Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • ERS Author FAQs
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • ERS Author FAQs
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Prognostic value of clinically important deterioration in COPD: IMPACT trial analysis

MeiLan K Han, Gerard J Criner, Mark T Dransfield, David MG Halpin, Christine E Jones, Sally Kilbride, Peter Lange, Sally Lettis, David A Lipson, David A Lomas, Neil Martin, Fernando J Martinez, Robert A Wise, Ian P Naya, Dave Singh
ERJ Open Research 2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00663-2020
MeiLan K Han
1University of Michigan, Pulmonary & Critical Care, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mrking@umich.edu
Gerard J Criner
2Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark T Dransfield
3Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Lung Health Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David MG Halpin
4University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine E Jones
5GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sally Kilbride
6GSK, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Lange
7Department of Public Health, Section of Epidemiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
8Medical Department, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sally Lettis
6GSK, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A Lipson
9GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA
10Perelman School of Medicine, Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David A Lipson
David A Lomas
11UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil Martin
12GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
13University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fernando J Martinez
14Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert A Wise
15Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Robert A Wise
Ian P Naya
12GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
17These authors contributed equally to this work
18Affiliation at the time of the study
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dave Singh
16Centre for Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
17These authors contributed equally to this work
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Clinically important deterioration (CID) is a multicomponent measure for assessing disease worsening in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This analysis investigated the prognostic value of a CID event on future clinical outcomes, and effect of single-inhaler triple versus dual therapy on reducing CID risk in patients in the IMPACT trial.

Methods IMPACT was a Phase III, double-blind, 52-week multicenter trial. Patients with symptomatic COPD and ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the prior year were randomised 2:2:1 to fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25 µg, FF/VI 100/25 µg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg. CID at the timepoint of interest was defined as: a moderate/severe exacerbation, or ≥100 mL decrease in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s or deterioration in health status (≥4.0 unit increase in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score or ≥2.0 unit increase in COPD Assessment Test score) from baseline. A treatment-independent post hoc prognostic analysis compared clinical outcomes up to Week 52 in patients with/without a CID by Week 28. A prospective analysis evaluated time-to-first CID with each treatment.

Results Patients with a CID by Week 28 had significantly increased exacerbation rates after Week 28, smaller improvements in lung function and health status at Week 52 (all p<0.001), and increased risk of all-cause mortality after Week 28 versus patients who were CID-free. FF/UMEC/VI significantly reduced CID risk versus dual therapies (all p<0.001).

Conclusions Prevention of short-term disease worsening was associated with better long-term clinical outcomes. FF/UMEC/VI reduced CID risk versus dual therapies; this effect may improve long-term prognosis in this population.

Funding GSK (CTT116855/NCT02164513).

Footnotes

This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Han reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, other from Novartis, other from Sunovion, personal fees from Mylan, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Verona, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Criner reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Almirall, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Chiesi, personal fees from CSA Medical, personal fees from Eolo Medical, personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, other from HGE Health Care Solutions, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Nuvaira, personal fees from Olympus, personal fees from Pulmonx, personal fees from Verona, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Broncus Medical, personal fees from Gala Therapeutics, personal fees from Helios Medical, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Mereo BioPharma, personal fees from NGM Biopharmaceuticals, personal fees from Philips Respironics, personal fees from Respivant Sciences, personal fees from The Implementation Group, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Dransfield reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; grants from Department of Defense, personal fees and other from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees and other from GlaxoSmithKline, other from Novartis, personal fees and other from AstraZeneca, other from Yungjin, personal fees and other from PneumRx/BTG, other from Pulmonx, personal fees from Genentech, other from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Quark Pharmaceuticals, grants from NIH, personal fees from Mereo, grants from American Lung Association, grants from NIH, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Halpin reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Chiesi, personal fees and non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Jones reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; other from GlaxoSmithKline, other from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Kilbride reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; other from GlaxoSmithKline, other from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Lange reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Chiesi, grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Lettis reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; other from GlaxoSmithKline, other from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Lipson reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; other from GlaxoSmithKline, other from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Lomas reports personal fees and other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; grants from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from Griffols, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Martin reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; other from GlaxoSmithKline, other from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Martinez reports grants and other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; personal fees, non-financial support and other from AstraZeneca, personal fees, non-financial support and other from Boehringer Ingelheim, non-financial support and other from ProterrixBio, personal fees from Columbia University, personal fees and non-financial support from Genentech, personal fees and non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees and non-financial support from Inova Fairfax Health System, personal fees from MD Magazine, personal fees from Methodist Hospital Brooklyn, personal fees and non-financial support from Miller Communications, personal fees and non-financial support from National Association for Continuing Education, personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis, personal fees from New York University, personal fees and non-financial support from Pearl Pharmaceuticals, personal fees and non-financial support from PeerView Communications, personal fees and non-financial support from Prime Communications, personal fees and non-financial support from Puerto Rican Respiratory Society, personal fees and non-financial support from Chiesi, personal fees and non-financial support from Sunovion, personal fees and non-financial support from Theravance, personal fees from UpToDate, personal fees from WebMD/MedScape, other from Afferent/Merck, non-financial support from Gilead, non-financial support from Nitto, personal fees and other from Patara/Respivant, personal fees and non-financial support from Potomac, other from Biogen, personal fees and non-financial support from University of Alabama Birmingham, other from Veracyte, non-financial support from Zambon, personal fees from American Thoracic Society, grants from NIH, personal fees and non-financial support from Physicians Education Resource, personal fees from Rockpointe, other from Prometic, personal fees from Rare Disease Healthcare Communications, other from Bayer, other from Bridge Biotherapeutics, personal fees and non-financial support from Canadian Respiratory Network, other from ProMedior, personal fees and non-financial support from Teva, personal fees from France Foundation, personal fees and non-financial support from Dartmouth, other from Gala, personal fees from Physicians Education Resource, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Wise reports personal fees, non-financial support and other from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca / Medimmune / Pearl, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Contrafect, personal fees from Pulmonx, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Spiration, personal fees from Sunovion, grants from Pearl Therapeutics, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Circassia, personal fees from Pneuma, personal fees from Verona, personal fees from Mylan/Theravance, personal fees from Propeller Health, grants from Sanofi-Aventis, personal fees from AbbVie, grants and personal fees from GSK, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Naya reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; other from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work;.

Conflict of interest: Dr. Singh reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from Chiesi, personal fees from Cipla, personal fees from Genentech, grants and personal fees from Glenmark, personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, grants and personal fees from Menarini, grants and personal fees from Mundipharma, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Peptinnovate, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Pulmatrix, grants and personal fees from Theravance, grants and personal fees from Verona, outside the submitted work;.

This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.

  • Received November 26, 2020.
  • Accepted December 8, 2020.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2021
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 7 Issue 1 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 7 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic value of clinically important deterioration in COPD: IMPACT trial analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Prognostic value of clinically important deterioration in COPD: IMPACT trial analysis
MeiLan K Han, Gerard J Criner, Mark T Dransfield, David MG Halpin, Christine E Jones, Sally Kilbride, Peter Lange, Sally Lettis, David A Lipson, David A Lomas, Neil Martin, Fernando J Martinez, Robert A Wise, Ian P Naya, Dave Singh
ERJ Open Research Jan 2021, 00663-2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00663-2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prognostic value of clinically important deterioration in COPD: IMPACT trial analysis
MeiLan K Han, Gerard J Criner, Mark T Dransfield, David MG Halpin, Christine E Jones, Sally Kilbride, Peter Lange, Sally Lettis, David A Lipson, David A Lomas, Neil Martin, Fernando J Martinez, Robert A Wise, Ian P Naya, Dave Singh
ERJ Open Research Jan 2021, 00663-2020; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00663-2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Microbial and clinical factors are related to recurrence of symptoms after childhood lower respiratory tract infection
  • Chest computed tomography and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient as rapid tools to diagnose and triage mildly symptomatic COVID-19 pneumonia patients
  • Anti-HSP47 siRNA Lipid Nanoparticle ND-L02-s0201 Reverses Interstitial Pulmonary Fibrosis in Preclinical Rat Models
Show more Original article

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • ERS author centre

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society