Abstract
Background Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves (EBV) has shown to be beneficial for severe emphysema patients. The most important predictor of treatment response is absence of collateral ventilation between the treatment target and ipsilateral lobe. However, there are still a substantial number of non-responders and it would be useful to improve the pre-treatment identification of responders. Presumably, predictors of response will be multifactorial and therefore our aim was to explore whether we can identify response groups using a clusteranalysis.
Methods At baseline and 1 year follow-up, pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life were measured. A quantitative chest CT scan analysis was performed at baseline and 2 to 6 months follow-up. The cluster analysis was performed using a hierarchical agglomerative method.
Results In total 428 patients (69%female, age 61±8 years, FEV1 27±8%pred, RV 254±50%pred) were included in our analysis. Three clusters were generated: 1 non-responder and 2 responder clusters. Despite solid technical procedures, the non-responder cluster had significantly less clinical response after treatment compared to the other clusters. The non-responder cluster was characterised by significantly less emphysematous destruction, less air trapping and a higher perfusion of the target lobe, and a more homogeneous distribution of emphysema and perfusion between the target and ipsilateral lobe.
Conclusions We found that target lobe characteristics are the discriminators between responders and non-responders which underlines the importance of visual and quantitative assessment of the potential treatment target lobe when selecting patients for EBV treatment.
Footnotes
This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.
This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.
- Received March 13, 2023.
- Accepted May 15, 2023.
- Copyright ©The authors 2023
This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org