Abstract
Background Right ventricle dysfunction (RVD) at echocardiography predicts mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but heterogenous definitions of RVD have been used. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the role of different definitions of RVD and of individual parameters of RVD as predictors of death.
Methods A systematic search for studies including patients with confirmed PE reporting on RV assessment at echocardiography and death in the acute phase was performed. The primary study outcome was death in-hospital or at 30 days.
Results RVD at echocardiography, regardless of its definition, was associated with increased risk of death (RR 1.49, 95%CI 1.24–1.79, I2=64%) and PE-related death (RR 3.77, 95% CI 1.61–8.80, I2=0%) in all-comers with PE, and with death in hemodynamically stable patients (RR 1.52, 95%CI 1.15–2.00, I2=73%). The association with death was confirmed for RVD defined as the presence of at least one criterion or at least two criteria for RV overload. In all-comers with PE, increased RV/LV ratio (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.90–2.39) and abnormal TAPSE (RR 2.29 CI 1.45–3.59) but not increased RV diameter were associated with death; in hemodynamically stable patients, neither RV/LV ratio (RR 1.11 CI 95% 0.91–1.35) nor TAPSE (RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.97–5.44) were significantly associated with death.
Conclusion Echocardiography showing RVD is a useful tool for risk stratification in all-comers with acute PE and in hemodynamically stable patients. The prognostic value of individual parameters of RVD in hemodynamically stable patients remains controversial.
Footnotes
This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.
This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.
- Received November 22, 2022.
- Accepted December 12, 2022.
- Copyright ©The authors 2022
This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org