Abstract
Background Exertional breathlessness is commonly assessed using incremental exercise testing (IET), but reference equations for breathlessness responses are lacking. We aimed to develop reference equations for breathlessness intensity during IET.
Methods Retrospective, consecutive cohort study of adults undergoing IET in Sweden. Exclusion criteria included cardiac or respiratory disease, death or any of the aforementioned diagnoses within 1 year of the IET, morbid obesity, abnormally low exercise capacity, submaximal exertion, or an abnormal exercise test. Probabilities for breathlessness intensity ratings (Borg CR10) during IET in relation to power output (%predWmax), age, sex, height, and body mass were analysed using marginal ordinal logistic regression. Reference equations for males and females were derived to predict the upper limit of normal (ULN), and the probability of different Borg CR10 intensity ratings.
Results 2581 participants (43% female) aged 18–90 years were included. Mean breathlessness intensity was similar between sexes at peak exertion (6.7±1.5 versus 6.4±1.5 Borg CR10 units) and throughout exercise in relation to %predWmax. Final reference equations included age, height and %predWmax for males, whereas height was not included for females. The models showed a close fit to observed breathlessness intensity ratings across %predWmax values. Models using absolute W did not show superior fit. Scripts are provided for calculating the probability for different breathlessness intensity ratings, and the ULN by %predWmax throughout IET.
Conclusion We present the first reference equations for interpreting breathlessness intensity during incremental cycle exercise testing in males and females aged 18–90 years.
Footnotes
This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.
Conflict of interest: No conflicts of interest exist for the authors.
This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.
- Received October 24, 2022.
- Accepted January 16, 2023.
- Copyright ©The authors 2023
This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org
