Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Non-invasive follow-up strategy after pulmonary endarterectomy for CTEPH

Dieuwertje Ruigrok, M. Louis Handoko, Lilian J. Meijboom, Esther J. Nossent, Anco Boonstra, Natalia J. Braams, Jessie van Wezenbeek, Robert Tepaske, Pieter Roel Tuinman, Leo M.A. Heunks, Anton Vonk Noordegraaf, Frances S. de Man, Petr Symersky, Harm-Jan Bogaard
ERJ Open Research 2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00564-2021
Dieuwertje Ruigrok
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Louis Handoko
2Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lilian J. Meijboom
3Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Esther J. Nossent
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Esther J. Nossent
Anco Boonstra
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalia J. Braams
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Natalia J. Braams
Jessie van Wezenbeek
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Tepaske
4Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pieter Roel Tuinman
5Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leo M.A. Heunks
5Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anton Vonk Noordegraaf
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anton Vonk Noordegraaf
Frances S. de Man
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Petr Symersky
6Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Petr Symersky
Harm-Jan Bogaard
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hj.bogaard@amsterdamumc.nl
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The success of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is usually evaluated by performing a right heart catheterisation (RHC). Here, we investigate whether residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) can be sufficiently excluded without the need for a RHC, by making use of early postoperative hemodynamics, or NT-proBNP, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) 6 months after PEA.

Methods In an observational analysis, residual PH after PEA measured by RHC was related to hemodynamic data from the postoperative ICU time and data from a 6-month follow-up assessment including NT-proBNP, TTE and CPET. After dichotomisation and univariate analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value (NPV) and likelihood ratios were calculated.

Results Thirty-six out of 92 included patients had residual PH 6 months after PEA (39%). Correlation between early postoperative and 6-month follow-up mean pulmonary artery pressure was moderate (Spearman rho 0.465, p<0.001). Early hemodynamics did not predict late success. NT-proBNP>300 ng L−1 had insufficient NPV (0.71) to exclude residual PH. Probability for PH on TTE had a moderate NPV (0.74) for residual PH. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2)<80% predicted had the highest sensitivity (0.85) and NPV (0.84) for residual PH.

Conclusions CPET 6 months after PEA, and to a lesser extent TTE can be used to exclude residual CTEPH, thereby safely reducing the number of patients needing to undergo re-RHC after PEA.

Footnotes

This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.

This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.

  • Received September 24, 2021.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2022
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 8 Issue 2 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 8 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Non-invasive follow-up strategy after pulmonary endarterectomy for CTEPH
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Non-invasive follow-up strategy after pulmonary endarterectomy for CTEPH
Dieuwertje Ruigrok, M. Louis Handoko, Lilian J. Meijboom, Esther J. Nossent, Anco Boonstra, Natalia J. Braams, Jessie van Wezenbeek, Robert Tepaske, Pieter Roel Tuinman, Leo M.A. Heunks, Anton Vonk Noordegraaf, Frances S. de Man, Petr Symersky, Harm-Jan Bogaard
ERJ Open Research Jan 2022, 00564-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00564-2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Non-invasive follow-up strategy after pulmonary endarterectomy for CTEPH
Dieuwertje Ruigrok, M. Louis Handoko, Lilian J. Meijboom, Esther J. Nossent, Anco Boonstra, Natalia J. Braams, Jessie van Wezenbeek, Robert Tepaske, Pieter Roel Tuinman, Leo M.A. Heunks, Anton Vonk Noordegraaf, Frances S. de Man, Petr Symersky, Harm-Jan Bogaard
ERJ Open Research Jan 2022, 00564-2021; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00564-2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Pulmonary vascular disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • “The whole of humanity has lungs, doesn't it, we are not all the same sort of people”. Patient preferences and choices for an online, self-guided chronic breathlessness supportive intervention (SELF-BREATHE)
  • Acoustic surveillance of cough for detecting respiratory disease using artificial intelligence
  • People living with Moderate-to-Severe COPD Prefer Improvement of Daily Symptoms Over the Improvement of Exacerbations: A Multi-Country Patient Preference Study
Show more Original research article

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society