Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Prevalence and genetic basis of first-line drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ca Mau, Vietnam

Jack Callum, Phuong T.B. Nguyen, Elena Martinez, Van-Anh T. Nguyen, Frances Garden, Nhung V. Nguyen, Thu-Anh Nguyen, Hoa B. Nguyen, Son V. Nguyen, Khanh B. Luu, Jennifer Ho, Nguyen N. Linh, Warwick J. Britton, Vitali Sintchenko, Greg J. Fox, Guy B. Marks
ERJ Open Research 2022 8: 00122-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00122-2022
Jack Callum
1Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
2University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jack Callum
Phuong T.B. Nguyen
2University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
3Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Phuong T.B. Nguyen
Elena Martinez
3Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Van-Anh T. Nguyen
4National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frances Garden
5University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nhung V. Nguyen
6Vietnam National Lung Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
7National Tuberculosis Control Program, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thu-Anh Nguyen
2University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
3Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hoa B. Nguyen
6Vietnam National Lung Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
7National Tuberculosis Control Program, Hanoi, Vietnam
8International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Son V. Nguyen
7National Tuberculosis Control Program, Hanoi, Vietnam
9Center for Social Disease Control, Ca Mau, Vietnam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Khanh B. Luu
3Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Ho
3Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
5University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
10Cairns Base Hospital, Cairns, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nguyen N. Linh
11Global Tuberculosis Program, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Warwick J. Britton
12Centenary Institute, Camperdown, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vitali Sintchenko
5University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Greg J. Fox
1Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
2University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
3Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guy B. Marks
3Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
5University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Guy B. Marks
  • For correspondence: g.marks@unsw.edu.au
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background and objective Data on the prevalence of anti-tuberculous drug resistance and its association with genetic mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis are limited. Our study explores the genomics of tuberculosis in Ca Mau, Vietnam.

Methods Patients ≥15 years in Ca Mau Province, Vietnam, were screened annually for tuberculosis between 2014 and 2017. Isolates underwent drug susceptibility testing (DST) using the breakpoint method. DNA was extracted and whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed.

Results We identified 365 positive sputum cultures for M. tuberculosis and processed 237 for DST and 265 for WGS. Resistance to isoniazid was present in 19.8% (95% CI 14.7 to 24.9%), rifampicin in 3.5% (1.1 to 5.7%) and ethambutol in 2.5% (0.9 to 5.4%) of isolates. Relevant mutations in rpoB gene were detected in 3.8% (1.8 to 6.8%). katG, inhA or fabG1 mutations were found in 19.6% (15.0 to 24.9%) with KatG being most common at 12.8% (9.1–17.5%). We found 38.4% of isolates were of Beijing lineage, 49.4% East-African-Indian lineage and 8.4% European-American lineage. There were no associations between resistance profiles and clinical features.

Conclusion The high burden of isoniazid resistance and the katG mutation highlights the challenges facing Vietnam in its efforts to achieve its EndTB goals.

Abstract

365 samples of Mycobacterium tuberculosis were collected in Ca Mau, Vietnam. 19.8% were phenotypically resistant to isoniazid. katG was the most common resistance mutation found in 12.8% of samples. rpoB mutations were found in 3.8% of samples. https://bit.ly/3axcaOE

Introduction

Drug-resistance remains a significant barrier to managing tuberculosis (TB) globally. During 2020, 132 222 people were diagnosed with multi-drug resistant (MDR) or rifampicin resistant (RR) TB. Additionally, there were 25 681 new diagnoses of extended drug resistance (XDR) or pre-XDR-TB [1]. Only one in three of these patients with MDR/RR-TB accessed treatment [1]. Vietnam is one of ten countries that make up 70% of the estimated new cases MDR/RR-TB not enrolled in treatment [1]. A better understanding of the approaches to preventing and treating drug-resistant TB is key to reducing deaths and severe sequelae of TB.

One of the major impediments to a better understanding of the epidemiology of drug-resistant TB has been the lack of valid population data on the incidence and prevalence of the problem. In most high burden settings, mycobacterial culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST), is not routinely performed [1]. Hence, most people with drug resistant TB are not identified until treatment failure occurs.

Most of what is known about drug resistance in high burden settings comes from drug-resistance surveys, conducted among diagnosed TB cases [2]. However, these are often limited to specialised settings that are not representative of the general population. Furthermore, many people with TB lack typical symptoms or, if they do have symptoms, are never diagnosed with TB [3]. Hence, when drug-resistance prevalence surveys are limited to passively detected cases, that is, symptomatic patients who present for diagnosis and management, they may not reflect the population prevalence of drug resistance.

The identification of genetic mutations that are associated with phenotypic drug resistance has opened up new opportunities for early and simple diagnosis of drug resistance [4–6] and also insights into the mechanisms of drug resistance [7]. However, it has also raised questions about the interpretation of discordances between genotypic and phenotypic drug resistance.

The implementation of a four year population-wide active case finding survey for tuberculosis in Ca Mau Province of Vietnam [8], in which patients were screened for TB regardless of the presence of symptoms, provided the opportunity to define the population prevalence of and relationship between phenotypic and genotypic resistance to first-line anti-tuberculous drugs in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates co-circulating in the general community in this region of southern Vietnam. Secondary objectives were to assess the association of drug resistance with M. tuberculosis lineages and to examine whether any routinely available demographic or clinical features in the patients were associated with isoniazid resistance.

Methods

Study population and setting

Ca Mau is the southern-most province of Vietnam with a population of 1 194 476 on the 2019 census [9]. Sitting on the peninsula of the Mekong Delta Region it has a tropical climate distinguished by a wet monsoon season from May to August, and a dry season from September to April [10]. The incidence of TB in Vietnam is 170 000 per year with 5500 occurring in HIV positive patients among a total of ∼250 000 HIV positive Vietnamese patients [11, 12].

Study design

We conducted a cluster randomised trial of active case finding for TB (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number ACTRN12614000372684) between March 2014 and February 2018. It has been described in detail elsewhere [8].

The cluster sampling unit was the sub-commune, which had an average population of 1000 persons 15 years of age or older. In 60 randomly selected clusters active case finding for TB was conducted annually for three years (intervention group). In another 60 randomly selected clusters (control group) no active case finding was conducted. In the fourth year of the trial a prevalence survey for TB was performed in both the intervention and control groups. The intervention included a household census of the cluster, followed by active screening of all consenting household members aged 15 years and over. The screening consisted of a questionnaire about symptoms (cough, production of sputum and presence of haemoptysis), smoking status and basic demographic data and a request to provide a single, spontaneously expectorated sputum sample. Sputum samples were transferred to a central (provincial) laboratory and tested using the Xpert MTB/RIF platform (Cepheid). Those who were Xpert MTB positive were asked to provide two further sputum specimens for mycobacterial culture and undergo a chest x-ray. In addition, in the fourth year, all participants were offered a chest x-ray and those with abnormalities suggestive of TB were requested to provide a single, spontaneously expectorated sputum sample for mycobacterial culture.

Participants who were Xpert MTB positive were also asked to complete a detailed clinical questionnaire collecting information on: symptoms, history of previous TB and treatment for TB and their self-reported history of diabetes.

Mycobacterial culture and identification of M. tuberculosis

Sputum specimens for mycobacterial culture were transferred, by cold chain, to a regional reference laboratory approximately four hours by car from field sites.

Specimens were processed with N-acetylcysteine and sodium hydroxide, followed by centrifugation. All processing sputum specimens were cultured in the liquid medium (BACTEC mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) 960 culture) and solid medium (BD BBL TM Prepared Lowenstein-Jensen Media). Cultures were incubated for up to 8 weeks. If the liquid cultures were positive, MPT64 antigen testing were performed to confirm the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. In cases with multiple positive cultures only the first culture was included in the analysis.

Phenotypic drug resistance testing

M. tuberculosis MGIT or LJ cultures were sent from the regional reference laboratory to the TB laboratory at the National Institute for Hygiene and Epidemiology for phenotypic DST. MGIT cultures were decontaminated by 1% NaOH (2 mL culture+2 mL 2% NaOH) then subcultured on LJ medium for 3–4 weeks. For LJ cultures, 1–2 colonies of M. tuberculosis were picked up and subcultured on LJ medium for 3–4 weeks. In case of contamination, repeat subcultures were performed from original cultures after decontamination with 2% NaOH according to standardised procedures.

The phenotypic DST for first-line agents was performed on purified and confirmed M. tuberculosis colonies using proportional agar microplate assay as described previously. This was the standard method in the reference laboratory [13]. Critical concentrations (breakpoints) were isoniazid 0.2 μg·mL−1, rifampicin 1 µg·mL−1 and ethambutol 5 μg·mL−1.

Extraction of mycobacterial DNA

M. tuberculosis colonies no more than 4 weeks old in subcultures were harvested in TE buffer (in cryovials) and inactivated at 80°C for 30 mins then kept at −80°C until they were sent for DNA extraction and whole genome sequencing (WGS).

All procedures of subcultures, DST and bacterial cell harvest/inactivation were conducted in BSL-3 laboratories.

Whole genome sequencing

Genomic DNA from 50–100 µL of subcultures were extracted as described before [14]. Libraries were constructed using Nextera XT DNA extraction kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Genome sequencing was performed on the NextSeq500 (Illumina) at the Center for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, New South Wales Health Pathology in Sydney, Australia. Fastq were processed through an established pipeline whilst contamination screening and organism identification were performed using Centrifuge v1.0.4 with trimming of reads by Trimmomatic v0.38.

Mykrobe predictor was used to assign phylogenetic lineages using lineage-informative single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (https://github.com/Mykrobe-tools/mykrobe) [15–17].

Identification of resistance-associated SNPs

Sequencing reads were mapped to the reference genome H37Rv (Genbank NC_000962) using the RedDog pipeline (https://github.com/katholt/RedDog) [18]. An initial phylogenetic tree was inferred using FastTree v2.1.8. Variant calling was performed using Snippy version 3.1 and in-house scripts use to filter mutations associated with drug resistance as per CRyPTIC database (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy) [19, 20]. Indels were detected from RedDog output and in-house scripts.

Statistical analysis

First, we report the prevalence of phenotypic drug resistance and of drug resistance conferring mutations, with 95% binomial confidence intervals. Then, we report on the prevalence of the major M. tuberculosis lineages and their association with drug resistance. The observed associations and significance were tested using a logistic regression model. Finally, we examined the predictive value of demographic and clinical characteristics for the most common form of drug resistance, isoniazid resistance, using logistic regression models.

Analysis was conducted using STATA 16.1.

Ethics

The protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Sydney (Ref: 2013/73) on 9 April 2013. The protocol was also approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Lung Hospital, Vietnam Ministry of Health (Ref: 407/QD-BVPTU) on 29 August 2013. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Results

There were 365 participants with one or more positive cultures for M. tuberculosis over the four years of the study. There were 12 participants who had more than one occurrence of a positive culture. Mycobacterial DNA was extracted for WGS from the cultures for 265 participants (73%). Of these, 237 participants (89%) had phenotypic DST performed (figure 1).

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Study flowchart. The first positive culture for a participant was included in the study if a positive culture was obtained on more than one occurrence. WGS: whole genome sequencing; DST: drug susceptibility testing.

Most M. tuberculosis positive cultures were from male participants (83.8%) and the mean age was 52.9 years (sd=15.4). Over half (53.9%) were current smokers, 8.8% had diabetes, and 12.2% of participants had a history of previous TB. Fever and night sweats within the last two weeks were reported in 27.2% and 24.4% of participants respectively (table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants

Phenotypic drug resistance shown higher levels of resistance to isoniazid compared with the other first line drugs (table 2), with a total of 19.8% (95%CI: 14.7, 24.9%). There were seven participants (3.0%, 95%CI: 1.2, 6.0%) with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis and one with rifampicin mono-resistance. Testing numbers were lower for DST because of misplaced samples.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Prevalence of drug resistance and resistance mutations in Ca Mau, Vietnam

From a total of 265 isolates sequenced, we found 88 isolates (33.2%, 95% CI 27.5, 38.9%) had an identifiable drug resistance mutation (table 2). There were 10 cases with a rpoB mutation. Two of these did not have phenotypic DST performed. Seven of remaining eight cases with rifampicin-resistance mutations in the rpoB gene demonstrated phenotypic resistance. One case was reported as susceptible by phenotypic DST. In this case, the rpoB mutation was L430P, which has been reported to be associated with lower MIC values [21].

There were 40 cases of isoniazid monoresistance. Several patients with fabG1 (5 of 18), inhA (2 of 2) and katG (2 of 31) mutations were phenotypically susceptible to isoniazid (using a breakpoint of 0.2 μg·mL−1). One isolate expressed a mutation associated with fluoroquinolone resistance (A90V mutation in gyrA gene) with no other resistance conferring mutations were identified. The complete list of mutations/substitutions and their corresponding phenotypic resistance patterns can be seen in table 3. No other resistance-associated mutations were detected beyond those listed in table 3. Phenotypic resistance with no detectable mutation was found in 2/46 INH resistant cultures, 0/8 RIF resistant cultures, and 1/6 ethambutol resistant cultures. One INH resistant sample did not have WGS performed.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Full list of genetic mutations/substitutions and their corresponding phenotypic resistance profiles

There were 106 isolates identified as Beijing lineage, 130 as EAI lineage and 23 European-American lineage. Six did not have lineage identified. The prevalence of isoniazid resistance was significantly related to lineage (table 4) and was higher among those with Beijing lineage isolates. All seven cases of MDR-TB were in Beijing strains.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Phylogenetic lineage as a predictor of resistance

Finally, there was no statistically significant relationship between isoniazid resistance and gender, smoking status, cough, haemoptysis, fever, night sweats, weight loss or smear positivity (table 5).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 5

The relationship between clinical features and phenotypic isoniazid resistance

Discussion

This study has demonstrated a high prevalence of isoniazid resistance and a low prevalence of other drug resistance among screen-detected cases of TB in the rural province of Ca Mau, Vietnam. The dominant genes in which mutations are associated with isoniazid resistance in this population are katG and fabG1, with only a small number of isoniazid resistant cases associated with inhA mutations. While the EAI strain is the dominant lineage in Ca Mau, the Beijing strain is common and is strongly associated with anti-tuberculous drug resistance. We did not find any clinical or demographic predictors of drug resistance in this study population though this may reflect limitations of the questionnaire style of data collection.

The high prevalence of isoniazid resistance in this study population is consistent with other reports from Vietnam. Previous studies in southern Vietnam have demonstrated a similar prevalence of isoniazid resistance of 16.6% and rifampicin resistance of 2.0% [22]. While much higher rates of resistance have been reported, this has been in selected populations. For example, one study conducted on isolates drawn from central reference hospitals reported that 58% of patients had isoniazid resistance and 39% had rifampicin resistance [23]. The reported prevalence of drug resistance across all of Vietnam ranges from 22.4% to 39.6% for isoniazid and 4.9% to 24.5% for rifampicin [23–25]. The prevalence of drug resistance is influenced by the breakpoint used for defining resistance. In this study we defined rifampicin resistance using a breakpoint of 1 μg·mL−1. However, the latest WHO guidelines have recommended lowering the 7H10 and MGIT breakpoints (critical concentrations) to 0.5 μg·mL−1. This may have led to an under-estimation of rifampicin resistance (and MDR-TB) in the study population [26].

Our findings in relation to the prevalence of mutations conferring drug resistance were also broadly consistent with previous reports which have shown that the katG mutation is predominant among isolates with isoniazid resistance [27–29]. Compared to katG mutations there was a low prevalence of inhA mutations among the isoniazid resistant isolates in this study population [30]. However, we did find a relatively high prevalence of mutations in fabG1 which, similar to inhA, encodes an enzyme in the FAS II process inhibited by isoniazid [31]. The clinical importance of katG mutation predominance among the isoniazid resistant isolates is that, unlike inhA & fabG1, it often confers a high level of resistance which cannot be overcome with high-dose Isoniazid [32, 33].

In contrast to our finding in this southern, rural province of Ca Mau, a study in Hanoi, a large urban centre in the north, reported that Beijing strain is the dominant lineage with a prevalence of 56.6% compared to EAI of 24.7% [34]. Previous studies in Vietnam have found the Beijing strain to be more common in young females and patients previously treated for TB [35] Our finding that Beijing strain was strongly associated with drug resistance is consistent with several previous observations that have reported a link with fluoroquinolone resistance, increased multidrug-resistance and increased relapse rates [36–38].

We found that many isolates with mutations in the genes associated with isoniazid resistance (inhA and fabG1) did not demonstrate phenotypic resistance to isoniazid. It is possible that the critical concentration (breakpoint) for determining isoniazid resistance in the phenotypic DST was too high to detect the low-level resistance associated with these mutations [39, 40]. It is worth noting that two of the samples that were phenotypically susceptible to isoniazid but had fabG1 mutations where the SNP was in the −8 position. Our experience has been that phenotypic isoniazid resistance associated with this mutation is only observed when the broth microdilution method is used [41]. In contrast, to these findings with inhA and fabG1, most isolates that demonstrated katG mutations did demonstrate phenotypic isoniazid resistance consistent with its association with high level isoniazid resistance [33]. The high specificity of the katG gene mutation for isoniazid resistance along with the high prevalence of isoniazid resistance in the general population supports its inclusion in rapid molecular tests that are used for screening for resistance [42]. This also supports the current Vietnam national TB protocol regimen for the inclusion of three drug therapy in the continuation phase to avoid acquired MDR-TB [43].

We did not find any correlations between clinical features and isoniazid resistance. This is consistent with the findings of other investigators who have found a relationship with previous history of TB, but not with presenting clinical symptoms [44]. It remains possible that other clinical characteristics, not measured here, might be predictive of isoniazid resistance. However, in general, our findings reinforce the importance of molecular strategies for rapid identification of drug resistance in people with TB.

This study has several strengths. The setting within a population-wide active case finding program, in which participants provided sputum for testing regardless of symptoms, means that the data can be considered representative of the general population. The low proportion of women among the cases, reflects the low prevalence of TB among women in Vietnam [45, 46]. The major limitation was the incompleteness of WGS and DST testing of the available cases. We assume that missing samples were missing a random. Another weakness was the lack of DST for pyrazinamide so that phenotypic resistance to this drug could not be assessed.

In conclusion, this population-based study has shown results consistent with previous, less representative studies in Vietnam: a high prevalence of isoniazid resistance that is strongly associated with katG mutations and with Beijing lineage. In the context of the rapid progress in development of molecular tests for selecting anti-tuberculous drug regimens, data on the association between phenotypic resistance and genetic mutations, particularly in unselected, community-based study populations such as this, should be helpful in designing future testing strategies.

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants and staff involved in the ACT3 study.

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

  • Conflicts of interest: W.J. Britton advises that support for the present manuscript has been received from National Health & Medical Research Council; grants or contracts outside the submitted work have been received from Australian Medical Research Future Fund and Perpetual Trustees, Australia; support for attending meetings and/or travel outside the submitted work received from Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Collaboration for TB Vaccine Development; leadership or fiduciary roles in other board, society, committee or advocacy group for the Board of Trustees, The Leprosy Mission International, disclosure made outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

  • Support statement: The study was supported by the Australian NHMRC Project grant for ACT3 (1045236) and the NHMRC Centres of Research Excellence in TB Control (1134949 and 1153493).

  • Received April 3, 2022.
  • Accepted May 31, 2022.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2022
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . Global Tuberculosis Report 2021. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2021. https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2021
  2. ↵
    1. Dean AS,
    2. Cox H,
    3. Zignol M
    . Epidemiology of drug-resistant tuberculosis. In: Gagneux S, ed. Strain Variation in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex: its Role in Biology, Epidemiology and Control. Cham, Springer, 2017; pp. 209–220. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64371-7_11
  3. ↵
    1. Boardman NJ,
    2. Moore T,
    3. Freiman J, et al.
    Pulmonary tuberculosis disease among immigrant detainees: rapid disease detection, high prevalence of asymptomatic disease and implications for tuberculosis prevention. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 73: 115–120. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa434
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Farhat MR,
    2. Shapiro BJ,
    3. Kieser KJ, et al.
    Genomic analysis identifies targets of convergent positive selection in drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 1183–1189. doi:10.1038/ng.2747
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jones R,
    2. Velasco MS,
    3. Harris LG, et al.
    Resolving a clinical tuberculosis outbreak using palaeogenomic genome reconstruction methodologies. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2019; 119: 101865. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2019.101865
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Mekonnen D,
    2. Derbie A,
    3. Chanie A, et al.
    Molecular epidemiology of M. tuberculosis in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2019; 118: 101858. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2019.101858
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Papaventsis D,
    2. Casali N,
    3. Kontsevaya I, et al.
    Whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for detection of drug resistance: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017; 23: 61–68. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2016.09.008
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Marks GB,
    2. Nguyen NV,
    3. Nguyen PT, et al.
    Community-wide screening for tuberculosis in a high-prevalence setting. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 1347–1357. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1902129
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    UNFPA, GSO. Results: The Viet Nam Population and Housing Census of 00:00 hours on 1 April 2019. Ha Noi, Statistical Publishing House, 2020; p. 159.
  9. ↵
    1. WorldBank
    . Report on Environmental and Social Impact Assessment. People's Committee of Ca Mau Province, 2019; p. 86. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/ru/660481568009638284/pdf/Environmental-and-Social-Impact-Assessment-for-Ca-Mau-Province.pdf
  10. ↵
    UNAIDS. Country factsheets - Viet Nam 2021. www.unaids.org/en/regionscountries/countries/vietnam
  11. ↵
    World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2020. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013131
  12. ↵
    1. Nguyen V,
    2. Nguyen H,
    3. Vu T, et al.
    Reduced turn-around time for Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing with a proportional agar microplate assay. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015; 21: 1084–1092. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2015.08.024
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Votintseva AA,
    2. Pankhurst LJ,
    3. Anson LW, et al.
    Mycobacterial DNA extraction for whole-genome sequencing from early positive liquid (MGIT) cultures. J Clin Microbiol 2015; 53: 1137–1143. doi:10.1128/JCM.03073-14
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Schleusener V,
    2. Köser CU,
    3. Beckert P, et al.
    Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance prediction and lineage classification from genome sequencing: comparison of automated analysis tools. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 1–9. doi:10.1038/srep46327
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hunt M,
    2. Bradley P,
    3. Lapierre SG, et al.
    Antibiotic resistance prediction for Mycobacterium tuberculosis from genome sequence data with Mykrobe. Wellcome Open Res 2019; 4: 191doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15603.1
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    mykrobe. https://github.com/Mykrobe-tools/mykrobe Date last updated: 25 June 2021.
  16. ↵
    RedDog. https://github.com/katholt/RedDog Date last updated 19 Feburary 2021.
  17. ↵
    Snippy. https://github.com/tseemann/snippy Date last updated: 4 August 2020.
  18. ↵
    1. Allix-Béguec C,
    2. Arandjelovic I, et al.
    1. CRyPTIC Consortium and the 100,000 Genomes Project
    , Allix-Béguec C, Arandjelovic I, et al. Prediction of susceptibility to first-line tuberculosis drugs by DNA sequencing. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 1403–1415. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1800474
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Miotto P,
    2. Cabibbe AM,
    3. Borroni E, et al.
    Role of disputed mutations in the rpoB gene in interpretation of automated liquid MGIT culture results for rifampin susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 2018; 56: e01599-17. doi:10.1128/JCM.01599-17
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Huong NT,
    2. Lan NT,
    3. Cobelens FG, et al.
    Antituberculosis drug resistance in the south of Vietnam: prevalence and trends. J Infect Dis 2006; 194: 1226–1232. doi:10.1086/507906
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Bañuls A-L,
    2. Tran THT,
    3. Pham KLT, et al.
    Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineages and anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in reference hospitals across Viet Nam. BMC Microbiol 2016; 16: 1–9. doi:10.1186/s12866-015-0617-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Le Hang NT,
    2. Maeda S,
    3. Lien LT, et al.
    Primary drug-resistant tuberculosis in Hanoi, Viet Nam: present status and risk factors. PloS one 2013; 8: e71867. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071867
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Nhung N,
    2. Hoa N,
    3. Sy D, et al.
    The fourth national anti-tuberculosis drug resistance survey in Viet Nam. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2015; 19: 670–675. doi:10.5588/ijtld.14.0785
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    World Health Organization. Technical report on critical concentrations for drug susceptibility testing of isoniazid and the rifamycins (rifampicin, rifabutin and rifapentine). Geneva, World Health Organization, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240017283
  24. ↵
    1. Mai TQ,
    2. Van Anh NT,
    3. Hien NT, et al.
    Drug resistance and Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain diversity in TB/HIV co-infected patients in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2017; 10: 154–160. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2017.07.003
    OpenUrl
    1. Holt KE,
    2. McAdam P,
    3. Thai PVK, et al.
    Frequent transmission of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing lineage and positive selection for the EsxW Beijing variant in Vietnam. Nat Genet 2018; 50: 849–856. doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0117-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Huyen MN,
    2. Cobelens FG,
    3. Buu TN, et al.
    Epidemiology of isoniazid resistance mutations and their effect on tuberculosis treatment outcomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57: 3620–3627. doi:10.1128/AAC.00077-13
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Dean AS,
    2. Zignol M,
    3. Cabibbe AM, et al.
    Prevalence and genetic profiles of isoniazid resistance in tuberculosis patients: a multicountry analysis of cross-sectional data. PLoS Med 2020; 17: e1003008. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003008
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Takayama K,
    2. Wang C,
    3. Besra GS
    . Pathway to synthesis and processing of mycolic acids in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005; 18: 81–101. doi:10.1128/CMR.18.1.81-101.2005
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Banerjee A,
    2. Dubnau E,
    3. Quemard A, et al.
    inhA, a gene encoding a target for isoniazid and ethionamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 1994; 263: 227–230. doi:10.1126/science.8284673
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    World Health Organization. WHO treatment guidelines for isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis: supplement to the WHO treatment guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2018. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260494/9789241550079-eng.pdf
  30. ↵
    1. Maeda S,
    2. Hijikata M,
    3. Le Hang NT, et al.
    Genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis spreading in Hanoi, Vietnam using conventional and whole genome sequencing methods. Infect Genet Evol 2020; 78: 104107. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2019.104107
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Buu TN,
    2. Huyen M,
    3. Lan N, et al.
    The Beijing genotype is associated with young age and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in rural Vietnam. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2009; 13: 900–906.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Buu TN,
    2. Huyen MN,
    3. van Soolingen D, et al.
    The Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype does not affect tuberculosis treatment failure in Vietnam. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51: 879–886. doi:10.1086/656410
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. An DD,
    2. Duyen NTH,
    3. Lan NTN, et al.
    Beijing genotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is significantly associated with high-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Vietnam. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 4835–4839. doi:10.1128/AAC.00541-09
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Huyen MN,
    2. Buu TN,
    3. Tiemersma E, et al.
    Tuberculosis relapse in Vietnam is significantly associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype infections. J Infect Dis 2013; 207: 1516–1524. doi:10.1093/infdis/jit048
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Hall L,
    2. Jude KP,
    3. Clark SL, et al.
    Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex for first and second line drugs by broth dilution in a microtiter plate format. J Vis Exp 2011; 52: 3094.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Lee J,
    2. Armstrong DT,
    3. Ssengooba W, et al.
    Sensititre MYCOTB MIC plate for testing Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptibility to first-and second-line drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58: 11–18. doi:10.1128/AAC.01209-13
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Lam C,
    2. Martinez E,
    3. Crighton T, et al.
    Value of routine whole genome sequencing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance detection. Int J Infect Dis 2021; 113: Suppl. 1, S48–S54. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.033
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Cao Y,
    2. Parmar H,
    3. Gaur RL, et al.
    Xpert MTB/XDR: A ten-color reflex assay suitable for point of care settings to detect isoniazid-, fluoroquinolone-, and second line injectable drug-resistance directly from Mycobacterium tuberculosis positive sputum. bioRxiv 2020; preprint [https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.08.288787].
  38. ↵
    Vietnam Ministry of Health. Guidelines for TB diagnosis and treatment. Hanoi, Vietnam Ministry of Health, 2020.
  39. ↵
    1. Flores-Treviño S,
    2. Rodríguez-Noriega E,
    3. Garza-González E, et al.
    Clinical predictors of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Mexico. PloS one 2019; 14: e0220946. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220946
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Hoa NB,
    2. Sy DN,
    3. Nhung NV, et al.
    National survey of tuberculosis prevalence in Viet Nam. Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88: 273–280. doi:10.2471/BLT.09.067801
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Nguyen HV,
    2. Tiemersma EW,
    3. Nguyen HB, et al.
    The second national tuberculosis prevalence survey in Vietnam. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0232142.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 8 Issue 4 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 8 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prevalence and genetic basis of first-line drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ca Mau, Vietnam
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Prevalence and genetic basis of first-line drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ca Mau, Vietnam
Jack Callum, Phuong T.B. Nguyen, Elena Martinez, Van-Anh T. Nguyen, Frances Garden, Nhung V. Nguyen, Thu-Anh Nguyen, Hoa B. Nguyen, Son V. Nguyen, Khanh B. Luu, Jennifer Ho, Nguyen N. Linh, Warwick J. Britton, Vitali Sintchenko, Greg J. Fox, Guy B. Marks
ERJ Open Research Oct 2022, 8 (4) 00122-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00122-2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prevalence and genetic basis of first-line drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ca Mau, Vietnam
Jack Callum, Phuong T.B. Nguyen, Elena Martinez, Van-Anh T. Nguyen, Frances Garden, Nhung V. Nguyen, Thu-Anh Nguyen, Hoa B. Nguyen, Son V. Nguyen, Khanh B. Luu, Jennifer Ho, Nguyen N. Linh, Warwick J. Britton, Vitali Sintchenko, Greg J. Fox, Guy B. Marks
ERJ Open Research Oct 2022, 8 (4) 00122-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00122-2022
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Original research articles

  • Awake prone position in COVID-19 acute respiratory failure
  • Time constant of the pulmonary circulation in CTEPH
  • Prognostic role of echocardiography in acute PE
Show more Original research articles

Tuberculosis

  • Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Finland
  • IGRA screening in biologics
Show more Tuberculosis

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society