Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Reply to: Interpreting lung oscillometry results: Z-scores instead of fixed cut-off values?

Xiaolin Liang, Jinping Zheng, Zhufeng Wang, Yi Gao
ERJ Open Research 2023 9: 00718-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00718-2022
Xiaolin Liang
1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinping Zheng
2National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jinping Zheng
Zhufeng Wang
2National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi Gao
2National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yi Gao
  • For correspondence: misstall2@163.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Z-score is preferable to fixed cut-offs in the interpretation of respiratory oscillometry results https://bit.ly/3GrKs2p

Reply to Sundeep Salvi and co-workers:

We thank S. Salvi and co-workers for their interest in our original article [1], which analysed the characteristics and diagnostic performance of respiratory oscillometry in respiratory diseases. S. Salvi and co-workers proposed that fixed cut-off values, instead of Z-scores, should be used to differentiate between healthy and disease states.

Since lung function tests have been applied in diagnosing respiratory diseases in clinical practice, what kind of cut-offs to use to interpretate lung function results has always been a hot issue. Many studies have compared the diagnostic value of fixed cut-offs, per cent of the predicted value or z-scores of lung function indices in differentiating between healthy and disease states [2–4]. While fixed cut-offs or per cent of the predicted value are commonly used in clinical practice at present and in the past, Z-score was proposed to be used in interpreting lung function results in the past decade [5]. The Z-score of a result is the number of standardised residuals away from the predicted value a measurement is. As it takes into account the impact of anthropometric factors on variation, Z-scores can more accurately reflect how far an observed lung function value is from the predicted value; therefore, it is recommended to be used in interpreting lung function results in the latest American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ERS) technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests [6] and the ERS technical standard on respiratory oscillometry [7].

S. Salvi and co-workers argued that Z-scores are not appropriate to be used in interpreting respiratory oscillometry results for the following reasons. First, oscillometric indices are not normally distributed; thus, the Z-score may not accurately reflect the probability of being within the healthy distribution. Secondly, although anthropometric factors (such as height and gender) have an impact on impulse oscillometry indices, their impact is not as large as that of spirometric indices (the highest determination coefficient of the predictive equation is ∼0.20). In this case, using fixed cut-offs for diagnosis may be a simple and feasible alternative.

For lung function indices, the Z-score is calculated by dividing the difference between the measured value and the predicted value by the residual standard deviation, which is the standard deviation of residuals of the regression equation. Our data on predictive equations of oscillometry we published previously [8] showed that, although the raw data of oscillometric indices were not normally distributed, the residuals of the regression equations were approximately normally distributed in raw or logarithmically transformed data. Under the condition that residuals of the regression equation are approximately normal distribution, we believe that Z-scores can still reflect the distribution probability of the measured value. Nevertheless, we agree with S. Salvi and co-workers that due to the low determination coefficients of predictive equations of oscillometry, Z-scores of oscillometric indices may present less efficacy when compared with Z-scores of spirometric indices. However, though the correction effect of Z-scores on anthropometric factors is relatively small in oscillometry, this correction effect still makes sense. In our prior analysis, we compared the diagnostic value of different kinds of cut-offs of oscillometric indices. As shown in figure 1, the R5 z-score displays a superior diagnostic capacity than the absolute value of R5 in diagnosing respiratory diseases (area under the curve (AUC) 0.81 versus 0.77, p<0.01) and obstructive airway diseases (AUC 0.79 versus 0.75, p<0.01). When we choose the best indicator for diagnosis, the accuracy of diagnosis is still the most important aspect to consider. Although absolute cut-off values are simple to use, they are not as accurate as Z-scores in diagnosis. The reason why some previous studies [9, 10] used absolute cut-off values rather than Z-scores of oscillometric indices in diagnosis is the lack of available adult reference values and Z-scores of oscillometry. Although the calculation of Z-scores is relatively complicated, it is believed that with the development of computer calculation and artificial intelligence interpretation, the interpretation of lung function results based on Z-scores is no longer a troublesome problem. Therefore, consistent with the recommendation of the current technical standard, we think that the Z-score is preferable in the interpretation of respiratory oscillometry results.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Comparisons of the diagnostic capacity between the actual value and Z-score of resistance measured at 5 Hz (R5) in diagnosing respiratory diseases and obstructive airway diseases.

In conclusion, based on the current evidence, we believe that Z-score is still the best indicator to interpret the oscillometry results. With the inspiration of S. Salvi and co-workers, we will pay more attention to the comparisons between Z-scores and fixed cut-offs of oscillometric indices in disease diagnosis and assessment.

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Invited article, peer reviewed.

  • Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

  • Received December 17, 2022.
  • Accepted December 27, 2022.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2023
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Liang X,
    2. Zheng J,
    3. Gao Y, et al.
    Clinical application of oscillometry in respiratory diseases: an impulse oscillometry registry. ERJ Open Res 2022; 8: 00080-2022. doi:10.1183/23120541.00080-2022
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Miller MR,
    2. Quanjer PH,
    3. Swanney MP, et al.
    Interpreting lung function data using 80% predicted and fixed thresholds misclassifies more than 20% of patients. Chest 2011; 139: 52–59. doi:10.1378/chest.10-0189
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Swanney MP,
    2. Ruppel G,
    3. Enright PL, et al.
    Using the lower limit of normal for the FEV1/FVC ratio reduces the misclassification of airway obstruction. Thorax 2008; 63: 1046–1051. doi:10.1136/thx.2008.098483
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Oh DK,
    2. Baek S,
    3. Lee SW, et al.
    Comparison of the fixed ratio and the Z-score of FEV1/FVC in the elderly population: a long-term mortality analysis from the Third National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2018; 13: 903–915. doi:10.2147/COPD.S148421
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Quanjer PH,
    2. Stanojevic S,
    3. Cole TJ, et al.
    Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 1324–1343. doi:10.1183/09031936.00080312
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Stanojevic S,
    2. Kaminsky DA,
    3. Miller MR, et al.
    ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests. Eur Respir J 2022; 60: 2101499. doi:10.1183/13993003.01499-2021
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. King GG,
    2. Bates J,
    3. Berger KI, et al.
    Technical standards for respiratory oscillometry. Eur Respir J 2020; 55: 1900753. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00753-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Liang XL,
    2. Gao Y,
    3. Guan WJ, et al.
    Reference values of respiratory impedance with impulse oscillometry in healthy Chinese adults. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13: 3680–3691. doi:10.21037/jtd-20-3376
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Li LY,
    2. Yan TS,
    3. Yang J, et al.
    Impulse oscillometry for detection of small airway dysfunction in subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms and preserved pulmonary function. Respir Res 2021; 22: 68. doi:10.1186/s12931-021-01662-7
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Liu Z,
    2. Lin L,
    3. Liu X
    . Clinical application value of impulse oscillometry in geriatric patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2017; 12: 897–905. doi:10.2147/COPD.S129974
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 9 Issue 2 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 9 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply to: Interpreting lung oscillometry results: Z-scores instead of fixed cut-off values?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Reply to: Interpreting lung oscillometry results: Z-scores instead of fixed cut-off values?
Xiaolin Liang, Jinping Zheng, Zhufeng Wang, Yi Gao
ERJ Open Research Mar 2023, 9 (2) 00718-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00718-2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reply to: Interpreting lung oscillometry results: Z-scores instead of fixed cut-off values?
Xiaolin Liang, Jinping Zheng, Zhufeng Wang, Yi Gao
ERJ Open Research Mar 2023, 9 (2) 00718-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00718-2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Lung structure and function
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Interpreting lung oscillometry results
  • It is time to end our love affair with SABA in asthma?
Show more Correspondence

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society