Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Comparison of inhalation technique with the Diskus® and Autohaler® in asthmatic children at home

A. van der Kolk, N. Lammers, M. Brusse-Keizer, J. van der Palen, J. Faber, R. Spenkelink-Visser, B.J. Thio
ERJ Open Research 2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00215-2019
A. van der Kolk
1Department of Pediatrics, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Lammers
2Department of Pediatrics, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N. Lammers
M. Brusse-Keizer
3Medical School Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. van der Palen
3Medical School Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
4Department of Research Methodology, Measurement and Data Analysis, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Faber
1Department of Pediatrics, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Spenkelink-Visser
5Department of Pediatrics, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.J. Thio
2Department of Pediatrics, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
3Medical School Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective Asthma is the most common chronic disease in childhood and anti-inflammatory medication is the cornerstone of treatment. Inhalers are frequently used incorrectly when demonstrated in the hospital, suggesting poor technique at home. We aimed to: 1) Compare daily inhalation technique with the Diskus® and Autohaler® in asthmatic children by filming inhalations at home; 2) Compare daily inhalation technique with technique demonstrated in the hospital.

Methods We performed a randomised study in asthmatic children (6–18 years) from the outpatient clinic of MST hospital from July 2014 to April 2016. Children received inhalation instructions for the Diskus® and Autohaler® and were randomised to use one device in the morning and the other in the evening. During the 28-days study period, inhalations were filmed at home and subsequently demonstrated in the hospital. All inhalations were checked for 7 critical errors per device.

Results A total of 636 videos with the Diskus® and 663 with the Autohaler® were provided by 27 children. The most common critical error in daily-life was an incorrect device position during preparation of the Diskus® (n=271) and an insufficiently deep inhalation (n=39) using the Autohaler®. Percentage of correct days using the Diskus® was 44%, compared to 96% with the Autohaler® (p<0.001). The two most common errors with the Diskus® were made at least twice as often at home than in the hospital.

Conclusion Inhalation technique at home was markedly better with the Autohaler® than with the Diskus®. Pediatricians should be aware that hospital-based demonstrations can overestimate daily inhalation technique with the Diskus®.

Footnotes

This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.

Conflict of Interest: Dr. van der Kolk has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of Interest: Dr. Thio has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of Interest: Dr. Faber has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of Interest: Dr. van der Palen has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of Interest: Dr. Brusse-Keizer has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of Interest: Dr. Lammers has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of Interest: Dr. Spenkelink-Visser has nothing to disclose.

This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.

  • Received August 23, 2019.
  • Accepted February 4, 2021.
  • ©The authors 2021
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 8 Issue 2 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 8 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of inhalation technique with the Diskus® and Autohaler® in asthmatic children at home
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Comparison of inhalation technique with the Diskus® and Autohaler® in asthmatic children at home
A. van der Kolk, N. Lammers, M. Brusse-Keizer, J. van der Palen, J. Faber, R. Spenkelink-Visser, B.J. Thio
ERJ Open Research Jan 2021, 00215-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00215-2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of inhalation technique with the Diskus® and Autohaler® in asthmatic children at home
A. van der Kolk, N. Lammers, M. Brusse-Keizer, J. van der Palen, J. Faber, R. Spenkelink-Visser, B.J. Thio
ERJ Open Research Jan 2021, 00215-2019; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00215-2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Asthma and allergy
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Interstitial lung disease incidence and mortality in the United Kingdom and the European Union: an observational study, 2001–2017
  • Microbial and host immune factors as drivers of COPD
  • Asymmetry in acute exacerbation of IPF
Show more Original article

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society