Abstract
Background Despite evidence that opioids might relieve chronic breathlessness, physicians may still be reluctant to prescribe them due to safety concerns. By contrast, benzodiazepine (BDZ) prescribing often seeks to reduce chronic breathlessness despite no evidence of net benefit. Prescribing patterns and indications for these medications in severe interstitial lung disease (ILD) are unknown.
Objective To evaluate the indications, medications, and temporal patterns of benzodiazepine and opioid prescriptions in people with oxygen-dependent ILD.
Methods This was an observational, population-based, longitudinal study of adults starting long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) for ILD between 2005 and 2014 in the Swedish National Registry for Respiratory Failure (Swedevox). People dispensed benzodiazepines (n=2000) and opioids (n=2000) from 6 months before start of LTOT throughout follow-up (first of death or study end) were analysed.
Results Of 1635 included patients, 651 (39.8%) received BDZs and 710 patients (43.4%) received opioids during the study period; 373 (22.8%) patients received both. The most frequently prescribed BDZ and opioid were oxazepam (85.6%) and oxycodone (28.7%), respectively. Indications for breathlessness were uncommon for BDZs (1.4%) and opioids (6.4%). During the last year of life, opioid indications for breathlessness increased from 2.5% (12–10 months before death) to 10.2% in the last 3 months of life (p=0.048).
Conclusion In oxygen-dependent ILD, opioids are rarely prescribed for breathlessness even in the last months of life, when chronic breathlessness often increases in prevalence and intensity.
Footnotes
This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.
Conflict of interest: Ms. Genberg has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Davies has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Ahmadi has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Currow has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Johnson has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Tanash has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Bajwah has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Dr. Ekström has nothing to disclose.
This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.
- Received October 1, 2020.
- Accepted December 4, 2020.
- Copyright ©ERS 2020
This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.