Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
    • WoS Reviewer Recognition Service
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Early View
  • Archive
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
    • WoS Reviewer Recognition Service
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Mepolizumab Has Clinical Benefits Including OCS Sparing Irrespective of Baseline EGPA Characteristics

David RW Jayne, Benjamin Terrier, Bernhard Hellmich, Paneez Khoury, Lee Baylis, Jane H Bentley, Jonathan Steinfeld, Steven W Yancey, Namhee Kwon, Michael E Wechsler, Praveen Akuthota on behalf of the EGPA mepolizumab study team
ERJ Open Research 2023; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00509-2023
David RW Jayne
1Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Terrier
2Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Cochin, Paris Cedex 14, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernhard Hellmich
3Klinik für Innere Medizin, Rheumatologie & Immunologie, Medius Kliniken, Universität Tübingen, Kirchheim-Teck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paneez Khoury
4Human Eosinophil Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lee Baylis
5Global Medical Affairs, GSK, Durham, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane H Bentley
6Clinical Statistics, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Steinfeld
7Respiratory Therapy Area Unit and Flexible Discovery Unit, GSK, Philadelphia, PA, USA
12Affiliation at time of study
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven W Yancey
8Respiratory Therapeutic Area, GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
12Affiliation at time of study
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Namhee Kwon
9Clinical Sciences, Respiratory, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
12Affiliation at time of study
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael E Wechsler
10Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Praveen Akuthota
11Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pakuthota@health.ucsd.edu
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The MIRRA trial (GSK ID: 115921/NCT02020889) demonstrated that mepolizumab increased remission time and reduced oral corticosteroid (OCS) use compared with placebo in patients with relapsing or refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). The present analysis investigated the impact of baseline characteristics on clinical outcomes and characterised the OCS-sparing effect of mepolizumab.

Methods In a Phase III, randomised controlled trial for patients with EGPA (MIRRA), patients received standard of care plus mepolizumab 300 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The accrued duration of remission, the proportion of patients in remission at Weeks 36 and 48, and the proportion of patients with clinical benefit (remission, OCS, or relapse-related) were assessed according to baseline EGPA characteristic subgroups (post hoc). Mepolizumab-related OCS-sparing benefits were also quantified.

Results Accrued duration of remission and the proportion of patients in remission at Weeks 36 and 48 were greater with mepolizumab than placebo across baseline subgroups: refractory disease, immunosuppressant use, EGPA duration, relapse number, and OCS use ≤20 mg·day−1. The proportion of patients with clinical benefit was greater with mepolizumab versus placebo (range: 76–81% versus 25–39%), irrespective of immunosuppressant use or EGPA duration. Patients treated with mepolizumab versus placebo accrued significantly more weeks on OCS ≤4 mg·day−1 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 5.06 [2.47,10.38]) and had a mean of 1423.1 mg less per-patient OCS exposure over 52 weeks.

Conclusions Mepolizumab treatment provided benefits to patients with EGPA across varying baseline clinical characteristics and can be considered an OCS-sparing treatment in EGPA.

Footnotes

This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.

Conflicts of interest: DRWJ has received research grants, consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Aurinia, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chemocentryx, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Takeda, and Vifor, speaker fees from Amgn, Vifor and GSK, and was supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre.

Conflicts of interest: BT reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Vifor, and GSK; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Vifor, GSK, and Boehringer Ingelheim and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Vifor and GSK.

Conflicts of interest: BH reports personal fees for lectures or advisory services from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim Chugai, InflaRx, GSK, Pfizer, Phadia, MSD, Roche, Novartis and Vifor, outside the submitted work.

Conflicts of interest: PK received research funding from the American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders.

Conflicts of interest: MEW has research grants with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and is a consultant with GSK, Genentech, Sanofi, Regeneron, AstraZeneca, Teva, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sentien, and Equillium.

Conflicts of interest: PA has research grants with the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, and the American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders, and declares himself as a paid instructor for AstraZeneca; consultant for AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi, and has received grant/research support from GSK, AstraZeneca and Regeneron.

Conflicts of interest: LB and JHB, are employees of GSK and own stocks/shares in GSK.

Conflicts of interest: JS, SWY, and NK were employees of GSK at the time of this study and own stocks/shares in GSK.

This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.

  • Received July 19, 2023.
  • Accepted October 6, 2023.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2023
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 9 Issue 6 Table of Contents
ERJ Open Research: 9 (6)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mepolizumab Has Clinical Benefits Including OCS Sparing Irrespective of Baseline EGPA Characteristics
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Mepolizumab Has Clinical Benefits Including OCS Sparing Irrespective of Baseline EGPA Characteristics
David RW Jayne, Benjamin Terrier, Bernhard Hellmich, Paneez Khoury, Lee Baylis, Jane H Bentley, Jonathan Steinfeld, Steven W Yancey, Namhee Kwon, Michael E Wechsler, Praveen Akuthota
ERJ Open Research Jan 2023, 00509-2023; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00509-2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Mepolizumab Has Clinical Benefits Including OCS Sparing Irrespective of Baseline EGPA Characteristics
David RW Jayne, Benjamin Terrier, Bernhard Hellmich, Paneez Khoury, Lee Baylis, Jane H Bentley, Jonathan Steinfeld, Steven W Yancey, Namhee Kwon, Michael E Wechsler, Praveen Akuthota
ERJ Open Research Jan 2023, 00509-2023; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00509-2023
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Biomarkers of Chronic Airflow Limitation and COPD Identified by Mass Spectrometry
  • A new variant in the ZCCHC8 gene: diverse clinical phenotypes and expression in the lung
  • Using an eDiary and wrist-band accelerometer to detect exacerbations and activity levels in COPD: a feasibility study
Show more Original research article

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About ERJ Open Research

  • Editorial board
  • Journal information
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Online ISSN: 2312-0541

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society