Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Feasibility and clinical utility of ambulatory cough monitoring in an outpatient clinical setting: a real world retrospective evaluation

Anne E. Vertigan, Sarah L. Kapela, Surinder S. Birring, Peter G. Gibson
ERJ Open Research 2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00319-2021
Anne E. Vertigan
1Speech Pathology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
2Priority Centre for Healthy Lungs, The University of Newcastle Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anne.vertigan@health.nsw.gov.au
Sarah L. Kapela
1Speech Pathology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah L. Kapela
Surinder S. Birring
3Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
4Department of Respiratory Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter G. Gibson
5Centre of Excellence in Severe Asthma and Priority Research Centre for Health Lungs, The University of Newcastle Faculty of Health and Medicine, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
6Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Research question Objective quantification of cough is rarely utilised outside of research settings and the role of cough frequency monitoring in clinical practice has not been established. This study examined the clinical utility of cough frequency monitoring in an outpatient clinical setting.

Methods The study involved a retrospective review of cough monitor data. Participants included 174 patients referred for treatment of cough and upper airway symptoms (103 chronic cough; 50 inducible laryngeal obstruction; 21 severe asthma), and 15 controls. Measures, taken prior to treatment, included 24-h ambulatory cough frequency using the Leicester Cough Monitor, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire and Laryngeal Hypersensitivity Questionnaire. Post-treatment data was available for 50 participants. Feasibility and clinical utility were also reported.

Results Analysis time per recording was up to 10 min. Seventy five percent of participants could use the monitors correctly and most (93%) recordings were interpretable. The geometric mean cough frequency in patients was 10.1 (sd=2.9) compared to 2.4 (2.0) for healthy controls, (p=0.003). There was no significant difference in cough frequency between clinical groups, (p=0.080). Cough frequency decreased significantly following treatment, (p<0.001). There was a moderate correlation between cough frequency and both cough quality of life and laryngeal hypersensitivity. Cough frequency monitoring was responsive to therapy, and able to discriminate differences in cough frequency between diseases.

Conclusion While ambulatory cough frequency monitoring remains a research tool, it provides useful clinical data that can assist in patient management. Logistical issues may preclude use in some clinical settings and additional time needs to be allocated to the process.

Footnotes

This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.

Conflict of iterest: Anne Vertigan has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of iterest: Sarah Kapela has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of iterest: Surinder Birring reports research funding for cough monitoring paid to King's College Hospital from Gala Therapeutics, ESA Medical and Avalyn Pharma, outside the submitted work.

Conflict of iterest: Peter Gibson has nothing to disclose.

This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.

  • Received May 7, 2021.
  • Accepted July 9, 2021.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2021
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 8 Issue 2 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 8 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Feasibility and clinical utility of ambulatory cough monitoring in an outpatient clinical setting: a real world retrospective evaluation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Feasibility and clinical utility of ambulatory cough monitoring in an outpatient clinical setting: a real world retrospective evaluation
Anne E. Vertigan, Sarah L. Kapela, Surinder S. Birring, Peter G. Gibson
ERJ Open Research Jan 2021, 00319-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00319-2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Feasibility and clinical utility of ambulatory cough monitoring in an outpatient clinical setting: a real world retrospective evaluation
Anne E. Vertigan, Sarah L. Kapela, Surinder S. Birring, Peter G. Gibson
ERJ Open Research Jan 2021, 00319-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00319-2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Telemedicine home CPAP titration and follow-up in the COVID-19 scenario
  • Gene expression profile of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in tumors of patients with nsclc: the influence of COPD
  • Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency genotypes PI*ZZ and PI*SZ in the Spanish registry of EARCO
Show more Original research article

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society