomerular microvascular endothelial cells, emphasising that organs are differently affected by COVID-19 infection. Notably, the indirect effect by serum mediators, as was also suggested in recent papers [32, 33] in addition to possible direct viral infection, might contribute to patients’ longer hospitalisation or driving the disease progression to severe ARDS.
Coagulation disorder is often seen in COVID-19, especially in severe cases [34]. The endothelial glycocalyx is a crucial compartment for binding and regulating enzymes involved in the coagulation cascade [35]. Tissue factor is a primary trigger of extrinsic coagulation and plays an essential role in haemostasis, which is increased as a result of glycocalyx damage [36, 37]. Combining with our data, the increased endothelial F3 expression corresponded with loss of the endothelial anticoagulant factors, such as TM, in response to incubation with COVID-19 ICU patient serum. This may be a driver of COVID-19 related coagulopathy, which is corroborated by two different ex vivo assays (thrombin generation and Xa generation on endothelial cell surface).
Here we observed that restoration of glycocalyx components by fucoidan leads to reduction of endothelial activation through inactivation of NFκB signalling pathway and downstream ICAM1 expression. Additionally, supplementary fucoidan induced endothelial barrier function recovery, which might open a new therapeutic strategy to treat or prevent respiratory dysfunction. Moreover, fucoidan supplementation has a beneficial effect for anticoagulation. First of all, fucoidan leads to endothelial cell surface tissue factor reduction. Two preprint studies suggested that ANG2 has additional and direct effects on coagulation in COVID-19 [28, 38], and our data demonstrate that fucoidan has a strong effect on decreasing ANG2 expression, preventing TIE2 inactivation. These findings reveal that glycocalyx preservation has promising effects on controlling COVID-19 injury, and our in vitro experiments show that fucoidan as a novel HS mimetic could be a potential therapeutic substance.
Our study had some limitations due to the time of hospitalisation of COVID-19 patients and official ethical approval. The present study only presents a limited group of patients who presented at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) during the first wave before major changes in therapeutic interventions occurred, such as the inclusion of dexamethasone treatment. In addition, no non-COVID-19 ARDS ICU patients were included, limiting the attribution of our data as COVID-19-specific effects. However, similar lung mechanics and increased extravascular lung oedema in COVID-19-related ARDS in comparison to non-COVID-19 ARDS have been found, indicating a similar contribution found in our study [39]. In addition, the fucoidan we used in the present study by itself was not intended for clinical use, but to exemplify possible glycocalyx-restoring mechanisms and endothelial cell functionality.
In conclusion, our present study supports the concept that endothelial cell dysfunction and loss of endothelial glycocalyx might drive worse outcomes like ARDS or coagulopathy in severe COVID-19 at a later disease stage. Fucoidan restored the endothelial glycocalyx and ameliorated endothelial activation, which led to protection of endothelial barrier function and induced antithrombotic effects. Our findings support further validation that glycocalyx preservation or restoration could prevent progression to severe COVID-19 and encourage future clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of glycocalyx preservation for treatment of more severe forms of COVID-19.
Supplementary material
Supplementary Material
Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.
Supplementary material 00652-2021.SUPPLEMENT
Graphical abstract 00652-2021.GRAPHICAL_ABSTRACT
Acknowledgements
We thank all patients and healthy volunteers for taking part in this study. The fucoidan, a main ingredient of the Endocalyx supplement (US patent number 9943572), was exclusively produced for MicroVascular Health Solutions LLC and was provided as a gift.
Footnotes
Proveance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.
BEAT-COVID study group: M.S. Arbous (Dept of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands), B.M. van den Berg (Dept of Internal Medicine, Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center), S. Cannegieter (Dept of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center), C.M. Cobbaert (Dept of Clinical Chemistry, Leiden University Medical Center), A. van der Does (Dept of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center), J.J.M. van Dongen (Dept of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center), J. Eikenboom (Dept of Internal Medicine, Thrombosis and Homeostasis, Leiden University Medical Center), M.C.M. Feltkamp (Dept of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Centre), A. Geluk (Dept of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center), J.J. Goeman (Dept of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center), M. Giera (Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center), T. Hankemeier (Dept of Analytical Biosciences, Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden University Medical Center), M.H.M. Heemskerk (Dept of Haematology, Leiden University Medical Center), P.S. Hiemstra (Dept of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center), C.H. Hokke, J.J. Janse, S.P. Jochems (all Dept of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center), S.A. Joosten (Dept of Infectious Diseases), M. Kikkert (Dept of Medical Microbiology), L. Lamont (Dept of Analytical Biosciences), J. Manniën (Dept of Biomedical Data Sciences), T.H.M. Ottenhoff (Dept of Infectious Diseases), M.R. del Prado (Dept of Intensive Care), N. Queralt Rosinach (Dept of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center), M. Roestenberg (Dept of Parasitology), M. Roos (Dept of Human Genetics), A.H.E. Roukens (Dept of Infectious Diseases), H.H. Smits (Dept of Parasitology), E.J. Snijder (Dept of Medical Microbiology), F.J.T. Staal, L.A. Trouw (both Dept of Immunology), R. Tsonaka (Dept of Biomedical Sciences), A. Verhoeven (Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics), L.G. Visser (Dept of Infectious Diseases), J.J.C. de Vries (Dept of Medical Microbiology), D.J. van Westerloo, J. Wigbers (both Dept of Intensive Care), H.J. van der Wijk (Dept of Biomedical Data Sciences), R.C. van Wissen (Dept of Clinical Chemistry), M. Wuhrer (Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics), M. Yazdanbakhsh (Dept of Parasitology) and M. Zlei (Dept of Immunology).
Author contributions: L. Yuan, T.J. Rabelink and B.M. van den Berg conceived and designed the study; L. Yuan, S. Chen, W.M.P.J. Sol and B.M. van den Berg performed experiments and original data collection; L. Yuan, T.J. Rabelink and B.M. van den Berg analysed and interpreted the data; L. Yuan, A.I.M. van der Velden, H. Vink, T.J. Rabelink and B.M. van den Berg edited and discussed the manuscript.
Conflict of interest: L. Yuan reports support for the present manuscript received from the China Scholarship Council grant CSC number 201806270262. H. Vink is Chief Science Officer of MicroVascular Health Solutions LLC (Alpine, UT, USA) and reports the Endocalyx patent (number 9943572) granted to MicroVascular Health Solutions in 2018. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.
Support statement: This work was supported by the China Scholarship Council grant to L. Yuan (CSC number 201806270262) and BEAT-COVID funding by Leiden University Medical Center.
- Received November 20, 2021.
- Accepted March 8, 2022.
- Copyright ©The authors 2022
This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org