Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

On the use of continuous positive airway pressure during the second and third waves of the Covid-19 pandemic

Claudia Brusasco, Francesco Corradi, Federico Dazzi, Alessandro Isirdi, Chiara Romei, Andrea Parisini, Silvia Boni, Gregorio Santori, Vito Brusasco, the Galliera CPAP-COVID-19 study group
ERJ Open Research 2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00365-2022
Claudia Brusasco
1Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claudia Brusasco
Francesco Corradi
2Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Francesco Corradi
Federico Dazzi
2Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandro Isirdi
2Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alessandro Isirdi
Chiara Romei
3Department Radiology, 2nd Radiology Unit, Pisa University-Hospital, Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Parisini
4E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvia Boni
4E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregorio Santori
5Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gregorio Santori
Vito Brusasco
6Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: claudia.brusasco@galliera.it
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background In a preliminary study during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave, we reported a high rate of success with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preventing death and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). That study, however, was too small to identify risk factors for mortality, barotrauma and impact on subsequent IMV. Thus, we re-evaluated the efficacy of the same CPAP protocol in a larger series of patients during second and third pandemic waves.

Methods 281 COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (158 full-code and 123 do-not-intubate, DNI), were managed with high-flow CPAP early in their hospitalization. IMV was considered after 4 days of unsuccessful CPAP.

Results The overall recovery rate from respiratory failure was 50% in the DNI and 89% in the full-code group. Among the latter, 71% recovered with CPAP only, 3% died under CPAP and 26% were intubated after a median CPAP time of 7 days (IQR: 5–12 days). Of the patients who were intubated, 68% recovered and were discharged from the hospital within 28 days. Barotrauma occurred during CPAP in <4% of patients. Age (OR=1.128; p <0.001) and tomographic severity score (OR=1.139; p=0.006) were the only independent predictors of mortality

Conclusions Early treatment with CPAP is a safe option for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19.

Footnotes

This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests with the subject of the article.

This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.

  • Received July 22, 2022.
  • Accepted November 2, 2022.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2022
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 9 Issue 2 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 9 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
On the use of continuous positive airway pressure during the second and third waves of the Covid-19 pandemic
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
On the use of continuous positive airway pressure during the second and third waves of the Covid-19 pandemic
Claudia Brusasco, Francesco Corradi, Federico Dazzi, Alessandro Isirdi, Chiara Romei, Andrea Parisini, Silvia Boni, Gregorio Santori, Vito Brusasco, the Galliera CPAP-COVID-19 study group
ERJ Open Research Jan 2022, 00365-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00365-2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
On the use of continuous positive airway pressure during the second and third waves of the Covid-19 pandemic
Claudia Brusasco, Francesco Corradi, Federico Dazzi, Alessandro Isirdi, Chiara Romei, Andrea Parisini, Silvia Boni, Gregorio Santori, Vito Brusasco, the Galliera CPAP-COVID-19 study group
ERJ Open Research Jan 2022, 00365-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00365-2022
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • The Bronchiectasis Exacerbation Diary: A Novel PRO for Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
  • What bothers severe asthma patients most? A paired patient-clinician study across seven European countries
  • The Palestinian primary ciliary dyskinesia population: first results of the diagnostic, and genetic spectrum
Show more Original research article

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society