Abstract
Background : There are substantial advances in diagnosis and treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but without much evidence available on recent mortality and survival trends.
Methods : A narrative synthesis approach was used to investigate the mortality trends, then meta-analyses for survival trends were carried out based on various time periods.
Results : Six studies reported the mortality data for IPF in 22 countries, and 62 studies (covering 63 307 patients from 20 countries) reported survival data for IPF. Age-standardised mortality for IPF varied from approximately 0.5 to 12 per 100 000 population per year after year 2000. There were increased mortality trends for IPF in Australia, Brazil, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and UK, while Austria, Croatia, Denmark, Romania, and US showed decreased mortality trends. The overall 3-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates (CSRs) were 61.8% (95% CI, 58.7–64.9; I2=97.1%) and 45.6% (95% CI, 41.5–49.7; I2=97.7%), respectively. Prior to 2010, the pooled 3-year CSRs was 59.9% (95% CI, 55.8–64.1; I2>95.8%), then not significantly (p=0.067) increased to 66.2% (95% CI, 62.9–69.5; I2=92.6%) in the 2010s decade. After excluding three studies in which no patients received antifibrotics after year 2010, the pooled 3-year CSRs significantly (p=0.039) increased to 67.4% (95% CI, 63.9–70.9; I2=93.1%) in the 2010s decade.
Discussion : IPF is a diagnosis associated with high mortality. There was no observed increasing survival trend for patients with IPF before year 2010, with then a switch to an improvement, which is probably multifactorial.
Footnotes
This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.
Conflict of interest: Qiang Zheng has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Ingrid A. Cox has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Julie A. Campbell has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Qing Xia has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Petr Otahal has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Barbara de Graaff has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Tamera J. Corte reports grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Hoffman La Roche, grants and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, grants from Avalyn Pharma, grants from Biogen, personal fees from Promedior, from null, outside the submitted work
Conflict of interest: Alan K Y Teoh reports conference fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and speaker fees from Roche, outside the submitted work.
Conflict of interest: E. Haydn Walters has nothing to disclose.
Conflict of interest: Andrew J. Palmer has nothing to disclose.
This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.
- Received October 19, 2021.
- Accepted January 9, 2022.
- Copyright ©The authors 2022
This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org