Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

What is the optimal management of potentially resectable stage III-N2 NSCLC? Results of a fixed effects network meta-analysis and economic modelling

Matthew Evison, Ross Maconachie, Toby Mercer, Caitlin H Daly, Nicky J. Welton, Shahzeena Aslam, Doug West, Neal Navani
ERJ Open Research 2023; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00299-2022
Matthew Evison
1Lung Cancer & Thoracic Surgery Directorate, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthew Evison
  • For correspondence: m.evison@nhs.net
Ross Maconachie
2NICE Centre for Guidelines, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toby Mercer
2NICE Centre for Guidelines, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caitlin H Daly
3Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Caitlin H Daly
Nicky J. Welton
3Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicky J. Welton
Shahzeena Aslam
4Bedford and Addenbrooke's Cambridge University NHS Hospital Trusts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Doug West
5Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neal Navani
6Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College London Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Neal Navani
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction There is a critical need to understand the optimal treatment regimen in patients with potentially resectable stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods A systematic review of randomised controlled trials using a literature search including the CDSR, CENTRAL, DARE, HTA, EMBASE and MEDLINE bibliographic databases. Selected trials were used to perform a Bayesian fixed effects network meta-analysis and economic modelling of treatment regimens relevant to current day treatment options: chemotherapy plus surgery (CS), chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (CR) and chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS).

Findings Six trials were prioritised for evidence synthesis. The fixed effects network meta-analyses demonstrated an improvement in Disease-Free Survival (DFS) for CRS versus CS and CRS versus CR of 0.34 years (95% CI 0.02–0.65) and 0.32 years (95% CI 0.05–0.58) respectively, over a five-year period. No evidence of effect were observed in overall survival although point estimates favoured CRS. The probabilities that CRS had a greater average survival time and greater probability of being alive than the reference treatment of CR 5 years were 89% and 86% respectively. Survival outcomes for CR and CS were essentially equivalent. The economic model calculated that CRS and CS had ICERs of £19 000/QALY and £78 000/QALY compared to CR. The probability that CRS generated more QALYs than CR and CS was 94%.

Interpretation CRS provides an extended time in a disease-free state leading to improved cost-effectiveness over CR and CS in potentially resectable stage III-N2 NSCLC.

Footnotes

This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.

Conflicts of interest: RM currently works as Associate Director, Value, Access and Devolved Nations, Merck, Sharp and Dohme (UK) Ltd. During the time of this work his role was Technical Adviser, Centre for Guidelines, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. MSD market treatments for lung cancer but this work was completed entirely while in employment with NICE and there are no obvious COI related to MSD's activities.

This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.

  • Received June 21, 2022.
  • Accepted December 20, 2022.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2023
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 9 Issue 2 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 9 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What is the optimal management of potentially resectable stage III-N2 NSCLC? Results of a fixed effects network meta-analysis and economic modelling
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
What is the optimal management of potentially resectable stage III-N2 NSCLC? Results of a fixed effects network meta-analysis and economic modelling
Matthew Evison, Ross Maconachie, Toby Mercer, Caitlin H Daly, Nicky J. Welton, Shahzeena Aslam, Doug West, Neal Navani
ERJ Open Research Jan 2023, 00299-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00299-2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
What is the optimal management of potentially resectable stage III-N2 NSCLC? Results of a fixed effects network meta-analysis and economic modelling
Matthew Evison, Ross Maconachie, Toby Mercer, Caitlin H Daly, Nicky J. Welton, Shahzeena Aslam, Doug West, Neal Navani
ERJ Open Research Jan 2023, 00299-2022; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00299-2022
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Exercise intolerance in post-COVID19 survivors after hospitalization
  • Does hiatal hernia impact gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough?
  • Reducing carbon footprint by switching to reusable soft mist inhalers
Show more Original research article

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society