Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Molecular assessment of mycobacterial burden in the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial disease

Huw C. Ellis, Miriam F. Moffatt, Colin Churchward, Leah Cuthbertson, William O.C. Cookson, Michael R. Loebinger
ERJ Open Research 2023 9: 00435-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00435-2022
Huw C. Ellis
1Host Defence Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
2Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Huw C. Ellis
Miriam F. Moffatt
2Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colin Churchward
2Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leah Cuthbertson
2Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Leah Cuthbertson
William O.C. Cookson
2Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael R. Loebinger
1Host Defence Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
2Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m.loebinger@rbht.nhs.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Nontuberculous pulmonary disease causes significant morbidity and mortality. Efforts to tackle infections are hampered by the lack of reliable biomarkers for diagnosis, assessment and prognostication. The aim of this study was to develop molecular assays capable of identifying and quantifying multiple nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) species and to examine their utility in following individual patients’ clinical courses.

Methods DNA was extracted from 410 sputum samples obtained longitudinally from a cohort of 38 patients who were commencing treatment for either Mycobacterium abscessus or Mycobacterium avium complex or who were patients with bronchiectasis who had never had positive cultures for mycobacteria. NTM quantification was performed with quantitative PCR assays developed in-house.

Results The molecular assays had high in vitro sensitivity and specificity for the detection and accurate quantification of NTM species. The assays successfully identified NTM DNA from human sputum samples (in vivo sensitivity: 0.86–0.87%; specificity: 0.62–0.95%; area under the curve: 0.74–0.92). A notable association between NTM copy number and treatment (Friedman ANOVA (df)=22.8 (3), p≤0.01 for M. abscessus treatment group) was also demonstrated.

Conclusion The quantitative PCR assays developed in this study provide affordable, real-time and rapid measurement of NTM burden, with significant implications for prompt management decisions.

Abstract

Molecular assays have been developed that are capable of quantifying NTM DNA in sputum. The assays were applied to 410 samples obtained from a cohort including patients on NTM treatment. The assays provide a fast and accurate measure of molecular burden. https://bit.ly/3TwmNmG

Introduction

Nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) pulmonary infection is increasing in prevalence throughout the world [1–3] and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality [4–6]. Mycobacteria are ubiquitous in the environment and their impact on individual patients is heterogeneous. Determining when and if to treat patients can be difficult. This is compounded by the fact that treatment involves multiple antibiotics over many months with disappointing success rates. Efforts to tackle infections in NTM are hampered by a lack of reliable biomarkers for diagnosis, assessment of disease activity and prognostication [7]. Consequently, decisions are currently based on mycobacterial culture results. Mycobacteria, however, are slow growing and significantly can take up to 8 weeks to culture. Data-backed treatment decisions are therefore not timely and are based on out-of-date information. In addition, culture-based results have significant issues with sensitivity owing to high false negative rates [8].

Culture-independent tests based on direct DNA detection have the potential to significantly improve the current situation. Previous studies using DNA-based approaches to directly detect and identify NTM species without the need for culture from respiratory studies have, however, provided disappointing results. The reported sensitivities are low, with NTM detected in only 29–76% of culture-positive samples [9–11]. In addition, these results continue to provide binary information with regards to the presence of mycobacteria. No techniques have been developed to accurately quantify NTM burden. To provide real-time data for the latter would enable more accurate assessment of the impact of treatment on the clinical state and subsequent treatment management decisions.

This study describes the development of a quantifiable molecular test for the six most commonly pathogenic NTM species in the UK and the longitudinal application of the assays targeting Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and M. abscessus in a patient cohort over a period of 18 months.

Methods

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained through the North West – Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee (reference 16/NW/0849).

Recruitment

A total of 38 patients with either cystic fibrosis (CF) or non-CF bronchiectasis were recruited to the study. Patients were assigned to one of three separate groups based on the following inclusion and exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients due to start treatment for M. abscessus complex or MAC (termed “M. abscessus treatment” and “M. avium treatment”, respectively).

  2. Patients with positive cultures for M. abscessus or MAC on more than one occasion but who were treatment naïve (termed “M. abscessus control” and “M. avium control”, respectively).

  3. Patients with bronchiectasis (CF and non-CF) who had never had positive cultures for mycobacteria (termed “control”).

Patients were reviewed on a monthly basis to monitor treatment compliance.

Sample collection

Patients requiring treatment provided a sputum sample at screening, then on a weekly basis for the first month, then monthly samples up to and including 12 months with final samples at 15 months and 18 months. M. abscessus control, M. avium control and control patients provided a sputum sample at screening, then on a weekly basis for the first month followed by monthly samples up to and including at 3 months.

Initial screening sputum samples (for participants in the treatment groups, these samples were obtained before treatment commenced) were divided with a sterile scalpel blade into four. One aliquot was sent immediately for mycobacterial culture and one sample frozen immediately at −80°C. The two other samples were kept at room temperature for 24 h before being sent for culture or being frozen at −80°C. A 24-h freezing delay was performed to account for changes in microbiological communities that may occur between sputum expectoration and receipt of future samples (subsequent sputum samples were sent to the laboratory via first class postal delivery). All sputum samples were obtained spontaneously.

Upon receipt of subsequent samples, these were again divided into two aliquots with one aliquot sent for mycobacterial culture and the other frozen at −80°C.

Stored sputum samples were thawed prior to DNA extraction. Details of DNA extraction can be found in the supplementary methods.

Assay development

Owing to its relatively large interspecies variability and its preservation between isolates of the same species, the hsp65 gene was selected as an assay target. Custom primers and probes (table 1) for the detection and quantification of the six most commonly pathogenic mycobacteria were designed in-house. The probes were tested in singleplex and multiplex. A series of pilot experiments was performed which demonstrated that the probes had a greater limit of detection when used in singleplex. NTM quantification was subsequently performed in singleplex. For details of primer and probe design, including sensitivity, specificity and level of quantitation feasible, please see the supplementary methods.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Custom designed primers and probes used for identification and quantification of six nontuberculous mycobacterium species

Quantitative PCR testing

DNA-extracted samples were diluted in a 1:50 ratio with PCR grade water. For each quantitative PCR (qPCR) reaction, 5 μL of diluted sample was combined with the assay. For quantification standards, 5 μL aliquots of serially diluted plasmids were used. Each standard and extracted sample was tested in triplicate to ensure reliability of results.

Each sample was tested in singleplex against probes targeting M. abscessus complex, M. avium and M. intracellulare (the latter two forming the MAC). Positive qPCR results required positivity in triplicate. Assay constituents as well as PCR cycling conditions are detailed in the supplementary methods.

Results

Clinical characteristics of the cohort

A total of 410 sputum samples were obtained from the 38 patients (table 2). Of these, 15 patients had recurrent isolates of MAC and eight of these patients (53.3%) were started on treatment. A further 18 patients had recurrent isolates of M. abscessus and 14 of them (77.8%) were started on treatment. MAC treatment regimens were based on guideline-based therapy with rifampicin, ethambutol and either clarithromycin or azithromycin. The treatment of M. abscessus was also based on guidelines with intravenous meropenem, amikacin and tigecycline and oral clarithromycin or azithromycin for the initiation phase [12–14]. The continuation phase was more varied owing to patient antibiotic intolerance as indicated in table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Clinical characteristics of the study cohort

Eight of the 14 patients who commenced treatment for M. abscessus were culture negative 12 months after initial culture conversion (figure 1). These patients were therefore deemed to be cured by British Thoracic Society (BTS) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria [12–14]. A total of 10 patients in the treatment group had positive cultures for more than one mycobacterial species, illustrating the frequency of mixed isolates and the inherent difficulty faced when selecting treatment regimes. Four of the eight patients who commenced treatment for MAC were culture negative 12 months after initial culture conversion (figure 1) and hence deemed to be cured by BTS and ATS criteria [12–14].

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Mycobacterial culture results by patient and time point. Blue squares indicate a negative culture result while orange indicate a positive result. The name inside the orange box is the nontuberculous mycobacterial species. Hashed boxes indicate that no sample was available for the patient. Time points 1 and 2 were the pre-initiation of treatment; 3–6 were weeks 1–4; 7–17 were months 2–12; 18 was month 15; and 19 was month 18. CF: cystic fibrosis; Bx: bronchiectasis; ABS: Mycobacterium abscessus; AVM: M. avium; INT: M. intracellulare; XEN: M. xenopi; FORT: M. fortuitum.

In the M. abscessus control and M. avium controls, all but one patient (patient 44) had a positive culture for the expected NTM species at a time point in the study period (figure 1). Individual NTM culture results, however, were inconsistent, with 28 of the 70 samples having negative cultures for NTM. All the patients recruited to the NTM culture-negative group (control) remained negative for the duration of the study. No patients in the control groups were maintained on prophylactic macrolides.

Impact of room temperature storage of samples

For each patient, screening sputum samples were taken prior to the commencement of treatment with subsequent samples being sent by patients to the laboratory via Royal Mail. To investigate the potential impact of the delay between sputum production and laboratory receipt and storage at −80°C, the screening sputum sample was aliquoted into two samples (see Methods, aliquots designated time point 1 and 2) and the NTM copy number (defined as the number of hsp65 gene copies identified by qPCR) was compared between the two time points.

For the M. abscessus culture-positive patients, increases in M. abscessus copy number between time points 1 and 2 were observed in 12 of the 18 patients but they were not statistically significant (t-test p=0.53) (figure 2a).

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Samples were derived from the same sputum sample but sample time point 2 incurred a 24 h time delay before processing. a) Mycobacterium abscessus copy number between time points 1 and 2. Mean±sd copy number at time point 1 was 1.39×109±4.44×109 copies·g−1 sputum and at time point 2 was 2.49×109±5.79×109 copies·g−1 sputum (p=0.53). b) M. avium complex (MAC) copy number between time points 1 and 2. Mean±sd copy number at time point 1 was 8.2×107±2.39×108 copies·g−1 sputum and at time point 2 was 2.32×108±7.8×108 copies·g−1 sputum (p=0.32).

For MAC culture-positive patients, eight of the 15 patients had an increase in MAC copy number between the two time points but again this was not statistically significant (t-test p=0.32) (figure 2b).

M. abscessus treatment group: quantitative assessment of mycobacterial burden

A total of 192 samples was obtained for the M. abscessus treatment cohort (n=14 patients). Of these, 46 of the samples were culture positive for M. abscessus. In addition, 11 samples were culture positive for M. avium, four samples were positive for M. intracellulare, two samples were positive for M. xenopi and one sample was positive for M. kansasii (figure 1).

For the M. abscessus treatment cohort, overall burden decreased significantly during antibiotic treatment (figures 3a and 4) (Friedman ANOVA (df): Fr=22.8 (3), p≤ 0.01) with significant differences between time points 1 and 3, time points 2 and 3 (p=0.02) and time points 2 and 4 (p=0.04) (Wilcoxon signed rank test). In contrast, for the M. abscessus control cohort the molecular load was more stable (Friedman ANOVA (df): Fr=2.2 (3), p=0.5) (supplementary figure S2).

FIGURE 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3

a) Custom assay with Mycobacterium abscessus probe used with samples from the M. abscessus treatment group. b) Patient culture results by time point are displayed below quantitative PCR data. Hashed boxes indicate unavailable samples. c) Interrupted treatment regimens relating to each sample time point and patient. Interruptions in treatment correlated with increased nontuberculous mycobacterial copy number. Only regimes that were interrupted are illustrated. ABS: Mycobacterium abscessus; INT: M. intracellulare; AVM: M. avium; XEN: M. xenopi; KAN: M. kansaii.

There was an association between qPCR results, negative culture and treatment adherence (figure 3a–c, respectively). Four patients experienced intolerable treatment side-effects (patients 2, 18, 23 and 35) and therefore had varying compliance. These four were the only patients who were culture and qPCR positive beyond time point 6 (1 month of treatment). For three of the patients, M. abscessus burden appeared to be resolved by implementation of an alternative oral antibiotic regime. For the fourth patient (patient 23), M. abscessus copy number increased beyond and remained greater than pretreatment levels at time point 6 and was only addressed by the reinstatement of an initiation therapy at time point 12.

MAC treatment group: quantitative assessment of mycobacterial load

For the MAC treatment cohort (M. avium treatment, n=8), a total of 117 samples were obtained. Of these, 24 were culture positive for M. avium, 12 for M. intracellulare and three for M. xenopi (figure 1).

For the majority of patients, treatment resulted in a reduction of MAC burden (figure 5). The effect demarcation was not as clear as that seen for the M. abscessus treatment cohort (figure 4), most likely due to the absence of an intravenous induction phase in the MAC cohort. The decrease in MAC copy number during treatment did not reach significance (Friedman ANOVA (df): Fr=3.75 (3), p=0.3) (figure 5).

FIGURE 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4

Individual patient results using the custom assay with a Mycobacterium abscessus probe used with samples from the M. abscessus treatment group.

FIGURE 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5

Individual patient results using the custom assay with a Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) probe used with samples from the MAC treatment group.

No decrease in MAC copy number was observed among the MAC control (untreated) group (Friedman ANOVA (df): Fr=3.01 (3), p=0.4) (supplementary figure S3).

For three of the patients (patients 1, 3 and 17) there were clear disparities between culture and molecular results, with the latter showing positive results despite the culture-based analysis being negative throughout the clinical course (figure 6b).

FIGURE 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6

a) Custom assay with a Mycobacterium abscessus probe used with samples from the M. abscessus treatment group. b) Patient culture results by time point are displayed below quantitative PCR data. Hashed boxes indicate unavailable samples. c) Interrupted treatment regimens relating to each sample time point and patient. Interruptions in treatment correlated with increased nontuberculous mycobacterial copy number. Only regimes that were interrupted are illustrated. XEN: M. xenopi; AVM: M. avium; INT: M. intracellulare.

Some association with clinical course and patient compliance was also observed. Three patients (patients 34, 38 and 39) experienced problems at various stages of treatment that resulted in the temporary cessation of treatment for a period of ≥2 months (figure 4). These points of treatment cessation were associated with peaks in MAC DNA copy number that in one patient (patient 39) were not replicated in culture analysis.

The control group: quantitative assessment of mycobacterial load

A total of 33 samples were available from the control cohort (n=5 patients). No samples were culture positive for NTM species (figure 1). No positive results were obtained when the samples were screened using the qPCR assay targeting M. abscessus.

For the MAC qPCR assay, positive results were obtained for samples from three patients (patients 42, 45 and 46). These results were not reciprocated by culture analysis. No significant difference was found in MAC copy number between time points (Friedman ANOVA (df): Fr=5.69 (3), p=0.13) (supplementary figure S4).

Concordance between culture and molecular results

Because diagnosis of NTM disease currently relies on culture of the pathological mycobacterial species [12, 13], we next examined the concordance between the mycobacterial culture (the reference standard) results and qPCR assay results (table 3 and supplementary results).

The custom qPCR assay for M. abscessus displayed excellent test characteristics, with a sensitivity of 0.87, specificity of 0.95, positive predictive value of 0.76 and negative predictive value of 0.98, resulting in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.923 (table 3 and supplementary figure S1a).

Owing to a significant lack of concordance between culture-based results and the qPCR assays targeting M. avium and M. intracellulare, the assays were combined to form a MAC qPCR assay, whereby MAC copy number was equal to the sum of the M. avium and M. intracellulare qPCR assays. This was performed to mitigate for misidentification of culture-based samples. It is important to note that culture samples were identified using a commercial test that is subject to misidentification of samples rather than whole genome sequencing. When combined, the assays showed 78% concordance with positive culture results with a test sensitivity of 0.86, specificity of 0.62, positive predictive value of 0.35 and a negative predictive value of 0.95, resulting in an AUC of 0.741 (table 3 and supplementary figure S1d).

Discussion

A diagnosis of NTM pulmonary disease and the subsequent monitoring of treatment rely upon culturing of the pathological bacteria. The shortfalls in this technique are demonstrated by the failure to culture the same NTM species in samples originating from the same sputum (patients 6 and 9, figure 1). This study describes the design of a custom qPCR assay and its application to a total of 410 samples from patients with treated and observed NTM pulmonary lung disease. The results demonstrate the potential clinical utility of this assay for monitoring and treatment assessments in these conditions.

The molecular assays described are of potential clinical value because they enable the provision of rapid and real-time biomarker data during the course of treatment, enabling clinicians to make treatment decisions with real-time data. Target NTM DNA demonstrated high copy numbers prior to initiation of treatment, with significant progressive reductions preceding culture conversion in several patients over the first time points. This was well demonstrated particularly in the M. abscessus-treated cohort, in which a reduction in molecular load provided evidence of initial treatment success. There was also some indication that DNA levels could be used to assess the need for or to establish the effectiveness of treatment changes. Several patients demonstrated increases in copy number accompanying interruption of treatments (figure 3c). This is illustrated in patient 18 who, after 8 months of antibiotic therapy, ceased nebulised amikacin therapy owing to shortness of breath. After the drug was held for 2 weeks the patient became culture and qPCR positive for M. abscessus. Similarly, patients 23 and 35 both showed recurrent isolates of M. abscessus during treatment following poor compliance. It may also be possible to use such data to determine the effectiveness of additional antibiotics to help patients with refractory disease. Presently treatment decisions are reliant on culture data that provide binary results and take many weeks to obtain. A longitudinal improvement in NTM copy number would serve to reassure clinicians of treatment efficacy when culture is persistently positive (see patient 6). Similarly the delay incurred by culture techniques may hinder patient improvement and may allow disease progression.

The treatment regimes of MAC differ significantly from M. abscessus not just in terms of differing antibiotics but also in that there is no initiation phase of treatment. Consequently, there is no initial rapid decline seen in MAC copy number. Instead MAC DNA copy numbers remain high often for several months before reducing. The slower replication rates associated with MAC in addition to the lack of an initiation phase could explain the difference in mycobacterial elimination.

In addition to providing rapid and quantitative data, there is evidence to suggest that the qPCR assays are also more sensitive than standard culture alone. Although there was generally good concordance between molecular and culture data, there were occasions in which negative culture results were accompanied by positive qPCR results. For samples taken from individuals undergoing treatment that exhibited this phenomenon, it could be postulated that the assay was detecting DNA from dead bacteria. However, the phenomenon was noted in samples not exposed to treatment. Samples from patient 6 at time points 1 and 2 (samples generated from the same divided sputum sample) demonstrated an incongruity between culture results (sample 1 was culture negative whereas sample 2 cultured M. abscessus). Molecular analyses of these samples were both qPCR positive for M. abscessus, demonstrating the potential for false negatives in culture-based techniques and suggesting that molecular techniques (once refined) will have better sensitivity than culture alone. Improved sensitivity is important with regards to decisions pertaining to the completion of treatment and culture conversion definitions. For example, patient 7 became culture negative after 1 week of anti-MAC treatment but was qPCR positive up until 10 months of treatment (time point 15) (figure 6). In these circumstances it is entirely possible that the patient's medication will have been stopped prematurely, a factor that is believed to be linked to relapse of disease and accounts for the successful eradication of MAC lung disease in only 60–80% of patients, with 20–40% failing to respond to treatment, and a significant proportion of successfully treated patients experiencing disease recurrence [15–18].

A further area of disparity between the culture and molecular data relates to multiple species detection by PCR. This is in line with previous data [19, 20], demonstrating that mycobacteria appear in communities rather than as individual isolates. Culture methods carry an inherent bias in favour of the reporting of fast growers whereas molecular methods, without the need for culture, would have less bias in this respect.

This study also looked at the impact of delays on NTM burden within sputum samples before their arrival at the laboratory for processing. This is currently extremely important with the huge increase in remote consultation and management, with many patients sending sputum samples via post. To control for samples incurring a delay while they are sent to the laboratory, screening samples were divided, with one sample undergoing a 24-h delay in freezing. Molecular analysis of NTM copy number between these samples showed no significant changes, indicating robustness of the assay with regard to sputum samples that cannot immediately be frozen. The impact of delayed freezing of sputum samples on culture-independent microbiological analyses has previously been investigated, with a significant decrease in the abundance of anaerobes seen at 12 h [21]. NTM are, however, aerobic bacteria with notoriously slow growth rates, which may account for the differences between the current study and the previous study.

Mycobacterial culture results for the control group revealed that all patients remained culture negative for the duration of the study. Three of the five patients, however, showed qPCR-positive results for MAC. This is likely attributable to the high failure rate associated with traditional culture techniques, which results in it having its own high false negative rate [22]. This study has demonstrated that culture techniques provide false negative results (see patient 6, samples 1 and 2) while other studies have shown histological evidence of NTM infection in asymptomatic patients with predisposing conditions [23].

There are some limitations of this study. For example, there were a few instances of false negatives in the presence of a positive sputum culture, suggesting some optimisation of the molecular tests may be needed going forward. In addition, because recruitment was only via one referral centre, the study size is small. Nevertheless, this study has significant strengths, including the development of an assay to enable rapid screening of sputum samples, and the high-frequency sputum sample testing conducted within the study that has provided insights into and a much better temporal understanding of the mycobacterial response to antibiotics.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Individual probe characteristics based on sputum sample culture-based results

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

  • Conflict of interest: M.R. Loebinger reports the following relationships outside the submitted work: consulting fees received from Insmed, Savara, Parion, Armata, Chiesi, Zambon and Astra Zeneca; lecture fees received from Grifols and Insmed; Infection Group Chair for the European Respiratory Society. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

  • Support statement: H.C. Ellis and M.R. Loebinger were funded by a grant from the Welton Foundation. M.F. Moffatt and W.O.C. Cookson were funded by a joint investigator award from the Wellcome Trust (reference numbers WT097117 and WT096964). Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Received September 3, 2022.
  • Accepted October 16, 2022.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2023
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Park SC,
    2. Kang MJ,
    3. Han CH, et al.
    Prevalence, incidence, and mortality of nontuberculous mycobacterial infection in Korea: a nationwide population-based study. BMC Pulm Med 2019; 19: 140. doi:10.1186/s12890-019-0901-z
    OpenUrl
    1. Jones MM,
    2. Winthrop KL,
    3. Nelson SD, et al.
    Epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in the U.S. Veterans Health Administration. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0197976. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0197976
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Cowman S,
    2. Burns K,
    3. Benson S, et al.
    The antimicrobial susceptibility of non-tuberculous mycobacteria. J Infect 2016; 72: 324–331. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2015.12.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Diel R,
    2. Ringshausen F,
    3. Richter E, et al.
    Microbiological and clinical outcomes of treating non-Mycobacterium avium complex nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2017; 152: 120–142. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.166
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Diel R,
    2. Lipman M,
    3. Hoefsloot W
    . High mortality in patients with Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2018; 18: 206. doi:10.1186/s12879-018-3113-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Jhun BW,
    2. Moon SM,
    3. Jeon K, et al.
    Prognostic factors associated with long-term mortality in 1445 patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: a 15-year follow-up study. Eur Respir J 2020; 55; 1900798. doi:10.1183/13993003.00798-2019
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Brown-Elliott BA,
    2. Griffith DE,
    3. Wallace RJ
    . Diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. Clin Lab Med 2002; 22: 911–925. doi:10.1016/s0272-2712(02)00018-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Preece CL,
    2. Perry A,
    3. Gray B, et al.
    A novel culture medium for isolation of rapidly growing mycobacteria from the sputum of patients with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 2016; 15: 186–191. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2015.05.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kim K,
    2. Lee H,
    3. Lee MK, et al.
    Development and application of multiprobe real-time PCR method targeting the hsp65 gene for differentiation of Mycobacterium species from isolates and sputum specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48: 3073–3080. doi:10.1128/JCM.00939-10
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wu TL,
    2. Chia JH,
    3. Kuo AJ, et al.
    Rapid identification of mycobacteria from smear-positive sputum samples by nested PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46: 3591–3594. doi:10.1128/JCM.00856-08
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Kim JU,
    2. Ryu DS,
    3. Cha CH, et al.
    Paradigm for diagnosing mycobacterial disease: direct detection and differentiation of. J Clin Pathol 2018; 71: 774–780. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204945
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Griffith DE,
    2. Aksamit T,
    3. Brown-Elliott BA, et al.
    An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 175: 367–416. doi:10.1164/rccm.200604-571ST
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Haworth CS,
    2. Banks J,
    3. Capstick T, et al.
    British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD). Thorax 2017; 72: Suppl. 2, ii1–ii64. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210927
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Kurz SG,
    2. Zha BS,
    3. Herman DD, et al.
    Summary for clinicians: 2020 clinical practice guideline summary for the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2020; 17: 1033–1039. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-222CME
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Xu HB,
    2. Jiang RH,
    3. Li L
    . Treatment outcomes for Mycobacterium avium complex: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 33: 347–358. doi:10.1007/s10096-013-1962-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Koh WJ,
    2. Jeong BH,
    3. Jeon K, et al.
    Clinical significance of the differentiation between Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare in M. avium complex lung disease. Chest 2012; 142: 1482–1488. doi:10.1378/chest.12-0494
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Field SK,
    2. Fisher D,
    3. Cowie RL
    . Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease in patients without HIV infection. Chest 2004; 126: 566–581. doi:10.1378/chest.126.2.566
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kobashi Y,
    2. Matsushima T,
    3. Oka M
    . A double-blind randomized study of aminoglycoside infusion with combined therapy for pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex disease. Respir Med 2007; 101: 130–138. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2006.04.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Cowman SA,
    2. James P,
    3. Wilson R, et al.
    Profiling mycobacterial communities in pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0208018. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208018
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Sulaiman I,
    2. Wu BG,
    3. Li Y, et al.
    Evaluation of the airway microbiome in nontuberculous mycobacteria disease. Eur Respir J 2018; 52: 1800810. doi:10.1183/13993003.00810-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Cuthbertson L,
    2. Rogers GB,
    3. Walker AW, et al.
    Time between collection and storage significantly influences bacterial sequence composition in sputum samples from cystic fibrosis respiratory infections. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52: 3011–3016. doi:10.1128/JCM.00764-14
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Huang JH,
    2. Kao PN,
    3. Adi V, et al.
    Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare pulmonary infection in HIV-negative patients without preexisting lung disease: diagnostic and management limitations. Chest 1999; 115: 1033–1040. doi:10.1378/chest.115.4.1033
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Char A,
    2. Hopkinson NS,
    3. Hansell DM, et al.
    Evidence of mycobacterial disease in COPD patients with lung volume reduction surgery; the importance of histological assessment of specimens: a cohort study. BMC Pulm Med 2014; 14: 124. doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-124
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 9 Issue 2 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 9 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular assessment of mycobacterial burden in the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Molecular assessment of mycobacterial burden in the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial disease
Huw C. Ellis, Miriam F. Moffatt, Colin Churchward, Leah Cuthbertson, William O.C. Cookson, Michael R. Loebinger
ERJ Open Research Mar 2023, 9 (2) 00435-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00435-2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Molecular assessment of mycobacterial burden in the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial disease
Huw C. Ellis, Miriam F. Moffatt, Colin Churchward, Leah Cuthbertson, William O.C. Cookson, Michael R. Loebinger
ERJ Open Research Mar 2023, 9 (2) 00435-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00435-2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Original research articles

  • Acute health effects of heated tobacco products
  • Clinical trial simulations in pulmonary fibrosis
  • Residual risk in routine noninvasive follow-up in PAH
Show more Original research articles

Respiratory infections

  • Previous TB infection, asthma and respiratory symptoms
  • Exercise intolerance in COVID-19 survivors
  • Prophylactic oral anticoagulants and mortality in COVID-19
Show more Respiratory infections

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society