Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Interpreting lung oscillometry results: Z-scores or fixed cut-off values?

Sundeep Salvi, Deesha Ghorpade, Nitin Vanjare, Sapna Madas, Anurag Agrawal
ERJ Open Research 2023 9: 00656-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00656-2022
Sundeep Salvi
1Pulmocare Research and Education Foundation, Pune, India
2Faculty of Health Sciences, Symbiosis International University, Pune, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deesha Ghorpade
1Pulmocare Research and Education Foundation, Pune, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: deesha.ghorpade@yahoo.in
Nitin Vanjare
3Department of Connected Devices, IQVIA, Thane, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sapna Madas
1Pulmocare Research and Education Foundation, Pune, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anurag Agrawal
4Ashoka University, Sonepat, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Instead of using % predicted values or Z-scores to define and quantify respiratory abnormality in oscillometry, fixed cut-off values will likely give more accurate discrimination https://bit.ly/3vVmIyE

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the article by Liang et al. [1] wherein the authors analysed the characteristics and diagnostic performance of oscillometry in adult patients with asthma (n=781), COPD (n=688), interstitial lung disease (n=274), bronchiectasis (n=109) and upper airway obstruction (n=40), and compared these with spirometry using data collected from a registry from across 13 hospital clinics in China. The authors concluded that compared to spirometry, respiratory oscillometry was more appropriate for evaluating, rather than diagnosing, respiratory diseases. The conclusion was based on the comparison of Z-scores for area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity between forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (spirometry) and resistance measured at 5 Hz (R5) (oscillometry) (AUC 0.900, sensitivity 74% and specificity 95.4% versus 0.807, 62.4% and 90.3%, respectively, for all respiratory diseases, and 0.820, 76.2% and 75.2% versus 0.788, 66.7% and 81.5%, respectively, for obstructive airways diseases). This is clearly one of the largest studies to date that has examined the diagnostic performance of oscillometry in real-life clinical practice; however, we argue that the Z-score methodology used to compare diagnostic performance of oscillometry with spirometry is not appropriate and therefore misleads the interpretation.

Lung oscillometry is a simple, noninvasive lung function test where multiple frequency pressure waves are forced into the respiratory tract superimposed over normal tidal beathing. The measured output is respiratory impedance, a combination of total respiratory resistance and respiratory reactance measured at different frequencies. In addition to providing information about airway resistance across central and peripheral airways, it also throws light on the mechanical properties of the lung and therefore complements existing tools such as spirometry. While reproducibility and technical training remain challenges, lung oscillometry is predicted to be a useful diagnostic tool with a bright future for diagnosing various respiratory disorders [2, 3].

Spirometry is currently the gold standard diagnostic tool for evaluating lung function. Its key parameters, FEV1 and forced vital capacity, are normally distributed in the healthy population, and these indices are strongly dependent on gender, age, height, weight and ethnicity, which together contribute to a high coefficient of determination value (R2) between 0.7 and 0.9. For a given set of these determinants, the expected value reflects the central tendency around which observed values are normally distributed. Z-scores reflect the deviation from the expected and its probability within the healthy population distribution, and are therefore widely used to determine the presence of respiratory disease and its severity. In contrast to spirometry, oscillometry indices (R5, R5−R20, reactance measured at 5 Hz, area of reactance and resonant frequency) are not normally distributed in the healthy population and the variables that drive spirometry predicted values (gender, age, height and weight) show poor coefficient of determination for oscillometry, with R2 values between and below 0.15–0.25 [4–6]. Liang et al. [7] have earlier reported reference values for oscillometry from the current study population (567 healthy subjects) and showed that oscillometry parameters were not normally distributed and that R2 values for age, height and weight ranged from 0.01 to 0.25. We have also shown in a large healthy adult population from India (n=1200) that age, height and weight show R2 values ranging from 0.06–0.20 (unpublished data). Sex and height were the only variables that showed a modest contribution to the predicted equation. Despite the presence of skewed data, interpretation of oscillometry is still recommended using Z-scores [8]. If expected values do not truly reflect the central tendency, around which observed values are normally distributed, calculated z-scores would no longer accurately reflect the probability of being within the healthy distribution. Low coefficient of determination and non-normal distributions for oscillometry suggest that this may be the case. It is also likely that spirometry was used for diagnosis of other groups. If oscillometry were to be more sensitive than spirometry, it would be likely to suffer from false elevation of the upper limit of normal in this design with a corresponding reduction of AUC and loss of sensitivity when using z-scores.

Given these biases, instead of using per cent predicted values or Z-scores to define and quantify respiratory abnormality in oscillometry, fixed cut-off values will likely give more accurate discrimination. In a small adult population (n=93) comprising healthy, asthmatic and COPD patients, we recently observed that single cut-off values for oscillometry indices showed reasonably good accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for differentiating between healthy and obstructed airways with the Antlia FOT device (Icaltech, India) (table 1). As more data become available, the cut-off values will become more finely tuned (different devices may, however, require different cut-off values). Several authors have also pragmatically used absolute cut-off values in adults for defining disease states on oscillometry instead of Z-scores [9–13].

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) for fixed cut-off values to differentiate between healthy and obstructive airway disease (OAD)

It seems that the mechanical properties of the lung behave relatively uniformly across adults of all age groups, although gender and height have modest roles. Like blood pressure, blood sugar and several other biochemical parameters, where single cut-off values are used to delineate between healthy and diseased states, it seems that oscillometry interpretation will (or should) also follow this pattern. If that is the case, then interpretation of oscillometry in adults will be a simple affair based on single cut-off values and this will further add to the distinct advantages that it has over spirometry.

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received November 29, 2022.
  • Accepted January 3, 2023.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2023
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Liang X,
    2. Zheng J,
    3. Gao Y, et al.
    Clinical application of oscillometry in respiratory diseases: an impulse oscillometry registry. ERJ Open Res 2022; 8: 00080-2022. doi:10.1183/23120541.00080-2022
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Calverley PMA,
    2. Farré R
    . Oscillometry: old physiology with a bright future. Eur Respir J 2020; 56: 2001815. doi:10.1183/13993003.01815-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Kaminsky DA,
    2. Simpson SJ,
    3. Berger KI, et al.
    Clinical significance and applications of oscillometry. Eur Respir Rev 2022; 31: 210208. doi:10.1183/16000617.0208-2021
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Deesomchok A,
    2. Chaiwong W,
    3. Liwsrisakun C, et al.
    Reference equations of the impulse oscillatory in healthy Thai adults. J Thorac Dis 2022; 14: 1384–1392. doi:10.21037/jtd-21-1989
    OpenUrl
    1. Moitra S,
    2. Moitra S,
    3. Ghosh AK, et al.
    Reference values of impulse oscillometry (IOS) for healthy Indian adults. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2020; 24: 536–539. doi:10.5588/ijtld.19.0796
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Guo YF,
    2. Herrmann F,
    3. Michel J-P, et al.
    Normal values for respiratory resistance using forced oscillation in subjects >65 years old. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 602–608. doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00010405
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Liang XL,
    2. Gao Y,
    3. Guan WJ, et al.
    Reference values for respiratory impedance with impulse oscillometry in healthy Chinese adults. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13: 3680–3691. doi:10.21037/jtd-20-3376
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. King GG,
    2. Bates J,
    3. Berger KI, et al.
    Technical standards for respiratory oscillometry. Eur Respir J 2020; 55: 1900753. doi:10.1183/13993003.00753-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Li LY,
    2. Yan TS,
    3. Yang J, et al.
    Impulse oscillometry for detection of small airway dysfunction in subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms and preserved pulmonary function. Respir Res 2021; 22: 68. doi:10.1186/s12931-021-01662-7
    OpenUrl
    1. Liu Z,
    2. Lin L,
    3. Liu X
    . Clinical application value of impulse oscillometry in geriatric patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2017; 12: 897–905. doi:10.2147/COPD.S129974
    OpenUrl
    1. Lipworth BJ,
    2. Jabbal S
    . What can we learn about COPD from impulse oscillometry? Respir Med 2018; 139: 106–109. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2018.05.004
    OpenUrl
    1. Kim SR,
    2. Park KH,
    3. Son NH, et al.
    Application of impulse oscillometry in adult asthmatic patients with preserved lung function. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2020; 12: 832–843. doi:10.4168/aair.2020.12.5.832
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Chaiwong W,
    2. Namwongprom S,
    3. Liwsrisakun C, et al.
    Diagnostic ability of impulse oscillometry in diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. COPD 2020; 17: 635–646. doi:10.1080/15412555.2020.1839042
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 9 Issue 2 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 9 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Interpreting lung oscillometry results: Z-scores or fixed cut-off values?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Interpreting lung oscillometry results: Z-scores or fixed cut-off values?
Sundeep Salvi, Deesha Ghorpade, Nitin Vanjare, Sapna Madas, Anurag Agrawal
ERJ Open Research Mar 2023, 9 (2) 00656-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00656-2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Interpreting lung oscillometry results: Z-scores or fixed cut-off values?
Sundeep Salvi, Deesha Ghorpade, Nitin Vanjare, Sapna Madas, Anurag Agrawal
ERJ Open Research Mar 2023, 9 (2) 00656-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00656-2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Lung structure and function
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Interpreting lung oscillometry results
  • It is time to end our love affair with SABA in asthma?
Show more Correspondence

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society