Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences

Barbara Johnson, Irene Steenbruggen, Brian L. Graham, Courtney Coleman
ERJ Open Research 2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00712-2020
Barbara Johnson
1European Lung Foundation, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irene Steenbruggen
2Lung Function Department, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Irene Steenbruggen
Brian L. Graham
3Respiratory Research Centre, Division of Respirology, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Courtney Coleman
1European Lung Foundation, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: courtney.coleman@europeanlung.org
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society commissioned a task force to update the technical standards for spirometry testing with the aim of increasing the accuracy, precision, and quality of spirometry measurements and improving the patient experience.

To inform the task force with patient experiences, European Lung Foundation, in collaboration with the task force, conducted an online survey in 10 languages between August and September 2018.

There were 1760 respondents from 52 countries. The majority were adults (97.1%) and the most common reasons for spirometry referral were diagnosis (35.5%) and management of an ongoing condition (60.9%). 53.2% reported regularly using inhalers.

Respondents were very experienced with spirometry: 89.9% completed more than one test; 48% completed 10 or more tests. However, most reported not knowing what FEV1 means (59.4%) and only 39.6% knew their most recent FEV1; the exception was respondents with cystic fibrosis (CF) who reported much greater knowledge.

Respondents rated as moderately or seriously problematic: being told to keep blowing when they felt nothing is coming out (31.4%), coughing (30.4%), tiredness (26.3%) and concern about shortness of breath (20.1%).

Overall, respondents found spirometry to be acceptable, however an important minority (17%) find it difficult. Patients want clear information before, during and after the test, including information on stopping medications. Operators have an important role in increasing the ease of patients, and changes to the testing environment can increase patient comfort. Patients want access to their results and want to understand how they relate to their individual health.

Footnotes

This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.

Conflict of interest: B. Johnson was an employee of the European Lung Foundation during the conduct of the study.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Steenbruggen has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Graham has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: C. Coleman is an employee of the European Lung Foundation.

This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.

  • Received September 30, 2020.
  • Accepted November 13, 2020.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2020
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

Next
Back to top
Vol 9 Issue 2 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 9 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences
Barbara Johnson, Irene Steenbruggen, Brian L. Graham, Courtney Coleman
ERJ Open Research Jan 2020, 00712-2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00712-2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Improving spirometry testing by understanding patient preferences
Barbara Johnson, Irene Steenbruggen, Brian L. Graham, Courtney Coleman
ERJ Open Research Jan 2020, 00712-2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00712-2020
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Lung structure and function
  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Microbial and host immune factors as drivers of COPD
  • Asymmetry in acute exacerbation of IPF
  • Multiple large clusters of tuberculosis in London
Show more Original article

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society