Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pleural infection incidence: a UK multicentre retrospective analysis

Eihab O. Bedawi, Khalil Ur Rehman, Deepan P. Sivakumar, Katie Ferguson, Syed Ajmal, Emma Graham, Rakesh K. Panchal, John P. Corcoran, Kevin G. Blyth, Najib M. Rahman, Alex West
ERJ Open Research 2022 8: 00206-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00206-2022
Eihab O. Bedawi
1Oxford Pleural Unit, Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Oxford, UK
2Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
8Co-first authors
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eihab O. Bedawi
  • For correspondence: eihab.bedawi@ouh.nhs.uk
Khalil Ur Rehman
3Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
8Co-first authors
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Khalil Ur Rehman
Deepan P. Sivakumar
3Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katie Ferguson
4Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
5Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Syed Ajmal
6University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma Graham
7University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rakesh K. Panchal
6University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John P. Corcoran
7University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John P. Corcoran
Kevin G. Blyth
4Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
5Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Najib M. Rahman
1Oxford Pleural Unit, Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Oxford, UK
2Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
9Co-senior authors
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex West
3Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
9Co-senior authors
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alex West
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

There was a significant reduction in pleural infection incidence, by almost a third, in the year following the start of the #COVID19 pandemic. Public health measures enforced during this period are likely to have played a significant role. https://bit.ly/3QAPPR9

To the Editor:

The fall in non-coronavirus disease 2019 (non-COVID-19) respiratory viruses, including seasonal influenza, during the pandemic is well reported [1–4]. It is thought to be a result of a combination of social distancing, lockdowns, improved hand hygiene and potentially virus–virus interactions and cross-protection affecting population dynamics. However, as vaccines weaken the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), clinicians remain vigilant for a potential resurgence of other respiratory pathogens and the implications of an ongoing rise in new SARS-CoV-2 variants.

A huge rise in pleural infection cases is well documented following the influenza pandemic in 1918 [5] and a recent epidemiological study from Arnold et al. [6] also found that for nine of the 10 years studied, the highest annual point incidence of influenza nationally coincided with the highest admission rate for pleural infection.

Pleural effusions have been noted in only a minority of severe COVID-19 cases (up to 5%) [7]. To date, no studies have examined the overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adult pleural infection incidence. This study was therefore planned to assess the impact of the pandemic on incidence and profile of pleural infection.

The study was conducted through a network of geographically diverse specialist pleural units across the UK actively recruiting to a prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT), the third Multicentre Intrapleural Sepsis Trial (MIST-3; ISRCTN registry identifier ISRCTN18192121). The five centres were continuously screening for cases of pleural infection within their services and had dedicated pleural multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings that captured and recorded all pleural infections across their services as standard practice.

Two comparative periods were chosen as March 2020 to February 2021 (post-COVID), to represent the study cohort, against the same period before the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2019 to February 2020; pre-COVID) as a control cohort. A retrospective review of screening logs and case notes was conducted.

The primary outcome measure was the difference in incidence (number of confirmed cases) of pleural infection admissions between the two time periods. Secondary outcome measures included the following: comparison of patient demographics; interval between symptoms onset and presentation; incidence of pleural infection during the influenza season; the effect of immunosuppression (patient receiving regular steroids, biological agents or active chemotherapy on admission); radiological evidence of pneumonic consolidation and/or COVID-19 infection (according to the reporting radiologist); and microbiological profile. As clinical outcomes would be skewed by involvement of the study cohort in the MIST-3 study, which involves early randomisation to one of three study intervention arms (standard care, intrapleural fibrinolytics, or an early surgical opinion), these were not evaluated. In the study cohort, data on COVID-19 PCR positivity was also collected. As this was a retrospective analysis, patient consent and research ethics committee approval were not required.

To be included, the patients had to be adults (aged ≥18 years) with a diagnosis of pleural infection based on standard, internationally agreed criteria [8] (identical to those used in large prospective RCTs [9]). These criteria were: 1) a clinical history compatible with pleural infection, and 2) a pleural collection that was either purulent, or Gram stain/culture positive, or acidic with a low pH (<7.2), or had a low pleural fluid glucose (in the absence of an accurate pH measurement), or a septated pleural collection clinically considered most likely secondary to pleural infection.

Statistical analyses were conducted using simple descriptive statistics. Continuous variables were reported as mean and standard deviation. Comparisons of proportions were conducted using the Pearson's Chi-squared test (p<0.05). The analyses were conducted using SPSS (IBM, version 28).

A total of 308 patients were included in the final analysis. In the 1-year pre-COVID period, 184 new cases of pleural infection were identified across the five participating centres versus 124 new cases in the 1-year period following the start of the pandemic. This equated to a decrease of 32.61% in admissions between the two years (figure 1).

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Incidence of pleural infection per month. Pre-COVID: March 2019 to February 2020. Post-COVID: March 2020 to February 2021.

Patient demographics (age and sex distribution, infection setting (hospital-acquired versus community-acquired), immunosuppression and median RAPID score (renal, age, purulence, infection source, and dietary factors)) were similar in both groups with no statistically significant differences in the two time periods studied. The median interval between symptoms onset and hospital attendance was slightly longer in the post-COVID cohort (14 versus 10 days) but did not reach statistical significance (p=0.16). All patients had computed tomography scans and none of these showed evidence of co-existent COVID-19 pneumonia.

Analysis of pleural infection cases diagnosed during the influenza season (December, January and February) showed 46 out of 184 (25%) in the pre-COVID period, and 15 out of 124 (12.1%) cases during those 3 months in the post-COVID period. This difference was statistically significant (Chi-squared 7.765 (1 df, n=308), p=0.005).

Greater proportions of pleural fluid purulence (49 out of 124 (39.5%) versus 50 out of 184 (27.2%); p=0.04) and culture-positive infections (48 out of 124 (38.7%) versus 49 out of 184 (26.6%); p=0.03) were observed in the post-COVID period. The species of microorganisms isolated on pleural fluid culture were similar in both cohorts.

SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity was seen in nine out of 124 (7.25%) patients in the post-COVID cohort.

We present, to our knowledge, the first study examining the impact of COVID-19 on the incidence and profile of pleural infection. Epidemiological studies have suggested that the incidence has steadily increased year-on-year in the last decade [10–12]. In this representative sample of the UK population, covering five geographically diverse areas, our data demonstrate a 32.6% decrease in pleural infection in the year following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The higher proportion of purulent and microbiology-positive infections in the post-COVID cohort may have been a result of poorer access to prior antibiotics in the community [13].

The low rate of co-existent COVID-19 PCR positivity (7.25%) and the absence of radiological evidence of COVID-19 pneumonia in any of the pleural infection cases are in keeping with the literature, which suggests that empyema does not appear to be frequently associated with COVID-19 pneumonia [7].

Compared to previous influenza pandemics, it is noteworthy that during the COVID-19 peaks, antibiotics were used sparingly to cover secondary bacterial infections, and this may have helped prevent empyema complications.

The potential role of public health measures in reducing pleural infection incidence is intriguing and one that has not been specifically explored in the existing literature. It is highly likely that decreased social mixing, shielding of older, more vulnerable patients with additional comorbidity, often at increased risk of pleural infection, as well as social distancing measures have had, in combination, a beneficial impact.

There were some limitations to this study. Being retrospective, it is bound by the validity and bias limitations of such a study design. However, the regular prospective screening procedures in place as part of recruitment to the MIST-3 study and the prospective documentation of pleural infection cases through the weekly specialist MDT meetings at the participating centres are likely to have been more robust methods of capturing cases compared to hospital episode statistics or administrative databases. These data only capture patients admitted to hospital and therefore cannot exclude that a proportion of patients chose to be treated in the community to avoid catching COVID-19 in hospital. The impact of vaccinations remains unclear. It also remains to be seen whether pleural infection incidence will return to pre-pandemic levels as enforcement of public health measures is relaxed.

This study demonstrates a reduction in pleural infection incidence, by almost a third, following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Potential causes for lower rates of pleural infection may be secondary to reduced community transmission of viruses due to social distancing and use of personal protective equipment in both community and healthcare settings.

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

  • Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

  • Received May 3, 2022.
  • Accepted June 15, 2022.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2022
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0

References

  1. ↵
    1. Oster Y,
    2. Michael-Gayego A,
    3. Rivkin M, et al.
    Decreased prevalence rate of respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: possible role for public health containment measures? Clin Microbiol Infect 2020; 27: 811–812. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.007
    OpenUrl
    1. Parry MF,
    2. Shah AK,
    3. Sestovic M, et al.
    Precipitous fall in common respiratory viral infections during COVID-19. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020; 7: ofaa511. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofaa511
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Tan JY,
    2. Conceicao EP,
    3. Sim XYJ, et al.
    Public health measures during COVID-19 pandemic reduced hospital admissions for community respiratory viral infections. J Hosp Infect 2020; 106: 387–389. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2020.07.023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Angoulvant F,
    2. Ouldali N,
    3. Yang DD, et al.
    Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: impact caused by school closure and national lockdown on pediatric visits and admissions for viral and nonviral infections – a time series analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 72: 319–322. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa710
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Mozingo AE
    . The surgical treatment of empyema by a closed method. JAMA 1918; 71: 2062–2068. doi:10.1001/jama.1918.26020510008010a
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Arnold DT,
    2. Hamilton FW,
    3. Morris TT, et al.
    Epidemiology of pleural empyema in English hospitals and the impact of influenza. Eur Respir J 2021; 57: 2003546. doi:10.1183/13993003.03546-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Rathore SS,
    2. Hussain N,
    3. Manju AH, et al.
    Prevalence and clinical outcomes of pleural effusion in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2022; 94: 229–239. doi:10.1002/jmv.27301
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Davies HE,
    2. Davies RJO,
    3. Davies CWH
    . Management of pleural infection in adults: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax 2010; 65: Suppl. 2, ii41–ii53.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Rahman NM,
    2. Maskell NA,
    3. West A, et al.
    Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 518–526. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1012740
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Farjah F,
    2. Symons RG,
    3. Krishnadasan B, et al.
    Management of pleural space infections: a population-based analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133: 346–351. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.09.038
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bobbio A,
    2. Bouam S,
    3. Frenkiel J, et al.
    Epidemiology and prognostic factors of pleural empyema. Thorax 2021; 76: 1117–1123. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215267
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Mummadi SR,
    2. Stoller JK,
    3. Lopez R, et al.
    Epidemiology of adult pleural disease in the United States. Chest 2021; 160: 1534–1551. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.026
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Gray DP,
    2. Sidaway-Lee K,
    3. Harding A, et al.
    Reduction in face-to-face GP consultations. Br J Gen Pract 2020; 70: 328. doi:10.3399/bjgp20X710849
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 8 Issue 3 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 8 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pleural infection incidence: a UK multicentre retrospective analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pleural infection incidence: a UK multicentre retrospective analysis
Eihab O. Bedawi, Khalil Ur Rehman, Deepan P. Sivakumar, Katie Ferguson, Syed Ajmal, Emma Graham, Rakesh K. Panchal, John P. Corcoran, Kevin G. Blyth, Najib M. Rahman, Alex West
ERJ Open Research Jul 2022, 8 (3) 00206-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00206-2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pleural infection incidence: a UK multicentre retrospective analysis
Eihab O. Bedawi, Khalil Ur Rehman, Deepan P. Sivakumar, Katie Ferguson, Syed Ajmal, Emma Graham, Rakesh K. Panchal, John P. Corcoran, Kevin G. Blyth, Najib M. Rahman, Alex West
ERJ Open Research Jul 2022, 8 (3) 00206-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00206-2022
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • A 3D-engineered silicone stent
  • Obesity does not modify effect of CPAP on insulin resistance
  • Asthma prevalence and medication dispensation
Show more Research letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society